It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Arctic-Boreal region is projected to experience spatially divergent trends in snow depth following climate change. However, the impact of these spatial trends has remained largely unexplored, despite potentially large consequences for the carbon cycle. To address this knowledge gap, we forced a customised arctic version of the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS with daily CMIP6 outputs from a global climate model (MRI-ESM2-0) under three climate scenarios. We find that snow depths increased the most in the coldest, northernmost regions, insulating the soil, which led to increased heterotrophic respiration and reduced carbon residence times. We emphasise the need for improved projections of future snow depth - in particular diverging trends across landscapes - to more accurately simulate the strength of Arctic-Boreal carbon feedbacks and their impact on global climate.
In a warming climate, snow depth increases fastest in the coldest Arctic regions, which leads to enhanced respiration and reduced carbon residence times compared to less cold areas, suggest simulations of climate-change scenarios with an Arctic-specific vegetation model.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Lund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
2 Lund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Lund University, Center for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
3 Rutgers University, Department of Environmental Sciences, New Brunswick, USA (GRID:grid.430387.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8796); National Center for Atmospheric Research, Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.57828.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 9680)
4 Lund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); University of Oslo, Centre for Biogeochemistry in the Anthropocene, Department of Geosciences, Oslo, Norway (GRID:grid.5510.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8921)