It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
Differences in the performance of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations have been attributed to the mathematical form of the equations and to differences between patient demographics and measurement methods. We evaluated differences in serum creatinine (SCr) and eGFR in cohorts matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and measured GFR (mGFR).
Methods
White North Americans from Minnesota (n = 1093) and the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) (n = 1548) and White subjects from the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) cohort (n = 7727) were matched for demographic patient characteristics (sex, age ± 3 years, BMI ± 2.5 kg/m2) and renal function (mGFR ± 3 ml/min/1.73 m2). SCr was measured with isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable assays in the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts and with non-standardized SCr assays recalculated to IDMS in the CRIC. The Minnesota cohort and CRIC shared a common method to measure GFR (renal clearance of iothalamate), while the EKFC cohort used a variety of exogenous markers and methods, all with recognized sufficient accuracy. We compared the SCr levels and eGFR predictions [for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and EKFC equations] of patients fulfilling these matching criteria.
Results
For 305 matched individuals, mean SCr (mg/dL) was not different between the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts (females 0.83 ± 0.20 versus 0.86 ± 0.23, males 1.06 ± 0.23 versus 1.12 ± 0.37; P > .05) but significantly different from the CRIC [females 1.13 ± 0.23 (P < .0001), males 1.42 ± 0.31 (P < .0001)]. The CKD-EPI equations performed better than the EKFC equation in the CRIC, while the opposite was true in the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts.
Conclusion
Significant differences in SCr concentrations between the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts versus CRIC were observed in subjects with the same level of mGFR and equal demographic characteristics and can be explained by the difference in SCr calibration.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care , KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Kortrijk , Belgium
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège , CHU Sart Tilman, Liège , Belgium
3 Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University , Lund , Sweden
4 Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Medical Radiology, Lund University , Malmö , Sweden
5 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Skåne University Hospital , Lund , Lund University , Sweden
6 Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Public Health , Berlin , Germany
7 Section of Nephrology, University Hospital of North Norway and Metabolic and Renal Research Group, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsö , Norway
8 Clinical Biochemistry, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust , Canterbury , UK
9 Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation Rénale , Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, France
10 Néphrologie, Dialyse, Hypertension et Exploration Fonctionnelle Rénale , Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
11 Function area Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute , Stockholm , Sweden
12 Division of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute , Huddinge, Sweden
13 Department of Geriatrics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University , Örebro, Sweden
14 Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
15 Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
16 Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, University of Liège , CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium