It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Streptococcus pneumoniae is the main aetiological agent in bacterial pneumonia. Therefore pneumococcal PCR is often included in respiratory multiplex PCR panels, both commercial and in-house. But respiratory PCR results for S. pneumoniae are difficult to interpret due to frequent non-pathogenic colonization on the mucosal surface of the upper airways with pneumococci or to cross-reaction of the PCR target in non-pneumococcal streptococci. In this study we investigated the value of lytA gene pneumococcal PCR in patients presenting with pneumonia.
Objectives
To assess the utility of lytA gene detection for S. pneumoniae in a respiratory multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) panel for patients presenting with pneumonia.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted for lytA gene results as target for S. pneumoniae in hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia and for which a respiratory multiplex PCR panel was performed. Patients were classified as ‘probable’, ‘possible’ or ‘unlikely’ of having a pneumococcal pneumonia.
Results
A sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 89.6% were found, corresponding to a negative predictive value and positive predictive value of 97.6% and 34.2%, respectively, when considering ‘probable’ versus ‘possible/unlikely’. In the PCR-positive cases we found a statistically significant difference in semi-quantitative Ct values between the ‘probable’ and the ‘possible/unlikely’ groups.
Conclusions
We conclude that a negative qPCR for the lytA gene in a respiratory sample is highly predictive of a negative S. pneumoniae culture and is possibly sufficient to exclude S. pneumoniae as a causative agent. Respiratory pneumococcal PCR has a high negative predictive value for pneumococcal disease but the positive predictive value is low.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium
2 Medical Microbiology Laboratory, GZA Hospitals Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium