It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
River-aquifer interactions play a crucial role in water availability, influencing environmental flows and impacting climate dynamics. Where groundwater tables lie below river water levels, stream water can infiltrate into the underlying aquifer, reducing streamflow. However, the prevalence of these “losing” rivers remains poorly understood due to limited national-wide in situ observations. Here we analyze water levels in 17,972 wells across Brazil to show that most of them (55%) lie below nearby stream surfaces, implying that these nearby streams are likely seeping into the subsurface. Our results demonstrate the widespread potential for stream water losses into underlying aquifers in many regions of the country, especially in areas with extensive groundwater pumping. Our direct observations underscore the importance of conjunctively managing groundwater and surface water, and highlight the widespread risk of streamflow losses to aquifers, which could impact global water access and ecosystems that rely on rivers.
Most Brazilian rivers are found to have the potential for stream water losses into underlying aquifers, especially in drier climates, thicker aquifers, and regions with extensive groundwater pumping.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)
2 University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722); Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism, and Geography, Campo Grande, Brazil (GRID:grid.412352.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2163 5978)
3 University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722); University of Calgary, Department of Civil Engineering, Calgary, Canada (GRID:grid.22072.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7697)
4 Colorado State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Fort Collins, USA (GRID:grid.47894.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8083)
5 São Paulo State University, Environmental Studies Center, Rio Claro, Brazil (GRID:grid.410543.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 478X)
6 University of California, Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676)
7 Rutgers University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, New Brunswick, USA (GRID:grid.430387.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8796)