It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
We sought to gauge provider perceptions to prepare an intervention which featured audit-feedback reports, academic detailing, and communication training to improve antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory infections (ARIs).
Methods
One-on-one interviews with providers (n = 20) from five VA Medical Centers were conducted in May–July 2017. Participants were recruited from emergency departments, primary care and community-based outreach clinics by e-mail. Interviews were conducted by telephone, audio-recorded, and transcribed. The Theory of Planned Behavior was used to develop semi-structured interview questions to capture attitudes, subjective norms (peer practices), planned future behaviors for managing ARIs, and intervention tools. Interviews were analyzed using codes developed from participant responses and categorized via consensus among authors. Codes were categorized into themes to map mental models.
Results
Beliefs and Attitudes: Providers were open to audit-feedback and tools to improve prescribing practices. Barriers to appropriate prescribing were perceived to include patient demand, time and resource limitations. Unfamiliarity with receipt of personal feedback and undefined roles of personnel to provide feedback within the clinic were anticipated to impede successful implementation. Behavior Control: Providers felt they had control to withhold or prescribe antibiotics. Social norms: Peer practices and lack of patient knowledge were perceived to drive patient demand. Planned future behaviors: The use of audit-feedback and communication strategies to address perceived patient demand were viable solutions to improve prescribing practices. However, utility of Shared Decision Making as a strategy varied due to provider expertise that antibiotics were not indicated for most ARIs; patient gaps in knowledge; and perceived patient insistence for an antibiotic.
Conclusion
Providers often intend to prescribe antibiotics appropriately yet barriers can influence practice. Potential interventions should provide tailored audit-feedback, address perceived patient demand, and support clinic structure to provide feedback. Strategies should consider time and resources available to address barriers.
Disclosures
All authors: No reported disclosures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Pharmacy, Boise VA Medical Center, Boise, Idaho
2 VA-Vinci Research, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah
3 Pharmacy Service, Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boise, ID
4 CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
5 University of Utah School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Salt Lake City, Utah
6 VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah