It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Environmental stress imposes negative impacts on the growth and development of the crop plants. The present study was designed to assess the effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia gladioli) on plant pigments and phenolic compounds in 10-day-old root-knot nematode (RKN)-infected Lycopersicon esculentum seedlings. The levels of different osmoprotectants and organic acids were also evaluated in nematode-infected L. esculentum seedlings. Our results revealed that nematode-infected seedlings had reduced levels of plant pigments (chlorophyll (70.5 %), carotenoids (64.8 %) and xanthophylls (34.3 %)) and enhanced levels of phenolic compounds (total phenols (40.3 %), flavonoids (80.9 %), anthocyanins (28.9 %) and polyphenols (366.1 %)), osmoprotectants (total osmolytes (15.3 %), total carbohydrates (54.9 %), reducing sugars (45.3 %), trehalose (94.5 %), glycine betaine (59.01 %) and proline (69.6 %)) and (citric acid (28.4 %), fumaric acid (18.16 %), succinic acid (179.9 %) and malic acid (21.7 %)). The levels of these metabolites increased after inoculation with P. aeruginosa and B. gladioli. The expression of genes encoding different enzymes pertaining to phenols and organic acid metabolism was also studied. The expression of genes was elevated in nematode-infected plants, i.e. CHS (chalcone synthase) by 1.32-folds, PAL (phenylalanine ammonia lyase) by 1.16-folds, CS (citrate synthase) by 1.6-folds, SUCLG1 (succinyl-CoA ligase) by 1.19-folds, SDH (succinate dehydrogenase) by 1.92-folds, FH (fumarate hydratase) by 2.4-folds and malate synthase (MS) by 1.26-folds and further upregulated after PGPR inoculation. This study demonstrates the importance of PGPR in managing nematode infection in plants through alteration in the synthesis of different secondary metabolites in plants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India
2 Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR-IIIM), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Jammu and Kashmir, India
3 Department of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4 Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India
5 Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
6 Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Botany, S.P. College Srinagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India