It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The ability to cognitively regulate emotional responses to aversive events is essential for mental and physical health. One prerequisite of successful emotion regulation is the awareness of emotional states, which in turn is associated with the awareness of bodily signals [interoceptive awareness (IA)]. This study investigated the neural dynamics of reappraisal of emotional responses in 28 participants who differed with respect to IA. Electroencephalography was used to characterize the time course of emotion regulation. We found that reappraisal was accompanied by reduced arousal and significant modulation of late neural responses. What is more, higher IA facilitated downregulation of affect and was associated with more pronounced modulation of underlying neural activity. Therefore, we conclude that IA not only advances the consolidation of somatic markers required for guiding individual behaviour but also creates processing advantages in tasks referring to these bodily markers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, 2 Institute of Psychology, Health Psychology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, 3 Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany and 4 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, 2 Institute of Psychology, Health Psychology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, 3 Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany and 4 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
2 Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, 2 Institute of Psychology, Health Psychology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, 3 Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany and 4 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany