It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is regarded as the most sensitive method available and is being used for screening procedure for all incoming passengers to Northern Cyprus for SARS-CoV-2. This study investigated the compatibility of two different RT-qPCR methodologies Diagnovital® and Bio-Speedy® by re-analyzing the previously confirmed positive samples. A total of 43 previously confirmed positive samples were re-analyzed by two different commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR kits. Only 23.5% of positive samples detected by Diagnovital® RT-qPCR kit were detected by Bio-Speedy® detection kit.
In conclusion, adoption of Diagnovital® RT-qPCR kit detecting two regions of SARS-CoV-2 genome in our laboratories enabled the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic cases with higher sensitivity and contributed to the prevention of viral transmission within the country. The timely detection of infection in asymptomatic individuals may be the key to a successful fight against the COVID- 19 pandemic.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 DESAM Institute, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
2 DESAM Institute, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
3 DESAM Institute, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Clinical Microbiology and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
4 DESAM Institute, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus; Faculty of Health Sciences, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
5 DESAM Institute, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
6 Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
7 DESAM Institute, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus; PCR Unit, Educational and Research Hospital of Kocaeli University, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey