It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This multi-site study measures different aspects of patient safety culture within selected secondary and tertiary care NHS hospitals by applying High Reliability Organisations (HRO) principles. We propose a new balanced definition of HRO within health setting with a new maturity grid, and use an instrument to survey various staff across hospitals. An electronic online questionnaire surveyed all staff grades across three NHS hospital trusts. The sample consisted of 1,243 randomly selected staff. We used a high reliability organisation (HRO) framework consisting of five dimensions to estimate maturity levels linked to patient safety culture to create a measurable and replicable process for benchmarking and improvement. The proposed maturity grid provides a clear and concise road map to support senior managers in formulating a patient safety strategy based on a higher level in maturity with respect to HRO five principles. The proposed methodology can also predict the likely direction of improvement, or deterioration, if no action is taken with respect to each of the HRO principles. Although healthcare leaders consider the principles of high reliability organisations (HROs) as a guide for strategy to improve patient safety, there is evidence that these principles are underused in the measurement and subsequent analysis of their impact on patient safety culture. Our approach provides a structured methodology that aims to contribute to streamlining implementation and monitoring of HRO principles towards improving safety and resilience.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, UK; Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, UK
2 Faculty of Science & Health, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK
3 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, UK
4 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, UK; Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania