It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Behavioral and environmental factors influence sleep outcomes. However, we understand little about how enviro-behavioral sleep hygiene practices and related sleep concerns vary across age cohorts. Using data from My Sleep Script, an app-based diagnostic checklist for identifying at risk patients, we described cohort differences in sleep hygiene and new sleep disturbances. 323 adults (46.6% female, 63.9% Caucasian) reported basic demographic, health, sleep, as well as enviro-behavioral data using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the Johns Hopkins Sleep Environment Instrument. We partitioned participants into four cohorts corresponding to birth year: The Silent Generation (N = 48, 14.9%), Baby Boomers (N = 124, 38.4%), Generation Xers (n = 109, 33.7%), and Millennials (N = 42, 13.0%). Spearman correlations described linkages among environment, behaviors, and sleep outcomes; a chi-square analysis, cohort differences in new sleep concerns. Having weapons, music players, lights, pets, and a disruptive sleep surface in the environment correlated with worse sleep quality. Eating, exercising, working, and sexual activity one hour before bed also correlated with worse sleep quality. Sleeping with pets, electronics, and on a disruptive surface correlated with lower sleep duration. Regarding cohort, we observed significant generational differences in new snoring and sleepiness complaints. Results confirm associations of suboptimal sleep hygiene with poor sleep outcomes and provide insights into their generational differences, warranting additional investigation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
2 Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
3 Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins Sleep Disorders Center, Maryland, United States
4 Penn State College of Health & Human Development, Assistant Professor, Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State, Pennsylvania, United States
5 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Director of The Center of mHealth and Innovations, United States