It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Livestock are a critical part of our food systems, yet their abundance globally has been cited as a driver of many environmental and human health concerns. Issues such as soil, water, and air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, aquifer depletion, antimicrobial resistance genes, and zoonotic disease outbreaks have all been linked to livestock operations. While many studies have examined these issues at depth at local scales, it has been difficult to complete studies at regional or national scales due to the dearth of livestock data, hindering pollution mitigation or response time for tracing and monitoring disease outbreaks. In the U.S. the National Agricultural Statistics Service completes a Census once every 5 years that includes livestock, but data are only available at the county level leaving little inference that can be made at such a coarse spatiotemporal scale. While other data exist through some regulated permitting programs, there are significant data gaps in where livestock are raised, how many livestock are on site at a given time, and how these livestock and, importantly, their waste emissions, are managed. In this perspective, we highlight the need for better livestock data, then discuss the accessibility and key limitations of currently available data. We then feature some recent work to improve livestock data availability through remote-sensing and machine learning, ending with our takeaways to address these data needs for the future of environmental and public health management.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

















1 Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas , Fayetteville, AR, United States of America; Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability , Raleigh, NC, United States of America
2 Quantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University , Mississippi State, MS, United States of America
3 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service , Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America
4 School of the Environment, Yale University , New Haven, CT, United States of America; School of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Sciences, Korea University , Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
5 United States Department of Agriculture, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory , Temple, TX, United States of America
6 School of Sustainable Engineering & the Built Environment, Arizona State University , Tempe, AZ, United States of America
7 Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park , PA, United States of America
8 Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability , Raleigh, NC, United States of America; Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, NC, United States of America; Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, NC, United States of America
9 Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas , Fayetteville, AR, United States of America; Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability , Raleigh, NC, United States of America; Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas , Lawrence, KS, United States of America
10 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University , Tempe, AZ, United States of America
11 Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability , Raleigh, NC, United States of America; Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Smith College , Northampton, MA, United States of America
12 Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability , Raleigh, NC, United States of America; Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland Baltimore County , Baltimore, MD, United States of America
13 Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas , Fayetteville, AR, United States of America