It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
The mammalian cell-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4c) has advantages over egg-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4e), as production using cell-derived candidate viruses eliminates the opportunity for egg adaptation. This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of IIV4c versus IIV4e in preventing cardiorespiratory hospitalizations during the 2019–2020 US influenza season.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records linked to claims data of US individuals aged 18–64 years. We assessed rVE against cardiorespiratory hospitalizations and against subcategories of this outcome, including influenza, pneumonia, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, and respiratory hospitalizations. We used a doubly robust inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression model to obtain odds ratios (ORs; odds of outcome among IIV4c recipients/odds of outcome among IIV4e recipients) adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, geographic region, vaccination week, health status, frailty, and healthcare resource utilization. rVE was calculated as 100(1 − ORadjusted).
Results
In total, 1 491 097 individuals (25.2%) received IIV4c, and 4 414 758 (74.8%) received IIV4e. IIV4c was associated with lower odds of cardiorespiratory (rVE, 2.5% [95% confidence interval, 0.9%–4.1%]), respiratory (3.7% [1.5%–5.8%]), and influenza (9.3% [0.4%–17.3%]) hospitalizations among adults 18–64 years of age. No difference was observed for the other outcomes.
Conclusions
This real-world study conducted for the 2019–2020 season demonstrated that vaccination with IIV4c was associated with fewer cardiorespiratory, respiratory, and influenza hospitalizations compared with IIV4e.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 CSL Seqirus , Kirkland, Quebec , Canada
2 FISABIO , Valencia , Spain
3 University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA
4 Veradigm , Chicago, Illinois , USA
5 CSL Seqirus Netherlands B.V. , Amsterdam , the Netherlands