It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
The current objective of preventive medicine reform is to guarantee that clinical medical students possess a comprehensive understanding of preventive medicine concepts, knowledge, and skills. Previously, case-based learning (CBL) was mostly employed to reform the clinical medicine curriculum, but there was a lack of reform in preventive medicine for clinical students in Sino-foreign joint training programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of case-based learning in the Sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.
Methods
A total of 79 clinical medical students from the Sino-foreign joint program at Wenzhou Medical University were selected as participants to engage in 10 case-based learning sessions. The effectiveness of the instruction was assessed by analyzing the final exam scores and questionnaire responses, which encompassed instructor evaluation, self-assessment, and course learning effectiveness evaluation (CLEE).
Results
In contrast to the traditional approach, which yielded a final score of 69.2, the case-based students achieved an average of 77.62. The results of instructor evaluation showed that students’ academic performance, problem-solving capabilities, research cooperation and communication, and learning attitude all improved significantly following case-based learning (P < 0.05). The self-assessment scores for all five case discussion courses exceeded 75 points, suggesting that students believed their overall competence had increased significantly. The CLEE demonstrated that CBL had a positive impact on students’ learning and was highly advantageous for students.
Conclusions
It is deserving of active promotion in medical education reform that case-based learning can enhance students’ comprehensive quality and classroom participation. Further research is required to ascertain whether it can replace traditional teaching methods.
Trial registration
Not clinical trial.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer