Content area
Full Text
The role attributed by bureaucratic power makes health professionals a source of authority; and contributes to the authority of medical tools and equipment in research laboratories by means of technologies. Hence, self-confidence of the medical doctor to his/her own authority turns into a public discourse which acts as intermediaries for interviewing with experienced "customers" by means of partnership applications established by computer terminals. Determinants in the lives of medical doctors in universities are no more the proud taken in achievements in their lives, their meaningful contributions to the development of medicine, training they deliver to medical students and the clinical service that they provide; instead, business margins are replacing the discourse which was once based on the foregoing. Therefore, pure medical organization is parallel to uncontrolled expansion of a monopoly which introduces heteronym (managed by others) regulations to an autonomic body. Clinical medical view is not the view of an observant, but one of professional medicine which is supported by the organization, where the medical doctor has the authority to take decisions and interfere. Such a viewpoint is a quantitative one which includes risk and calculations into symptoms and diagnosis, which also expands and presents an uncontrolled gauge. The language of action which was not resolved in amplitude consists not of individualism observed in medical determination, but of several reviewed individual phenomena. This case reads the "visible" one, but it remains in the "invisible" side as it does not notice that glance always strolls around and "peeping" travels linearly without interruption. The study suggests a model for establishing within medical faculties Anthropological Medicine Institutes which focus on human nature. The suggestion is both paramedical and medical.
Keywords: Health professionals, Clinic, Modern medicine, Anthropology, Medical faculties.
INTRODUCTION
As a dimension of patient-doctor relationship, management of conflict between the role of patient on medical decisions and patient autonomy and health, patient values and medical doctor's values are all aimed at seeking an ideal patient-doctor relationship model (Atici, 2007: 47). In this case, a public style occurs which allows "patients to choose their own doctor and students to choose their own teachers"(Illich, 1977a; 2005). Determinants in the lives of health professionals in universities are no more the proud taken in achievements in their lives, their meaningful contributions...