It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lupus nephropathy is a glomerular lesion and one of the most severe organ localizations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Diabetic nephropathy, on the other hand, is a major cause for chronic kidney disease (CKD) as well as for end stage kidney disease (ESKD). We present the case of a 51-year-old woman with nephrotic syndrome diagnosed 4 months previously. Since the diagnosis was made, a rapid decline in renal function was observed – serum creatinine rose from 159 to 200 and to 462 μmol/l. Arterial hypertension was present for 2 years with BP values up to 200/90 mm Hg, as well as newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus which was insulin-treated due to the low renal function. The test for anti-dsDNA-63.3 was positive and ANA titers were 1: 320. The renal biopsy revealed a combination of lupus nephropathy and a nodular variant of diabetic nephropathy. Treatment with methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide and heparin was initiated. This was followed by improvement in serum creatinine and proteinuria, by reduction of edema, decreased titers of anti-dsDNA and by improvement of the general well-being. A few months later, in the course of another intermittent infection, the patient’s condition deteriorated sharply, necessitating hemodialysis. Nephropathy secondary to lupus erythematosus is rarely seen in combination with diabetic nephropathy, but once they co-occur, a complicated course of the disease will eventually lead to serious kidney damage. The morphological examination of the renal biopsy aspirate is the only reliable mean to assess the nature of the glomerular changes and to make adequate therapeutic decisions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Clinic of Nephrology, Military Hospital – Sofia, Bulgaria
2 Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Dialysis Unit, Military Hospital – Sofia, Bulgaria
3 Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical aculty, Trakia University – Stara Zagora, Bulgaria