Abstract

This multi-site study measures different aspects of patient safety culture within selected secondary and tertiary care NHS hospitals by applying High Reliability Organisations (HRO) principles. We propose a new balanced definition of HRO within health setting with a new maturity grid, and use an instrument to survey various staff across hospitals. An electronic online questionnaire surveyed all staff grades across three NHS hospital trusts. The sample consisted of 1,243 randomly selected staff. We used a high reliability organisation (HRO) framework consisting of five dimensions to estimate maturity levels linked to patient safety culture to create a measurable and replicable process for benchmarking and improvement. The proposed maturity grid provides a clear and concise road map to support senior managers in formulating a patient safety strategy based on a higher level in maturity with respect to HRO five principles. The proposed methodology can also predict the likely direction of improvement, or deterioration, if no action is taken with respect to each of the HRO principles. Although healthcare leaders consider the principles of high reliability organisations (HROs) as a guide for strategy to improve patient safety, there is evidence that these principles are underused in the measurement and subsequent analysis of their impact on patient safety culture. Our approach provides a structured methodology that aims to contribute to streamlining implementation and monitoring of HRO principles towards improving safety and resilience.

Details

Title
No Harm in Learning – A Balanced High Reliability Organisation (HRO) Approach in Healthcare
Author
Mitchell, Caroline 1 ; Darren Van Laar 2 ; Strevens, Caroline 3 ; Labib, Ashraf 4 

 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, UK; Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, UK 
 Faculty of Science & Health, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK 
 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, UK 
 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, UK; Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania 
Pages
1-19
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
De Gruyter Poland
e-ISSN
2285388X
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3159098605
Copyright
© 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.