It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Diagnostic stewardship is an emerging tool that can be used to prevent overuse of diagnostics. Because GI mPCR (GI multiplex PCR panel) tests can be ordered on formed stool, the test has lower pre-test probability for Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection than traditional singleplex PCR. Furthermore, after 48hours of admission, most other targets on the GI mPCR are no longer clinically relevant. Any C. difficile testing on inappropriate specimens may increase the rate of Lab ID events (positive C. difficile tests after 3 days of admission) without improving detection of true infections.
Methods
In January 2018, our 700-bed academic medical center implemented an informatics-based intervention that restricted ordering of the GI mPCR to the first 48 hours of hospitalization. After 48 hours, providers were required to contact microbiology to request an exception (see Figure 1). Singleplex PCR testing for C. difficile was available throughout admission. Orders for the GI mPCR test require the provider to note whether the patient had >3 loose stools in the previous day. Statistical analysis performed with STATA software.
Results
A total of 282 late (after 48 hours of admission) GI mPCR tests were ordered in the 104 days before restriction and 210 late tests were ordered in the 104 days after. Late GI mPCR tests (before and after restriction) resulted in diagnoses other than C. difficile less than 5% of the time (20 of 492 tests). 11.7% (24 of 210) of late GI mPCR tests were ordered for patients who did not have >3 loose stools in the previous day. Prior to restriction, 15% (41 of 282) of Lab ID events from GI mPCR were for patients who had already tested positive for C. difficile earlier in the same admission. Following the intervention, there was a decreased proportion of GI mPCR tests that were positive for C. difficile (from 14.5% to 11.3%, P = 0.26), as well as a significantly decreased rate of Lab ID events detected by GI mPCR, from 7.2/10,000 patient days to 4.0/10,000 patient days (P = 0.01).
Conclusion
Accurate diagnosis of C. difficile infection is important for treatment and prevention efforts, yet these data show that many rapid GI mPCR tests are inappropriately ordered on patients who may not have loose stools and who are unlikely to have an alternate diagnosis. EMR-based restriction on the GI mPCR ordering time reduced Lab ID events of C. difficile infection without missing important alternate diagnoses.
Disclosures
All authors: No reported disclosures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Infectious Diseases and Global Health, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
2 Department of Pediatrics, Section Infectious Disease, University of Chicago / Comer Children Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
3 Infection Control Program, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
4 Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
5 Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois