It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Interest and investment in electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (VTOLs), commonly known as flying cars, have grown significantly. However, their sustainability implications are unclear. We report a physics-based analysis of primary energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of VTOLs vs. ground-based cars. Tilt-rotor/duct/wing VTOLs are efficient when cruising but consume substantial energy for takeoff and climb; hence, their burdens depend critically on trip distance. For our base case, traveling 100 km (point-to-point) with one pilot in a VTOL results in well-to-wing/wheel GHG emissions that are 35% lower but 28% higher than a one-occupant internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) and battery electric vehicle (BEV), respectively. Comparing fully loaded VTOLs (three passengers) with ground-based cars with an average occupancy of 1.54, VTOL GHG emissions per passenger-kilometer are 52% lower than ICEVs and 6% lower than BEVs. VTOLs offer fast, predictable transportation and could have a niche role in sustainable mobility.
Vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (VTOLs), or “flying cars” can shorten commute time and could play a niche role in sustainable mobility. The authors estimate that over long distances, fully-loaded electric VTOL taxis could result in fewer GHG emissions than average occupancy ground-based cars.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Ford Motor Company, Research and Innovation Center, Dearborn, USA (GRID:grid.417922.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0720 9454); University of Michigan, Center for Sustainable Systems, School for Environment and Sustainability, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
2 Ford Motor Company, Research and Innovation Center, Dearborn, USA (GRID:grid.417922.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0720 9454); University of Michigan, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
3 University of Michigan, Center for Sustainable Systems, School for Environment and Sustainability, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
4 Ford Motor Company, Research and Innovation Center, Dearborn, USA (GRID:grid.417922.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0720 9454)