It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Relapsing and recurrent peritonitis episodes are major causes of technique failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). We examined the efficacy of extended antibiotic therapy for the prevention of relapsing and recurrent peritonitis.
Methods
From February 2016 to November 2018 we recruited 254 PD patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for PD peritonitis. They were randomized to a standard group, with the duration of intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotic treatment following the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guideline according to the causative microorganisms, and an extended group, with 1 extra week of IP antibiotics. The primary endpoint was relapsing, recurrent or repeat peritonitis episodes within 6 months.
Results
The primary endpoint developed in 36 and 29 patients of the extended and standard groups, respectively (28.3% versus 22.8%; P = 0.34). The rate of complete cure, without relapsing, recurrent or repeat peritonitis within 6 months, was 63.8 and 69.3% for the extended and standard groups, respectively (P = 0.35). Repeat peritonitis episodes were more common in the extended than the standard group (15.0% versus 5.5%; P = 0.013).
Conclusions
In patients with PD-related peritonitis, extending the antibiotic therapy for 1 extra week beyond the ISPD protocol should not be recommended. Extending the treatment does not reduce the risk of relapsing or recurrent peritonitis episodes but rather is associated with a higher risk of repeat peritonitis episodes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Medicine, Carol & Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, China; Department of Therapeutics, Carol & Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, China; Faculty of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
2 Department of Medicine, Carol & Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, China; Department of Therapeutics, Carol & Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, China