It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
In Nigeria, the prescription of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical site infection tends to be driven by local policy rather than by published guidelines (e.g. WHO and Sanford).
Objectives
To triangulate three datasets and understand key barriers to implementation using a behavioural science framework.
Methods
Surgeons (N = 94) from three teaching hospitals in Nigeria participated in an online survey and in focus group discussions about barriers to implementation. The theoretical domains framework (TDF) was used to structure question items and interview schedules. A subgroup (N = 20) piloted a gamified decision support app over the course of 6 months and reported barriers at the point of care.
Results
Knowledge of guidelines and intention to implement them in practice was high. Key barriers to implementation were related to environmental context and resources and concern over potential consequences of implementing recommendations within the Nigerian context applicable for similar settings in low-to-middle-income countries.
Conclusions
The environmental context and limited resource setting of Nigerian hospitals currently presents a significant barrier to implementation of WHO and Sanford guidelines. Research and data collected from the local context must directly inform the writing of future international guidelines to increase rates of implementation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 UCL IRDR Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, University College London, London, UK
2 Department of Sociology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
3 Department of Medical Microbiology, Lagos State University College of Medicine/Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
4 Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
5 Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
6 Paediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
7 Department of Ophthalmology, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
8 Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Pharmacy, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
9 Department of Pharmacy, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
10 Department of Surgery, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
11 Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
12 School of Software and Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
13 Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
14 UCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK