It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Measles, a highly contagious and potentially fatal disease, remains a significant public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent measles and achieving high immunization coverage is crucial for protecting children and communities. This study investigated the trends and inequalities in measles immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone between 2008 and 2019.
Methods
The study utilized data from the Sierra Leone Demographic Health Surveys conducted in 2008, 2013, and 2019. The World Health Organisation Health Equity Assessment Toolkit was used to calculate various inequality measures, including Difference (D), Ratio (R), Population Attributable Risk (PAR), and Population Attributable Fraction (PAF). An inequality assessment was conducted for six stratifiers: age, economic status, level of education, place of residence, sex of the child, and sub-national province.
Results
In Sierra Leone, measles immunization coverage increased between 2008 and 2013 and decreased slightly in 2019. In 2008, 66.2% of two-year-olds were immunized, which increased to 86.2% in 2013 and then fell slightly to 82.2% in 2019. There was a decrease in inequality for age from 4.2 percentage points in 2008 to 3.0 percentage points in 2019 (D = 4.2 in 2008 and 3.0 in 2019). Economic-related inequality decreased from 8.1 percentage points in 2008 to 7.5 percentage points in 2019 (D = 8.1 in 2008 and 7.5 in 2019). Inequality in education decreased from 10.3 percentage points in 2008 to 7.4 percentage points in 2019 based on results from the inequality measure D. For place of residence, inequality decreased from 6.0 percentage points in 2008 to 4.0 percentage points in 2019. For the child’s sex, the inequality increased from 1.9 percentage points in 2008 to 4.5 percentage points in 2019. The PAF revealed that the setting average could have been 1.4% higher in 2008 and 2.7% higher in 2019 without the child’s sex inequality. Provincial inequality decreased from 19.4 percentage points in 2008 to 16.9 percentage points in 2019 (D = 19.4 in 2008 and 16.9 in 2019).
Conclusion
The observed fluctuations in national measles immunization coverage for children under two underscore the need for sustained efforts in vaccination programs. While improvements in access based on age, socioeconomic status, education level, and place of residence suggest progress in reducing inequalities, the persistent provincial disparities, with a significant gap in 2019, highlight ongoing challenges that must be addressed to ensure equitable health outcomes. Additionally, the increase in inequalities based on the child’s sex during the study period raises concerns about targeted interventions that may inadvertently neglect specific groups. These findings imply that policymakers must prioritize strategies that maintain high vaccination rates and focus on closing the geographical and sex-based gaps, particularly in underserved provinces and among vulnerable populations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer