It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) remains a global health issue, affecting mainly children and adolescent and pregnant women. Because of problems associated with current iron compounds used in both supplementation and fortification areas, there is an emerging interest in new natural iron sources to combat IDA.
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare the iron absorption of iron-enriched Aspergillus oryzae [Aspiron (ASP)] with FeSO4 in humans.
Methods
Iron absorption was assessed using stable isotope and serum iron response methods after oral intake of iron by healthy women in 2 separate studies. In the first study, ASP was intrinsically labelled with 58Fe into a dry form containing 8% iron. Subjects (n = 16, 18–35 y) were randomly assigned to consume liquid semipurified meals labelled with 2 stable iron isotopes, 57FeSO4 (10 mg) and ASP containing 2 mg 58Fe and 8 mg natural abundance iron, in 2 visits. Isotope enrichment was measured 2 wk after the last meal was eaten. In the second study, 17 subjects were randomly assigned to consume a test meal with 3 iron supplements during 3 separate visits: FeSO4, 10 mg Fe, and ASP in 2 iron doses, 10 mg and 20 mg. Changes in serum iron were measured at regular intervals for 4 h after supplementation.
Results
The first study showed that the difference in iron absorption from FeSO4 and ASP was not significant (17.18% ± 14.2% compared to 15.14% ± 12.3%; P = 0.07). The results of the second study suggested that the iron from ASP was released slowly compared to FeSO4 and the area under the curve did not reflect the absorption of ASP iron, but rather the rate of iron release.
Conclusions
Iron-enriched A. oryzae has high relative bioavailability and may cause lower iron surges into the blood compared to FeSO4.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Food Sciences and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA;
2 Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY