It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction. The global burden of breast cancer (BC) has encouraged ceaseless research in exploring novel biomarkers, aiming to optimize BC management and prognosis.
Objective. To explore the prognostic value of serum SEMA4C and investigate its potential for monitoring the response to surgical treatment in patients with BC.
Materials and methods. Seventy-five (75) pre-treatment patients from the Clinic of Surgery with invasive BC without any initial treatment prior to blood sample collection were included in the study. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was used to measure serum levels of SEMA4C in human serum. Participants were divided based on pathological stage, nodal involvement and histological grade. Follow-up blood samples of 35 patients who underwent surgery were collected to investigate if SEMA4C could measure the response to surgical treatment.
Results. Postoperative serum levels of SEMA4C were significantly lower than preoperative levels (p p < 0.001). Regarding prognostic value, no statistically significant difference was observed in terms of the pathological stage (p = 0.181), lymph node (LN) status (p = 0.752), and histological grade (p = 0.412).
Conclusion. According to our study, serum SEMA4C levels did not differ significantly in terms of pathological stage, LN status and histological grade. Notably, postoperative serum levels of SEMA4C were significantly decreased after surgical treatment compared to preoperative values, which underscores the potential of SEMA4C as a putative candidate biomarker for monitoring response to therapy in patients with BC. However, additional research is mandatory to validate the role of SEMA4C in BC.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria; Clinic of Surgery, University Hospital “Alexandrovska” – Sofia, Bulgaria
2 Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria; Clinic of Clinical Immunology with Stem Cell Bank, University Hospital “Alexandrovska” – Sofia, Bulgaria