It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Disclosure: K.S. Wei: None. A. Joyo: None. A.N. Lim: None. T.E. Angell: None.
Introduction: Myxedema coma (MC) is a rare condition of severe hypothyroidism with high mortality. Diagnostic scoring systems exist, such as criteria by Popoveniuc et al. (2014) and Chiong et al. (2015), which both include categories of: “highly likely MC” (hlMC), “suggestive of MC” (sMC), and “unlikely MC” (uMC). Because few data support their clinical utility, we performed an analysis comparing these diagnostic criteria and associations with mortality and hospital measures. Methods: Patients with MC were included from a retrospective cohort of hospitalized adult patients with TSH greater than or equal to 10 mIU/L and free thyroxine (fT4) below the lower reference limit. Initial clinical diagnosis of MC was generally based on: hypothyroidism, precipitating illness, hypothermia, and altered mentation. Data collection included patient characteristics, mortality, ICU admission, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients were post-hoc categorized based on criteria of Popoveniuc and Chiong. Results: Of 386 initial patients, 25 patients had a clinical diagnosis of MC (median age = 60.1 years [IQR: 53.6-70.0]; 10/25 [40%] female). Median TSH was 58 mIU/L (IQR: 33.8-93.3) and median fT4 was 0.48 ng/dL (IQR: 0.16-0.68). All patients received IV levothyroxine and supportive care. Using Popoveniuc, 20/25 (80%) patients were hlMC and 5/25 (20%) were sMC. In contrast, using Chiong, 11/25 (44%) were hlMC, while 14/25 (56%) were sMC. No patient was considered uMC by either system. 10/25 (40%) patients were hlMC in both systems. 10/25 (40%) were hlMC in Popoveniuc but not Chiong, while only 1/25 (4%) was hlMC in Chiong but not Popoveniuc. Finally, 4/25 (16%) were not hlMC in either system. Mortality occurred in 3/25 (12%) patients, 2 of which were hlMC in Popoveniuc but not Chiong. There was a trend toward longer median hospital LOS in patients identified as hlMC vs not hlMC using Popoveniuc (11 days [IQR: 5.3-37.0] vs. 3.0 days [IQR: 2.0-17.5], p=0.07) but no statistically significant differences in hospital LOS were noted. There were no significant differences in ICU admission or LOS. Conclusion: Existing diagnostic scoring criteria of MC identified most patients but differed in their categorizations. Some cases of clinically diagnosed MC were not identified as hlMC by either scoring criteria. Criteria by Popoveniuc et al. appears to better capture patients most at risk for mortality and prolonged hospitalization.
Presentation: 6/2/2024
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Los Angeles General Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA
2 Keck Medicine of USC , Los Angeles, CA