It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Clostridioides difficile is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infection. Despite multimodal prevention efforts, in-hospital transmission continues to occur. In this study, we tested whether the choice of treatment can reduce C. difficile shedding and contamination of the inpatient environment.
Methods
We conducted a prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial of adult inpatients with C. difficile at Duke University Hospital. Thirty subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive metronidazole, vancomycin, or fidaxomicin. Stool specimens and environmental samples from five high-touch surfaces were serially collected throughout each subject’s hospital stay. Each specimen was assessed by quantitative culture and PCR ribotyping. Primary outcomes included the change over time in C. difficile stool burden and environmental contamination relative to treatment choice. As a secondary outcome, we examined the correlation between infecting strains and contaminating strains present in the care environment.
Results
Relative to metronidazole (Figure 1), C. difficile stool shedding decreased more rapidly for patients receiving vancomycin (P = 0.05) and most rapidly with fidaxomicin (P = 0.002). Treatment choice had no significant effect on total C. difficile colony counts across sites sampled over time (Figure 2). However, both vancomycin (P = 0.001) and fidaxomicin (P = 0.01) were associated with lower proportions of positive environmental cultures than metronidazole (Figure 3). Ribotyping of subjects’ stool isolates matched surrounding environmental isolates >90% of the time (Figure 4).
Conclusion
Fidaxomicin and vancomycin reduced C. difficile stool burden more rapidly than metronidazole. Environmental results were mixed: fidaxomicin and vancomycin were associated with fewer positive surface cultures, but no difference in total colony counts. High concordance between stool and environmental ribotypes confirms that most room contamination originated from study subjects, without a significant contribution from any additional sources. Treatment choice may have a role in reducing C. difficile contamination of the hospital environment. Further study is needed to assess for effect on disease incidence.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported Disclosures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
2 UNC Health Care Systems, Snow Camp, North Carolina
3 UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
4 Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina
5 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina