It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Illumina DNA methylation arrays are a widely used tool for performing genome-wide DNA methylation analyses. However, measurements obtained from these arrays may be affected by technical artefacts that result in spurious associations if left unchecked. Cross-reactivity represents one of the major challenges, meaning that probes may map to multiple regions in the genome. Although several studies have reported on this issue, few studies have empirically examined the impact of cross-reactivity in an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS). In this paper, we report on cross-reactivity issues that we discovered in a large EWAS on the presence of the C9orf72 repeat expansion in ALS patients. Specifically, we found that that the majority of the significant probes inadvertently cross-hybridized to the C9orf72 locus. Importantly, these probes were not flagged as cross-reactive in previous studies, leading to novel insights into the extent to which cross-reactivity can impact EWAS. Our findings are particularly relevant for epigenetic studies into diseases associated with repeat expansions and other types of structural variation. More generally however, considering that most spurious associations were not excluded based on pre-defined sets of cross-reactive probes, we believe that the presented data-driven flag and consider approach is relevant for any type of EWAS.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Department of Neurology , UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands
2 University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter , Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
3 Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience , King’s College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London SE5 9RS, UK
4 Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast , 90 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 6AG, Northern Ireland, UK
5 Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2HQ, UK
6 Complex Trait Genomics Laboratory, Smurfit Institute of Genetics , Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 DK07, Republic of Ireland
7 Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin , Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Dublin D02 PN40, Republic of Ireland