Abstract

Background

Evaluating end-of-life (EOL) antimicrobial prescribing practices may guide stewardship efforts.

Methods

We conducted a 27-item survey of attending physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners at Yale New Haven Hospital from January 2018 to February 2018 using REDCap.

Results

Of 275 providers surveyed, 109 (40%) responded. Regardless of specialty, most consider withholding antimicrobials at EOL (n = 73/109, 67%), view IV antimicrobials as escalation of care (n = 66/109, 61%), believe decision-making should involve patients and providers (n = 101/109, 93%), and recognize diarrhea as an adverse effect (n = 97/109, 89%; Table 1). However, among the subset who conduct advance care planning (N = 82), only 49% (N = 40/82) discuss antimicrobials.

Conclusion

Despite agreement in EOL prescribing practices across specialties, antimicrobials are not routinely addressed during advance care planning. These data support the integration of antimicrobial use into advance care plans linked to stewardship programs.

End-of-Life Prescribing Practices, N (%)

Characteristic Specialty Years Practicing
Overall N = 109 Hematology Oncology N = 49 Infectious Diseases N = 23 Pulmonary Critical Care N = 23 Geriatrics Primary Care N = 10 Palliative Care N = 4 < 10 N = 52 ≥ 10 N = 57
Advance Care Planning
Conduct above 82 (75) 41 (84) 15 (65) 12 (52) 10 (100) 4 (100) 35 (67) 47 (83)
Discuss antimicrobials 40 21 8 5 5 1 16 24
Barriers to Addressing Antimicrobials
Lack of time 36 (33) 15 (31) 10 (44) 7 (30) 2 (20) 2 (50) 17 (33) 19 (33)
Family members 57 (52) 28 (57) 16 (70) 10 (44) 2 (20) 1 (25) 34 (65) 23 (40)
Litigation fear 25 (23) 11 (23) 8 (35) 6 (26) 0 (0) 0 (0) 15 (29) 10 (18)
Decision Making
Patient provider together 101 (93) 43 (88) 22 (96) 22 (96) 10 (100) 4 (100) 47 (90) 54 (95)
Withholding Antimicrobials
Consider above 73 (67) 35 (71) 15 (65) 10 (46) 9 (90) 4 (100) 33 (64) 40 (71)
Deem unethical 8 (7) 5 (10) 1 (4) 2 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (8) 4 (7)
Escalation of Care
IV antimicrobials 66 (61) 26 (53) 15 (65) 16 (70) 6 (60) 3 (75) 26 (50) 40 (70)
Restricted antimicrobials 66 (61) 26 (53) 14 (61) 17 (74) 5 (50) 4 (100) 28 (54) 38 (67)
IV Antimicrobial Adverse Effects
Line discomfort 81 (74) 34 (69) 19 (83) 18 (78) 8 (80) 2 (50) 37 (71) 44 (77)
Diarrhea 97 (89) 43 (88) 20 (87) 22 (96) 9 (90) 3 (75) 46 (88) 51 (89)

Disclosures

M. Juthani-Mehta, Iterum Therapeutics: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.

Details

Title
1832. Concordance in End-of-Life Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices among Medicine Subspecialists
Author
Datta, Rupak 1 ; McManus, Dayna 2 ; Topal, Jeffrey 3 ; Sanft, Tara 4 ; Quagliarello, Vincent 1 ; Dembry, Louise Marie 1 ; Morrison, Laura 5 ; Juthani-Mehta, Manisha 1 

 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 
 Department of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut 
 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 
 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 
 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 
Pages
S521-S522
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Nov 2018
Publisher
Oxford University Press
e-ISSN
23288957
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3171026471
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.