It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Accelerated aging, as measured by epigenetic clocks, is associated with declines in immune system functioning. Investigating the causal basis of this association may provide mechanistic insight into the link between DNA methylation, on which epigenetic clocks are based, and age-related changes in immune cell composition. Using preliminary data from the Louisville Twin Study, this study examined the genetic and environmental sources of covariation between immune cell count (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and GrimAge Acceleration. GrimAge is a composite biomarker derived from 7 DNA methylation-based surrogates associated with mortality and smoking pack years. GrimAge Acceleration is the residual of GrimAge regressed onto chronological age. Participants consisted of 43 monozygotic twin pairs and 30 (18 same-sex) dizygotic twin pairs with a mean age of 54.5 years (sd = 5.27). Phenotypic analyses revealed that GrimAge Acceleration was significantly associated with neutrophil and lymphocyte count (r = 0.45 and -0.49, respectively). To examine the sources of covariation between these variables, biometric regression models were used to decompose the covariance between GrimAge Acceleration and neutrophils (and lymphocytes) into genetic and environmental components. Bivariate analyses revealed moderate, marginally significant genetic correlations between GrimAge Acceleration and immune cell count (rg = 0.32 and -0.38 for neutrophils and lymphocytes, respectively) and large, significant nonshared environmental correlations (re = .58 and -.54 for neutrophils and lymphocytes, respectively). Common genetic factors accounted for 39% of the phenotypic correlation in neutrophils and 43% in lymphocytes, whereas common nonshared environmental factors accounted for 61% and 57% of the correlation in these cell types, respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California , United States
2 University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , United States
3 University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia , United States
4 Norton Children’s Research Institute , Louisville, Kentucky , United States
5 University of Louisville School of Medicine , Louisville, Kentucky , United States
6 Norton Healthcare , Louisville, Kentucky , United States