It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
In this study, we evaluated the potential of a network approach to electromyography and electroencephalography recordings to detect covert command-following in healthy participants. The motivation underlying this study was the development of a diagnostic tool that can be applied in common clinical settings to detect awareness in patients that are unable to convey explicit motor or verbal responses, such as patients that suffer from disorders of consciousness (DoC).
Methods
We examined the brain and muscle response during movement and imagined movement of simple motor tasks, as well as during resting state. Brain-muscle networks were obtained using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) of the coherence spectra for all the channel pairs. For the 15/38 participants who showed motor imagery, as indexed by common spatial filters and linear discriminant analysis, we contrasted the configuration of the networks during imagined movement and resting state at the group level, and subject-level classifiers were implemented using as features the weights of the NMF together with trial-wise power modulations and heart response to classify resting state from motor imagery.
Results
Kinesthetic motor imagery produced decreases in the mu-beta band compared to resting state, and a small correlation was found between mu-beta power and the kinesthetic imagery scores of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second version. The full-feature classifiers successfully distinguished between motor imagery and resting state for all participants, and brain-muscle functional networks did not contribute to the overall classification. Nevertheless, heart activity and cortical power were crucial to detect when a participant was mentally rehearsing a movement.
Conclusions
Our work highlights the importance of combining EEG and peripheral measurements to detect command-following, which could be important for improving the detection of covert responses consistent with volition in unresponsive patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer