It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Climate change is altering the thermal habitats of freshwater fish species. We analyze modeled daily temperature profiles from 12,688 lakes in the US to track changes in thermal habitat of 60 lake fish species from different thermal guilds during 1980-2021. We quantify changes in each species’ preferred days, defined as the number of days per year when a lake contains the species’ preferred temperature. We find that cooler-water species are losing preferred days more rapidly than warmer-water species are gaining them. This asymmetric impact cannot be attributed to differences in geographic distribution among species; instead, it is linked to the seasonal dynamics of lake temperatures and increased thermal homogenization of the water column. The potential advantages of an increase in warmer-water species may not fully compensate for the losses in cooler-water species as warming continues, emphasizing the importance of mitigating climate change to support effective freshwater fisheries management.
Climate change is warming freshwater fish thermal habitats. Here, the authors examine daily temperature profiles from 12,688 lakes and thermal habitats of 60 fish species, finding that cold-water fishes are losing preferred thermal habitats at a faster rate than warm-water fishes are gaining them.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Limnology, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675)
2 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Limnology, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675); Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Office of Applied Science, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.448456.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1525 4976)
3 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Limnology, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675); Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Fisheries Management, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.448456.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1525 4976)
4 University of Minnesota, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, St. Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657)
5 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Limnology, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675); Aarhus University, Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
6 University of Missouri, U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Natural Resources, Columbia, USA (GRID:grid.134936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 3504)