It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
In October 2015, ACIP recommended that serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine may be administered to persons aged 16–23 years (age 16–18 preferentially) as Category B (individual clinical decision-making), in addition to the Category A recommendation made in June 2015 for at-risk individuals aged ≥10 years. Currently, MenB vaccine coverage among adolescents and young adults (AYAs), including whether disparities exist, is not well-described.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of claims data collected by IQVIA and linked to sociodemographic data collected by Experian to estimate overall and subpopulation-level uptake of MenB vaccine (≥1 dose) among AYAs aged 10–25 years as of May 31, 2017.
Results
Among 2,501,188 AYAs aged 10–25 years, MenB vaccine uptake was only 1.4% at the end of May 2017. MenB vaccination varied by age, with uptake of 0.2%, 2.5%, 1.6%, and 0.2% among individuals aged 10‒15, 16‒18, 19‒23, and 24‒25 years (P < 0.01), respectively. Lower uptake was observed for non-Hispanic blacks (1.0% vs. 1.4% among non-Hispanic whites, P < 0.01), AYAs in lower income households (1.0% vs. 2.2% among lowest vs. highest income deciles, P < 0.01), and those living in rural (0.6%) or urban/inner-city (0.9%) areas (vs. 1.5% in suburban areas, P < 0.01). The strongest predictors of MenB vaccination were previously receiving quadravalent meningococcal (MenACWY) or human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. These AYAs were 36.1 and 5.1 times more likely to have received MenB vaccine and had MenB uptake of 9.8% and 5.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
As of May 2017, MenB vaccine uptake among AYAs aged 10‒25 years was low (<2%). Even though absolute differences were small, significant disparities in MenB uptake existed. Uptake was notably higher for AYAs who had received ≥1 dose of MenACWY or HPV vaccine. This suggests MenB vaccination is occurring primarily among AYAs who have received other Category A vaccines, and that conversations between clinicians and patients about MenB vaccination—which are at the heart of a Category B recommendation—are limited outside of this context. Given the real-world inadequacies of a Category B recommendation highlighted by our study, future efforts should improve the AYA vaccination platform to ensure adequate immunization of AYAs, especially in underserved communities.
Disclosures
F. L. Khan, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock and Stock Options. D. L. Swerdlow, Pfizer Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. L. J. York, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock and Stock Options. P. Balmer, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock and Stock Options. R. E. Isturiz, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock and Stock Options. J. M. McLaughlin, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock and Stock Options.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Pfizer, Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania