Corrigendum: Lack of Helios during neural development induces adult schizophrenia-like behaviors associated with aberrant levels of the TRIF-recruiter protein WDFY1

Abstract

• please read through all the templates before choosing • pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated.In the published article, there was a mistake in the Funding statement. The funding statement for the Key Development Project of the Department of Science and Technology was displayed as "2015CBd051". The correct statement is "Key Development Project of Department of Science and Technology (2015C03Bd051).'' Template continues on the next page  the responsibility of the authors to acquire the licenses, to follow any citation instructions requested by third-party rights holders, and cover any supplementary charges.End of template, if you would like to request a correction for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's Editorial Office

In the published article, there was an error in the image used for Figure 3J as published. The corrected Figure 3J and its caption appear below.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Characterization of schizophrenia-like phenotypes related to striatal function in He–/– mice. (A) The curve in graph depicts the body weight gain in both genotypes, He–/– and He+/+ mice from embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) to postnatal day 28 (P28) (n = 3 He+/+ males and 4 He+/+ females, and 4 He–/– males and 4 He–/– females). (B) Time to jump out from the glass cylinder in 8-week-old He–/– and He+/+ mice (n = 4 He+/+ males and 4 He+/+ females, and 3 He–/– males and 4 He–/– females). (C) Locomotor activity in the open field was monitored for 25 min in He–/– and He+/+ mice (n = 6 He+/+ males and 5 He+/+ females, and 5 He–/– males and 6 He–/– females). After these 25 min, all mice received an injection of D-amphetamine sulfate (3 mg/kg) as indicated by the top arrow in the graph and the locomotor activity was subsequently monitored for additional 45 min. The induced locomotor activation in He+/+ (D) and He–/– (E) mice was evaluated by comparing representative covered distances from baseline and from treatment as depicted in gray in (C). (F) Locomotor activity in the open field was monitored for 25 min in He–/– and He+/+ mice (n = 8 He+/+ and 8 He–/–; 4 males an 4 females per genotype). After these 25 min, all mice received an injection of R-(-)-apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg) as indicated by the top arrow in the graph and the locomotor activity was subsequently monitored for additional 45 min. The induced locomotor activation in He+/+ (G) and He–/– (H) mice was evaluated by comparing representative covered distances from baseline and from treatment as depicted in gray in (F). (I) Representative images of a DiI-labeled medium spiny neuron (scale bar = 20 microns) and (J) representative medium spiny neuron dendrites from 8-weeks-old He+/+ and He–/– mice (scale bar = 3 microns). (K) Quantitative analysis showing dendritic spine density per micron of dendritic length from 8-week-old He+/+ and He–/– mice (n = 26 dendrites from 5 He+/+ mice, 2 males and 3 females, and 20 dendrites from 5 He–/– mice, 3 males and 2 females). (L) Density of each type of dendritic spine (stubby, thin, and mushroom) in dendrites of medium spiny neurons from (K) in He–/– and He+/+ mice. Total evaluated spines: 977 from He+/+ mice and 1088 from He–/– mice. Bars represent mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by unpaired Student's t-test in (B, K), by paired Student's t-test in (D, E, G, H) and by two-way ANOVA in (A, C, F, L). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 when compared with He+/+ mice in (A–C, F, K, L). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 when compared with baseline data in (D, E, G, H).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.