It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Over 404.6 million people are affected worldwide each year by urinary tract infections (UTIs), with ∼237 000 associated deaths globally in 2019. Much more common in women than men, acute UTI occurs in up to 50% of the female population. Despite this, there is a lack of good diagnostic tools for use at the point-of-care, and over- and under-diagnosis are common, leading to long-term complications and patient suffering, and driving the spread of antimicrobial resistance through insufficient appropriate antibiotic stewardship.
Objectives
To evaluate the performance of a novel point-of-care testing platform, Lodestar DX, in comparison with standard laboratory processing of urine specimens.
Methods
A total of 199 fresh urine samples from symptomatic adult females suspected of having an acute UTI were tested using Lodestar DX and the results compared with standard laboratory methods performed at a local microbiology laboratory.
Results
Using standard laboratory methods, 129/199 samples produced a result and could be compared. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Lodestar DX were 88.1% (95% CI: 77.8%–94.7%) and 83.9% (95% CI: 72.3%–92.0%), respectively (n = 129), with a positive predictive value of 85.5% (95% CI: 76.9%–91.3%), a negative predictive value of 86.7% (95% CI: 77.1%–92.6%) and an overall accuracy of 86.1% (95% CI: 78.9%–91.5%).
Conclusions
The results show good correlation between Lodestar DX results and those of the standard laboratory method for this patient group. However, the platform would benefit from further testing to establish its true point-of-care compatibility and a direct comparison between this and other testing methods, such as urine dipstick testing.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park , Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
2 Llusern Scientific Limited, Cardiff Edge Business Park , Longwood Drive, Cardiff CF14 7YU, Wales
3 University of South Wales, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science , Pontypridd CF37 1DL, Wales