It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Quantitative variation in plastid pigments and polyphenols during leaf growth and after curing have been studied with several chlorophyll-deficient genotypes of tobacco. Under culture for flue-cured tobacco, the chlorophyll-deficient pale-yellow (NC95-Py) and yellow-green (SC58-yg) lines did not differ in polyphenol accumulation from the corresponding normal green recurrent parents NC95 and SC58. A negative correlation was evident between concentrations of polyphenol and chlorophyll. Decrease of the latter during leaf growth was accompanied with a decline of PPO and PRO activities. When the chlorophyll-deficient genotypes were grown under conditions for Burley tobacco, concentrations of chlorophyll and polyphenol maintained a steady level and were positively correlated, while the oxidases tended to increase. Burley 21 contained the lowest amount of polyphenols among the chlorophyll mutants, although the low chlorophyll content of its mature leaves was comparable to that of SC58-yg. Use of cultural practices for flue-cured tobacco caused an accumulation of polyphenols in green leaves. There was a greater loss of soluble polyphenols during air-curing than during flue-curing. Results indicate that the interaction of cultural practices with chlorophyll-deficient genes affects the metabolism of chlorophylls and polyphenols during leaf growth and maturation. Introduction of these genes into tobacco cultivars may provide a means of enhancing uniformity of leaf maturity and modifying certain leaf chemical constituents.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentudty, U.S.A
2 Tobacco Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research, Science and Education Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oxford, North Carolina, and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A