It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Full labia minora reconstruction can be necessary due to congenital malformation or genetic syndromes, but more often is required following oncologic excisions, or debridements after vulvar or perineal infections. It is important to note that full labia reconstruction can be needed after genital mutilation, or iatrogenic deformity after previous labia reduction procedure. A 37-year-old female patient, with vulvar necrotizing fasciitis after a marsupialization of the right Bartholin’s gland, was referred to the Gynecology and Obstetrics unit. Three surgical debridements were performed, associated with prolonged antibiotic therapy, leading to a total loss of the right labia minora and the clitoris glans, in addition to minimal loss of labia majora. With a two-stage approach on the labia minora, the first procedure allowed to pull the left labia minora as a labia sharing flap, in order to join the remnant scar tissue on the right side, respecting the anterior and posterior leaflets. The second part was performed five weeks later, after autonomization of the new labia minora flap. Once the flap was divided, a perfectly vascularized right neo-labia minora was obtained. The flap healed uneventfully. The patient was asked to complete a questionnaire at six months, which confirmed an excellent aesthetic result with a like with like reconstruction. Eight months later, a final correction was performed to enhance the definitive aesthetic aspect with lipofilling of the right labia majora. Two techniques have been previously published with a two-stage cross-labial transposition flap, one using a top cut leading to a bottom pedicle and another using a bottom cut with an upper pedicle. We proceeded with a one-time edge resection, respecting the full vascular pedicle and transposed the full height of the labia minora. This technique revealed to be extremely effective, guaranteeing a reliable vascularization and decreasing the risk of tearing on the pedicle.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
2 Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Cemtre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland