Introduction
In recent years, drug overdose deaths have increased significantly [1, 2]. The supply of synthetic opioids like fentanyl has increased the number of overdose deaths for more than a decade [3]. Since its commercial synthesis in 1960, fentanyl has become the most used opioid as an intraoperative analgesic [4]. Due to its high lipid solubility, fentanyl is more fast-acting and more potent than heroin, resulting in a quick onset of euphoria and relief from pain [5]. Nevertheless, fentanyl has become one of the most detected drugs involved in overdose fatalities in the United States [6]. Overdose deaths involving opioids accounted for 70.6% of deaths in 2019, while synthetic opioids accounted for 51.5%. According to the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 9.5 million Americans misuse opioids every year, and 75% of the 92,000 drug overdose deaths were caused by opioids [7, 8].
Susceptibility to viruses such as HIV and viral hepatitis is common in people with opioid use disorders (OUDs), and several outbreaks have occurred as a result of the current opioid crisis [9, 10]. Multiple studies demonstrate that endogenous and exogenous opioids modulate immune function in vitro and in vivo [11–13] including multiple effects on adult macrophages [14]. Additionally, opioids such as morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, heroin, and fentanyl are thought to have immunomodulatory properties [15]. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that opioids suppress multiple immune cells, including macrophage phagocytosis and cytokine secretion, neutrophil production of cytokines and chemokines, diminished cytotoxic function of natural killer cells, repression of dendritic cells, and decreased activation and proliferation of B and T cells [16, 17].
Macrophages and CD4+ T cells are major targets for HIV infection in vivo and play a major role in the pathogenesis of infection [18–20]. We have recently demonstrated that fentanyl increases the expression of HIV p24 antigen and enhances chemokine co-receptors in HIV-infected and HIV-susceptible lymphocytes [21]. However, the role of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl on HIV replication in macrophages is yet to be investigated.
Methods
Cell lines and reagents
U937 is a cell line exhibiting monocyte morphology that was obtained from ATCC (#CRL-1593.2). SH-SY5Y is a neuroblastoma cell line that robustly expresses the mu opioid receptor and was obtained from ATCC (#CRL-2266). Fentanyl and naltrexone were obtained as Certified Reference Material from Cerilliant (Round Rock, TX). Per their certificates of analysis, these reagents are suitable for the identification, calibration, and quantification of analytes in analytical and R&D applications. Fentanyl was diluted with dH2O to concentrations of 1 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL, and 10 ug/mL.
Human peripheral blood CD14+ monocytes were procured from Lonza and maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (Biotechne, screened for MDM maturation and viability), 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 U/mL penicillin, 2 mM glutamine, and 5 ng/mL GM-CSF or 20 ng/mL M-CSF (Peprotech). Monocytes were maintained in cytokine-supplemented media for 7 days to facilitate maturation into monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs).
Mu opioid receptor expression
Mu opioid receptor expression (MOR) was quantified in 1 x 105 cells using the human opioid receptor mu 1 (OPRM1) ELISA (MyBioSource; San Diego, CA) with a lower limit of detection (LOD) of 7.81 pg/mL.
Virus preparation
HIVYK-JRCSF (CCR5-tropic) was prepared by transfection of 1 x 106 293T cells (ATCC #CRL-3216) per well with 1 μg of the full-length HIVYK-JRCSF plasmid [22] in a 6-well plate using the FuGene6 transfection reagent (Roche). Transfected cells were incubated at 37°C for an additional 48–72 hours. Virus-containing supernatants were passed through a 0.20 μm filter and precipitated in polyethylene glycol at 4°C. Virus was centrifuged at 14,000 g for 20 minutes, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and frozen at -80°C until use. The virus was titered using TZM-bl cells and β -galactosidase staining. HIV p24 protein was quantified in culture supernatants as outlined below.
HIV infection and p24 protein quantification
2 x 105 U937 cells were infected with 0.5 TCID50 of HIVYK-JRCSF for 1 hour. The virus was removed, and cells were washed with PBS 5 times to remove unbound virus prior to fentanyl exposure. HIV p24 protein was quantified using the HIV p24 ELISA Kit (Abcam; Cambridge, MA) with a lower limit of sensitivity of 1.1 pg/mL.
Drug exposure
HIV-infected U937 cells were seeded at 2 x 105 cells per well. Fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with drug, p24 protein was quantified in culture supernatants by ELISA.
Proviral DNA quantification
DNA was extracted from ACH-2 cells that contain a single copy of HIV proviral DNA (LAV strain) and used as a positive control to quantify virus levels in U937 cells before and after fentanyl exposure. HIV proviral DNA copy number was quantified by real-time PCR amplification using Brilliant III ultra-fast SYBR green QPCR master mix (Agilent) as described elsewhere [23]. Primer sequences used for amplification of HIV-1 pol: 5′ - TAC AGG AGC AGA TGA TAC AG - 3′ and 5′ - CCT GGC TTT AAT TTT ACT GG - 3′. SYBR green real-time PCR assay was performed in 20 μL of PCR mixture consisting of 2x Master Mix, 200 nM of each oligonucleotide primer targeting the HIV pol gene, and DNA extracted from U937 cells treated and untreated with HIV YK-JRCSF +/- fentanyl at three different concentration. To quantify HIV provirus, a standard curve was defined using serial dilutions of ACH-2-derived DNA ranging from 1 to 106 copies/uL. All standard dilutions, controls, and samples were run in triplicate, and the average value ct was utilized to quantify HIV DNA.
Human peripheral blood CD14+ monocytes were obtained from Lonza and cultured in RPMI 1640. Cell counting was performed using trypan blue staining and 1 x 106 cells were seeded in a flask and supplemented with RPMI 1640 + GM CSF+ IL-4 and incubated at 37°C for 6 days for monocyte to macrophage transformation. On day 7, MDMs were harvested, and 1 x 105 cells per well were plated.
Naltrexone was added (10 μg/mL) and incubated for 1–2 hours and then fentanyl (10 μg/mL) was added and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, cells were infected with HIVYK-JRCSF and incubated for 2 hours. Cells were rinsed three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with fresh media with fentanyl and incubated for 3 days. Supernatant and cells were harvested at the end of 72 hours. HIV p24 ELISA was performed with supernatants, and PCR for detection of integrated DNA was performed from DNA extracted from cell lysates by real-time PCR based on SYBR Green I detection.
Chemokine receptor expression
CCR5 protein expression was quantified in cell lysates using the Human CC-Chemokine Receptor 5 (CCR5) ELISA Kit (MyBioSource.com; catalog #MBS166945) with a sensitivity of 2.61 ng/L. CXCR4 protein expression was quantified in cell lysates using the Human CXC-Chemokine Receptor 4 (CXCR4) ELISA Kit (MyBioSource.com; catalog #MBS771091) with a sensitivity of 3.9 pg/mL.
TLR9 receptor expression
TLR9 protein expression was quantified in cell lysates by the Human Toll-Like Receptor 9 ELISA Kit (MyBioSource.com; catalog #MBS762185) with a sensitivity of 0.094 ng/mL.
Cell viability
10,000 U937 cells were seeded per well of a 96-well plate. Fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with fentanyl, the potential toxicity was evaluated by the MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (BioVision; Milpitas, CA; catalog #K299-1000).
RNAseq and microRNAseq
The U937 cell line was seeded at 1 x 106 cells per well. 100 ng/mL fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with drug, total RNA was isolated using the commercially available microRNA Isolation Kit (miVana; Applied Biosystems; Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA concentration and purity were determined by NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA). A 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent; Santa Clara, CA) and agarose electrophoresis were used to assess RNA integrity.
MicroRNAseq was performed by the Genomics, Epigenomics and Sequencing Core at the University of Cincinnati [24]. NEBNext small RNA sample library preparation kit (NEB; Ipswich, MA) was used to prepare the library with a modified approach for precise microRNA library size selection and higher library recovery and microRNA read alignment. After 15 cycles of PCR with 100 ng total RNA as input, the libraries with unique indices were pooled, column cleaned, and combined with a custom-designed DNA ladder containing purified amplicons of 135 and 146 base pairs (bp). This size range corresponds to a 16–27 nt insert microRNA library that covers all microRNAs. The library pool ranging from 135 to 146 bp, including the DNA marker, was gel purified and quantified using the NEBNext Library Quant kit (NEB) in the QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA). A few million reads were generated to determine the relative concentration of each library using an Illumina Nextseq 550 sequencer. To achieve equal numbers of reads from each sample, the capacity of each library was adjusted for the final data analysis. Sequences were pre-processed using the ShortRead R tool to remove adapters and low-quality reads. Using the Bowtie2 aligner, reads were aligned to the reference human genome(hg19) [25]. The reads aligning to each known mature microRNA were counted using Bioconductor packages for next-generation sequencing data analysis [26] based on microRNA definitions in the miRBase database [27]. Statistical analysis to detect differentially expressed microRNAs were performed, and p-values were calculated based on the negative binomial model of read counts as implemented in edgeR [28].
Following established protocols, the University of Cincinnati’s Genomics, Epigenomics and Sequencing Core carried out directed polyA RNA sequencing [29, 30]. Bioanalyzer was used to test the quality of total RNA (Agilent; Santa Clara, CA). The Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEBNext; Ipswich, MA) was used to isolate polyA RNA for library preparation with 1 μg of high-quality total RNA as input. SMARTer Apollo automated NGS library prep system (Takara Bio USA; Mountain View, CA) and the New England BioLabs NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep kit (PCR cycle number 8) were utilized for enrichment of polyA RNA and library preparation, respectively. Following QC and real-time qPCR (NEBNext Library Quant Kit; New England BioLabs; Ipswich, MA), the individual indexed libraries were proportionally pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NextSeq 550 sequencer (Illumina; San Diego, CA) at single read 1x85 bp setting. Using Kallisto the raw reads were aligned, which uses pseudoalignment to determine if they are compatible with genomic targets. Genomic annotations were provided by the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) Genome Browser, with output in transcripts per million (TPM). Raw data were log2-transformed and baselined to the median of all samples. Transcripts were filtered further to include only those with TPM > 3 in 50% of samples (N = 10,703 transcripts). The level of differential expression was determined using moderated t-tests [31] with a significance cutoff of p < 0.05. With a focus on biological processes and pathways, significant transcripts were evaluated for their ontological relevance using ToppGene and ToppCluster, and figures were produced in Cytoscape. To construct comprehensive gene sets for candidate biological functions, Gataca (https://gataca.cchmc.org/gataca/) and ToppGene were used (https://toppgene.cchmc.org), where the input for Gataca is a biological process or pathway and the output is related genes. Principal component analysis (PCA) was then used to create principal components from candidate gene sets, which were plotted to assess each candidate gene set’s capacity to separate samples based on drug exposure.
Quantitative real time PCR validation
SYBR green analysis was utilized to validate the accuracy of the RNAseq results using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Total cellular RNA was extracted from cells infected with HIV and treated with fentanyl / no fentanyl with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA synthesis and PCR amplification were performed with the Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (#600887, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Beta globin was used as the endogenous control for mRNA analysis. Two upregulated (AGAP5, EIF3C) and two downregulated genes (EARS2, DDX42) were selected. The primers used are listed in S1 Table. Amplifications were performed with the following thermal cycling conditions: 10-minute incubation at 50°C for cDNA synthesis followed by initial activation at 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 30 seconds (sec) at 95°C, 30 seconds of Tm, and 1 minute at 60°C. A dissociation curve was generated to confirm the generation of a single PCR product. Gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔct method and normalized to a housekeeping gene.
Statistical analysis
For each experimental condition, technical duplicates were performed with error bars representing the standard deviation. ANOVA with replication was utilized to evaluate the statistical significance (p < 0.05) for the different doses of fentanyl compared to the “no drug” condition.
Results
Expression of the mu opioid receptor
Mu opioid receptor (MOR) expression was quantified in U937 cells. MOR expression was lower than in the positive control SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line but still robustly expressed (Fig 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fentanyl enhances HIV replication
Previous studies have shown that other drugs of abuse increase long terminal repeat activation and/or HIV gene expression in monocytes/macrophages [32–34]. Thus, we evaluated the potential impact of fentanyl on HIV expression. As shown in Fig 2, fentanyl led to a dose-dependent increase in HIV p24 protein expression at 24 hours post-drug exposure (ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0038). Log10 copies of HIV proviral DNA were also increased with dose-dependent concentration of drug compared to HIV-infected but drug-naïve U937 cells (ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0001) (Fig 3).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Cells were infected with HIVYK-JRCSF at a TCID50 of 0.5 for 1 hour and rinsed with PBS three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with DMEM. 0 ng, 1 ng, 100 ng, or 10 μg of fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with drug, HIV p24 protein (pg/mL) was quantified in culture supernatants. ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0038.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
After 24 hours, cells were treated with HIVYK-JRCSF at TCID50 of 0.5 for 1 hour and rinsed with PBS three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with fresh DMEM. 0 ng, 1 ng, 100 ng, or 10 μg of fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After incubation with drug for 24 hours, HIV proviral DNA was quantified in cells by real-time PCR based on SYBR Green I detection. Error bars represent the standard deviations between replicates. ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0001.
Fentanyl alters expression of HIV co-receptors
As the interaction of HIV with susceptible cells is mediated by its primary receptor (CD4) and chemokine co-receptors (CCR5 and CXCR4), we investigated the influence of fentanyl on CCR5 and CXCR4 protein expression levels in HIV-uninfected U937 cells treated with drug. We previously reported increased expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 in other cell types [35]; however, in U937 cells, fentanyl resulted in a modest but non-significant decrease in CCR5 protein expression (Fig 4A; ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0946). There was no change in CXCR4 protein expression in U937 cells treated with fentanyl (Fig 4B; ANOVA for dose effect = 0.1414).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
0 ng, 1 ng, 100 ng, or 10 μg of fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with drug, (A) CCR5 receptor (ng/mL) and (B) CCR4 receptor protein (ng/mL) levels were quantified by ELISA in cell lysates. ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0946 for CCR5 and 0.1414 for CXCR4.
Fentanyl does not impact TLR9 expression
Liao et al. previously reported that opioid use leads to decreased expression of toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in individuals with HIV and that morphine promoted HIV replication in macrophages by inhibiting TLR9 [36]. We previously observed that HIV infection of SH-SY5Y cells resulted in a significant increase in TLR9 protein expression and that this induction was abolished by fentanyl [37]. In contrast, no such effect of fentanyl on TLR9 expression was observed in U937 cells (Fig 5; ANOVA for dose effect = 0.455).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
100 ng fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with drug, cells were infected with HIVYK-JRCSF at a TCID50 of 0.5 for 1 hour and rinsed with PBS three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with fresh DMEM. After 24 hours of incubation, TLR9 receptor protein (ng/mL) was quantified by ELISA in cell lysates. ANOVA for dose effect = 0.455.
Fentanyl decreases cell viability
Given that fentanyl could impact cell growth, cell proliferation was quantified in U937 cells exposed to fentanyl. As shown in Fig 6, a modest dose-dependent reduction in U937 cell number was observed, although cell viability remained high (ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0402).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fentanyl was added to the culture medium after 24 hours. After 24 hours of incubation with drug, the potential toxicity (optical density [OD] at 590 nm) was evaluated by the MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit. ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0402.
Fentanyl had no significant effect on microRNA expression
Using total microRNA isolated from U937 cells treated with or without fentanyl for 24 hours, a comprehensive microRNA expression profile was generated. There were 19 microRNAs differentially expressed with p-value < 0.2 as shown in S1 Fig. A list of microRNAs with their p-value and fold change is provided in S2 Table.
Fentanyl alters the cellular transcriptome in U937 cells
To further explore the role of fentanyl in HIV pathogenesis, U937 cells were treated with fentanyl to characterize its effect on cellular gene expression. Differential analysis identified 14,740 transcripts of which 56 were significantly expressed in the fentanyl-treated cells compared to untreated. The list of transcripts that are significantly upregulated or downregulated is shown in S3 Table. GO enrichment for the differentially expressed genes using ToppGene is provided in S4 Table. Principal component analysis (PCA) was plotted to determine each candidate gene set’s ability to segregate samples according to drug exposure (Fig 7). Using principal component analysis, gene expression profiles were then explored in more depth for genes involved in antiviral response, cell death, chemokine signaling, interferon response, and NFκB signaling. The list of genes under each subcategory is provided in S5 Table. A list of five upregulated genes with the highest fold change and downregulated genes with the lowest fold change is provided in Fig 7.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
(A) Antiviral, (B) cell death, (C) chemokine, (D) interferon, and (E) NFκB signaling genes that are significantly differentially expressed (red circle = no fentanyl and cyan circle = fentanyl treated). Genes highlighted in red are those that are statistically significant.
Validation of RNAseq data by real-time PCR
To validate the RNAseq results, two sets of differentially expressed genes that demonstrated up regulation or down regulation, coupled with a low P value (P value < 0.05) were selected for further analysis. The analysis of real-time PCR results using RNA isolated from both U937 and MDM cells infected with HIV and treated with fentanyl revealed overall agreement with the RNAseq data. Variations in the expression pattern of the differentially expressed genes were observed in the real-time PCR analysis among the RNA samples isolated from U937 and MDM cells. Expression of AGAP4, EIF3C, DDX42, and EARS2 genes were statistically significant in U937 cells (S2 Fig). Except for the EIF3 gene, all other three genes showed significant expression in MDMs (S3 Fig).
Fentanyl enhances HIV replication in monocyte-derived macrophages
We further tested the effects of fentanyl on HIV-infected MDMs (Fig 8). Fentanyl treatment resulted in a 54.8% increased expression of HIV p24 and 2.25 log10 increase in proviral DNA. Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist used to treat opioid and alcohol use disorder and can limit HIV replication induced by opioids [38]. Treatment with 10 ug/mL naltrexone blocked the effect of fentanyl on HIV replication.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
On day 7, monocyte-derived macrophages [MDM] were harvested, and 1 x 105 cells per well were plated. Naltrexone was added at 10 ug/mL and incubated for 1–2 hours, and then fentanyl at 10 ug /mL was added and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, cells were infected with HIVYK-JRCSF and incubated for 2 hours. The cells were then rinsed three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with fresh media with fentanyl and incubated for 3 days. Supernatant and cells were harvested at the end of 72 hours. (A) HIV p24 ELISA was performed from supernatant, ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0066 and (B) integrated DNA was quantified from cells by real-time PCR based on SYBR Green I detection, ANOVA for dose effect = 0.0558. Error bars represent the standard deviations between replicates.
Discussion
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in deaths related to drug overdoses. Numerous studies have shown that opioids depress immunity and increase infection susceptibility [39]. Opioid use disorders (OUDs) increase the risk of contracting infections such as HIV and viral hepatitis [11]. The immune function can be modulated by endogenous opioids and exogenous opioids [11]. For instance, HIV replication was elevated in morphine-exposed immune cells [14, 40, 41]. Morphine may affect HIV disease by modulating beta-chemokine, chemokine receptor, and microRNA expression mechanisms [42, 43]. Cocaine has also been reported to have similar effects on HIV replication [44]. Cocaine activates HIV and promotes replication by downregulation of chemokines [45]. Similarly, HIV replication is facilitated by methamphetamine [46, 47]. Fentanyl users are likely to inject and share syringes frequently, which has become a major concern for disease prevention efforts since this increases the risk of contracting parenterally transmitted diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C [48–50]. Macrophages and CD4+ T cells are major targets for HIV and play a major role in pathogenesis. We have recently demonstrated that fentanyl increases HIV p24 antigen production and enhances chemokine co-receptors in HIV-infected and HIV-susceptible CD4+ T cells [21]. To explore the effect of fentanyl on the other immunological cell types involved in HIV infection pathogenesis, we evaluated macrophages.
A previous study by Wang X et al. performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrated that morphine activates the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) and reduces anti-HIV microRNA levels [51]. Additionally, cocaine can enhance HIV transcription, raising virus load in patients [52, 53]. Morphine and methadone promote HIV replication in human immune cells by stimulating the expression of CCR5, a principal HIV entry coreceptor. Earlier research has shown that morphine promotes HIV infection by upregulating CCR5 expression in macrophages [54]. Methadone can also increase CCR5 production and enhance HIV infection [33, 55]. Thus, fentanyl may enhance HIV entry into cells by increasing HIV co-receptor expression. While we previously reported increased expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 in other cell types [21, 37], in the current study fentanyl resulted in a modest but non-significant decrease in CCR5 protein expression in U937 cells and there was no major difference in CXCR4 protein expression.
Naltrexone is a MOR antagonist approved by the FDA for alcohol use disorder and OUD [56]. In persons living with HIV, naltrexone extends viral suppression of HIV [57]. In vitro, naltrexone reverses enhanced viral replication induced by several drugs of abuse [58]. Supporting these findings, our results also demonstrated that both HIV p24 protein and proviral DNA expression decreased when opioid receptors were blocked with naltrexone.
Our previous studies demonstrated that fentanyl inhibited HIV-induced TLR9 expression [37]. Several TLRs may be involved in the pathogenesis of HIV [59]. Earlier reports showed that the clinical course of HIV was shown to be impacted by TLR9, although further study is required to determine how TLR9 influences HIV [60]. A study by Brichacek et al. found that TLR9 agonists reduced HIV replication in PBMCs [61]. A study by Liao et al. found that opioids reduced the expression of TLR9 within HIV-infected individuals [36]. Methamphetamine also interferes with TLR9-mediated HIV antiviral activity [62]. As a result of downregulating TLR expression in host cells, fentanyl suppresses HIV immunity. However, our study did not show any effect of fentanyl on TLR9 expression in U937 cells.
Limitations of the present study should be considered. First, in vitro exposure to fentanyl was brief (24 hours) and may not reflect chronic, long-term drug use. There is also a high rate of polysubstance use among persons who inject drugs. Thus, fentanyl use may occur alongside other substances such as methamphetamine and cocaine. Second, despite a lack of well-characterized physiologically relevant concentrations of fentanyl, other researchers have reported concentrations between 10−12 M and 10−4 M [63–65]. We used three different concentrations of fentanyl in this experiment, which is in line with the values found in patient populations with drugs of abuse. Third, our experiments used a single HIV isolate; however, it is possible that distinct viral isolates may respond differently to fentanyl. Fourth, there are many metabolites and analogs of fentanyl that should be examined as well. In addition to their distinctive binding affinities for mu opioid receptors, analogs and metabolites may also inhibit HIV replication [66, 67]. Finally, RNA sequencing results showed multiple transcripts that were differently expressed in the cells treated with fentanyl compared to untreated HIV-infected U937 cells. Several microRNAs were also differentially expressed, although none were significant.
Taken together, our study provides compelling experimental evidence that fentanyl enhances HIV infection and replication in U937 and primary MDM cells. Further, the effect of fentanyl was found to be reversed by naltrexone. This proved that the deleterious function of fentanyl on HIV pathogenesis could be altered by blocking the MOR on the target cells. Comprehensive research is required to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying fentanyl’s promotion of HIV replication and infection in vivo.
Supporting information
S1 Table. List of primers used to validate RNA sequencing data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s001
(RTF)
S2 Table. MicroRNAs with p value <0.2 in U937 cells infected with HIV in the presence / absence of fentanyl.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Transcripts that are significantly upregulated or downregulated in U937 cells infected with HIV in the presence / absence of fentanyl.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. GO enrichment for the differentially expressed genes using ToppGene in U937 cells infected with HIV in the presence / absence of fentanyl.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s004
(RTF)
S5 Table. Differentially expressed genes in U937 cells infected with HIV in the presence / absence of fentanyl by gene function (antiviral response, cell death, chemokine signaling, interferon response, and NFκB signaling).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s005
(XLSX)
S1 Fig.
(A) Volcano plot of all microRNAs in U937 cells in the presence / absence of fentanyl. (B) Heatmap of microRNAs that are differentially expressed in U937 cells in the presence / absence of fentanyl (p value < 0.2). Those microRNAs that are upregulated are shown in red, while those that are downregulated are shown in green.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s006
S2 Fig. Primary monocytes at 1 x 105 cells were seeded in a flask and supplemented with RPMI 1640 + GM-CSF + IL-4 and incubated at 37°C for 6 days for monocyte to macrophage transformation.
On day 7, monocyte-derived macrophages [MDM] were harvested, and 1 x 105 cells per well were plated. Fentanyl at 10 ug/mL was added and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, cells were infected with HIVYK-JRCSF and incubated for 2 hours. The cells were rinsed three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with fresh media with fentanyl and incubated for 3 days. Cells were harvested at the end of 72 hours and total RNA extraction was performed. Genes of interest were quantified by brilliant III ultrafast SYBR qRT-PCR. Error bars represent the standard deviations between replicates. Data were normalized to beta-globin expression and fold-change in expression was calculated by the 2 −ΔΔCT method. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s007
S3 Fig. U937 at 1 x 105 cells per well were plated.
Fentanyl at 10 ug/mL was added and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, cells were infected with HIVYK-JRCSF and incubated for 2 hours. The cells were rinsed three times to remove any unbound virus and replaced with fresh media with fentanyl and incubated for 3 days. Cells were harvested at the end of 72 hours and total RNA extraction was performed. Genes of interest were quantified by brilliant III ultrafast SYBR qRT-PCR. Error bars represent the standard deviations between replicates. Data were normalized to beta-globin expression and fold-change in expression was calculated by the 2 −ΔΔCT method. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341.s008
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Elizabeth Odegard for her valuable suggestions and constructive comments.
References
1. 1. Shiels MS, Freedman ND, Thomas D, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Trends in US drug overdose deaths in non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white persons, 2000–2015. Annals of internal medicine. 2018 Mar 20;168(6):453–5.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
2. 2. Jalal H, Buchanich JM, Roberts MS, Balmert LC, Zhang K, Burke DS. Changing dynamics of the drug overdose epidemic in the United States from 1979 through 2016. Science. 2018 Sep 21;361(6408):eaau1184. pmid:30237320
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
3. 3. Hodder SL, Feinberg J, Strathdee SA, Shoptaw S, Altice FL, Ortenzio L, Beyrer C. The opioid crisis and HIV in the USA: deadly synergies. The Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1139–50. pmid:33617769
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
4. 4. Stanley TH. The fentanyl story. The Journal of Pain. 2014 Dec 1;15(12):1215–26. pmid:25441689
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
5. 5. Fairbairn N, Coffin PO, Walley AY. Naloxone for heroin, prescription opioid, and illicitly made fentanyl overdoses: challenges and innovations responding to a dynamic epidemic. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2017 Aug 1;46:172–9. pmid:28687187
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
6. 6. Hedegaard H, Bastian BA, Trinidad JP, Spencer M, Warner M. Drugs most frequently involved in drug overdose deaths: United States, 2011–2016.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
7. 7. Abuse S. Mental health services administration. Results from the. 2013 Jan 10;2:013.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
8. 8. Dwyer-Lindgren L, Bertozzi-Villa A, Stubbs RW, Morozoff C, Shirude S, Unützer J, et al. Trends and patterns of geographic variation in mortality from substance use disorders and intentional injuries among US counties, 1980–2014. Jama. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1013–23. pmid:29536097
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
9. 9. Strathdee SA, Beyrer C. Threading the needle—how to stop the HIV outbreak in rural Indiana. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):397–9. pmid:26106947
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
10. 10. Conrad C, Bradley HM, Broz D, Buddha S, Chapman EL, Galang RR, et al. Community outbreak of HIV infection linked to injection drug use of oxymorphone—Indiana, 2015. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2015 May 5;64(16):443. pmid:25928470
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
11. 11. Donahoe RM, Vlahov D. Opiates as potential cofactors in progression of HIV-1 infections to AIDS. Journal of neuroimmunology. 1998 Mar 15;83(1–2):77–87. pmid:9610676
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
12. 12. Eisenstein TK, Hilburger ME. Opioid modulation of immune responses: effects on phagocyte and lymphoid cell populations. Journal of neuroimmunology. 1998 Mar 15;83(1–2):36–44. pmid:9610671
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
13. 13. Grimm MC, Ben-Baruch A, Taub DD, Howard OM, Resau JH, Wang JM, et al. Opiates transdeactivate chemokine receptors: δ and μ opiate receptor–mediated heterologous desensitization. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1998 Jul 20;188(2):317–25.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
14. 14. Peterson PK, Sharp BM, Gekker G, Portoghese PS, Sannerud K, Balfour HH Jr. Morphine promotes the growth of HIV-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. Aids. 1990 Sep 1;4(9):869–74. pmid:2174676
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
15. 15. Roy S, Ninkovic J, Banerjee S, Charboneau RG, Das S, Dutta R, et al. Opioid drug abuse and modulation of immune function: consequences in the susceptibility to opportunistic infections. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2011 Dec;6:442–65. pmid:21789507
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
16. 16. Plein LM, Rittner HL. Opioids and the immune system–friend or foe. British journal of pharmacology. 2018 Jul;175(14):2717–25. pmid:28213891
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
17. 17. Chomont N, El-Far M, Ancuta P, Trautmann L, Procopio FA, Yassine-Diab B, et al. HIV reservoir size and persistence are driven by T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation. Nature medicine. 2009 Aug;15(8):893–900. pmid:19543283
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
18. 18. Kruize Z, Kootstra NA. The role of macrophages in HIV-1 persistence and pathogenesis. Frontiers in microbiology. 2019 Dec 5;10:2828. pmid:31866988
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
19. 19. Lopez P, Koh WH, Hnatiuk R, Murooka TT. HIV infection stabilizes macrophage-T cell interactions to promote cell-cell HIV spread. Journal of virology. 2019 Sep 15;93(18):e00805–19. pmid:31270227
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
20. 20. Vidya Vijayan KK, Karthigeyan KP, Tripathi SP, Hanna LE. Pathophysiology of CD4+ T-cell depletion in HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. Frontiers in immunology. 2017 May 23;8:580. pmid:28588579
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
21. 21. Madhuravasal Krishnan J, Kong L, Karns R, Medvedovic M, Sherman KE, Blackard JT. The Synthetic Opioid Fentanyl Increases HIV Replication and Chemokine Co-Receptor Expression in Lymphocyte Cell Lines. Viruses. 2023 Apr 21;15(4):1027. pmid:37113007
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
22. 22. Adachi A, Gendelman HE, Koenig S, Folks T, Willey R, Rabson A, et al. Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and nonhuman cells transfected with an infectious molecular clone. Journal of virology. 1986 Aug;59(2):284–91. pmid:3016298
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
23. 23. Gibellini D, Vitone F, Schiavone P, Ponti C, La Placa M, Re MC. Quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) proviral DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by SYBR green real-time PCR technique. Journal of clinical virology. 2004 Apr 1;29(4):282–9. pmid:15018857
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
24. 24. Langevin SM, Kuhnell D, Orr-Asman MA, Biesiada J, Zhang X, Medvedovic M, et al. Balancing yield, purity and practicality: a modified differential ultracentrifugation protocol for efficient isolation of small extracellular vesicles from human serum. RNA biology. 2019 Jan 2;16(1):5–12. pmid:30604646
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
25. 25. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature methods. 2012 Apr;9(4):357–9. pmid:22388286
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
26. 26. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nature methods. 2015 Feb;12(2):115–21. pmid:25633503
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
27. 27. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic acids research. 2014 Jan 1;42(D1):D68–73. pmid:24275495
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
28. 28. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139–40. pmid:19910308
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
29. 29. Walsh KB, Zhang X, Zhu X, Wohleb E, Woo D, Lu L, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage induces inflammatory gene expression in peripheral blood: global transcriptional profiling in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. DNA and cell biology. 2019 Jul 1;38(7):660–9. pmid:31120332
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
30. 30. Rapp SJ, Dershem V, Zhang X, Schutte SC, Chariker ME. Varying negative pressure wound therapy acute effects on human split-thickness autografts. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2020 Jan 30;41(1):104–12. pmid:31420676
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
31. 31. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology. 2004 Feb 12;3(1). pmid:16646809
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
32. 32. Wang Y, Wang X, Ye L, Li J, Song L, Fulambarkar N, et al. Morphine suppresses IFN signaling pathway and enhances AIDS virus infection. PLoS One. 2012 Feb 16;7(2):e31167. pmid:22359571
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
33. 33. Li Y, Wang X, Tian S, Guo CJ, Douglas SD, Ho WZ. Methadone enhances human immunodeficiency virus infection of human immune cells. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2002 Jan 1;185(1):118–22. pmid:11756991
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
34. 34. Wang MR, Wu DD, Luo F, Zhong CJ, Wang X, Zhu N, et al. Methadone inhibits viral restriction factors and facilitates HIV infection in macrophages. Frontiers in immunology. 2020 Jul 3;11:1253. pmid:32719674
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
35. 35. Kong L, Karns R, Shata MT, Brown JL, Lyons MS, Sherman KE, et al. The synthetic opioid fentanyl enhances viral replication in vitro. Plos one. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249581. pmid:33852610
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
36. 36. Liao Y, Jiang J, Liang B, Wei F, Huang J, Pan P, et al. Opiate use inhibits TLR9 signaling pathway in vivo: possible role in pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection. Scientific reports. 2017 Oct 12;7(1):13071. pmid:29026137
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
37. 37. Kong L, Shata MT, Brown JL, Lyons MS, Sherman KE, Blackard JT. The synthetic opioid fentanyl increases HIV replication and chemokine co-receptor expression in vitro. Journal of NeuroVirology. 2022 Dec;28(4–6):583–94. pmid:35976538
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
38. 38. Blum K, Modestino EJ, Badgaiyan RD, Baron D, Thanos PK, Elman I, et al. Analysis of evidence for the combination of pro-dopamine regulator (KB220PAM) and naltrexone to prevent opioid use disorder relapse. EC psychology and psychiatry. 2018 Aug;7(8):564. pmid:30417173
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
39. 39. McCarthy L, Wetzel M, Sliker JK, Eisenstein TK, Rogers TJ. Opioids, opioid receptors, and the immune response. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2001 Apr 1;62(2):111–23. pmid:11245967
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
40. 40. Guo CJ, Li Y, Tian S, Wang X, Douglas SD, Ho WZ. Morphine enhances HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes through modulation of β-chemokines and CCR5 receptor. Journal of investigative medicine. 2002 Nov;50(6):435–42.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
41. 41. Li Y, Merrill JD, Mooney K, Song L, Wang X, Guo CJ, et al. Morphine enhances HIV infection of neonatal macrophages. Pediatric research. 2003 Aug;54(2):282–8. pmid:12736382
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
42. 42. Steele AD, Henderson EE, Rogers TJ. μ-opioid modulation of HIV-1 coreceptor expression and HIV-1 replication. Virology. 2003 Apr 25;309(1):99–107.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
43. 43. Tang B, Li Y, Yuan S, Tomlinson S, He S. Upregulation of the δ opioid receptor in liver cancer promotes liver cancer progression both in vitro and in vivo. International journal of oncology. 2013 Oct 1;43(4):1281–90.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
44. 44. Bagasra O, Pomerantz RJ. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of cocaine. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1993 Nov 1;168(5):1157–64. pmid:8228349
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
45. 45. Peterson PK, Gekker GE, Chao CC, Schut R, Molitor TW, Balfour HH Jr. Cocaine potentiates HIV-1 replication in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. Involvement of transforming growth factor-beta. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: 1950). 1991 Jan 1;146(1):81–4. pmid:1984454
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
46. 46. Nair MP, Saiyed ZM. Effect of methamphetamine on expression of HIV coreceptors and CC-chemokines by dendritic cells. Life sciences. 2011 May 23;88(21–22):987–94. pmid:20932494
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
47. 47. Nair MP, Saiyed ZM, Nair N, Gandhi NH, Rodriguez JW, Boukli N, et al. Methamphetamine enhances HIV-1 infectivity in monocyte derived dendritic cells. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2009 Mar;4:129–39. pmid:18958626
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
48. 48. Havens JR, Walsh SL, Korthuis PT, Fiellin DA. Implementing treatment of opioid-use disorder in rural settings: a focus on HIV and hepatitis C prevention and treatment. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2018 Aug;15:315–23. pmid:29948609
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
49. 49. Lambdin BH, Bluthenthal RN, Zibbell JE, Wenger L, Simpson K, Kral AH. Associations between perceived illicit fentanyl use and infectious disease risks among people who inject drugs. International journal of drug policy. 2019 Dec 1;74:299–304. pmid:31733979
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
50. 50. VALLEY MA, BOURKE DL, MCKENZIE AM. Recurrence of thoracic and labial herpes simplex virus infection in a patient receiving epidural fentanyl. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1992 Jun 1;76(6):1056–7.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
51. 51. Wang X, Ye L, Zhou Y, Liu MQ, Zhou DJ, Ho WZ. Inhibition of anti-HIV microRNA expression: a mechanism for opioid-mediated enhancement of HIV infection of monocytes. The American journal of pathology. 2011 Jan 1;178(1):41–7. pmid:21224041
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
52. 52. Nair MP, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Reynolds J, Whitney R, Bernstein Z, et al. Cocaine modulates dendritic cell-specific C type intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin expression by dendritic cells in HIV-1 patients. The Journal of Immunology. 2005 Jun 1;174(11):6617–26. pmid:15905500
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
53. 53. Valjent E, Corvol JC, Pagès C, Besson MJ, Maldonado R, Caboche J. Involvement of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade for cocaine-rewarding properties. Journal of Neuroscience. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8701–9. pmid:11102476
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
54. 54. Homan J.W., Steele A.D., Martinand-Mari C., Rogers T.J., Henderson E.E., Charubala R., et al. 2002. Inhibition of morphine-potentiated HIV-1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with the nuclease-resistant 2-5A agonist analog, 2-5A (N6B). Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 30(1), pp.9–20.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
55. 55. Suzuki S, Carlos MP, Chuang LF, Torres JV, Doi RH, Chuang RY. Methadone induces CCR5 and promotes AIDS virus infection. FEBS letters. 2002 May 22;519(1–3):173–7. pmid:12023039
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
56. 56. Volkow ND, Blanco C. Medications for opioid use disorders: clinical and pharmacological considerations. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2020 Jan 2;130(1):10–3. pmid:31763992
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
57. 57. Springer S.A., Di Paola A., Azar M., Barbour R., Biondi B.E., Desabrais M., et al. 2018. Extended-release naltrexone improves viral suppression among incarcerated persons living with HIV with opioid use disorders transitioning to the community: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 78(1), p.43.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
58. 58. Ho WZ, Guo CJ, Yuan CS, Douglas SD, Moss J. Methylnaltrexone antagonizes opioid-mediated enhancement of HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2003 Dec 1;307(3):1158–62. pmid:14560041
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
59. 59. Browne EP. The role of toll-like receptors in retroviral infection. Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 14;8(11):1787. pmid:33202596
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
60. 60. Bochud PY, Hersberger M, Taffé P, Bochud M, Stein CM, Rodrigues SD, et al. Polymorphisms in Toll-like receptor 9 influence the clinical course of HIV-1 infection. Aids. 2007 Feb 19;21(4):441–6. pmid:17301562
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
61. 61. Brichacek B, Vanpouille C, Kiselyeva Y, Biancotto A, Merbah M, Hirsch I, et al. Contrasting roles for TLR ligands in HIV-1 pathogenesis. PloS one. 2010 Sep 20;5(9):e12831. pmid:20862220
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
62. 62. Cen P, Ye L, Su QJ, Wang X, Li JL, Lin XQ, et al. Methamphetamine inhibits Toll-like receptor 9-mediated anti-HIV activity in macrophages. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2013 Aug 1;29(8):1129–37. pmid:23751096
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
63. 63. Kanamori T, Iwata YT, Segawa H, Yamamuro T, Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, et al. Metabolism of fentanyl and acetylfentanyl in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):106–14. pmid:29311471
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
64. 64. Tiscione NB, Wegner K. Validation of the Neogen® fentanyl ELISA kit for blood and urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2017 May 1;41(4):313–7.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
65. 65. Wu F, Slawson MH, Johnson-Davis KL. Metabolic patterns of fentanyl, meperidine, methylphenidate, tapentadol and tramadol observed in urine, serum or plasma. Journal of analytical toxicology. 2017 May 1;41(4):289–99. pmid:28119437
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
66. 66. Ellis CR, Kruhlak NL, Kim MT, Hawkins EG, Stavitskaya L. Predicting opioid receptor binding affinity of pharmacologically unclassified designer substances using molecular docking. PloS one. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197734. pmid:29795628
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
67. 67. Lipiński PF, Kosson P, Matalińska J, Roszkowski P, Czarnocki Z, Jarończyk M, et al. Fentanyl family at the mu-opioid receptor: uniform assessment of binding and computational analysis. Molecules. 2019 Feb 19;24(4):740. pmid:30791394
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
Citation: Madhuravasal Krishnan J, Kong L, Meeds HL, Roskin KM, Medvedovic M, Sherman KE, et al. (2025) The synthetic opioid fentanyl increases HIV replication in macrophages. PLoS ONE 20(2): e0298341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298341
About the Authors:
Janani Madhuravasal Krishnan
Contributed equally to this work with: Janani Madhuravasal Krishnan, Ling Kong
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft
Affiliation: Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
Ling Kong
Contributed equally to this work with: Janani Madhuravasal Krishnan, Ling Kong
Roles: Formal analysis, Methodology
Affiliation: Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
Heidi L. Meeds
Roles: Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
Krishna M. Roskin
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations: Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
Mario Medvedovic
Roles: Conceptualization, Software, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Environmental & Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
Kenneth E. Sherman
Roles: Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations: Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America, Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
Jason T. Blackard
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliations: Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America, Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-3811
1. Shiels MS, Freedman ND, Thomas D, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Trends in US drug overdose deaths in non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white persons, 2000–2015. Annals of internal medicine. 2018 Mar 20;168(6):453–5.
2. Jalal H, Buchanich JM, Roberts MS, Balmert LC, Zhang K, Burke DS. Changing dynamics of the drug overdose epidemic in the United States from 1979 through 2016. Science. 2018 Sep 21;361(6408):eaau1184. pmid:30237320
3. Hodder SL, Feinberg J, Strathdee SA, Shoptaw S, Altice FL, Ortenzio L, Beyrer C. The opioid crisis and HIV in the USA: deadly synergies. The Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1139–50. pmid:33617769
4. Stanley TH. The fentanyl story. The Journal of Pain. 2014 Dec 1;15(12):1215–26. pmid:25441689
5. Fairbairn N, Coffin PO, Walley AY. Naloxone for heroin, prescription opioid, and illicitly made fentanyl overdoses: challenges and innovations responding to a dynamic epidemic. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2017 Aug 1;46:172–9. pmid:28687187
6. Hedegaard H, Bastian BA, Trinidad JP, Spencer M, Warner M. Drugs most frequently involved in drug overdose deaths: United States, 2011–2016.
7. Abuse S. Mental health services administration. Results from the. 2013 Jan 10;2:013.
8. Dwyer-Lindgren L, Bertozzi-Villa A, Stubbs RW, Morozoff C, Shirude S, Unützer J, et al. Trends and patterns of geographic variation in mortality from substance use disorders and intentional injuries among US counties, 1980–2014. Jama. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1013–23. pmid:29536097
9. Strathdee SA, Beyrer C. Threading the needle—how to stop the HIV outbreak in rural Indiana. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):397–9. pmid:26106947
10. Conrad C, Bradley HM, Broz D, Buddha S, Chapman EL, Galang RR, et al. Community outbreak of HIV infection linked to injection drug use of oxymorphone—Indiana, 2015. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2015 May 5;64(16):443. pmid:25928470
11. Donahoe RM, Vlahov D. Opiates as potential cofactors in progression of HIV-1 infections to AIDS. Journal of neuroimmunology. 1998 Mar 15;83(1–2):77–87. pmid:9610676
12. Eisenstein TK, Hilburger ME. Opioid modulation of immune responses: effects on phagocyte and lymphoid cell populations. Journal of neuroimmunology. 1998 Mar 15;83(1–2):36–44. pmid:9610671
13. Grimm MC, Ben-Baruch A, Taub DD, Howard OM, Resau JH, Wang JM, et al. Opiates transdeactivate chemokine receptors: δ and μ opiate receptor–mediated heterologous desensitization. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1998 Jul 20;188(2):317–25.
14. Peterson PK, Sharp BM, Gekker G, Portoghese PS, Sannerud K, Balfour HH Jr. Morphine promotes the growth of HIV-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. Aids. 1990 Sep 1;4(9):869–74. pmid:2174676
15. Roy S, Ninkovic J, Banerjee S, Charboneau RG, Das S, Dutta R, et al. Opioid drug abuse and modulation of immune function: consequences in the susceptibility to opportunistic infections. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2011 Dec;6:442–65. pmid:21789507
16. Plein LM, Rittner HL. Opioids and the immune system–friend or foe. British journal of pharmacology. 2018 Jul;175(14):2717–25. pmid:28213891
17. Chomont N, El-Far M, Ancuta P, Trautmann L, Procopio FA, Yassine-Diab B, et al. HIV reservoir size and persistence are driven by T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation. Nature medicine. 2009 Aug;15(8):893–900. pmid:19543283
18. Kruize Z, Kootstra NA. The role of macrophages in HIV-1 persistence and pathogenesis. Frontiers in microbiology. 2019 Dec 5;10:2828. pmid:31866988
19. Lopez P, Koh WH, Hnatiuk R, Murooka TT. HIV infection stabilizes macrophage-T cell interactions to promote cell-cell HIV spread. Journal of virology. 2019 Sep 15;93(18):e00805–19. pmid:31270227
20. Vidya Vijayan KK, Karthigeyan KP, Tripathi SP, Hanna LE. Pathophysiology of CD4+ T-cell depletion in HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. Frontiers in immunology. 2017 May 23;8:580. pmid:28588579
21. Madhuravasal Krishnan J, Kong L, Karns R, Medvedovic M, Sherman KE, Blackard JT. The Synthetic Opioid Fentanyl Increases HIV Replication and Chemokine Co-Receptor Expression in Lymphocyte Cell Lines. Viruses. 2023 Apr 21;15(4):1027. pmid:37113007
22. Adachi A, Gendelman HE, Koenig S, Folks T, Willey R, Rabson A, et al. Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and nonhuman cells transfected with an infectious molecular clone. Journal of virology. 1986 Aug;59(2):284–91. pmid:3016298
23. Gibellini D, Vitone F, Schiavone P, Ponti C, La Placa M, Re MC. Quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) proviral DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by SYBR green real-time PCR technique. Journal of clinical virology. 2004 Apr 1;29(4):282–9. pmid:15018857
24. Langevin SM, Kuhnell D, Orr-Asman MA, Biesiada J, Zhang X, Medvedovic M, et al. Balancing yield, purity and practicality: a modified differential ultracentrifugation protocol for efficient isolation of small extracellular vesicles from human serum. RNA biology. 2019 Jan 2;16(1):5–12. pmid:30604646
25. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature methods. 2012 Apr;9(4):357–9. pmid:22388286
26. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nature methods. 2015 Feb;12(2):115–21. pmid:25633503
27. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic acids research. 2014 Jan 1;42(D1):D68–73. pmid:24275495
28. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139–40. pmid:19910308
29. Walsh KB, Zhang X, Zhu X, Wohleb E, Woo D, Lu L, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage induces inflammatory gene expression in peripheral blood: global transcriptional profiling in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. DNA and cell biology. 2019 Jul 1;38(7):660–9. pmid:31120332
30. Rapp SJ, Dershem V, Zhang X, Schutte SC, Chariker ME. Varying negative pressure wound therapy acute effects on human split-thickness autografts. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2020 Jan 30;41(1):104–12. pmid:31420676
31. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology. 2004 Feb 12;3(1). pmid:16646809
32. Wang Y, Wang X, Ye L, Li J, Song L, Fulambarkar N, et al. Morphine suppresses IFN signaling pathway and enhances AIDS virus infection. PLoS One. 2012 Feb 16;7(2):e31167. pmid:22359571
33. Li Y, Wang X, Tian S, Guo CJ, Douglas SD, Ho WZ. Methadone enhances human immunodeficiency virus infection of human immune cells. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2002 Jan 1;185(1):118–22. pmid:11756991
34. Wang MR, Wu DD, Luo F, Zhong CJ, Wang X, Zhu N, et al. Methadone inhibits viral restriction factors and facilitates HIV infection in macrophages. Frontiers in immunology. 2020 Jul 3;11:1253. pmid:32719674
35. Kong L, Karns R, Shata MT, Brown JL, Lyons MS, Sherman KE, et al. The synthetic opioid fentanyl enhances viral replication in vitro. Plos one. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249581. pmid:33852610
36. Liao Y, Jiang J, Liang B, Wei F, Huang J, Pan P, et al. Opiate use inhibits TLR9 signaling pathway in vivo: possible role in pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection. Scientific reports. 2017 Oct 12;7(1):13071. pmid:29026137
37. Kong L, Shata MT, Brown JL, Lyons MS, Sherman KE, Blackard JT. The synthetic opioid fentanyl increases HIV replication and chemokine co-receptor expression in vitro. Journal of NeuroVirology. 2022 Dec;28(4–6):583–94. pmid:35976538
38. Blum K, Modestino EJ, Badgaiyan RD, Baron D, Thanos PK, Elman I, et al. Analysis of evidence for the combination of pro-dopamine regulator (KB220PAM) and naltrexone to prevent opioid use disorder relapse. EC psychology and psychiatry. 2018 Aug;7(8):564. pmid:30417173
39. McCarthy L, Wetzel M, Sliker JK, Eisenstein TK, Rogers TJ. Opioids, opioid receptors, and the immune response. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2001 Apr 1;62(2):111–23. pmid:11245967
40. Guo CJ, Li Y, Tian S, Wang X, Douglas SD, Ho WZ. Morphine enhances HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes through modulation of β-chemokines and CCR5 receptor. Journal of investigative medicine. 2002 Nov;50(6):435–42.
41. Li Y, Merrill JD, Mooney K, Song L, Wang X, Guo CJ, et al. Morphine enhances HIV infection of neonatal macrophages. Pediatric research. 2003 Aug;54(2):282–8. pmid:12736382
42. Steele AD, Henderson EE, Rogers TJ. μ-opioid modulation of HIV-1 coreceptor expression and HIV-1 replication. Virology. 2003 Apr 25;309(1):99–107.
43. Tang B, Li Y, Yuan S, Tomlinson S, He S. Upregulation of the δ opioid receptor in liver cancer promotes liver cancer progression both in vitro and in vivo. International journal of oncology. 2013 Oct 1;43(4):1281–90.
44. Bagasra O, Pomerantz RJ. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of cocaine. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1993 Nov 1;168(5):1157–64. pmid:8228349
45. Peterson PK, Gekker GE, Chao CC, Schut R, Molitor TW, Balfour HH Jr. Cocaine potentiates HIV-1 replication in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. Involvement of transforming growth factor-beta. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: 1950). 1991 Jan 1;146(1):81–4. pmid:1984454
46. Nair MP, Saiyed ZM. Effect of methamphetamine on expression of HIV coreceptors and CC-chemokines by dendritic cells. Life sciences. 2011 May 23;88(21–22):987–94. pmid:20932494
47. Nair MP, Saiyed ZM, Nair N, Gandhi NH, Rodriguez JW, Boukli N, et al. Methamphetamine enhances HIV-1 infectivity in monocyte derived dendritic cells. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2009 Mar;4:129–39. pmid:18958626
48. Havens JR, Walsh SL, Korthuis PT, Fiellin DA. Implementing treatment of opioid-use disorder in rural settings: a focus on HIV and hepatitis C prevention and treatment. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2018 Aug;15:315–23. pmid:29948609
49. Lambdin BH, Bluthenthal RN, Zibbell JE, Wenger L, Simpson K, Kral AH. Associations between perceived illicit fentanyl use and infectious disease risks among people who inject drugs. International journal of drug policy. 2019 Dec 1;74:299–304. pmid:31733979
50. VALLEY MA, BOURKE DL, MCKENZIE AM. Recurrence of thoracic and labial herpes simplex virus infection in a patient receiving epidural fentanyl. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1992 Jun 1;76(6):1056–7.
51. Wang X, Ye L, Zhou Y, Liu MQ, Zhou DJ, Ho WZ. Inhibition of anti-HIV microRNA expression: a mechanism for opioid-mediated enhancement of HIV infection of monocytes. The American journal of pathology. 2011 Jan 1;178(1):41–7. pmid:21224041
52. Nair MP, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Reynolds J, Whitney R, Bernstein Z, et al. Cocaine modulates dendritic cell-specific C type intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin expression by dendritic cells in HIV-1 patients. The Journal of Immunology. 2005 Jun 1;174(11):6617–26. pmid:15905500
53. Valjent E, Corvol JC, Pagès C, Besson MJ, Maldonado R, Caboche J. Involvement of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade for cocaine-rewarding properties. Journal of Neuroscience. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8701–9. pmid:11102476
54. Homan J.W., Steele A.D., Martinand-Mari C., Rogers T.J., Henderson E.E., Charubala R., et al. 2002. Inhibition of morphine-potentiated HIV-1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with the nuclease-resistant 2-5A agonist analog, 2-5A (N6B). Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 30(1), pp.9–20.
55. Suzuki S, Carlos MP, Chuang LF, Torres JV, Doi RH, Chuang RY. Methadone induces CCR5 and promotes AIDS virus infection. FEBS letters. 2002 May 22;519(1–3):173–7. pmid:12023039
56. Volkow ND, Blanco C. Medications for opioid use disorders: clinical and pharmacological considerations. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2020 Jan 2;130(1):10–3. pmid:31763992
57. Springer S.A., Di Paola A., Azar M., Barbour R., Biondi B.E., Desabrais M., et al. 2018. Extended-release naltrexone improves viral suppression among incarcerated persons living with HIV with opioid use disorders transitioning to the community: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 78(1), p.43.
58. Ho WZ, Guo CJ, Yuan CS, Douglas SD, Moss J. Methylnaltrexone antagonizes opioid-mediated enhancement of HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2003 Dec 1;307(3):1158–62. pmid:14560041
59. Browne EP. The role of toll-like receptors in retroviral infection. Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 14;8(11):1787. pmid:33202596
60. Bochud PY, Hersberger M, Taffé P, Bochud M, Stein CM, Rodrigues SD, et al. Polymorphisms in Toll-like receptor 9 influence the clinical course of HIV-1 infection. Aids. 2007 Feb 19;21(4):441–6. pmid:17301562
61. Brichacek B, Vanpouille C, Kiselyeva Y, Biancotto A, Merbah M, Hirsch I, et al. Contrasting roles for TLR ligands in HIV-1 pathogenesis. PloS one. 2010 Sep 20;5(9):e12831. pmid:20862220
62. Cen P, Ye L, Su QJ, Wang X, Li JL, Lin XQ, et al. Methamphetamine inhibits Toll-like receptor 9-mediated anti-HIV activity in macrophages. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2013 Aug 1;29(8):1129–37. pmid:23751096
63. Kanamori T, Iwata YT, Segawa H, Yamamuro T, Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, et al. Metabolism of fentanyl and acetylfentanyl in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):106–14. pmid:29311471
64. Tiscione NB, Wegner K. Validation of the Neogen® fentanyl ELISA kit for blood and urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2017 May 1;41(4):313–7.
65. Wu F, Slawson MH, Johnson-Davis KL. Metabolic patterns of fentanyl, meperidine, methylphenidate, tapentadol and tramadol observed in urine, serum or plasma. Journal of analytical toxicology. 2017 May 1;41(4):289–99. pmid:28119437
66. Ellis CR, Kruhlak NL, Kim MT, Hawkins EG, Stavitskaya L. Predicting opioid receptor binding affinity of pharmacologically unclassified designer substances using molecular docking. PloS one. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197734. pmid:29795628
67. Lipiński PF, Kosson P, Matalińska J, Roszkowski P, Czarnocki Z, Jarończyk M, et al. Fentanyl family at the mu-opioid receptor: uniform assessment of binding and computational analysis. Molecules. 2019 Feb 19;24(4):740. pmid:30791394
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 Madhuravasal Krishnan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
The illicit use of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl has led to a serious public health crisis in the US. People with opioid use disorder are more likely to contract infections such as HIV and viral hepatitis and experience more severe disease. While several drugs of abuse are known to enhance viral replication and suppress immunologic responses, the effects of synthetic opioids on HIV pathogenesis have not been investigated thoroughly. Thus, we examined the impact of fentanyl on HIV replication and chemokine receptor expression in the U937 cell line and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs).
Methods
U937 cells were exposed to varying concentrations of fentanyl. Expression levels of the CXCR4 and CCR5 chemokine receptors were measured in cell lysates. HIV p24 antigen was quantified in culture supernatants by ELISA, and HIV proviral DNA was quantified in cells using SYBR real-time PCR targeting the pol gene. RNAseq was performed to characterize cellular gene regulation in the presence of fentanyl.
Results
Fentanyl induced HIV p24 expression and proviral DNA levels in U937 cells and in primary MDMs. The opioid antagonist naltrexone blocked the effect of fentanyl and reversed the expression of HIV protein and proviral DNA. Fentanyl led to a non-significant decrease in CXCR4 and CCR5 protein levels in U937 cells. RNA sequencing identified several differentially expressed genes in cells infected with HIV and exposed to fentanyl compared to infected cells with no drug exposure. Several microRNAs were also differentially expressed upon fentanyl exposure but not at a statistically significant level.
Conclusion
These data demonstrate that the synthetic opioid fentanyl can promote HIV replication in macrophages. As higher HIV levels lead to accelerated disease progression and a higher risk of transmission to others, further research is needed to better understand opioid-virus interactions and to develop new and/or optimized treatment strategies for people living with HIV and opioid use.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer