1. Introduction
Dementia refers to cognitive impairments typical for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD is characterized by neurodegeneration due to neuronal cell death, starting in the entorhinal cortex of the hippocampus, primarily affecting individuals aged 65 and older [1]. However, it can also affect about 5% of those under 65, termed early-onset Alzheimer’s disease [2,3]. AD affects approximately 50 million people worldwide, and this number is expected to triple by 2050, highlighting its significance as a global health issue. The hallmark features of AD include neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques, which disrupt cholinergic neurons, leading to cognitive decline (Figure 1). Early symptoms include memory problems, sleep issues, and mood disorders, progressing to difficulties in walking and communicating in later stages [4].
The main pathological features include amyloid beta (Aβ) accumulation, tau pathology, and cholinergic dysfunction [4,5]. In AD, cholinergic dysfunction is exacerbated by the altered activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), enzymes that regulate ACh levels. AChE, responsible for the breakdown of ACh, is typically elevated in AD patients, especially in the cortex and hippocampus, contributing to cognitive impairment. BuChE, although less prominent in healthy brains, increases in AD, particularly in regions affected by amyloid pathology, potentially compensating for the loss of cholinergic neurons [6,7].
Although there is no cure for AD, treatments exist that may slow disease progression or alleviate symptoms. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications fall into two categories: those that slow clinical decline and those that relieve symptoms. Some medications, such as aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody approved in 2021, target amyloid plaques to slow cognitive decline. Lecanemab, another monoclonal antibody, was fast-tracked for FDA approval in 2023 for use in mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. These drugs show promise, but their long-term safety and efficacy are still under evaluation [8,9].
Several drugs focus on symptom management such as cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs): rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine, and tacrine work by increasing ACh levels, improving cognition and memory, though they do not alter the disease’s progression. Donepezil is widely used, while rivastigmine also inhibits BuChE, and galantamine modulates nicotinic receptors [8,9]. Moreover, the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) antagonist (glutamate inhibitor) memantine regulates glutamate (Glu), preventing neuronal damage from excitotoxicity. It is used for moderate-to-severe AD and can be combined with ChEIs to improve cognitive function [8,9,10].
Current treatments for AD, including cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, offer limited symptom relief, especially in the early to moderate stages, but do not halt disease progression or address the underlying neurodegeneration. Newer therapies like aducanumab and lecanemab, which target amyloid plaques, may provide benefits in the later stages of the disease. However, these treatments are associated with side effects, ranging from mild symptoms such as nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, muscle cramps, and fatigue to more serious risks like dizziness, headache, hallucinations, heart issues, and brain swelling, particularly with the newer medications [8,9,10]. These challenges underscore the urgent need for novel therapeutic interventions and the development of treatments with fewer side effects to enhance patient outcomes.
Medicinal plants have been utilized for centuries in traditional medicine for their therapeutic properties. These plants are a source of bioactive compounds with potential pharmacological benefits, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects [11,12]. Phytochemicals like alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids have demonstrated potential in addressing neurodegenerative diseases (NNDs), including AD, by combating oxidative stress, minimizing inflammation, and protecting neurons [13,14]. Herbal medicines have been explored for their ability to regulate neurotransmitter imbalances, especially acetylcholine, and may serve as potential candidates for AD treatment [15,16,17].
The diversity of plant compounds makes them valuable sources for developing new treatments for AD, offering a holistic approach with fewer side effects compared to synthetic drugs [15,18]. For example, galantamine and rivastigmine (ChEIs), two FDA-approved drugs for AD, are derived from natural sources, highlighting the importance of traditional medicine in modern therapeutic strategies [18,19,20]. Moreover, many plant extracts showed multitarget effects in AD treatment by addressing amyloid plaques, tau aggregation, oxidative stress, inflammation, cholinergic dysfunction, and excitotoxicity, while generally demonstrating safety and low toxicity or no toxicity in studies [18,21,22].
A systematic review was essential to critically assess and synthesize the available evidence on the cholinesterase-inhibiting properties of various plant species, their extracts, and isolated compounds. The review aimed to aggregate current findings, providing a detailed summary of plants with ChEI properties. It also highlighted specific plant species and compounds demonstrating significant cholinesterase inhibition, identifying them as promising candidates for further investigation as potential therapies for AD. Additionally, the review offered insights and recommendations to guide future research, including candidates for clinical trials and deeper exploration of their mechanisms of action, contributing to the development of novel plant-based therapeutic strategies for AD treatment.
2. Materials and Methods
This study was performed according to the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (Table S1) [23,24]. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42025585536.
2.1. Search Scheme
An electronic literature search was performed from 29 August to 1 September 2024 on Medline (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and Scopus. The aim was to identify research studies that assess the impact of plant species on cholinesterase enzyme activity. Controlled search vocabularies (MeSH) were used and involved a combination of the following: (a) (in vitro OR neurons) AND (in vivo OR animals), (b) (Plant OR plant products OR Plant extracts OR herb), and (c) (cholinesterase inhibitors OR anti-cholinesterase OR ChEIs OR acetylcholinesterase inhibitors OR anti-acetylcholinesterase OR AChE inhibitor OR anti-AChE OR AChEIs OR butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors OR anti-butyrylcholinesterase OR BChE inhibitor OR anti-BChE OR BChEIs).
2.2. Data Extraction Collection and Synthesis
Three independent reviewers (E.A., F.A. and G.A.) participated in data extraction, while the fourth reviewer (M.N.A) assisted in resolving any discrepancies. Relevant data were collected from qualifying publications and organized into tables categorized by study type: in vitro studies involving human or animal neurons, and in vivo animal models. Additionally, the following information was gathered from the relevant studies: authors, publication year, whether the study was conducted in vitro or in vivo, type of enzyme, cell or animal species, scientific name of the plant, type of extracts used, dosage or concentration of the extracts, duration of treatment, route of administration (for in vivo studies), study procedures, overall outcomes, and conclusions. Each eligible study’s data were then qualitatively synthesized in the main text.
A total of (1571) search results were imported into EndNote® 21 and Rayyan® 1.4. 3 softwares for further screening and duplication removal. Subsequently, a manual examination of the title and abstract screening was conducted to identify relevant studies based on the predetermined inclusion criteria. Three independent researchers (M.N.A., E.A., and F.A.) selected studies based on the eligibility criteria for this systematic review.
The review question was the following: Can plants and their components inhibit cholinesterase activity in neurons?
Population (P): in vitro neurons (human or animal), and in vivo animal models of Alzheimer’s.
Intervention (I): Plants and their components.
Comparison (C): Cholinesterase activity in controls (models of Alzheimer’s).
Outcomes (O): Inhibit cholinesterase activity.
2.3. Inclusion Criteria
The analysis included all original in vitro studies, encompassing research that utilized established cell lines (e.g., neuronal cell lines) to assess the effects of plant extracts or isolated compounds on cholinesterase (ChE) activity, specifically within the context of Alzheimer’s disease.
Similarly, all in vivo studies involving vertebrate animal models treated with various intervention compounds to induce over-activation of cholinesterase enzymes, as well as Alzheimer’s disease models characterized by impaired cholinergic neurotransmission, were included. These studies must examine the direct effects of plant extracts on cholinesterase enzymes, specifically AChE and/or BChE.
There were no restrictions on the duration, route of administration, or dosage of the plant extracts.
2.4. Exclusion Criteria
Studies that assessed plant products influencing enzymes other than ChE were excluded, as were those conducted on isolated AChE and/or BChE enzymes, or in humans, in silico studies, or those employing computer simulations, computational methods, or molecular docking. Additionally, studies involving non-vertebrate animal models or models not related to Alzheimer’s disease were excluded. Studies measuring ChE activity in vivo, but not in the brain (neurons)—such as those analyzing plasma or erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase—were also excluded if they reported no effect on ChE or an increase in its activity. Furthermore, reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, editorials, conference abstracts, and studies lacking control groups were not considered.
3. Results
A total of 1571 articles were identified through the primary database search. After removing duplicates, 370 papers were excluded based on title and abstract screening, leaving 712 articles for full-text evaluation. Of these, 648 did not meet the predefined eligibility criteria and were excluded for the following reasons: in silico studies using computer simulation or molecular docking (n = 15), studies using plants to inhibit other pathological mechanisms (n = 223), editorials (n = 1), studies using non-vertebrate animals or models unrelated to Alzheimer’s disease (n = 82), conference abstracts (n = 3), non-English articles (n = 2), studies not involving plants and using other synthetic compounds (n = 89), studies showing no effect or an increase in ChE activity (n = 10), studies measuring ChE activity in plasma or erythrocytes (n = 4), and studies involving isolated enzymes (n = 219). As a result, 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. A flow chart, following the PRISMA protocol, was created to illustrate the study selection process (Figure 2).
All of the studies utilized in vivo animal models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with various compounds employed to induce the condition. These included scopolamine hydrobromide (SCO) (n = 39), aluminum chloride (AlCl3) (n = 9), streptozotocin (STZ) (n = 4), amyloid beta (Aβ) (n = 6), trimethyltin (TMT) (n = 2), transgenic dementia models (n = 2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (n = 1), and 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NPA) (n = 1) (Table 1). Moreover, the results of this systematic review indicated that various animal species were used in the included studies, including the following: Swiss albino mice (n = 14), Balb/C albino mice (n = 3), C57BL/6J mice (n = 3), C57BL/6N mice (n = 3), ICR mice (n = 6), Kunming mice (n = 2), double transgenic mice (n = 2), mice (n = 4), zebrafish (n = 1), albino Wistar rats (n = 16), and albino Sprague Dawley rats (n = 12).
3.1. Neuroprotective Effects of Plant Extracts in Mitigating Scopolamine (SCO)-Induced Memory Impairment Through AChE Inhibition
Several studies have demonstrated the potential of various plant extracts in mitigating SCO-induced memory impairment by inhibiting AChE activity. For instance, the administration of ethyl acetate extract of Ferula ammoniacum and hydro-methanolic extract of Elaeagnus umbellata significantly reduced AChE and BChE activity in the cortex and hippocampus, enhancing memory performance [25,26].
Similarly, oral administration (o.p.) of Salicornia europaea ethanol extract (SE-EE), which contains Acanthoside B (Aca.B), at doses of 10–20 mg/kg significantly decreased AChE levels in both the hippocampus and cortical regions compared to the scopolamine-treated group (p < 0.05) [27]. Other plant extracts such as Drynaria quercifolia, administered intraperitoneally, significantly inhibited AChE activity in scopolamine-induced memory-impaired mice in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.0001) [28]. In addition, the administration of Vernonia amygdalina alkaloid-rich extract (BLAE) at doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg showed a protective effect by reducing AChE and BChE activity, which were elevated by scopolamine [29].
Extracts from Amygdalus spinosissima roots, Peganum harmala, Trianthema portulastrum, Centella asiatica, and other plants, including Citrus reticulata and Cudrania tricuspidata, have also shown promising results in reducing AChE activity and improving cognitive function in SCO-treated mice [30,31,32,33,34,35]. Moreover, Sapindus laurifolia and walnut oil significantly reduced oxidative stress and AChE levels (p < 0.001) [36,37].
Furthermore, Bacopa monnieri and Olax subscorpioidea have demonstrated significant inhibition of AChE activity and oxidative stress alongside improvements in memory and neuronal integrity [38,39]. Other studies on plant extracts like Nepeta nuda, Indigofera sessiliflora, Dendropanax morbifera, Pinus densiflora, Dichrocephala integrifolia, Alnus rugosa, Salvia moorcroftiana, and Sanguisorba minor have similarly reported reduced AChE activity and enhanced cognitive function in SCO-induced memory impairment models [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
The ethanolic extract of Stachys sieboldii (250 and 500 mg/kg) improved memory, reduced AChE activity, increased acetylcholine (ACh) and antioxidant enzyme catalase (CAT) levels, and enhanced neuroplasticity in rats and mice, suggesting neuroprotective effects [48].
Further investigations into extracts from Ocimum basilicum, Lavandula stoechas, Schisandra chinensis, and Ginkgo biloba have highlighted their neuroprotective effects, with significant reductions in AChE activity (p < 0.001) and improvements in memory and oxidative stress markers [49,50,51,52,53].
Studies on the methanolic extracts of Bergenia ciliata, Cnestis ferruginea, and Emblica officinalis also reported significant reductions in AChE activity and improvements in cognitive functions [54,55,56]. Moreover, chlorogenic acid extract demonstrated neuroprotective effects by reducing AChE activity, oxidative stress, and memory impairment, while wild ginseng also improved learning and reduced cholinergic loss and AChE activity in the hippocampus [57,58]. Other notable plant extracts, such as Gelsemium sempervirens, Diospyros lotus, and Lavandula angustifolia, have demonstrated improved cognitive performance and significant reductions in AChE activity, further supporting their potential neuroprotective benefits [59,60,61]. Finally, Nine-Herb Decoction, containing various plant extracts, and Prunella vulgaris aqueous extract have also exhibited protective effects against SCO-induced memory impairments by inhibiting AChE activity [62,63]. These findings emphasized the potential of natural plant extracts in treating memory impairment and cholinergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), including Alzheimer’s, by inhibiting cholinesterase activity.
3.2. Cholinesterase Inhibition by Plant Extracts in Aluminum Chloride (AlCl3)-Induced Alzheimer’s Models
Treatment with various plant extracts has demonstrated potential neuroprotective effects against AlCl3-induced neurotoxicity. For instance, oral administration of three Canna indica extracts (derived from aerial parts, roots, and a combination of both) at 200 mg/kg significantly reduced AChE levels in the cortex and hippocampus (p < 0.001) and BChE levels in the cortex (p < 0.0001) [64]. Similarly, Echinacea purpurea extracts (250 mg/kg, aqueous and alcoholic) improved cognitive behavior, reduced oxidative stress, lowered amyloid plaque density, and inhibit AChE in rats, suggesting its neuroprotective properties [65]. Asiatic acid (AA) from Centella asiatica (75 mg/kg) enhanced antioxidant activity and reduced AChE activity, oxidative stress, and brain damage, especially in the cortex and hippocampus of AlCl3-exposed rats (p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01, respectively) [66].
Moreover, genistein and chickpea ethanol extracts (10 mg/kg) mitigated AlCl3-induced neurotoxicity by reducing AChE activity, inflammation, and oxidative stress [67]. Opuntia ficusindica extracts (100 mg/kg) improved learning and memory, reduced AChE activity, and restored neurotransmitter levels in Sprague Dawley rats [68]. Orange peel extract (100–200 mg/kg) also significantly decreased AChE activity and mRNA expression and protected brain tissue by decreasing oxidative stress in AlCl3-treated rats [69]. Malva neglecta methanolic extract (200–600 mg/kg) and Tecoma stans extract (200–400 mg/kg) both improved cognition, reduced AChE activity, and alleviated oxidative stress in AlCl3-treated mice [70,71]. Additionally, intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of crude ethyl alcohol extract of Mentha longifolia at a dose of 400 mg/kg significantly inhibited the AChE increase caused by AlCl3 exposure (50.42% compared to the vehicle group), with a 36.60% inhibition observed when the extract was administered to the animals [72].
3.3. Cholinesterase-Inhibitory Properties of Plant Extracts in Streptozotocin (STZ)-Induced Alzheimer’s Disease Models
The results from this systematic review found that four different plant extracts have demonstrated cognitive-enhancing and ChE-inhibiting properties in AD models. Evolvulus alsinoides, studied at doses of 100–500 mg/kg, showed antioxidant, cholinergic (AChE, and BChE), and rho kinase inhibitory effects, leading to dose-dependent cognitive improvement and reduced oxidative stress in STZ -treated rats [73]. Clitoria ternatea extract (100–500 mg/kg) significantly decreased AChE and BuChE activities in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of STZ-exposed rats [74]. The hydromethanol extract (HME) of Allium cepa, administered at doses of 42, 84, and 168 mg/kg, reversed the increased AChE activity in STZ-treated mice, effectively restoring cognitive function [75]. Similarly, Bergenia ciliata methanolic extract (125–500 mg/kg) normalized AChE and BuChE activities in STZ-treated rats, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic agent for AD [76].
3.4. Neuroprotective Effects of Plant Extracts and Essential Oils in Amyloid Beta (Aβ)-Induced Alzheimer’s Disease Models
Various plant extracts and essential oils have demonstrated neuroprotective effects against Alzheimer’s-like symptoms by modulating AChE activity and enhancing cognitive function. Chamaecyparis obtusa essential oil (1 mL/cage via inhalation) in rats exhibited cognitive improvement, decreased AChE activity, and prevented neuronal apoptosis after Aβ-induced damage [77]. Bacopa monnieri extract (40–80 mg/kg) reduced Alzheimer’s-like symptoms in Aβ42-injected rats by improving cognitive function, preserving hippocampal neurons, modulating the GSK-3β/Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and significantly decreasing AChE activity at 80 mg/kg [78]. Pinus densiflora extract (15–30 mg/kg) improved cognitive function and reduced AChE activity, while increasing antioxidant levels, reducing neuroinflammation, and enhancing mitochondrial activity in Aβ-treated ICR mice [79]. Cistanche tubulosa aqueous extract (100–200 mg/kg) improved cognitive function, reduced amyloid deposition, and reversed cholinergic and dopaminergic dysfunction, with the 200 mg/kg dose significantly decreasing cortical AChE activity in Aβ-infused rats [80]. Blueberry leaf extract (ethyl acetate fraction, 5–20 mg/kg) alleviated Aβ-induced memory impairment by inhibiting AChE activity and oxidative stress in Aβ-treated mice [81]. Additionally, essential oils from Pistacia khinjuk leaves (PKEO) and Allium sativum cloves (ASEO) showed strong AChE and BChE inhibitory effects in rats, suggesting their potential as treatments for Alzheimer’s [82].
3.5. Neuroprotective Effects of Poncirus Trifoliata and Black Soybean Extracts in Trimethyltin (TMT)-Induced Memory Impairment Models
In TMT-induced memory impairment models, Poncirus trifoliata extract (400–1200 mg/kg) improved learning and memory and reduced AChE activity, highlighting its potential for NDDs [83]. Similarly, black soybean nonanthocyanin extracts (5–20 mg/kg) enhanced learning and memory, reduced oxidative stress, and inhibited AChE activity, with the 20 mg/kg dose showing significant AChE reduction in TMT-treated mice [84].
3.6. Neuroprotective Effects of β-Sitosterol and Valeriana Officinalis Extracts in Transgenic Alzheimer’s Disease Models
In a double-transgenic Alzheimer’s model, β-sitosterol (10 mg/kg) from Polygonum hydropiper enhanced memory and motor coordination and reduced AChE and BChE activity, indicating its neuroprotective potential [85]. Valeriana officinalis extracts, particularly volvalerenic acid K, inhibited AChE activity in a dose-dependent manner and improved learning and memory in APPswe/PS1E9 double-transgenic mice [86].
3.7. Neuroprotective Effects in Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and 3-Nitropropionic Acid (3-NPA)-Treated Models
In H2O2-treated rats, oral administration of hydrophobic fractions from Thymus algeriensis (180 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced elevated ROS and AChE levels, alleviating neuronal degeneration and restoring AChE activity to near control levels (p < 0.05) [87]. In the 3-NPA-treated model, oral administration of Pedalium murex Linn leaf extract (200–400 mg/kg) improved memory, learning, and motor coordination, increased antioxidant enzymes, and decreased AChE levels in rats with Alzheimer’s-like symptoms [88].
Table 1The table presents the plants and plant extracts that exhibited cholinesterase-inhibitory effects.
Reference | Study Type and Animal Species | Type of Enzyme (AChE/BChE) | Scientific Name of the Plant | Dosage of the Extracts | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adeniyi et al. (2024) [39] | In vivo | AChE | Olax subscoprioidea Oliv. (Olacaceae) leaves | 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | MEOS pre-treatment significantly decreased AChE activity when compared to SCO-treated group (p < 0.05). |
Akbaba et al. (2021) [40] | In vivo | AChE | Nepeta nuda ssp. | 1% or 3%, 21 days of daily inhalation (15 min per day) | Inhalation of essential oil in SCO-treated rats demonstrated potential AChE inhibitory activity (p < 0.0005). |
Alam et al. (2023) [60] | In vivo | AChE | The roots of Diospyros lotus | 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg | A significant decrease in AChE enzyme activity was observed with diospyrin at 10 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 15 mg/kg (p < 0.01) in the frontal cortex, compared to the SCO group. |
Arora et al. | In vivo | AChE | Centella asiatica (CA) | 100 mg/kg, 15 days, p.o. | The increase in AChE activity in the cerebral cortex caused by SCO was also considerably inhibited by CAE (p < 0.01). |
Arora et al. (2021) [38] | In vivo | AChE | Bacopa monnieri (BM) | 100 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | The elevated AChE induced by SCO was also prevented with BME and BME-EF pre-treatment and differences found were significant at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively. |
Bandaru et al. (2020) [36] | In vivo | AChE | Sapindus laurifolia | MESL fraction A (catechin) 50 and 100 mg/kg, | Treated animals significantly showed a decrease in AChE levels (p < 0.001) compared to SCO-treated animals. |
Barai et al. (2018) [54] | In vivo | AChE | Bergenia ciliata (Haw) Sternb. | 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | A concentration-dependent decrease in AChE activity was observed, with the 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg doses effectively mitigating the spike in brain AChE activity, resulting in a significant reduction (p < 0.001) compared to the SCO-injected group. |
Brinza et al. (2021) [47] | In vivo | AChE | Alnus rugosa leaves | 1, 3, and 5 µg/L, 10 days, immersion in water for zebrafish | The 100 µM SCO-treated zebrafish that received baicalein 5,6-dimethyl ether showed a significant dose-depending decrease in AChE activity (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) compared to SCO-alone-treated fish. |
Das et al. (2002) [52] | In vivo | AChE | Ginkgo biloba | 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg daily, 7 days, postoperatively, daily as aqueous suspension | AChE-specific activity was significantly lowered in the detergent-soluble fraction (DS) of the 30 and 60 mg/kg G. biloba-treated dementia groups (p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference from the SCO-treated dementia group). |
Deng et al. | In vivo | AChE | Aerial parts of Peganum harmala Linn | 5, 15, and 45 mg/kg, 7 days, p.o. | DVAS treatment significantly reduced AChE and ache levels in hippocampus and cortex in mice treated with scopolamine, with varying doses affecting the brain’s function. |
Ferdous et al. | In vivo | AChE | Drynaria quercifolia | DCF (200, 100, and 50 mg/kg) and DEF (400, 200, and 100 mg/kg), 12–15 successive days, i.p. | Treatment with DCF and DEF resulted in a significant, dose-dependent reduction in AChE activity (p < 0.0001) in the brains of SCO-induced memory-impaired mice. |
Golechha et al. (2012) [55] | In vivo | AChE | Fruit of Emblica offcinalis | 150, 300, 450, 600 mg/kg, 7 days, i.p. | The EO extract at doses of 150 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 300 mg/kg, 450 mg/kg, and 600 mg/kg (p < 0.001) significantly and dose-dependently reduced the SCO-induced elevation of AChE levels in the mice brain. |
Haider et al. (2021) [41] | In vivo | AChE | The whole plant of Indigofera sessiliflora (IS.CR) | 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg, 48 days, p.o.. | Increased levels of AChE induced via SCO were prominently reduced in the brains of animals, with IS.CR at doses of 200 (p < 0.01) and 300 mg/ kg (p < 0.0001) as compared to the SCO-treated group. |
Hosseini et al. (2022) [46] | In vivo | AChE | Sanguisorba minor | 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, 21 days, i.p. | Animals treated with different doses of the extract (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, p < 0.001) exhibited a reduction in AChE activity in the hippocampus, compared to the SCO group. |
Ishola et al. (2013) [56] | In vivo | AChE | Cnestis ferruginea Vahl ex (CF) | CF (100 and 200 mg/kg/bw, p.o.) and CF-2 (12.5, 25 mg/kg/bw, p.o.), 3 days | The AChE activity was significantly decreased in CF-treated groups (100 and 200 mg/kg) when compared to the SCO group (p < 0.01). |
Jee et al. | In vivo | AChE | Cudrania tricuspidata | 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg/day, 28 days, p.o. | The SCO + 500 mg/kg/day CTFE group showed a decrease in AChE activity in hippocampal tissue compared to the SCO group. |
Karthivashan et al. | In vivo | AChE | Salicornia europaea | Aca.B 10–20 mg/kg, 7 days, p.o. | Aca.B-treated groups showed a significant decrease in AChE levels in both hippocampus and cortical regions compared to SCO-treated groups (p < 0.05). |
Kim et al. (2023) [42] | In vivo | AChE | The dried aerial parts of Dendropanax morbifera | 125, 250, and 375 mg/kg, 3 weeks, p.o. | Treatment with all DMLS concentrations significantly reduced AChE activity compared to the SCO-treated group (p < 0.01). |
Kouémou et al. (2017) [44] | In vivo | AChE | Dichrocephala integrifolia leaves | 35, 87.5, 175, and 350 mg/kg, 10 days, p.o. | The activity on AChE induced via SCO was significantly reduced by D. integrifolia at the dose of 87.5 mg/kg (p < 0.0001). |
Kwon et al. (2010) [57] | In vivo | AChE | Chlorogenic acid (CGA) | 3, 6, and 9 mg/kg, 7 days, p.o | CGA administration (3 or 6 mg/kg) significantly inhibited AChE activity in the hippocampus by 21.67% and 35.06% compared with the SCO-treated group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) but did not significantly inhibit AChE activity in the frontal cortex at these concentrations. |
Lee et al. (2015) [43] | In vivo | AChE | Pinus densiflora | 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, 7 days, p.o. | Pre-treatment with PNE completely inhibited the hyper-activation of AChE compared with the SCO-injection group (p < 0.001 for all groups (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg for PNE)). |
Lee et al. (2010) [58] | In vivo | AChE | Panax ginseng | Wild ginseng (WG): 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, 7 days, i.p. | AChE activity was reduced in the WG groups, indicating a potential improvement in the cholinergic system. |
Liao et al. (2020) [37] | In vivo | AChE | Walnut oil | 10 mL/kg, 8 weeks, p.o. | Walnut oil significantly inhibited the SCO-induced increase in AChE activity in brain tissue (p < 0.05 versus the SCOP-treated group). |
Mushtaq et al. (2021) [50] | In vivo | AChE | Lavandula stoechas L. (aerial parts) | 9 and 18 mg/kg, 7 days, p.o. | The AChE level was significantly reduced in comparison to SCO-treated animals, with the group treated with AfL.s (18 mg/kg, p.o.) showing the greatest inhibition of AChE among all groups (p < 0.001). |
Nazir et al. | In vivo | AChE | Aerial parts extract/fractions of Ferula ammoniacum | 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, 8 days, p.o. | In the Fa.etac + SCOP-treated groups, a significant decrease (p < 0.01, p < 0.001) in %AChE and %BChE activities was observed in the frontal cortex and hippocampus tissues, with levels lower than those in the SCO-treated group. |
Nazir et al. (2020) [26] | In vivo | AChE | Elaeagnus umbellata | Compound 1 (10 and 30mg/kg, 8 days, i.p.), | The results showed that the % AChE and BChE activity in the cortex and hippocampus tissues of the CGA- and CHF-treated groups were significantly lower (p < 0.001, p < 0.01) compared to the SCO-treated group. |
Oboh et al. | In vivo | AChE | Vernonia amygdalina | 100, 200 mg/kg, 7–14 days | AChE and BChE activity were elevated by SCO; however, these effects were mitigated by BLAE pre-treatment (p < 0.05). |
Palit et al. (2015) [59] | In vivo | AChE | Gelsemium sempervirens L. | 1 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | Gelsemium significantly reduced AChE activity in comparison to SCO-treated mice (p < 0.01). |
Pruthi et al. | In vivo | AChE | Citrus reticulata | ME (200 and 400 mg/kg) | By decreasing brain AChE activity, ME and EAF both enhanced the cognitive function that SCO caused in mice (p < 0.05 vs. SCO). |
Qu et al. | In vivo | AChE | Prunella vulgaris L. | 100 mg/kg, 3 days, p.o. | In rats with SCOP-induced brain dementia, oral administration of EtOAc-APV significantly inhibited the increase in AChE activity (p < 0.05). |
Ravichandran et al. (2018) [48] | In vivo | AChE | Stachys sieboldii (SS) | 250 and 500 mg/kg, 28 days, p.o. | The treatment with the extract significantly decreased the elevated levels of AChE induced via SCO to the control group by both concentrations in the hippocampus (p < 0.05). |
Sajjadi et al. | In vivo | AChE | Amygdalus spinosissima root parts | 50, 100, or 150 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | The treatment of SCO-injected mice with the extract showed significant (p < 0.05) down-regulation of the AChE and BChE genes. |
Singh et al. (2022) [49] | In vivo | AChE | Leaves of Ocimum basilicum | 5 and 10 mg/kg, 7 days, p.o. | The compounds isolated from OBE (S1 and S2) significantly reduced AChE activity induced in SOC-treated mice (p < 0.05 vs. SCO). |
Singh et al. (2016) [53] | In vivo | AChE | Leaves of Ocimum basilicum | 200 and 400 mg/kg, 7 days, i.p. | SCO administration significantly increased AChE activity, while OBE pre-treatment notably reduced brain AChE activity (p < 0.05). |
Song et al. (2020) [51] | In vivo | AChE | Schisandra chinensis (SC) | 10 mg/kg, 18 days, p.o. | The AChE activity was increased in SCO-AD model group and decreased to a level close to the normal group by the treatment with SC extract (p < 0.01 vs. SCO model group). |
Wahid et al. (2022) [45] | In vivo | AChE | Salvia moorcroftiana | SIMO-Crd (100 and 200 mg/kg) | All treatments resulted in a decrease in AChE levels in the hippocampus and frontal cortex, which were elevated by SCO treatment (p < 0.05–p < 0.001 vs. SCO-treated (amnesic) group). |
Weon et al. (2016) [62] | In vivo | AChE | Nine-Herb Decoction with Notopterygium, also known as Chianghuo Combination (GT), consists of nine crude extracts obtained from the following: | 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, 4 days, p.o. | Fermented GT treatment significantly decreased AChE activity in the hippocampus of the SCO-treated group by 24.15% and 31.64% at doses of 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively (p < 0.05 compared to the SCO-treated group). |
Xu et al. (2016) [61] | In vivo | AChE | Lavandula angustifolia | 50 and 100 mg/kg/d, 10 days, p.o. | The LO (100 mg/kg) decreased the AChE activity in SCO-treated mice (p < 0.05). |
Yadav et al. | In vivo | AChE | Trianthema portulastrum (TP) | 200, 400, and 600 mg/kg/day, 21 days, p.o. | BFTP (600 mg/kg, p < 0.01) demonstrated an ameliorative effect on SCO-induced elevation of AChE activity, while lower doses of BFTP (400 and 200 mg/kg, p < 0.05) also improved the cholinergic deficit caused by SCO. |
Ibrahim et al. | In vivo | AChE | Mentha longifolia | 400 mg/kg, 60 days, i.p. | AChE was significantly increased by AlCl3 (50.42% compared to vehicle group) but inhibited by 36.60% when crude extract was given to the animal. |
Saleem et al. | In vivo | AChE | Malva neglecta | 200, 400, and 600 mg/kg, 21 days, p.o. | The AChE levels in the MNME-treated groups significantly decreased in a dose-dependent manner, while those in the AlCl3-treated groups rose (p < 0.001). |
Abd El-Aziz et al. | In vivo | AChE | Orange peel | 100 and 200 mg/kg, 6 weeks, p.o. | Rats treated with AlCl3 (p < 0.05) and given 100 or 200 OPE showed significantly lower levels of AChE activity and mRNA in their brain tissue. |
El-Hawary et al. (2020) [68] | In vivo | AChE | Opuntia ficusindica (cladode, peel, and fruits) | 100 mg/kg, 6 weeks, p.o. | All the studied extracts (cladode, peel, fruits, polysaccharides extract) showed a significant decrease in AChE levels counteracting the effect of AlCl3 (p < 0.05 versus AlCl3 group). |
Gouthami et al. | In vivo | AChE | Tecoma stans | 200 or 400 mg/kg, 42 days, p.o. | AlCl3-treated mice showed increased brain AChE activity, while METS administration significantly decreased AChE levels compared to the control group. |
Mohamed et al. (2023) [65] | In vivo | AChE | Echinacea purpurea flowers | 250 mg/kg, 60 days, p.o. | Both extracts significantly inhibit AChEs in vivo compared to the AlCl3-treated group (p < 0.0001). |
Ojha et al. (2022) [64] | In vivo | AChE | The aerial parts and root of Canna indica L. | 200 mg/kg, 21 days, p.o. | CIA, CIR, and CIA + CIR extracts significantly decreased the level of AChE in the cortex and hippocampus compared to the AlCl3 group (p < 0.001). |
Suryavanshi et al. (2022) [66] | In vivo | AChE | Centella asiatica | 75 mg/kg, 8 weeks, p.o. | Co-administration of AA effectively declined the AChE activity in the cortex (p ≤ 0.05) and hippocampus (p ≤ 0.01) of the brain as compared to AlCl3-intoxicated rats. |
Wahby et al. (2017) [67] | In vivo | AChE | Cicer arietinum (chickpea) | 10 mg/kg, 6 weeks, p.o. | Co-administration of either Gen or CPE with AlCl3 significantly decreased the activity of AChE, restoring it to the control value (p < 0.01). |
Mehla et al. (2013) [74] | In vivo | AChE | Clitoria ternatea | 100, 300, and 500 mg/kg, 7 days before the ICV-STZ injection and continued for 28 days after injection, p.o. | A significant decrease in AChE activity was observed in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus following extract administration, compared to the STZ group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001). |
Kaur et al. | In vivo | AChE | Allium cepa | EAF (42, 84, and 168 mg/kg, 9–22 days, p.o.) | ICV STZ-treated mice showed a significant increase in the brain AChE activity compared with the control group and this was efficiently reversed in EAF-treated mice (p < 0.05 vs. STZ control group) |
Barai et al. | In vivo | AChE | Bergenia ciliata | 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg, 28 days, p.o. | BM restored the AChE activity to normal levels and showed a dose-dependent decrease in the increased AChE activity caused by STZ (p < 0.001). |
Mehla et al. (2012) [73] | In vivo | AChE | Evolvulus alsinoides | 100, 300, and 500 mg/kg, 35 days, p.o. | A significant decrease in AChE activity was observed with hydro-alcoholic extract of E. alsinoides at doses of 100 mg/kg (p < 0.05), 300 mg/kg (p < 0.001), and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) in cerebral cortex and hippocampus as compared to STZ group. |
Bae et al. (2012) [77] | In vivo | AChE | Chamaecyparis obtusa | 1 mL/cage for two consecutive hours for 30 days before injection of Aβ into the hippocampus and 7 days after injection, inhalation | Inhalation of EOCO significantly reduced AChE activity in rats injected with Aβ-induced cognitive impairment (p < 0.05). |
Ghajarbeygi et al. | In vivo | AChE | Pistacia khinjuk and Allium sativum | 1, 2, and 3% wt/wt, 3 weeks, p.o. | Oral administration of PKEO and ASEO resulted in significant inhibition of AChE and BChE in rats injected with Aβ25–35 peptide (p < 0.05). |
Go et al. (2022) [79] | In vivo | AChE | Pinus densiflora (Korean red pine) | 15 and 30 mg/kg, p.o. | Both concentrations showed decrease in AChE activity compared to the Aβ group (p < 0.05). |
Jeong et al. (2013) [81] | In vivo | AChE | Blueberry | 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, 3 weeks, p.o. | The Aβ-treated group showed an increase in AChE activity, whereas the pre-treatment of the EtOAc fraction (5, 10, 15 mg/kg) effectively inhibited AChE in the brains of mice after Aβ25–35 exposure (p < 0.05). |
Sushma et al. (2024) [78] | In vivo | AChE | Bacopa monnieri (BM) | 40 and 80 mg kg−1, 28 days, p.o. | BM 80 mg kg−1 significantly decreased the AChE activity that was elevated by Aβ42 injection in the hippocampal tissue of rat brains, compared to the Aβ42-injected group (p < 0.05). |
Wu et al. (2014) [80] | In vivo | AChE | Cistanche tubulosa (CT) | 100 and 200 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | CT extract (200 mg/kg) only reversed the increase in cortical AChE activity in Aβ1–42-infused rats (p < 0.01 for CT). |
Jeong et al. (2014) [84] | In vivo | AChE | Soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr) | 5,10, and 20 mg/kg, 3 weeks, | The pre-treatment groups with nonanthocyanins relatively inhibited AChE activity in the brains of mice. AChE activity in the (20 mg/kg)-treated group was significantly reduced compared to the TMT-treated group (p < 0.05 vs. TMT-treated group). |
Kim et al. (2009) [83] | In vivo | AChE | Poncirus trifoliata | 400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg, 3 weeks, mixed in the diet | All sample groups exhibited significant inhibition of AChE activity induced by the TMT injection (p < 0.05 vs. TMT group). |
Ayaz et al. (2017) [85] | In vivo | AChE | Polygonum hydropiper | 10 mg/kg, 5 days, i.p. | In the frontal cortex, β-sitosterol caused a significant decrease in AChE and BChE levels (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). |
Chen et al. (2016) [86] | In vivo | AChE | The root of Valeriana officinalis var. latiofolia | 0.65, 1.30, and 2.60 mg·kg−l·day−1, 90 days, p.o. | Administration of Compound 4 (volvalerenic acid K) resulted in a significant, concentration-dependent decrease in AChE activity in the brain of the transgenic dementia mouse model (p < 0.01). |
Guesmi et al. (2018) [87] | In vivo | AChE | The aerial parts of Thymus algeriensis | 180 mg/kg/day, 15 days, p.o | The extract significantly reduced the elevated AChE levels in the brains of H2O2-treated rats, restoring AChE activity to levels comparable to the normal control group (p < 0.05). |
Velayutham et al. | In vivo | AChE | Pedalium murex Linn | 200 and 400 mg/kg, 14 days, p.o. | The elevated AChE levels induced by 3-NPA administration in rats were significantly reduced following EEPML treatment (p < 0.001). |
Abbreviations: AChE: acetylcholinesterase; AlCl3: aluminum chloride; Aβ: amyloid beta; BChE: butyrylcholinesterase; H2O2: hydrogen peroxide; i.p.: intraperitoneal injection; ICV: intracerebroventricularly; p.o.: oral administration; 3-NPA: 3-nitropropionic acid; SOC: scopolamine hydrobromide; STZ: streptozotocin; TMT: trimethyltin.
4. Discussion
The systematic review of the literature presented substantial evidence supporting the neuroprotective effects of various plant extracts in alleviating memory impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) through the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and/or butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activities. AChE is a pivotal enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of acetylcholine (ACh), a neurotransmitter crucial for cognitive function. The decline in ACh levels due to increased AChE activity is a hallmark of AD, contributing to cognitive decline and memory impairment [16]. In addition to AChE, BChE plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of AD. While AChE is primarily responsible for terminating cholinergic neurotransmission, BChE has been shown to hydrolyze ACh as well, albeit with lower catalytic efficiency [89]. Notably, during the progression of AD, BChE activity can increase significantly, potentially contributing to the aggregation of amyloid beta-peptides and the formation of senile plaques, which are characteristic of the disease [90,91]. Therefore, the identification of natural compounds that can inhibit both AChE and BChE represents a promising therapeutic strategy for AD, as it may help restore cholinergic function and mitigate the neurodegenerative processes associated with this condition [92,93].
Numerous studies included in this review demonstrated that various plant extracts significantly reduced AChE and BChE activities and improved cognitive performance in animal models of AD. For instance, the ethyl acetate extract of Ferula ammoniacum and the hydro-methanolic extract of Elaeagnus umbellata were shown to effectively decrease both AChE and BChE activity in the cortex and hippocampus, leading to enhanced memory performance in scopolamine (SCO)-treated mice [25,26]. Similarly, administration of extracts from Vernonia amygdalina, Amygdalus spinosissima, and Bergenia ciliata demonstrated protective effects against SCO-induced cognitive impairment by significantly reducing both AChE and BChE activity in treated animals [29,30,54]. The cholinergic hypothesis of AD suggested that impaired cholinergic neurotransmission contributes to cognitive decline. Research indicated that in patients with advanced AD, AChE levels can decline significantly while BChE levels may increase, suggesting a compensatory mechanism where BChE attempts to hydrolyze ACh in the absence of sufficient AChE activity [92]. Additionally, increased BChE activity, especially in the hippocampus and temporal cortex, may exacerbate this cognitive decline by promoting amyloid-beta aggregation and plaque formation, which are key features of AD [94,95]. Therefore, the ability of these plant-derived compounds to inhibit both AChE and BChE indicates a promising therapeutic strategy for restoring cholinergic function and alleviating cognitive impairments associated with AD [96,97].
Moreover, the review highlighted the multifaceted mechanisms through which these plant extracts exerted their neuroprotective effects. Many of the extracts not only inhibited ChE activity but also exhibited antioxidant properties, thereby reducing oxidative stress—a key factor in the pathogenesis of NDDs [98,99]. For instance, extracts from Bacopa monnieri and Olax subscorpioidea demonstrated significant reductions in oxidative stress alongside AChE inhibition, suggesting that these compounds may protect neuronal integrity while enhancing cognitive function [38,39]. The interplay between cholinergic modulation and antioxidant activity underscores the potential of these natural products as comprehensive therapeutic agents against AD.
In addition to SCO-induced models, the review also examined the effects of plant extracts in aluminum chloride (AlCl3)-induced neurotoxicity. Extracts from Canna indica and Echinacea purpurea significantly reduced AChE levels and improved cognitive behavior in AlCl3-treated rats, indicating that these plants may offer protective effects against neurotoxic agents commonly associated with AD [64,65]. The ability of Centella asiatica to enhance antioxidant activity while reducing AChE activity further emphasizes the potential of these extracts in combating neurodegenerative processes [66]. The review also highlights the efficacy of plant extracts in models of AD induced by streptozotocin (STZ) and amyloid beta (Aβ). For example, Evolvulus alsinoides and Clitoria ternatea exhibited significant AChE inhibition and cognitive improvement in STZ-treated rats, indicating their potential as therapeutic agents for AD [73,74]. Furthermore, essential oils and extracts from Chamaecyparis obtusa and Bacopa monnieri had shown promise in ameliorating Aβ-induced cognitive deficits, further supporting the role of phytochemicals in neuroprotection [77,78].
This study supported recent review studies, highlighting the potential of plant extracts and their isolated active compounds with anti-cholinesterase properties in advancing drug discovery for AD [100,101,102]. The diverse mechanisms through which these plant extracts exert their effects—ranging from ChE inhibition to antioxidant activity—suggested that they may serve as valuable adjuncts or alternatives to conventional pharmacological treatments for AD [103,104]. As the search for effective treatments continues, the integration of traditional herbal medicine with modern pharmacological approaches may pave the way for novel strategies in managing Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.
5. Conclusions
This study identified plant species with bioactive compounds that inhibit AChE and BuChE, offering potential therapeutic benefits for AD. Additionally, many of the extracts demonstrated not only ChE inhibition but also antioxidants, anti-inflammatory properties, as well as enhanced learning and memory, suggesting they could serve as effective alternatives or supplements to conventional AD treatments.
Conceptualization, M.N.A.; methodology, M.N.A.; software, M.N.A.; validation, M.N.A., E.M.A., F.M.A. and G.M.A.; formal analysis, M.N.A., E.M.A., F.M.A. and G.M.A.; investigation, M.N.A., E.M.A., F.M.A. and G.M.A.; resources, M.N.A., E.M.A., F.M.A. and G.M.A.; data curation, M.N.A., E A., F.M.A. and G.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.A., E.M.A., F.M.A. and G.M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.N.A.; visualization, M.N.A.; supervision, M.N.A.; project administration, M.N.A.; funding acquisition, M.N.A., E.M.A., F.M.A. and G.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data supporting the results are available on request from the first author (M.N.A.). The data are not publicly available due to confidentiality agreements.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. The physiological structure of the brain and neurons in (A) healthy brain and (B) brain affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The figure was created using BioRender (https://www.biorender.com/).
Figure 2. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart displaying the study identification and selection process.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at
References
1. Breijyeh, Z.; Karaman, R. Comprehensive Review on Alzheimer’s Disease: Causes and Treatment. Molecules; 2020; 25, 5789. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245789] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302541]
2. Kumar, A.; Sidhu, J.; Lui, F.; Tsao, J.W. Alzheimer Disease. StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024.
3. Long, J.M.; Holtzman, D.M. Alzheimer disease: An update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell; 2019; 179, pp. 312-339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001]
4. Kamatham, P.T.; Shukla, R.; Khatri, D.K.; Vora, L.K. Pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease: Breaking the memory barrier. Ageing Res. Rev.; 2024; 101, 102481. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102481] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39236855]
5. Du, X.; Wang, X.; Geng, M. Alzheimer’s disease hypothesis and related therapies. Transl. Neurodegener.; 2018; 7, 2. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-018-0107-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423193]
6. Mushtaq, G.; Greig, N.; Khan, J.; Kamal, M. Status of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets; 2014; 13, pp. 1432-1439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1871527313666141023141545]
7. Nordberg, A.; Ballard, C.; Bullock, R.; Darreh-Shori, T.; Somogyi, M. A review of butyrylcholinesterase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord.; 2013; 15, 26731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4088/PCC.12r01412]
8. Alhazmi, H.A.; Albratty, M. An update on the novel and approved drugs for Alzheimer disease. Saudi Pharm. J.; 2022; 30, pp. 1755-1764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2022.10.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601504]
9. Thawabteh, A.M.; Ghanem, A.W.; AbuMadi, S.; Thaher, D.; Jaghama, W.; Karaman, D.; Karaman, R. Recent Advances in Therapeutics for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules; 2024; 29, 5131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules29215131] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39519769]
10. Briggs, R.; Kennelly, S.P.; O’Neill, D. Drug treatments in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Med.; 2016; 16, pp. 247-253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-247] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251914]
11. Marrelli, M. Medicinal Plants. Plants; 2021; 10, 1355. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10071355]
12. Chaachouay, N.; Zidane, L. Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Source for Drug Discovery and Development. Drugs Drug Candidates; 2024; 3, pp. 184-207. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ddc3010011]
13. Riaz, M.; Khalid, R.; Afzal, M.; Anjum, F.; Fatima, H.; Zia, S.; Rasool, G.; Egbuna, C.; Mtewa, A.G.; Uche, C.Z. et al. Phytobioactive compounds as therapeutic agents for human diseases: A review. Food Sci. Nutr.; 2023; 11, pp. 2500-2529. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3308]
14. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Therapeutic Potential of Phenolic Compounds in Medicinal Plants-Natural Health Products for Human Health. Molecules; 2023; 28, 1845. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041845] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838831]
15. Ayaz, M.; Mosa, O.F.; Nawaz, A.; Hamdoon, A.A.E.; Elkhalifa, M.E.M.; Sadiq, A.; Ullah, F.; Ahmed, A.; Kabra, A.; Khan, H. et al. Neuroprotective potentials of Lead phytochemicals against Alzheimer’s disease with focus on oxidative stress-mediated signaling pathways: Pharmacokinetic challenges, target specificity, clinical trials and future perspectives. Phytomedicine; 2024; 124, 155272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155272]
16. Ahmed, F.; Ghalib, R.; Sasikala, P.; Ahmed, K. Cholinesterase inhibitors from botanicals. Pharmacogn. Rev.; 2013; 7, pp. 121-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.120511]
17. Dos Santos, T.; Gomes, T.; Pinto, B.; Camara, A.; Paes, A. Naturally occurring acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and their potential use for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Front. Pharmacol.; 2018; 9, 1192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01192] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405413]
18. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Rapposelli, S.; Sestito, S.; Herrera-Bravo, J.; Arancibia-Diaz, A.; Salazar, L.A.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Beyatli, A.; Leyva-Gómez, G.; González-Contreras, C. et al. Multi-Target Mechanisms of Phytochemicals in Alzheimer’s Disease: Effects on Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation and Protein Aggregation. J. Pers. Med.; 2022; 12, 1515. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091515] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143299]
19. Hegde, M.L. Molecular characterization of neuroprotective activities of plant based products could revive their utilization and lead discovery of new drug candidates for brain diseases. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci.; 2014; 6, pp. 63-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.129168]
20. Russo, P.; Frustaci, A.; Del Bufalo, A.; Fini, M.; Cesario, A. Multitarget drugs of plants origin acting on Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Med. Chem.; 2013; 20, pp. 1686-1693. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867311320130008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23410167]
21. Nagori, K.; Nakhate, K.T.; Yadav, K.; Ajazuddin,; Pradhan, M. Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Medicinal Plants for Alzheimer’s Disease: Preclinical to Clinical Trial Insights. Future Pharmacol.; 2023; 3, pp. 877-907. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol3040053]
22. Lobine, D.; Sadeer, N.; Jugreet, S.; Suroowan, S.; Keenoo, B.S.; Imran, M.; Venugopala, K.N.; Ibrahim, F.M.; Zengin, G.; Mahomoodally, M.F. Potential of Medicinal Plants as Neuroprotective and Therapeutic Properties Against Amyloid-β-Related Toxicity, and Glutamate-Induced Excitotoxicity in Human Neural Cells. Curr. Neuropharmacol.; 2021; 19, pp. 1416-1441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666210412095251] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845746]
23. Page, M.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.; Mulrow, C.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.; Akl, E.; Brennan, S. et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ; 2021; 372, n160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160]
24. Page, M.; McKenzie, J.; Bossuyt, P.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.; Mulrow, C.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.; Akl, E.; Brennan, S. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ; 2021; 10, 89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4]
25. Nazir, N.; Nisar, M.; Zahoor, M.; Uddin, F.; Ullah, S.; Ullah, R.; Ansari, S.A.; Mahmood, H.M.; Bari, A.; Alobaid, A. Phytochemical analysis, in vitro anticholinesterase, antioxidant activity and in vivo nootropic effect of Ferula ammoniacum (Dorema ammoniacum) D. Don. in scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice. Brain Sci.; 2021; 11, 259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020259] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669503]
26. Nazir, N.; Zahoor, M.; Nisar, M.; Karim, N.; Latif, A.; Ahmad, S.; Uddin, Z. Evaluation of neuroprotective and antiamnesic effects of Elaeagnus umbellate thunb. On scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice. BMC Complement. Med. Ther.; 2020; 20, 143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-02942-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397979]
27. Karthivashan, G.; Kweon, M.H.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, D.H.; Ganesan, P.; Choi, D.K. Cognitive-enhancing and ameliorative effects of acanthoside B in a scopolamine-induced amnesic mouse model through regulation of oxidative/inflammatory/cholinergic systems and activation of the TrkB/CREB/BDNF pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol.; 2019; 129, pp. 444-457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.062]
28. Ferdous, R.; Islam, M.B.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Dey, A.K.; Mondal, M.O.A.; Islam, M.N.; Alam, A.K.; Rahman, A.A.; Sadik, M.G. Anticholinesterase and antioxidant activity of Drynaria quercifolia and its ameliorative effect in scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2024; 319, 117095. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117095] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37634747]
29. Oboh, G.; Adedayo, B.C.; Adetola, M.B.; Oyeleye, I.S.; Ogunsuyi, O.B. Characterization and neuroprotective properties of alkaloid extract of Vernonia amygdalina Delile in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Chem. Toxicol.; 2022; 45, pp. 731-740. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2020.1773845] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32543989]
30. Sajjadi, M.; Oskoueian, E.; Karimi, E.; Ebrahimi, M. Amygdalus spinosissima root extract enhanced scopolamine-induced learning and memory impairment in mice. Metab. Brain Dis.; 2021; 36, pp. 1859-1869. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00768-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273042]
31. Deng, G.; Wu, C.; Rong, X.; Li, S.; Ju, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ma, C.; Ding, W.; Guan, H.; Cheng, X. et al. Ameliorative effect of deoxyvasicine on scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction by restoration of cholinergic function in mice. Phytomedicine; 2019; 63, 153007. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153007]
32. Yadav, E.; Singh, D.; Debnath, B.; Rathee, P.; Yadav, P.; Verma, A. Molecular Docking and Cognitive Impairment Attenuating Effect of Phenolic Compound Rich Fraction of Trianthema portulacastrum in Scopolamine Induced Alzheimer’s Disease Like Condition. Neurochem. Res.; 2019; 44, pp. 1665-1677. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02792-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949934]
33. Arora, R.; Kumar, R.; Agarwal, A.; Reeta, K.H.; Gupta, Y.K. Comparison of three different extracts of Centella asiatica for anti-amnesic, antioxidant and anticholinergic activities: In vitro and in vivo study. Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2018; 105, pp. 1344-1352. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.156] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021372]
34. Pruthi, S.; Kaur, K.; Singh, V.; Shri, R. Improvement of cognitive function in mice by Citrus reticulata var. kinnow via modulation of central cholinergic system and oxidative stress. Metab. Brain Dis.; 2021; 36, pp. 901-910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00687-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33651274]
35. Jee, S.C.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, M.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, S.; Park, J.O.; Sung, J.S. Neuroprotective Effect of Cudrania tricuspidata Fruit Extracts on Scopolamine-Induced Learning and Memory Impairment. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 9202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239202] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276674]
36. Bandaru, N.; Ramu, A.; Vidhyadhara, S. Neuroprotective and antioxidant activities of fraction isolated from methanolic extract of Sapindus laurifolia on scopolamine induced dementia. Pharmacogn. Res.; 2020; 12, pp. 119-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/pr.pr_50_19]
37. Liao, J.; Nai, Y.; Feng, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Xu, H. Walnut Oil Prevents Scopolamine-Induced Memory Dysfunction in a Mouse Model. Molecules; 2020; 25, 1630. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071630]
38. Arora, R.; Kumar, R.; Agarwal, A.; Gupta, Y.K. Bacosides enrichment does not improve the anti-amnesic effect of Bacopa monnieri: Behavioural and biochemical evidences. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2021; 35, pp. 6054-6057. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2020.1817919] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32924596]
39. Adeniyi, I.A.; Oregbesan, P.O.; Adesanya, A.; Olubori, M.A.; Olayinka, G.S.; Ajayi, A.M.; Onasanwo, S.A. Olax subscorpioidea prevented scopolamine-induced memory impairment through the prevention of oxido-inflammatory damage and modulation of cholinergic transmission. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2024; 318, 116995. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.116995]
40. Akbaba, E.; Bagci, E.; Hritcu, L.; Maniu, C. Improvement of memory deficits via acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of Nepeta nuda ssp. nuda essential oil in rats. Kuwait J. Sci.; 2021; 48, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.48129/kjs.v48i3.9217]
41. Haider, M.S.; Ashraf, W.; Javaid, S.; Rasool, M.F.; Rahman, H.M.A.; Saleem, H.; Anjum, S.M.M.; Siddique, F.; Morales-Bayuelo, A.; Kaya, S. et al. Chemical characterization and evaluation of the neuroprotective potential of Indigofera sessiliflora through in-silico studies and behavioral tests in scopolamine-induced memory compromised rats. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.; 2021; 28, pp. 4384-4398. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.033]
42. Kim, S.B.; Ryu, H.Y.; Nam, W.; Lee, S.M.; Jang, M.R.; Kwak, Y.G.; Kang, G.I.; Song, K.S.; Lee, J.W. The Neuroprotective Effects of Dendropanax morbifera Water Extract on Scopolamine-Induced Memory Impairment in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2023; 24, 16444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216444] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003650]
43. Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.G.; Lee, H.W.; Han, J.M.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, D.W.; Saravanakumar, A.; Son, C.G. Hippocampal memory enhancing activity of pine needle extract against scopolamine-induced amnesia in a mouse model. Sci. Rep.; 2015; 5, 9651. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep09651]
44. Kouémou, N.E.; Taiwe, G.S.; Moto, F.C.O.; Pale, S.; Ngoupaye, G.T.; Njapdounke, J.S.K.; Nkantchoua, G.C.N.; Pahaye, D.B.; Bum, E.N. Nootropic and Neuroprotective Effects of Dichrocephala integrifolia on Scopolamine Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Pharmacol.; 2017; 8, 847. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00847]
45. Wahid, F.; Jan, T.; Al-Joufi, F.A.; Shah, S.W.A.; Nisar, M.; Zahoor, M. Amelioration of scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction in experimental mice using the medicinal plant Salvia moorcroftiana. Branin Sci.; 2022; 12, 894. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070894] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884701]
46. Hosseini, Z.; Mansouritorghabeh, F.; Kakhki, F.S.H.; Hosseini, M.; Rakhshandeh, H.; Hosseini, A.; Hasanpour, M.; Iranshahi, M.; Rajabian, A. Effect of Sanguisorba minor on scopolamine-induced memory loss in rat: Involvement of oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase. Metab. Brain Dis.; 2022; 37, pp. 473-488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00898-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982352]
47. Brinza, I.; Ayoub, I.M.; Eldahshan, O.A.; Hritcu, L. Baicalein 5,6-Dimethyl Ether Prevents Memory Deficits in the Scopolamine Zebrafish Model by Regulating Cholinergic and Antioxidant Systems. Plants; 2021; 10, 1245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10061245] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207381]
48. Ravichandran, V.A.; Kim, M.; Han, S.K.; Cha, Y.S. Stachys sieboldii Extract Supplementation Attenuates Memory Deficits by Modulating BDNF-CREB and Its Downstream Molecules, in Animal Models of Memory Impairment. Nutrients; 2018; 10, 917. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10070917]
49. Singh, V.; Kaur, K.; Kaur, S.; Shri, R.; Singh, T.G.; Singh, M. Trimethoxyflavones from Ocimum basilicum L. leaves improve long term memory in mice by modulating multiple pathways. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2022; 295, 115438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2022.115438] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671863]
50. Mushtaq, A.; Anwar, R.; Gohar, U.F.; Ahmad, M.; Marc Vlaic, R.A.; Mureşan, C.C.; Irimie, M.; Bobescu, E. Biomolecular Evaluation of Lavandula stoechas L. for Nootropic Activity. Plants; 2021; 10, 1259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10061259] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205806]
51. Song, X.M.; Wang, T.J.; Guo, L.X.; Jin, Y.B.; Wang, J.; Yin, G.; Jiang, K.; Wang, L.J.; Huang, H.R.; Zeng, L. In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-AChE and Antioxidative Effects of Schisandra chinensis Extract: A Potential Candidate for Alzheimer’s Disease. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med.; 2020; 2020, 2804849. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2804849]
52. Das, A.; Shanker, G.; Nath, C.; Pal, R.; Singh, S.; Singh, H. A comparative study in rodents of standardized extracts of Bacopa monniera and Ginkgo biloba: Anticholinesterase and cognitive enhancing activities. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.; 2002; 73, pp. 893-900. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(02)00940-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12213536]
53. Singh, V.; Kahol, A.; Singh, I.P.; Saraf, I.; Shri, R. Evaluation of anti-amnesic effect of extracts of selected Ocimum species using in-vitro and in-vivo models. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2016; 193, pp. 490-499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.10.026] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27725240]
54. Barai, P.; Raval, N.; Acharya, S.; Acharya, N. Neuroprotective effects of Bergenia ciliata on NMDA induced injury in SH-SY5Y cells and attenuation of cognitive deficits in scopolamine induced amnesia in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2018; 108, pp. 374-390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30227331]
55. Golechha, M.; Bhatia, J.; Arya, D.S. Studies on effects of Emblica officinalis (Amla) on oxidative stress and cholinergic function in scopolamine induced amnesia in mice. J. Environ. Biol.; 2012; 33, pp. 95-100. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033650]
56. Ishola, I.O.; Tota, S.; Adeyemi, O.O.; Agbaje, E.O.; Narender, T.; Shukla, R. Protective effect of Cnestis ferruginea and its active constituent on scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice: A behavioral and biochemical study. Pharm. Biol.; 2013; 51, pp. 825-835. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.767360] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627469]
57. Kwon, S.H.; Lee, H.K.; Kim, J.A.; Hong, S.I.; Kim, H.C.; Jo, T.H.; Park, Y.I.; Lee, C.K.; Kim, Y.B.; Lee, S.Y. et al. Neuroprotective effects of chlorogenic acid on scopolamine-induced amnesia via anti-acetylcholinesterase and anti-oxidative activities in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol.; 2010; 649, pp. 210-217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.001]
58. Lee, B.; Park, J.; Kwon, S.; Park, M.W.; Oh, S.M.; Yeom, M.J.; Shim, I.; Lee, H.J.; Hahm, D.H. Effect of wild ginseng on scopolamine-induced acetylcholine depletion in the rat hippocampus. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.; 2010; 62, pp. 263-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1211/jpp.62.02.0015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487207]
59. Palit, P.; Mukherjee, D.; Mandal, S.C. Reconstituted mother tinctures of Gelsemium sempervirens L. improve memory and cognitive impairment in mice scopolamine-induced dementia model. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2015; 159, pp. 274-284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.09.008]
60. Alam, A.; Ali, G.; Nawaz, A.; AlOmar, T.S.; Rauf, A.; Ayaz, M.; Ahmad, S.; Almasoud, N.; AlOmar, A.S.; Khalil, A.A. et al. Neuroprotective evaluation of diospyrin against drug-induced Alzheimer’s disease. Fitoterapia; 2023; 171, 105703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2023.105703]
61. Xu, P.; Wang, K.; Lu, C.; Dong, L.; Gao, L.; Yan, M.; Aibai, S.; Liu, X. Protective effect of lavender oil on scopolamine induced cognitive deficits in mice and H2O2 induced cytotoxicity in PC12 cells. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2016; 193, pp. 408-415. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.08.030]
62. Weon, J.B.; Lee, J.; Eom, M.R.; Jung, Y.S.; Ma, C.J. Cognitive enhancing effect of the fermented Gumiganghwal-tang on scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice. Nutr. Neurosci.; 2016; 19, pp. 125-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000152] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216329]
63. Qu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Gao, J.; Chen, H.; Liu, C.; Gao, W. Prunella vulgaris L., an Edible and Medicinal Plant, Attenuates Scopolamine-Induced Memory Impairment in Rats. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2017; 65, pp. 291-300. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04597] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28001065]
64. Ojha, P.S.; Biradar, P.R.; Tubachi, S.; Patil, V.S. Evaluation of neuroprotective effects of Canna indica L against aluminium chloride induced memory impairment in rats. Adv. Tradit. Med.; 2023; 23, pp. 539-556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13596-021-00627-x]
65. Mohamed, S.M.; Shalaby, M.A.; Al-Mokaddem, A.K.; El-Banna, A.H.; El-Banna, H.A.; Nabil, G. Evaluation of anti-Alzheimer activity of Echinacea purpurea extracts in aluminum chloride-induced neurotoxicity in rat model. J. Chem. Neuroanat.; 2023; 128, 102234. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2023.102234]
66. Suryavanshi, J.; Prakash, C.; Sharma, D. Asiatic acid attenuates aluminium chloride-induced behavioral changes, neuronal loss and astrocyte activation in rats. Metab. Brain Dis.; 2022; 37, pp. 1773-1785. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11011-022-00998-3]
67. Wahby, M.M.; Mohammed, D.S.; Newairy, A.A.; Abdou, H.M.; Zaky, A. Aluminum-induced molecular neurodegeneration: The protective role of genistein and chickpea extract. Food Chem. Toxicol.; 2017; 107, pp. 57-67. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.044] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28552514]
68. El-Hawary, S.S.; Sobeh, M.; Badr, W.K.; Abdelfattah, M.A.O.; Ali, Z.Y.; El-Tantawy, M.E.; Rabeh, M.A.; Wink, M. HPLC-PDA-MS/MS profiling of secondary metabolites from Opuntia ficus-indica cladode, peel and fruit pulp extracts and their antioxidant, neuroprotective effect in rats with aluminum chloride induced neurotoxicity. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.; 2020; 27, pp. 2829-2838. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.07.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994743]
69. Abd El-Aziz, N.; Shehata, M.; Alsulami, T.; Badr, A.N.; Elbakatoshy, M.; Ali, H.; El-Sohaimy, S. Characterization of Orange Peel extract and its potential protective effect against aluminum chloride-induced Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmaceuticals; 2023; 16, 12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16010012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678510]
70. Saleem, U.; Akhtar, R.; Anwar, F.; Shah, M.A.; Chaudary, Z.; Ayaz, M.; Ahmad, B. Neuroprotective potential of Malva neglecta is mediated via down-regulation of cholinesterase and modulation of oxidative stress markers. Metab. Brain Dis.; 2021; 36, pp. 889-900. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00683-x]
71. Ganga, R.; Gouthami, K.; Nvlsuvarchala Reddy, V.; Nicholas, M. Anti-Amnesic effect of methanolic leaf extract of Tecoma stans: An experimental study in rodents. J. Young Pharm.; 2020; 12, pp. S91-S96. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5530/JYP.2020.12S.54]
72. Ibrahim, A.Y.; Youness, E.R.; Shalaby, A.S.; El-Din, M.M. Anti-acetylcholinesterase, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activities of Mentha longifolia for treating alzheimer disease. Der Pharm. Lett.; 2016; 8, pp. 34-39.
73. Mehla, J.; Pahuja, M.; Dethe, S.M.; Agarwal, A.; Gupta, Y.K. Amelioration of intracerebroventricular streptozotocin induced cognitive impairment by Evolvulus alsinoides in rats: In vitro and in vivo evidence. Neurochem. Int.; 2012; 61, pp. 1052-1064. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2012.07.022]
74. Mehla, J.; Pahuja, M.; Gupta, P.; Dethe, S.; Agarwal, A.; Gupta, Y.K. Clitoria ternatea ameliorated the intracerebroventricularly injected streptozotocin induced cognitive impairment in rats: Behavioral and biochemical evidence. Psychopharmacology; 2013; 230, pp. 589-605. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3185-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23832386]
75. Kaur, R.; Randhawa, K.; Kaur, S.; Shri, R. Allium cepa fraction attenuates STZ-induced dementia via cholinesterase inhibition and amelioration of oxidative stress in mice. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol.; 2020; 31, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0197]
76. Barai, P.; Raval, N.; Acharya, S.; Acharya, N. Bergenia ciliata ameliorates streptozotocin-induced spatial memory deficits through dual cholinesterase inhibition and attenuation of oxidative stress in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2018; 102, pp. 966-980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.115] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710552]
77. Bae, D.; Seol, H.; Yoon, H.G.; Na, J.R.; Oh, K.; Choi, C.Y.; Lee, D.W.; Jun, W.; Youl Lee, K.; Lee, J. et al. Inhaled essential oil from Chamaecyparis obtuse ameliorates the impairments of cognitive function induced by injection of β-amyloid in rats. Pharm. Biol.; 2012; 50, pp. 900-910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2011.642886] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22468783]
78. Sushma,; Sahu, M.R.; Murugan, N.A.; Mondal, A.C. Amelioration of Amyloid-β Induced Alzheimer’s Disease by Bacopa monnieri through Modulation of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and GSK-3β/Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.; 2024; 68, e2300245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202300245]
79. Go, M.J.; Kim, J.M.; Kang, J.Y.; Park, S.K.; Lee, C.J.; Kim, M.J.; Lee, H.R.; Kim, T.Y.; Joo, S.G.; Kim, D.O. et al. Korean Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) Bark Extract Attenuates Aβ-Induced Cognitive Impairment by Regulating Cholinergic Dysfunction and Neuroinflammation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2022; 32, pp. 1154-1167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2207.07015]
80. Wu, C.R.; Lin, H.C.; Su, M.H. Reversal by aqueous extracts of Cistanche tubulosa from behavioral deficits in Alzheimer’s disease-like rat model: Relevance for amyloid deposition and central neurotransmitter function. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.; 2014; 14, 202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-202]
81. Jeong, H.R.; Jo, Y.N.; Jeong, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, M.J.; Heo, H.J. Blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum) leaf extracts protect against Aβ-induced cytotoxicity and cognitive impairment. J. Med. Food; 2013; 16, pp. 968-976. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2013.2881] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24117094]
82. Ghajarbeygi, P.; Hajhoseini, A.; Hosseini, M.S.; Sharifan, A. An in vitro and in vivo cholinesterase inhibitory activity of Pistacia khinjuk and Allium sativum essential oils. J. Pharmacopunct.; 2019; 22, pp. 231-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2019.22.031]
83. Kim, J.K.; Bae, H.; Kim, M.J.; Choi, S.J.; Cho, H.Y.; Hwang, H.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Lim, S.T.; Kim, E.K.; Kim, H.K. et al. Inhibitory Effect of Poncirus trifoliate on Acetylcholinesterase and Attenuating Activity against Trimethyltin-Induced Learning and Memory Impairment. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.; 2009; 73, pp. 1105-1112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb.80859] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19420715]
84. Jeong, J.H.; Jo, Y.N.; Kim, H.J.; Jin, D.E.; Kim, D.O.; Heo, H.J. Black soybean extract protects against TMT-induced cognitive defects in mice. J. Med. Food; 2014; 17, pp. 83-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2013.3023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24456358]
85. Ayaz, M.; Junaid, M.; Ullah, F.; Subhan, F.; Sadiq, A.; Ali, G.; Ovais, M.; Shahid, M.; Ahmad, A.; Wadood, A. et al. Anti-Alzheimer’s Studies on β-Sitosterol Isolated from Polygonum hydropiper L. Front. Pharmacol.; 2017; 8, 697. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00697]
86. Chen, H.W.; He, X.H.; Yuan, R.; Wei, B.J.; Chen, Z.; Dong, J.X.; Wang, J. Sesquiterpenes and a monoterpenoid with acetylcholinesterase (AchE) inhibitory activity from Valeriana officinalis var. latiofolia in vitro and in vivo. Fitoterapia; 2016; 110, pp. 142-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2016.03.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976216]
87. Guesmi, F.; Bellamine, H.; Landoulsi, A. Hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, and mediated brain injury attenuated by Thymus algeriensis. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.; 2018; 43, pp. 1275-1281. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0107] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29800528]
88. Velayutham, S.; Sundararaju, A.; Govindhaswamy, T.; Gurupackiyam, M.; Balakrishnan, A.; Abdul, M.Y.; Ashok, C.; Jeyabalan, S. Neuroprotective Effect of Ethanolic Extract of Pedalium murex Linn Leaf in 3-Nitropropionic acid Induced Neurodegeneration. J. Res. Pharm.; 2023; 27, pp. 1143-1156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/jrp.405]
89. Tuzimski, T.; Petruczynik, A.; Szultka-Młyńska, M.; Sugajski, M.; Buszewski, B. Isoquinoline Alkaloid Contents in Macleaya cordata Extracts and Their Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibition. Molecules; 2022; 27, 3606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113606]
90. Katalinić, M.; Rusak, G.; Barović, J.D.; Šinko, G.; Jelić, D.; Antolović, R.; Kovarik, Z. Structural Aspects of Flavonoids as Inhibitors of Human Butyrylcholinesterase. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2010; 45, pp. 186-192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.09.041]
91. Hoffmann, M.; Stiller, C.; Endres, E.; Scheiner, M.; Gunesch, S.; Sotriffer, C.A.; Maurice, T.; Decker, M. Highly Selective Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibitors With Tunable Duration of Action by Chemical Modification of Transferable Carbamate Units Exhibit Pronounced Neuroprotective Effect in an Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Model. J. Med. Chem.; 2019; 62, pp. 9116-9140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609115]
92. Li, S.; Li, A.J.; Travers, J.; Xu, T.; Sakamuru, S.; Klumpp-Thomas, C.; Huang, R.; Xia, M. Identification of Compounds for Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibition. Slas Discov.; 2021; 26, pp. 1355-1364. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24725552211030897] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269114]
93. Bonesi, M.; Loizzo, M.R.; Conforti, F.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Saab, A.M.; Menichini, F.; Tundis, R. Berberis Aetnensis and B. Libanotica: A Comparative Study on the Chemical Composition, Inhibitory Effect on Key Enzymes Linked to Alzheimer’s Disease and Antioxidant Activity. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.; 2013; 65, pp. 1726-1735. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12172] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24236982]
94. Asik, R.M.; Suganthy, N.; Palanisamy, P.; Abdul-Kader, A.M.; Archunan, G. Antioxidant and Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activities of Ethyl Acetate Extract of Terminalia chebula: Cell-Free in Vitro and in Silico Studies. Pharmacogn. Mag.; 2017; 13, 437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/pm.pm_57_17]
95. Markowicz-Piasecka, M.; Sikora, J.; Mateusiak, Ł.; Mikiciuk-Olasik, E.; Huttunen, K.M. Metformin and Its Sulfenamide Prodrugs Inhibit Human Cholinesterase Activity. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.; 2017; 2017, 7303096. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7303096]
96. Uddin, M.J.; Russo, D.; Rahman, M.M.; Uddin, S.B.; Halim, M.A.; Zidorn, C.; Milella, L. Anticholinesterase Activity of Eight Medicinal Plant Species: In Vitro and In Silico Studies in the Search for Therapeutic Agents against Alzheimer’s Disease. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med.; 2021; 2021, 9995614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9995614]
97. Sadeghi, M.; Seyedebrahimi, S.; Ghanadian, M.; Miroliaei, M. Identification of cholinesterases inhibitors from flavonoids derivatives for possible treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: In silico and in vitro approaches. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol.; 2024; 7, 100146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2024.100146] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38707547]
98. Currais, A.; Farrokhi, C.; Dargusch, R.; Armando, A.; Quehenberger, O.; Schubert, D.; Maher, P. Fisetin Reduces the Impact of Aging on Behavior and Physiology in the Rapidly Aging SAMP8 Mouse. J. Gerontol. Ser. A; 2017; 73, pp. 299-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glx104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28575152]
99. Ranjan, N.; Kumari, M. Inhibitory activity of acetylcholinesterase (AchE) and antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of Desmodium gangeticum (L.). Int. J. Bioassays; 2016; 6, pp. 5208-5210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2017.01.004]
100. Lai Shi Min, S.; Liew, S.Y.; Chear, N.J.Y.; Goh, B.H.; Tan, W.-N.; Khaw, K.Y. Plant Terpenoids as the promising source of cholinesterase inhibitors for anti-AD therapy. Biology; 2022; 11, 307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11020307] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205173]
101. Taqui, R.; Debnath, M.; Ahmed, S.; Ghosh, A. Advances on plant extracts and phytocompounds with acetylcholinesterase inhibition activity for possible treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Phytomed. Plus; 2022; 2, 100184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phyplu.2021.100184]
102. Tamfu, A.N.; Kucukaydin, S.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Ozturk, M.; Dinica, R.M. Non-alkaloid cholinesterase inhibitory compounds from natural sources. Molecules; 2021; 26, 5582. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185582]
103. Jabir, N.; Khan, F.; Tabrez, S. Cholinesterase targeting by polyphenols: A therapeutic approach for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci. Ther.; 2018; 24, pp. 753-762. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.12971] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29770579]
104. Andrade, S.; Ramalho, M.J.; Loureiro, J.A.; Pereira, M.d.C. Natural Compounds for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 2313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092313] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083327]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by memory loss and cognitive decline, primarily due to dysfunction of acetylcholine caused by acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. While synthetic cholinesterase inhibitors like donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine are commonly used, they have notable side effects, prompting interest in natural alternatives. Medicinal plants, rich in bioactive compounds like flavonoids and alkaloids, have shown potential as cholinesterase inhibitors with additional antioxidants and anti-inflammatory benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the cholinesterase-inhibiting effects of various plant species and their compounds to identify new therapeutic candidates and reduce side effects. Method: A PRISMA-compliant review was conducted, screening studies from multiple databases, with a final inclusion of 64 in vivo studies. Results: These studies highlighted plant extracts such as Ferula ammoniacum, Elaeagnus umbellata, Bacopa monnieri, and Centella asiatica, which improved memory, reduced oxidative stress, and provided neuroprotection. Some extracts also reduced amyloid plaques, enhanced neuronal integrity, and restored cholinesterase activity, indicating their potential as therapeutic agents for AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. Conclusions: The findings underscore the promise of plant-based compounds in treating cognitive decline and cholinergic dysfunction in AD, advocating for further research into their therapeutic potential.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer