It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are associated with adverse effects and increasing resistance. However, uncomplicated cystitis remains a frequent reason for FQ use. Selective reporting involves withholding susceptibilities for select antimicrobial agents on microbiology reports, in hopes of dissuading use by providers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of FQ susceptibility suppression on discharge prescribing for hospitalized patients with uncomplicated cystitis.
Methods
This retrospective quasi-experimental analysis was conducted among adult patients at a 350-bed academic medical center. Its aim was to compare the incidence of FQ prescribing for cystitis at hospital discharge, one year before and after implementation (1 March 2017–31 March 2019) of a policy to suppress FQ urinary susceptibility results for pansusceptible Klebsiella spp and Escherichia coli. FQ appropriateness and risk factors for FQ use were also examined.
Results
There was a relative risk reduction of 39% in discharge FQ prescribing when adjusted for discharge team (adjusted risk ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, .40–.93). Almost all FQ use was inappropriate, largely due to organisms’ susceptibility to a guideline-preferred agent (n = 61). In multivariate analysis, odds ratios of discharge FQ prescribing were 0.22 (95% CI, .12–.39) for insured patients, 0.43 (95% CI, .21–.86) for patients with antibiotic allergy, and 57.8 (95% CI, 13.7–244) for those receiving inpatient FQ. Discharge from a medicine team was protective against discharge FQ prescribing.
Conclusions
With multidisciplinary inpatient medicine services and avoidance of inpatient FQ use, suppression of FQ susceptibilities on pansusceptible urine isolates for Klebsiella spp and E coli may represent an attractive strategy for antibiotic stewardship at hospital discharge.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Medical Center , Oklahoma City, Oklahoma , USA
2 College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma , Oklahoma City, Oklahoma , USA
3 Department of Clinical and Administration Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma , Oklahoma City, Oklahoma , USA