It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
CD163 and calprotectin have been proposed as biomarkers of active renal vasculitis. This study aimed to determine whether the combination of serum/urine calprotectin (s/uCalprotectin) and urinary soluble CD163 (suCD163) increases their individual performance as activity biomarkers.
Methods
We included 138 patients diagnosed with ANCA vasculitis (n = 52 diagnostic phase, n = 86 remission). The study population was divided into the inception (n = 101) and the validation cohorts (n = 37). We determined the s/uCalprotectin and suCD163 concentration using enzyme-linked immunoassay at the diagnostic or at the remission phase. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted to assess the biomarkers’ classificatory values. We elaborated a combinatorial biomarker model in the inception cohort. The ideal cutoffs were used in the validation cohort to confirm the model's accuracy in the distinction between active disease and remission. We added the classical ANCA vasculitis activity biomarkers to the model to increase the classificatory performance.
Results
The concentrations of sCalprotectin and suCD163 were higher in the diagnostic compared with the remission phase (P = .013 and P < .0001). According to the ROC curves, sCalprotectin and suCD163 were accurate biomarkers to discern activity [area under the curve 0.73 (0.59–0.86), P = .015 and 0.88 (0.79–0.97), P < .0001]. The combinatory model with the best performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio included sCalprotectin, suCD163 and haematuria. Regarding the inception and the validation cohort, we obtained a sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio of 97%, 90% and 9.7, and 78%, 94% and 13, respectively.
Conclusions
In patients with ANCA vasculitis, a predictive model combining sCalprotectin, suCD163 and haematuria could be useful in detecting active kidney disease.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Nephrology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat , Barcelona , Spain
2 Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona , Spain
3 Department of Nephrology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid , Spain
4 Department of Immunology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona , Spain