It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Corticosteroids systemically reduce immune system activity thereby limiting inflammation in the GI tract. Corticosteroid use is limited by deleterious systemic effects including immunosuppression and adverse effects on growth and development (Giles et al., 2018). The metabolism of dietary polysaccharides, such as plant cell wall xyloglucan, by gut symbionts has been demonstrated to be mediated by niche members of the human gut microbiota (Larsbrink et al., 2014). By caging corticosteroids like dexamethasone (DEX) with xyloglucans to be released by microbiota at the site of disease, there is potential to increase efficacy and limit adverse effects.
Mice deficient in Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol polyphosphate 5’-phosphatase (SHIP-/-) develop spontaneous CD-like ileal inflammation (Ngoh et al., 2016). We have used SHIP-/- mice to compare the efficacy of DEX versus caged DEX to reduce intestinal inflammation.
Aims
Caged DEX will reduce CD-like ileal inflammation in SHIP-/- mice at a lower dose than uncaged DEX because it is released and acts at the site of inflammation.
To assess this hypothesis we propose 3 aims:
Measure decaging activity along the GI tract of SHIP-/- mice ex vivo
Determine the minimum effective dose of DEX required to reduce ileal inflammation in SHIP-/- mice
Determine if equimolar and lower concentrations of caged DEX can reduce ileal inflammation in SHIP-/- mice
Methods
Intestinal contents and feces were harvested from SHIP-/- mice. Decaging activity was measured ex vivo, using caged resorufin (a fluorescent reporter).
SHIP-/- mice were orally gavaged with dexamethasone (or vehicle), or the molar equivalent of caged dexamethasone from 6–8 weeks of age. At 8 weeks of age, gross and histopathology were assessed and IL-1β concentrations were measured in full-thickness tissue homogenates.
Results
SHIP-/- mice demonstrated decaging activity in the cecal, colon, and fecal contents assayed. DEX treatment (3 or 1 mg/kg) of SHIP-/- mice eliminated CD-like gross pathology and histopathology, and reduced IL-1β concentrations in full-thickness ileal tissue homogenates from SHIP-/- mice compared to untreated or vehicle-treated mice. DEX did not have any harmful effects on the intestines of SHIP+/+ mice. 1 or 0.3 mg/kg molar equivalent of caged DEX (3-fold lower concentrations) eliminated CD-like gross pathology in SHIP-/- mice compared to treatment with vehicle control. Additionally, the mean IL-1β concentration in tissue homogenates of mice treated with the molar equivalent of 1 mg/kg caged DEX was reduced
Conclusions
SHIP-/- mice express decaging activity are effectively treated by DEX, and caged DEX shows similar efficacy at reducing SHIP-/- ileal pathology at lower concentrations than uncaged DEX. In future experiments, we will examine caged DEX at a lower concentration, and in 2nd mouse model of intestinal inflammation.
Funding Agencies
GlycoNet
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2 The University of British Columbia Michael Smith Laboratories, Vancouver, BC, Canada