It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
During 2016, our hospital experienced an outbreak with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in our solid-organ transplant (SOT) population. Since this outbreak and until now, our hospital has implemented active CPE screening of patients admitted to SOT units and point prevalence surveillances in any unit with a known CPE patient. The present study evaluates the yield of these screening tests and their cost since implementation.
Methods
This retrospective cohort was performed in a 600-bed hospital in Milwaukee, WI. CPE screening tests were retrieved from the clinical microbiology laboratory dataset from January 2016 to April 2019. CPE tests are performed on rectal swabs or stool samples using the CDC broth enrichment method followed by MIC confirmation using Etest. CPE patients were placed on enhanced precautions (gowns, gloves, booties) and were cohorted geographically and to 1:1 nursing and nurse aid staff.
Results
A total of 6,684 samples belonging to 3,383 patients were processed (1.9 samples/patient). Two hundred thirty (3.44%) had carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, although only 33 isolates (0.49%) were confirmed as either KPC (n = 31) or NDM (n = 2) positive. Out of the 3,383 patients tested, 121 were identified as carriers of carbapenem-resistant isolates but only 11 (0.32%) were CPE (KPC = 11; NDM = 2). The incidence of new CPE patients during 2016 was 0.82% but decreased to 0.28% and 0.33% in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The units with the highest number of CPE patients were the transplant intensive care unit (n = 6) and the step-down SOT unit (n = 3). Negative cultures were quoted at $8.49 per sample but culture plates with colonies increased the cost per test to $28.44. The total cost for all the 6,684 screening tests was calculated at $61,335. The cost of CPE screening per positive CPE patient identified comes up to $5,575 (not including RN collection time).
Conclusion
In an institution with staff and CPE patient cohorting, active screening of CPE positive patients was relatively expensive given our low -level of transmission. In the near future, we plan to stop staff and patient cohorting due to the high stress that these interventions place on our hospital staff. This might ensue in increase transmission, which will be detected by CPE screening tests.
Disclosures
All authors: No reported disclosures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidad CES, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
2 Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
3 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
4 Froedtert and Medical College of Wisconsin, Racine, Wisconsin