It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the Kitaev honeycomb model, spins coupled by strongly-frustrated anisotropic interactions do not order at low temperature but instead form a quantum spin liquid with spin fractionalisation into Majorana fermions and static fluxes. The realization of such a model in crystalline materials could lead to major breakthroughs in understanding entangled quantum states, however achieving this in practice is a very challenging task. The recently synthesized honeycomb material RuI3 shows no long-range magnetic order down to the lowest probed temperatures and has been theoretically proposed as a quantum spin liquid candidate material on the verge of an insulator to metal transition. Here we report a comprehensive study of the magnetic anisotropy in un-twinned single crystals via torque magnetometry and detect clear signatures of strongly anisotropic and frustrated magnetic interactions. We attribute the development of sawtooth and six-fold torque signal to strongly anisotropic, bond-dependent magnetic interactions by comparing to theoretical calculations. As a function of magnetic field strength at low temperatures, torque shows an unusual non-parabolic dependence suggestive of a proximity to a field-induced transition. Thus, RuI3, without signatures of long-range magnetic order, displays key hallmarks of an exciting candidate for extended Kitaev magnetism with enhanced quantum fluctuations.
Quantum spin liquids are materials predicted to be absent of magnetic ordering at low temperature, giving rise to fractionalised electronic states, but conclusive experimental evidence is still absent. Here, the authors conduct angular dependent torque measurements on the candidate spin liquid material RuI3 and, through a comparison of experimental and theoretical results, provide evidence indicating the presence of frustrated magnetic interactions in the system.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
2 Princeton University, Department of Chemistry, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006)
3 Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Institut für Theoretische Physik, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721)