Correspondence to Dr Ramya Ramaswami; [email protected]
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC
IL-7 is a cytokine that is essential in the role of T-cell development, proliferation and homeostasis. Administration of IL-7 to people with HIV (PWH) without significant immune reconstitution following antiretroviral therapy and in patients with idiopathic CD4+ lymphopenia was associated with circulatory T-cell increases. We hypothesize that IL-7 treatment may be beneficial in Kaposi sarcoma (KS), where CD4+ T cell lymphopenia is associated with KS onset. There are no studies evaluating IL-7 in KS.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
In participants with KS (with and without HIV) who received IL-7 (efineptakin alfa (NT-I7)), there were increases with number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, in particular among PWH who had low CD4+ T cell counts at baseline. Of evaluable participants, 42% had partial response to IL-7.
HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY
NT-I7 administration demonstrated preliminary evidence of activity among PWH in whom CD4+ T cell counts are associated with KS onset and persistence. With up to four intramuscular injections, this treatment may be beneficial in limited-resource settings, such as sub-Saharan Africa, where KS is highly prevalent. However, more data are needed to identify an optimal dose of IL-7 in this population.
Introduction
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is an angioproliferative tumor caused by KS herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpesvirus 8.1 There are five major established epidemiological variants of KS: (1) a classic form that is typically observed in elderly men, (2) an endemic subtype that is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, (3) epidemic KS that is seen among individuals with HIV infection, (4) an iatrogenic form that is noted in transplant-recipients, and (5) among HIV-negative men who have sex with men.2 In the USA, epidemic KS is the most common epidemiological subtype and KSHV transmission is high among men who have sex with men.3 4 KSHV is endemic in sub-Saharan Africa, and due to the high prevalence of HIV, KS is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among men in this region.5 In these epidemiological subtypes, there is a strong association between immune dysregulation of the host and KSHV infection that leads to the onset and persistence of KS. Several studies have shown significantly lower total absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and CD4+ T-cell counts in patients with classic and HIV-associated KS as compared with age-matched and sex-matched controls.6 7 HIV-associated KS is also associated with increased frequencies of exhausted and immunosenescent T-cells, with lower frequencies of naïve T-cells.7
Among people with HIV (PWH), initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) leads to immune reconstitution and, in some cases, increases in T-cell responses against KSHV, which may lead to beneficial KS responses.8 9 ART is an essential component of treatment for HIV-associated KS and, in some cases, ART alone can lead to regression of mild KS with limited cutaneous involvement.10 For patients with extensive KS and those with other epidemiological KS subtypes requiring systemic treatment, the existing standard first-line treatment options include chemotherapy agents, such as liposomal doxorubicin or paclitaxel, used intermittently over many years.11 However, prolonged chemotherapy administration may contribute to immunosuppression, which may impair immune reconstitution and increase the risk of opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies.12 As KS pathogenesis is related to immune dysregulation, immunotherapy options that attenuate senescence and augment immune surveillance may be favorable treatment approaches in KS.13
Several immunotherapy and immunomodulatory options have been investigated in KS. Immunomodulatory agents, such as low-dose interferon-alpha 2b and pomalidomide have been approved for HIV-associated KS, and pomalidomide is also approved in patients with HIV-negative KS.14 15 In addition to decreasing T-cell senescence and increasing T-cell activation, pomalidomide has been shown to transiently increase CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts.16 17 Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, has been evaluated in HIV-associated, classic and endemic KS. Pembrolizumab has been shown to have an acceptable safety profile along with evidence of activity against KS in several studies.18 19 In addition to enhancing CD8+ effector antitumor responses in cancer, anti-PD1 agents may contribute to antitumor activity by expanding CD4+ T-cell functions and T-cell receptor diversity.20 21 Given that these agents are noted to modulate and increase CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and their functions as one of many mechanistic actions, identifying a therapeutic option that specifically increases and potentiates these T-cell populations may be beneficial for the treatment of KS.
Interleukin-7 (IL-7), which is produced by endothelial, epithelial, and stromal cells in the bone marrow, thymus, and lymph nodes plays an important role in T-cell development and homeostasis throughout life.22 23 This cytokine stimulates T-cell proliferation (including naïve T-cells) and prolongs survival of mature T-cells. Several studies have demonstrated increases in serum or plasma IL-7 levels in patients with HIV-associated, chemotherapy-associated or idiopathic CD4+ T lymphopenia.24 25 In HIV infection and other lymphopenic states, a significant inverse correlation has been observed between serum IL-7 levels and CD4+ T-cell counts (below 250 cells/µL) due to a compensatory homeostatic response.26 Administration of short-acting recombinant IL-7 in PWH has been shown to increase peripheral T-cells, broaden T-cell receptor diversity, and increase CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts.27–29 IL-7 was also administered to patients with cancer and resulted in a similar effect on T-cell profiles.30
Efineptakin alfa (NT-I7, also known as rhIL-7-hyFc) is a long-acting immunoglobulin fusion protein composed of a recombinant form of endogenous human IL-7 fused to a hybrid crystallizable fragment region that extends the half-life of this compound. NT-I7 was well-tolerated and increased ALC, CD4+, and CD8+ T-cell counts following a single dose as a monotherapy agent in healthy volunteers.31 Apart from regulatory T-cells, all the other T-cell subsets proliferated and expanded for 56 days in a dose-dependent manner as shown in a previous study.25 It is hypothesized that administration of NT-I7 may lead to enhanced T-cell mediated antitumor immune responses, specifically in individuals with low numbers of circulating T-cells.
Here, we report the results of Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network 17 (CITN-17), a phase I dose-escalation multicenter study of NT-I7 in patients with KS. This study evaluated the safety of NT-I7 monotherapy, its impact on CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell kinetics, and the antitumor activity in participants with KS with and without HIV.
Methods
Study design, safety monitoring and study participants
CITN-17 is a multicenter, phase I, single-arm study with a 3+3 dose escalation design of NT-I7 that was initiated in 2021 in the USA. Four doses of NT-I7 were administered intramuscularly every 9 weeks, and three dose levels (DL) were investigated (480 µg/kg, 960 µg/kg and 1200 µg/kg). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), defined as any adverse event (AE) related to NT-I7 and met at least one of the hematologic or non-hematologic criteria as defined in the protocol, were evaluated in the first 28 days of treatment. Participants >18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <2, with histologically confirmed KS and evidence of evaluable disease per the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) criteria were eligible. Any stage of KS was permissible; however, participants with visceral disease were included if they did not require immediate intervention and had limited tumor-related symptoms. PWH were required to be on effective ART for at least 3 months with inadequate regression of KS or persistent KS affecting their quality of life. PWH were required to have an undetectable HIV viral load (VL) of <40 copies/mL.
Previous studies of IL-7 in PWH had demonstrated HIV viremia (“blips”) of >50 copies/mL of unclear clinical significance.29 Therefore, HIV VL was measured prior to every cycle and week 4 and 13. If there was an increase in HIV VL to over 400 copies/mL, the next cycle was held until HIV VL was <400 copies/mL with an evaluation of medication adherence, and HIV resistance testing was performed if HIV VL was >1000 copies.
KS response was evaluated using the modified ACTG KS response criteria15 32 prior to every cycle (weeks 0, 9, 18 and 27), week 13 and week 36 at the end of treatment (EOT). The primary objective was to determine the safety and AE profile of NT-I7 in three DL and estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Safety was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0. The secondary endpoints included an evaluation of the objective response rate of NT-I7 in participants with KS and the kinetics of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in the blood during the study.
Correlative studies
Clinical cell counts: Complete blood count testing to determine ALC, and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell count testing were performed on longitudinally collected, locally processed blood samples at each clinical site using CLIA-certified assays.
Whole blood immunophenotyping: The T-cell subsets were defined using the following flow cytometry gating criteria: CD4 T cells (CD45+/CD3+/CD4+); CD8 T cells (CD45+/CD3+/CD8+) Central Memory (CD45RA−/CD197+(CCR7)); Effector Memory (CD45RA−/CD197−); Terminal Effector (CD45RA+/CD197−); and Tscm (CD45RA+/CD197+/CD27+CD28+/CD95+/CD127+).33 34 The absolute number of Naive (CD4+ or CD8+) T cells was determined by subtracting the number of Tscm from the absolute number of (CD45RA+/CD197+) CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, respectively.
The change in absolute numbers, frequencies and phenotypes of T cells and other PBMC subsets were evaluated at the Central Immune Monitoring Lab (CIML) at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center by flow cytometry using whole blood received and processed within 24 hours of blood draw.
To assess the absolute numbers of lymphocyte subpopulations in the periphery, whole blood collected in ACD vacutainers was stained (100 µL, ~24 hours after collection) in Trucount tubes (BD 340334) with a validated 14-color antibody panel staining mix containing 1x Brilliant Stain Buffer (BD 563794), FACS Buffer (2% FBS in DPBS (Gibco 14190144)) and the following antibodies: CD3 BUV805 (BD 612895), CD4 BUV661 (BD 612962), CD8 BUV496 (BD 564804), CD28 BB700 (BD 745905), CD45 BUV395 (BD 563792), CD45RA vioGreen (Miltenyi Biotec 130-113-369), CD127 PE-Cy5 (BioLegend 351324), CD197 APC-Fire 750 (BioLegend 353246), CD279 PE-Cy7 (BD 561272), CD366 BV421 (BioLegend 345007), CD185 BB515 (BD 564624), CD95 PE (BioLegend 305608), CD27 BV650 (BD 563228), and CX3CR1 PE-Dazzle 594 (BioLegend 341624). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. Subsequently, 900 µL of 1x FACS Lysing Buffer (BD 349202) was added to stained samples for 15 min at room temperature before freezing at −80°C. Thawed samples were collected in batches on a BD Symphony A1 and analyzed using FlowJo V.10.8 software (BD Life Sciences).
Immunogenicity and serum NT-I7 concentration: Serum NT-I7 concentration and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) blood draw specimens were processed on site at local labs immediately after collection and shipped in batch on ice to CIML. CIML organized batch shipments of samples to BioAgilytix (Durham, NC) for analyses. ADA and neutralizing ADAs (NADA) to NT-I7 were evaluated before the first dose of NT-I7, prior to each cycle and at the EOT using a risk-based, tiered bridging electrochemiluminescence ELISA-based testing approach. The assay included a core assay comprising screening, confirmatory, and titer testing for detecting ADA to NT-I7 and an IL-7 epitope-specific assay. ADA-positive patient serum samples were further tested for the presence or absence of NADA using a cell-based assay.
Serum NT-I7 concentrations were quantified in samples obtained prior to administration of study therapy at each cycle, 3 hours post NT-I7 administration, at week 1, 9 weeks and at EOT. The assay to evaluate serum NT-I7 did not specifically differentiate between endogenous IL-7 and the study therapy. NT-I7 concentrations were quantified using an electrochemoluminiscent sandwich immunoassay in which anti-huIL-7 capture antibody was immobilized, analyte was bound to the capture antibody, and SULFO-TAG anti-huIL-7 detection antibody was used to generate an electroluminescent response that is directly proportional to the amount of analyte detected in the well. Back-calculated concentrations of NT-I7 were generated using a 5-parameter logistic curve fit with 1/y2 weighting.
Statistical analysis
The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and the MTD of NT-I7 in patients with KS. The safety analyses included data from participants who received at least one dose of NT-I7. The KS antitumor effect was evaluated using the modified ACTG criteria.15 32 The best response obtained within 12 months of the first dose of NT-I7 was used in all evaluable participants across the study doses. ALC, CD4+ and CD8+ levels and flow-cytometry enumeration data were evaluated by non-parametric analyses using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences were evaluated between responders and non-responders (which included one participant who experienced a DLT and came off treatment at week 5, and therefore, was not evaluable for the first KS response assessment at week 9) using Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon rank sum test) and Wilcoxon signed rank test, as appropriate. These p value analyses were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell ratio kinetics over the course of the study were evaluated using a t-test assuming unequal variances; and the overall p value was based on a mixed model fitted with treatment interval and responder status fitted as fixed effects adjusted for baseline, and a random intercept allowed. ADA data were evaluated using the Student’s t-test (two tails, type equal variance).
Results
Study participant characteristics
Between May 2022 and December 2023, eight cisgender male participants were enrolled on the study; six participants were enrolled to DL1 and two participants were enrolled to DL2. Among all participants, the median age was 55 years and 75% of participants were white (table 1). 75%t of all participants had stage T0 KS, and all participants with T0 disease were enrolled in DL1. Both participants in DL2 had stage T1 disease; one of these participants had pulmonary KS involvement and recurrent pleural effusions. Half of all the participants had prior systemic therapy, which consisted of chemotherapy. Among participants enrolled in DL1, two participants had prior radiation, and one participant had prior surgical removal of KS. Five of the eight participants had an HIV diagnosis, including both participants in DL2. Overall, the HIV VL was undetectable (<40 copies/mL) for PWH at baseline. Among all enrolled participants, the median CD4+ T-cell count was 650 cells/µL, CD8+ T-cell count was 592 cells/µL and median CD4+/CD8+ ratio was 1.28. Participants in DL2 had a lower median CD4+ T-cell count of 119 cells/µL and a CD4+/CD8+ ratio of 0.22 compared with participants in DL1.
Table 1Baseline participant and disease characteristics among all enrolled participants and by dose level of study therapy
Total (N=8) | Dose level 1 480 µg/kg (N=6) | Dose level 2 960 µg/kg (N=2) | |
Age, years, at study entry median (range) | 55 (33–70) | 56 (48–70) | 37 (33–41) |
Cisgender men, n (%) | 8 (100) | 6 (100) | 2 (100) |
Race/ethnicity | |||
White, n (%) | 6 (75) | 5 (83) | 1 (50) |
Black, n (%) | 1 (13) | 0 | 1 (50) |
Not specified, n (%) | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Disease characteristics | |||
ACTG tumor stage, n (%) | |||
T0 | 6 (75) | 6 (100) | 0 |
T1 | 2 (25) | 0 | 2 (100) |
Prior systemic therapy, n (%) | 4 (50) | 2 (33) | 2 (100) |
Chemotherapy | 4 (50) | 2 (33) | 2 (100) |
Immunotherapy | 1 (13) | 0 | 1 (50) |
Other | 3 (38) | 1 (17) | 2 (100) |
Prior radiation therapy, n (%) | 2 (25) | 2 (33) | 0 |
Prior surgery, n (%) | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
HIV characteristics | |||
HIV positive, n (%) | 5 (63) | 3 (50) | 2 (100) |
Baseline CD4+ cells/μL, median (range) among PWH | 526 (59, 1233) | 707 (526, 1233) | 119 (59, 179) |
T cell characteristics | Total (N=7) | Dose level 1 480 µg/kg (N=5) | Dose level 2 960 µg/kg (N=2) |
Baseline CD4+ cells/μL, median (range) | 650 (59–1362) | 707 (526–1362) | 119 (59–179) |
Baseline CD8+ cells/μL, median (range) | 592 (292–1024) | 749 (292–1024) | 496 (400–592) |
CD4+/CD8+ ratio, median (range) | 1.28 (0.1–2.2) | 1.29 (0.7–2.2) | 0.22 (0.1–0.3) |
ACTG, AIDS Clinical Trials Group; PWH, people with HIV.
Treatment administration and safety
Among all the participants, the median number of NT-I7 treatments administered was 3.5 doses. Four of the eight participants (three in DL1 and one in DL2) completed all four doses of the NT-I7. The reasons for discontinuation among the other four participants were a DLT, disease progression, withdrawal by a participant and one participant discontinued treatment per physician discretion.
All participants were evaluable for DLTs. All NT-I7-related toxicities were grade 1–2 AEs (table 2). Among all eight participants, the most common AE related to the NT-I7 was a grade 1–2 local injection site reaction that was observed in seven participants. The injection site reactions were managed with antihistamines and topical steroids on the study. One participant who experienced a grade 2 injection site reaction following the first dose opted to come off treatment 5 weeks after cycle 1, thus meeting the criteria for a DLT and serious AE (SAE). A second participant in DL2 had an SAE due to hospitalization as a result of grade 2 infection and grade 3 chylothorax that was not related to NT-I7 administration. This participant had pleural effusions at baseline related to KS and chose to discontinue treatment following the hospitalization. Other toxicities included grade 1–2 alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase increases noted in 67% and 50% of the participants in DL1 but not among participants in DL2. Grade 2 increases in ALC were noted in 50% of all participants, which is expected per the activity of the NT-I7.
Table 2Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) that were judged as possibly related, probably related, or definitely related to study drug
Total (N=8) | Dose level 1 480 µg/kg (N=6) | Dose level 2 960 µg/kg (N=2) | |
Participants with at least one related TEAE | |||
Grades 1–2 | 7 (88) | 6 (100) | 1 (50) |
General disorders and administration site conditions All grades 1–2 | |||
Injection site reaction | 7 (88) | 6 (100) | 1 (50) |
Localized edema | 2 (25) | 1 (17) | 1 (50) |
Influenza-like symptoms | 1 (13) | 0 | 1 (50) |
Fatigue | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Malaise | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders All grades 1–2 | |||
Diarrhea | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Nausea | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Infections and infestations All grades 1–2 | |||
Herpes simplex reactivation | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Papulopustular rash | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Investigations All grades 1–2 | |||
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 4 (50) | 4 (67) | 0 |
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 3 (38) | 3 (50) | 0 |
CD4 T cell lymphocyte decreased | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Lymphocyte count decreased | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Lymphocyte count increased | 4 (50) | 3 (50) | 1 (50) |
Platelet count decreased | 2 (25) | 2 (33) | 0 |
Thyroid stimulating hormone increased | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutritional disorders All grades 1–2 | |||
Hyperglycemia | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders All grades 1–2 | |||
Headache | 2 (25) | 1 (17) | 1 (50) |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders All grades 1–2 | |||
Sore throat | 1 (13) | 0 | 1 (50) |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder All grades 1–2 | |||
Rash maculopapular | 2 (25) | 2 (33) | 0 |
Vascular disorder All grades 1–2 | |||
Flushing | 1 (13) | 1 (17) | 0 |
Adverse events graded per CTCAE V.5.0.
CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event.
Among participants with HIV, two participants (one in each DL) had an increase in the HIV VL between 40 and 200 copies/mL at week C2W09, but the HIV VL returned to undetectable levels following C3W18.
KS activity and outcomes
One participant who experienced a DLT within the first cycle came off treatment at week 5 and, therefore, was not evaluable for the first KS response assessment at week 9 prior to the second cycle of treatment. Seven participants were evaluable for KS response: three participants experienced a partial KS response (PR), three participants had stable disease as a best response and one participant without HIV had progression of KS. All participants who had a response were PWH, and two of the three responders received DL2 doses (figure 1A,B). The overall objective response rate to NT-I7 was 42.9% (95% CI 9.9%, 81.6%). There were no deaths reported in the study.
Figure 1. Example of partial response to NT-I7 therapy on study. (A) Study participant with target KS lesion at C1W00 prior to NT-I7 administration. (B) Study participant with evidence of confirmed partial response to NT-I7 at C3W18 with evidence of lightening and flattening of target lesion 4. KS, Kaposi sarcoma.
ALC, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell kinetics
The pharmacodynamic impact of NT-I7 on lymphocyte populations is summarized in figure 2 and online supplemental table 1, and individual data are shown in online supplemental figure 1. Following the first dose of NT-I7, there was a minimal increase in ALC after the first week (p=0.38). However, the ALC peaked significantly (~3.5-fold, figure 2A) from baseline at week 4 (C1W04) (p=0.02). There was a significant elevation in the ALC from baseline to C2W13 and C3W18. Missing data at C4W27, EOT and at safety follow-up in four participants limited further evaluation of these time points. CD4+ T-cell increases (~5-fold from baseline) and CD8+ T cell increases (~3.5-fold from baseline) (figure 2B) were noted at C1W04 and began to decrease thereafter but remained elevated compared with the baseline till C2W13 (p=0.03). Notably, the numbers of observed circulating T cells did not increase above the C1W04 peak, despite subsequent doses of NT-I7. To investigate more specifically which T cell subsets were affected by treatment, we performed high-dimensional flow cytometry on whole blood. The overall profile of these analyses paralleled the clinical counts. For both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, all measured subsets increased significantly, including the effector memory and central memory subsets, which increased proportionally from C1W04 (p=0.003(CD4+CM); p=0.0003 (CD8+CM); p=0.005 (CD4+EM); p=0.001 (CD8+EM) figure 2C,D). Importantly, within CD4+ T cell subsets, there was a significant expansion of the naïve T-cell subsets from baseline to C1W04 (p=0.02) which persisted through the course of treatment (figure 2C). In both the CD4+ and CD8+ compartments, there was rapid expansion of the memory stem T-cell (Tscm) subset by C1W01 (figure 2C,D) which appeared to be the most affected subset of CD8+ T cells (figure 2D). Importantly, for both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, terminal effector cells had also increased from baseline.
Figure 2. Impact of NT-I7 (IL-7) on ALC, T-cells and T-cell subsets across study. Red arrows above time points indicate NT-I7 administration. (A) ALC changes across the study in all participants, absolute counts (left panel) and fold-change from baseline (right panel). (B) Absolute clinical cell counts (left panel) and fold-change (right panel) from baseline of CD4 and CD8 T cells among all participants at time points on the study. *Indicates statistical significance where p<0.05 in paired analyses compared with baseline. Blue asterisk corresponds to CD4 T cells and red astrisk corresponds to CD8 T cells. (C) Changes in absolute CD4 T-cell differentiation subsets (left panel) and fold change (right panel) over the course of the study. (D) Changes in absolute CD8 T-cell differentiation subsets (left panel) and fold change (right panel) over the course of the study. ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; CM, central memory; EM, effector memory; EOT, end-of-treatment; N, Naïve; TE, terminal effector; TSCM, memory stem T-cell.
We evaluated whether changes in ALC and in the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell numbers and/or fold-expansion with study treatment were related to NT-I7 clinical responses in all participants. Evaluable participants with objective KS responses to NT-I7 treatment in this study were PWH. The absolute numbers and fold-change in ALC, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells did not change by treatment response (figure 3A–C, online supplemental table 1). Among the treatment responders, the median ALC (figure 3A) and CD4+ T-cell counts (figure 3B) were lower at baseline, although not statistically significantly different as compared with those who did not respond to NT-I7 (p=0.39 for ALC, p=0.22 for CD4+cells). There were no statistically significant differences in CD8+ T cell counts or fold-change from baseline between responders and non-responders over the course of the study (figure 3C). The median CD4+/CD8+ ratio at baseline for seven evaluable participants was 0.98 and at C2W13 was 1.18. Interestingly, when comparing the CD4+/CD8+ ratio by response, there were statistically significant differences in CD4+/CD8+ ratio between treatment responders and non-responders at both baseline (p=0.011) and throughout the treatment (figure 3D); with responders having a lower CD4/CD8 ratio. Despite persistently low CD4+/CD8+ ratios as compared with those who did not respond to NT-I7, participants with response reported decrease in KS-associated edema and had objective improvement in the KS lesions (figure 1A,B).
Figure 3. Changes in ALC, CD4 and CD8 T-cells relative to clinical response status to NT-I7. (A) ALC absolute (left panel) and fold-change (right panel) changes by response. (B) Absolute (left panel) and fold-change (right panel) CD4 T-cell clinical counts and changes by response. (C) Absolute (left panel) and fold-change (right panel) CD8 T-cell clinical counts and changes by response. (D) CD4/CD8 ratio by response to NT-I7. Statistically significant difference between responders and non-responders is noted. Non-responders include one participant who experienced a DLT and was not evaluable for response. ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; DLTs, dose-limiting toxicities.
Immunogenicity assessment
Treatment-emergent ADA and their effect on NT-I7 serum concentrations, pharmacodynamics and safety were also analyzed as part of the safety assessment. ADA was not detected at baseline in any of the seven participants tested (0/7, 0%). After two doses of NT-I7 (C2W09), six participants developed treatment-emergent ADA (6/7, 85.7%), even if titers were low (ADA titer range 30–2430). Interestingly, one participant who did not develop ADA was receiving the higher DLs (960 µg/kg) and had the lowest CD4 T cell counts at baseline (59 cells/µL). ADA was persistent and remained detectable over the follow-up period. Five ADA samples had neutralizing activity at the first time of detection (5/6, 83.3%) while the remaining sample showed neutralizing activity at a later time point (EOT, week 18).
NT-I7 serum concentrations (figure 4A) were easily detectable 3 hours after administration, significantly decreased by C1W01 and were back to baseline before the next administration. Each subsequent dose of NT-I7 resulted in an increase in NT-I7 concentration, and higher in the higher DL participants, but showing decreased peak concentrations with each subsequent dose of NT-I7 administration (figure 4B). However, development of ADA did not affect the pharmacodynamics of NT-I7 and could be a physiological mechanism to maintain ALC levels within physiological range. Despite the low sample number in this study, and consistent with this hypothesis, ADA was developed at peak increase of ALC and ALC levels remained stable thereafter (figure 4C). The participant with a treatment response who did not develop ADA had significantly lower baseline ALC (0.63 vs an average of 1.85 k/µL) and lower peak ALC (2.07 vs an average of 6.5 k/µL) (figure 4D). The ADA levels and serum NT-I7 levels by participant are noted in online supplemental figure 2.
Figure 4. NT-I7 serum concentrations, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) titers and absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) measurements in study participants. (A) NT-I7 serum concentrations after a single dose of NT-I7, by dose level. C1W00: predose; C1W00H3: 3 hours postadministration; C1W01: 168 hours postadministration; C1W09: 1512 hours postadministration. (B) NT-I7 serum concentrations before and 3 hours postadministration for the first three doses, by dose level. (C) ALC measurements and development of ADA during study. (D) ALC levels over the course of study in participants with treatment-emergent ADA and one participant who did not develop ADA. Gray areas in (C, D) between 2.5 and 4.5 K/[micro]L denote lymphocytosis.
Discussion
In this study evaluating IL-7 in participants with KS, doses of NT-I7 of 480 µg/kg and 960 µg/kg in eight participants were associated with grade 1 and 2 treatment-related AEs. Treatment was safe among PWH with no significant impact on HIV VL. However, the primary objective was not met due to early study closure following termination of funding. Despite early termination, we noted that among seven response-evaluable participants, the majority of whom had prior systemic KS therapy a response in a subset of participants. The overall response rate of NT-I7 was 42.9%. KS responses in this study were observed in three participants with HIV. These PWH with KS responses to NT-I7 had low CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratios of less than 0.5 that were persistently low as compared with those whose KS did not respond to treatment. Among all participants who received NT-I7, there was an expansion of several T-cell subsets, including CD4+ naïve T-cells, CD8+ memory stem T-cells and effector T-cells in both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets that may have impacted KS activity in those with lower CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts.
In this small study of seven evaluable participants, the overall response rate of NT-I7 in KS is lower than response rates observed with other cytotoxic chemotherapy agents for KS which ranges from 50% to 70%,35 36 and immunomodulatory therapies such as pomalidomide or lenalidomide with response rates of 60%–70%.15 37 However, CITN-17 enrolled a heterogeneous population of participants with and without HIV as well as those with and without prior systemic KS therapy. Many of the seminal studies evaluating KS therapies have focused on participants with HIV. Three of the five PWH (60%) in this study experienced a KS response to NT-I7, which is similar to other aforementioned studies evaluating treatments in HIV-associated KS. With regard to safety, there were no grade three events related to the study therapy. The most common AEs were local injection site reactions that were managed with antihistamines and topical steroids and with oral steroids in one participant. An injection site reaction was a DLT in one participant at a dose of 480 µg/kg but this was not observed in other participants who were treated with NT-I7 at the higher DL.
KS is a malignancy that arises in the context of inadequate immunological reconstitution. Low CD4+/CD8+ ratios have been shown to increase the risk of KS incidence in a large cohort of PWH.38 Low CD4+/CD8+ ratios are also associated with increased markers of T-cell senescence, activation and exhaustion despite well-controlled HIV39 40 indicate the presence of immune dysregulation and inflammation; these characteristics are considered hallmarks of cancer.41 At baseline, participants with a KS response in this study had lower CD4+/CD8+ ratios as compared with non-responders. Lower CD4+/CD8+ ratios between responders and non-responders in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio persisted from baseline to C2W13. Moreover, we did not observe increases in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio during the study that may account for KS response. The reasons for this apparent incongruity are unclear but may be due expansion of T-cell subsets by IL-7. More specifically, there may be differential expansion and/or activation of minor T-cell subsets, changing the balance between regulatory and effector T cell mechanisms leading to this observation. Such minor subset ratio differences or balances may not be readily conspicuous in our assays and may not effect changes in overall CD4+/CD8+ ratios over the course of treatment.
IL-7 through its activation of the JAK/STAT pathway has been shown to be essential for B-cell and T-cell development, proliferation and survival.23 42 Among all study participants, there were increases following IL-7 administration in the fold-change of several CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. The proportion of CD4+ naïve T cell populations appeared to be higher, and the proportion of memory stem T-cells were higher in the CD8+ T cell subsets, after dosing. Central memory T cells also increased in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. These changes were seen within 1 week of treatment administration and persisted with the subsequent doses of NT-I7. The changes observed in the T-cell subsets were similar to other studies evaluating IL-7 administration in PWH,29 patients with metastatic melanoma,30 and those receiving treatment following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, where naïve T cell subsets increased.43 Though this analysis did not specifically evaluate regulatory T-cell subsets, which have immunosuppressive properties, several studies investigating administration of IL-7 and NT-I7 have shown increase in naïve and central memory T-cell subsets without increases in regulatory T-cells in patients with lymphopenia.29–31 44 Other possible antitumor mechanisms of IL-7 in responders may be due to the observed increases in naïve T-cell and central memory T-cell subsets. Increases in these subsets may augment immune response to tumor antigens and improve adaptive immunity in KS. PWH with KS have been shown to have higher levels of immunosenescent T-cells and lower naïve T-cells as compared with PWH alone.7 Therefore, treatment responses observed in PWH within this study may be due to the greater degree of immune dysregulation among PWH and KS. There are ongoing studies of KSHV-specific T cell responses and T-cell receptor changes in the KS tissues that may help further our understanding of the mechanism of action of IL-7 and its impact on KS.
In patients with lymphopenia, previous analyses have shown that endogenous IL-7 levels are high due to homeostatic regulation of T-cells.26 Consistent with physiological homeostatic regulation of both IL-7 levels and T cell counts, we observed treatment-emergent ADA that seem to maintain ALC levels at high but physiological levels. Correspondingly, the only participant who did not develop ADA had the lowest baseline ALC and peak ALC and did not need homeostatic compensatory mechanisms. Due to the limited number of participants in this study, as well as the heterogeneity of the study population, it is challenging to draw definitive conclusions from these data. However, we did not observe any relationship between treatment-emergent ADA and efficacy or safety outcomes.
Previous studies have demonstrated increases in HIV VL or “blips” following IL-7 administration.28 45 All participants in the study were required to have an undetectable HIV VL at baseline and two participants had increases in HIV VL up to 200 copies/mL at C2W9 that subsequently resolved prior to the next cycle. An analysis of the HIV reservoir was not evaluated in this study. Vandergeeten et al demonstrated that IL-7 led to HIV persistence among participants receiving ART by enhancing residual levels of viral production and inducing proliferation of latently infected CD4+ T cells.46 Though IL-7 alone may not contribute to eradication of HIV, combination strategies may help advance the treatment of both KS and HIV. A recent study of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor, in participants with HIV-associated KS resulted in a response rate of 62%.47 The same anti-PD-1 inhibitor led to reversal of HIV latency in CD4+ T-cells after the first infusion in participants with HIV and cancer.48 Combining IL-7 with a PD-1 inhibitor would be a logical next treatment approach and may be beneficial as a “kick and kill” strategy for the HIV latency reservoir but also as two agents that independently have demonstrated activity in KS.
There were important limitations in this study that impact our findings. Most significantly, the limited study population impairs our ability to fully evaluate the primary objective of identifying an MTD of NT-I7. Moreover, the participants have different epidemiological subtypes of KS; therefore, it is unclear whether the responses observed in PWH were due to chance or a biological effect of the therapies. Despite these limitations, this study provides important insights on the use of IL-7 as a therapy for KS. Though IL-7 has been shown to be useful in CD4 T-cell restoration among PWH, clinical benefit in a specific disease state has not been clearly demonstrated in prior studies. Evidence of preliminary activity of IL-7 in a malignancy associated with CD4+ lymphopenia is clinically meaningful. Additionally, as IL-7 has a reasonable safety profile and does not require intravenous administration, this may be beneficial in limited-resource settings, such as certain areas of sub-Saharan Africa, where KS is highly prevalent and infusion-based therapies and management of chemotherapy-related toxicities may be challenging.
In summary, NT-I7 administration was safe among participants with KS and led to increases in overall lymphocyte counts and increases in naïve and central memory T-cell subsets. Administration was also associated with KS responses in 42% of participants. NT-I7 demonstrated a similar safety profile to prior studies of IL-7 administration with evidence of preliminary activity of KS in PWH. Future studies need to fully evaluate the appropriate dose of NT-I7 in this population to identify the MTD.
We thank participants and their families for their participation in this study. We also thank the medical teams at each research site who cared for study participants. We thank Adam Rupert and Kyndal Cook at the AIDS Monitoring Laboratory for their analysis of serum IL-7 levels in participant samples. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (UM1CA154967) and funding from NIT.
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Consent obtained directly from patient(s).
Ethics approval
This study involves human participants and was approved by National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board and participating sites (reference/ID number: CITN-17). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
X @DrKateLurain, @Fluffone, @ThomasUldrick
Deceased Dr. Cheever sadly passed away September 23, 2021 https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/center-news/2021/09/fred-hutch-mourns-sudden-loss-of-dr--martin--mac--cheever.html
Contributors Protocol development and study design: TSU, MC, BHL, JCK and SPF. Data collection: RR, MPM, KL, RY, IE, PC, AA, AW and C-CJW. Data analysis and interpretation: ASK, SPF, RR and C-CJW. Statistical analyses: L-LK, ASK and SPF. Care of study participants: RR, MPM, KL, RY, IE, PC, AA, EB and C-CJW. RR is the guarantor.
Funding CITN-17 was coordinated by the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN) and funded in part by NIH/NCI grant UM1CA154967 (CITN: Principal Investigator and IND Sponsor: Nancy E. Davidson). This study was funded in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute ZIA BC 011954.
Competing interests RR, KL and RY report receiving research support from Celgene (now Bristol Myers Squibb), from CTI BioPharma (a Sobi Company), PDS Biotech, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals through CRADAs with the NCI. RR, KL and RY report receiving drug for a clinical trial from Merck through a CRADA with the NCI. RR, KL and RY report receiving drug for a clinical trial from EMD-Serano and Eli Lilly through a CRADA at the NCI. RY reports receiving preclinical material from Lentigen Technology through a CRADA or MTA with the NCI. MPM reports receiving research support from Roche through a CTA with Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. TSU is currently employed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. TSU and RY are coinventors on US Patent 10,001,483 entitled 'Methods for the treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma or KSHV-induced lymphoma using immunomodulatory compounds, and uses of biomarkers.' RY is also a coinventor on patents on a peptide vaccine for HIV and on the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma with IL12, and an immediate family member of RY is a coinventor on patents related to internalization of target receptors, on KSHV viral IL-6, and on the use of calreticulin and calreticulin fragments to inhibit angiogenesis. All rights, title, and interest to these patents have been or should by law be assigned to the US Department of Health and Human Services; the government conveys a portion of the royalties it receives to its employee inventors under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-502). No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors. TSU name as a coinventor on US Provisional Patent Application 18/310,649, KSHV Oncoprotein Antigens and Epitodes for Expanding Antigen Specific T-cells.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
1 Chang Y, Cesarman E, Pessin MS, et al. Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Science 1994; 266: 1865–9. doi:10.1126/science.7997879
2 Cesarman E, Damania B, Krown SE, et al. Kaposi sarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5: 9. doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0060-9
3 Labo N, Miley W, Benson CA, et al. Epidemiology of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus in HIV-1-infected US persons in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2015; 29: 1217–25. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000682
4 Kedes DH, Operskalski E, Busch M, et al. The seroepidemiology of human herpesvirus 8 (Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus): distribution of infection in KS risk groups and evidence for sexual transmission. Nat Med 1996; 2: 918–24. doi:10.1038/nm0896-918
5 Motlhale M, Sitas F, Bradshaw D, et al. Epidemiology of Kaposi’s sarcoma in sub-Saharan Africa. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 78: 102167. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2022.102167
6 Touloumi G, Hatzakis A, Potouridou I, et al. The role of immunosuppression and immune-activation in classic Kaposi’s sarcoma. Int J Cancer 1999; 82: 817–21. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990909)82:6<817::aid-ijc8>3.0.co;2-7
7 Unemori P, Leslie KS, Hunt PW, et al. Immunosenescence is associated with presence of Kaposi’s sarcoma in antiretroviral treated HIV infection. AIDS 2013; 27: 1735–42. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283601144
8 Bihl F, Mosam A, Henry LN, et al. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-specific immune reconstitution and antiviral effect of combined HAART/chemotherapy in HIV clade C-infected individuals with Kaposi’s sarcoma. AIDS 2007; 21: 1245–52. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328182df03
9 Bihl F, Berger C, Chisholm JV, et al. Cellular immune responses and disease control in acute AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. AIDS 2009; 23: 1918–22. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283300a91
10 Bower M, Dalla Pria A, Coyle C, et al. Prospective stage-stratified approach to AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 409–14. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6757
11 Ramaswami R, Lurain K, Yarchoan R. Oncologic Treatment of HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma 40 Years on. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40: 294–306. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.02040
12 Martín-Carbonero L, Palacios R, Valencia E, et al. Long-term prognosis of HIV-infected patients with Kaposi sarcoma treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47: 410–7. doi:10.1086/589865
13 Lurain K, Yarchoan R, Ramaswami R. Immunotherapy for KSHV-associated diseases. Curr Opin Virol 2022; 55: 101249. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2022.101249
14 Krown SE, Li P, Von Roenn JH, et al. Efficacy of Low-Dose Interferon with Antiretroviral Therapy in Kaposi’s Sarcoma: A Randomized Phase II AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2002; 22: 295–303. doi:10.1089/107999002753675712
15 Ramaswami R, Polizzotto MN, Lurain K, et al. Safety, Activity, and Long-term Outcomes of Pomalidomide in the Treatment of Kaposi Sarcoma among Individuals with or without HIV Infection. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28: 840–50. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3364
16 Polizzotto MN, Uldrick TS, Wyvill KM, et al. Pomalidomide for Symptomatic Kaposi’s Sarcoma in People With and Without HIV Infection: A Phase I/II Study. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 4125–31. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.69.3812
17 Lurain K, Polizzotto MN, Krug LT, et al. Immunophenotypic analysis in participants with Kaposi sarcoma following pomalidomide administration. AIDS 2023; 37: 1693–703. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000003627
18 Delyon J, Biard L, Renaud M, et al. PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in classic or endemic Kaposi’s sarcoma: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23: 491–500. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00097-3
19 Lurain K, Ramaswami R, Ekwede I, et al. 1979P phase I trial of pembrolizumab in HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS). Ann Oncol 2023; 34. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.1208
20 Cader FZ, Hu X, Goh WL, et al. A peripheral immune signature of responsiveness to PD-1 blockade in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Nat Med 2020; 26: 1468–79. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1006-1
21 Oh SA, Wu D-C, Cheung J, et al. PD-L1 expression by dendritic cells is a key regulator of T-cell immunity in cancer. Nat Cancer 2020; 1: 681–91. doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0075-x
22 Buentke E, Mathiot A, Tolaini M, et al. Do CD8 effector cells need IL-7R expression to become resting memory cells? Blood 2006; 108: 1949–56. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-04-016857
23 Barata JT, Durum SK, Seddon B. Flip the coin: IL-7 and IL-7R in health and disease. Nat Immunol 2019; 20: 1584–93. doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0479-x
24 Bolotin E, Annett G, Parkman R, et al. Serum levels of IL-7 in bone marrow transplant recipients: relationship to clinical characteristics and lymphocyte count. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 783–8. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1701655
25 Napolitano LA, Grant RM, Deeks SG, et al. Increased production of IL-7 accompanies HIV-1-mediated T-cell depletion: implications for T-cell homeostasis. Nat Med 2001; 7: 73–9. doi:10.1038/83381
26 Fry TJ, Connick E, Falloon J, et al. A potential role for interleukin-7 in T-cell homeostasis. Blood 2001; 97: 2983–90. doi:10.1182/blood.v97.10.2983
27 Lévy Y, Sereti I, Tambussi G, et al. Effects of recombinant human interleukin 7 on T-cell recovery and thymic output in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: results of a phase I/IIa randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55: 291–300. doi:10.1093/cid/cis383
28 Thiébaut R, Jarne A, Routy J-P, et al. Repeated Cycles of Recombinant Human Interleukin 7 in HIV-Infected Patients With Low CD4 T-Cell Reconstitution on Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of 2 Phase II Multicenter Studies. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62: 1178–85. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw065
29 Sereti I, Dunham RM, Spritzler J, et al. IL-7 administration drives T cell-cycle entry and expansion in HIV-1 infection. Blood 2009; 113: 6304–14. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-10-186601
30 Rosenberg SA, Sportès C, Ahmadzadeh M, et al. IL-7 administration to humans leads to expansion of CD8+ and CD4+ cells but a relative decrease of CD4+ T-regulatory cells. J Immunother 2006; 29: 313–9. doi:10.1097/01.cji.0000210386.55951.c2
31 Kim S, Lee SW, Koh J-Y, et al. A single administration of hIL-7-hyFc induces long-lasting T-cell expansion with maintained effector functions. Blood Adv 2022; 6: 6093–107. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006591
32 Krown SE, Metroka C, Wernz JC. Kaposi’s sarcoma in the acquired immune deficiency syndrome: a proposal for uniform evaluation, response, and staging criteria. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Oncology Committee. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1201–7. doi:10.1200/JCO.1989.7.9.1201
33 Maecker HT, McCoy JP, Nussenblatt R. Standardizing immunophenotyping for the Human Immunology Project. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12: 191–200. doi:10.1038/nri3158
34 Gattinoni L, Speiser DE, Lichterfeld M, et al. T memory stem cells in health and disease. Nat Med 2017; 23: 18–27. doi:10.1038/nm.4241
35 Cianfrocca M, Lee S, Von Roenn J, et al. Randomized trial of paclitaxel versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for advanced human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi sarcoma: evidence of symptom palliation from chemotherapy. Cancer 2010; 116: 3969–77. doi:10.1002/cncr.25362
36 Cooley T, Henry D, Tonda M, et al. A randomized, double-blind study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. Oncologist 2007; 12: 114–23. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-114
37 Reid EG, Shimabukuro K, Moore P, et al. AMC-070: Lenalidomide Is Safe and Effective in HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28: 2646–56. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0645
38 Castilho JL, Bian A, Jenkins CA, et al. CD4/CD8 Ratio and Cancer Risk Among Adults With HIV. JNCI 2022; 114: 854–62. doi:10.1093/jnci/djac053
39 Serrano-Villar S, Gutiérrez C, Vallejo A, et al. The CD4/CD8 ratio in HIV-infected subjects is independently associated with T-cell activation despite long-term viral suppression. J Infect 2013; 66: 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2012.09.013
40 Serrano-Villar S, Sainz T, Lee SA, et al. HIV-infected individuals with low CD4/CD8 ratio despite effective antiretroviral therapy exhibit altered T cell subsets, heightened CD8+ T cell activation, and increased risk of non-AIDS morbidity and mortality. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10: e1004078. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004078
41 Hanahan D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov 2022; 12: 31–46. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059
42 Dias S, Silva H, Cumano A, et al. Interleukin-7 is necessary to maintain the B cell potential in common lymphoid progenitors. J Exp Med 2005; 201: 971–9. doi:10.1084/jem.20042393
43 Perales M-A, Goldberg JD, Yuan J, et al. Recombinant human interleukin-7 (CYT107) promotes T-cell recovery after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012; 120: 4882–91. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-06-437236
44 Sportès C, Hakim FT, Memon SA, et al. Administration of rhIL-7 in humans increases in vivo TCR repertoire diversity by preferential expansion of naive T cell subsets. J Exp Med 2008; 205: 1701–14. doi:10.1084/jem.20071681
45 Imamichi H, Degray G, Asmuth DM, et al. HIV-1 viruses detected during episodic blips following interleukin-7 administration are similar to the viruses present before and after interleukin-7 therapy. AIDS 2011; 25: 159–64. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328340a270
46 Vandergeeten C, Fromentin R, DaFonseca S, et al. Interleukin-7 promotes HIV persistence during antiretroviral therapy. Blood 2013; 121: 4321–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-11-465625
47 Lurain K, Ramaswami R, Ekwede I, et al. Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network 12: Pembrolizumab in HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 0. doi:10.1200/JCO.24.00640
48 Uldrick TS, Adams SV, Fromentin R, et al. Pembrolizumab induces HIV latency reversal in people living with HIV and cancer on antiretroviral therapy. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14: eabl3836. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abl3836
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
CD4+ T-cell lymphocytopenia and immune dysfunction are factors that drive the onset and persistence of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) in people with (PWH) and without HIV. Standard chemotherapy agents for KS can contribute to increasing CD4+ T cell lymphocytopenia. IL-7 is a cytokine that is essential in T-cell development, proliferation and homeostasis. In PWH, IL-7 administration leads to increased numbers of circulating central memory and naïve T-cell phenotypes.
Methods
In this multicenter phase I study with a 3+3 dose escalation design, participants with KS with or without HIV received up to four intramuscular injections of IL-7 (NT-I7) every 9 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate safety over three escalating dose levels (DL) of NT-I7 (DL1:480 µg/kg, DL2: 960 µg/kg and DL3: 1200 µg/kg) and identify a maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of antitumor activity per the modified AIDS Clinical Trials Group Criteria and assessment of the effect of NT-I7 on the kinetics of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells.
Results
Eight cisgender male participants (five with HIV infection) were enrolled. Six participants were treated at DL1, and two were treated at DL2. The study was closed to accrual after enrolment of the second participant on DL2 due to termination of study funding. Four of the eight participants (three in DL1 and one in DL2) completed all four doses of the NT-I7. With regard to treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), all participants had <grade 2 AEs, which included injection site reaction and alanine aminotransferase increase. Injection site reaction was a dose-limiting toxicity in one participant at DL1. The overall KS objective response rate to NT-I7 was 42.9% (95% CI 9.9%, 81.6%) and all three responders were PWH. Absolute lymphocyte counts, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts increased among all participants following administration of NT-I7. Participants who experienced a response had HIV and lower CD4/CD8 ratio at baseline and throughout the study as compared with those who did not have KS response to NT-I7.
Conclusions
Preliminary data demonstrate safety and activity of IL-7 in patients with KS and activity specifically among individuals HIV-associated KS.
Trial registration number
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 HIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
2 Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
3 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
4 Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California, USA
5 Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
6 NeoImmuneTech Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA
7 Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
8 Cytel (Shanghai) Co Ltd, Shanghai, China