1. Introduction
Ionic liquids (ILs) consist entirely of ions (ammonium, phosphonium, imidazolium, pyridinium and sulfonium and mesylate, triflate, alcoholate or carboxylate (CH3CO2−, CF3CO2− …) or inorganic ions (PF6−, BF4−, NO3−, Br−, Cl−, I−, …) [1,2]. They have interesting properties such as a melting point below 100 °C under 1 atm, low vapor pressure and physical and chemical stability [3]. Ionic liquids have a high dissolution and solvation capacity, which varies according to the nature of the cations and anions, making them excellent candidates as possible green substitutes for organic solvents in chemical reactions, extractions and biotransformations [4,5,6]. They are non-volatile, thermally stable and have a composition-dependent viscosity. Their density varies between 1.05 and 1.36 g/mL. The disadvantages of ionic liquids derived from petrosourced cations (imidazoliums, pyridiniums, etc.) are their high cost, poor biodegradability, biocompatibility and durability, hence the interest in synthesizing and using biosourced, biocompatible and biodegradable ionic liquids.
Ionic liquids (ILs) are of interest for a wide range of applications in chemistry, electrochemistry and biotechnology from a sustainable perspective [7]. Indeed, some of them could meet the needs of a more sustainable chemistry, which recommends the use of less polluting solvents and auxiliaries. In particular, ILs can be used in processes for treating biomass such as lignin [8] in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries [9], but also in the treatment of nuclear waste and the recovery of nuclear fuel in the electrochemical field [10]. Since some ILs can be immiscible with other solvents, they can form biphasic systems, and since organic species have a high solubility in these ILs, they are suitable as solvents for the extraction of most bioactive compounds from plants. For example, a hydrophobic IL based on butylmethylimidazolium and tetrafluoroborate (BMIM-BF4) forms a biphasic system in the presence of water for the extraction and separation of bioactive compounds such as phenolic compounds like piperine and tetrandine extracted from natural plants like Lonicera japonica, Stephania tetrandra and white pepper [11].
Choline-based ionic liquids (ChILs) are a class of ionic compounds that have gained significant attention in recent years due to their unique properties and potential applications in pharmaceutical formulations (green surfactants [12,13,14] biomass pretreatments (dissolution of lignin, cellulose and keratin [12,15,16,17] and catalysis (one pot three-component reaction, tricyanovinylation of indoles and Knoevenagel condensation for examples) [12,18,19,20]. Choline, a quaternary ammonium compound, is a naturally occurring substance found in many living organisms, where it plays a crucial role in various biological processes [21], being a source of the methyl groups needed to make the primary methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine, a part of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, and a component of the major phospholipids in membranes. When combined with different anions, choline forms a variety of ChILs that exhibit excellent ionic conductivity, high thermal stability, and tunable physicochemical properties [22].
A few years ago, our group developed various ILs based on ammonium or phosphonium with anion from natural acids (L-lactic, L-tartaric, pyruvic, malic, malonic, succinic and osidic acids), but also from L-proline and its derivatives. These compounds showed in general a lower toxicity towards various organisms than usual chlorinated and commercial ILs [23,24,25]. Other ILs based on betaine [26] or choline [27,28,29] have also been prepared in recent years. In the case of choline derivatives, cholinium esters with saturated carbon chains have been prepared. The ecotoxicity of all these ILs was determined using a hemocyte-based bioassay [26] revealing the importance of the nature of both cations and anions in decreasing the ILs toxicity.
Turmeric is widely cultivated in China, India and Southeast Asia. Turmeric powder has been employed in traditional Chinese medicine for more than 4000 years for the treatment of various ailments, including diabetic ulcers, coughs, liver disorders, gallbladder issues, sinusitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and loss of appetite [30]. According to Ayurvedic principles, turmeric boosts the general vigor of the body, enhances digestion, regulates menstrual cycles, dissolves gallstones, and relieves arthritis [31]. The therapeutical properties of turmeric are mainly attributed to curcumin (Curcumin I) due to its high concentration (75–80%) in turmeric extract in comparison to demethoxycurcumin (Curcumin II) (15–20%), bisdemethoxycurcumin (Curcumin III) (3–5%) [32] and cyclocurcumin (<1%) [33] (Figure 1). Bisdemethoxycurcumin possesses anti-oxidant, anti-cancer and anti-metastasis activities. Demethoxycurcumin has anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative activities and is a candidate for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [34]. Cyclocurcumin was reported to prevent oxidative stress, rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disorders [33]. Curcumin, which is the main coloring agent in the rhizomes of turmeric, has as anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative, anti-metastatic, anti-angiogenic, anti-diabetic, hepato-protective, anti-atherosclerotic, anti-thrombotic, wound healing, anti-arthritic, neuroprotective, analgesic, immunomodulator and pulmonoprotective properties [35].
Curcuminoids also display anti-cancer properties, especially in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [36], which represents a significant public health concern, with both incidence and mortality rates steadily rising worldwide [37]. Curcuminoids have been categorized by the US FDA as “generally safe”, as they did not show significant side effects. Curcuminoids do not show any adverse effects up to a daily dose of 8 g to 12 g [38,39]. Despite many advantages, curcuminoid pharmacological efficacy is compromised in vivo due to poor aqueous solubility, poor gastrointestinal absorption, chemical instability, fast metabolism and quick systemic excretion that may result in poor systemic bioavailability [36]. In a Phase II clinical trial involving patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, an oral dose of 8 g curcuminoids per day resulted in plasma concentration of curcuminoids from 22 to 41 ng/mL [40]. Various nanotechnology-based delivery systems, such as nanotubes, nanofibers, micelles, liposomes, polymeric (e.g., PLGA [poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)] and chitosan), protein (e.g., sunflower seed protein, bovine serum albumin), metal and solid-based lipid (e.g., long-PEGylated) nanoparticles have been found to increase curcuminoids bioavailability. Curcuminoids in combination with conventional chemotherapy drugs (doxorubicin, paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) have enhanced their therapeutic anti-cancer efficacy by targeting various molecules and regulating signaling pathways involved in cancer progression [41]. Moreover, curcuminoids were reported to overcome resistance and re-sensitize cancer to chemotherapeutic drugs in many studies [42].
Depending on its origin and the soil conditions in which it is grown, turmeric contains 2–9% curcuminoids, rising to around 20% depending on the season [43]. Curcuminoids are traditionally extracted from turmeric powder using polar organic solvents such as alcohols, acetone, ethyl acetate, etc. In 2010, Sogi et al. also studied the effect of four independent variables (temperature, particle size, mixing time and solvent (ethanol) to meal ratio on curcuminoid yield from turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)) [44]. Of all the solvents used, acetone gave the highest extraction yield (22.8%). The work of S.K. Bajpai et al. on the extraction of curcuminoids with 20 g of fine turmeric powder in 150 mL of acetone under moderate agitation for 72 h at 37 °C gave a yield of 14.95% by mass [45]. Just a little earlier, Pjo et al. studied the extraction of curcuminoids by using sCO2. They proved that curcuminoids were successfully extracted (31.07 mg from 1 g of curry powder over 2 h) with an ethanol modified sCO2 fluid (3.0 mL/min CO2 + 0.3 mL/min ethanol) at 60 °C with a pressure of 250 atm [46].
Finally, in 2018, Ranveer et al. showed that activation by ultrasound (25 W, 30 min) could increase the curcuminoid extraction yield by up to 6% [47]. Chen et al. used imidazolium and NTf2− anion-based ILs as a curcuminoid extraction solvent through an ATPS-DLLME (aqueous two-phase extraction system—dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction) method; a 0.96% extraction yield with a purity of more than 51% with respect to the total dry mass of the product was obtained [48].
Thymol and carvacrol are among the compounds present in oregano (Origanum vulgare); this herbaceous perennial plant of the Lamiaceae family, an aromatic of the Mediterranean flora, is used in cooking and for medicinal purposes, as is its essential oil, which has anti-inflammatory properties. Its chemical composition can vary depending on the region; in Portuguese oregano, carvacrol, thymol, γ-terpinene and β-fenchylic alcohol are present as major compounds in large numbers [49].
Carvacrol extraction was carried out with 1 g of crushed oregano leaves in 100 mL EtOH (60%) at reflux 95 °C for 6 h with a yield of 0.75–7.5% carvacrol by mass for the species Origanum savitum. On the other hand, a yield of 2.75% was obtained by maceration for 12 h with the species Origanum onites [50]. Oliveira et al. have shown that oregano essential oil has a high carvacrol (38.6%) and thymol (18.5%) content, which varies according to species, growing location and season [51].
Carvacrol has been shown to have anti-proliferative activity on HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cell line with an IC50 = 0.40 mM [52]. Carvacrol also inhibits the growth of several bacterial strains, such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus [53].
In the present study, we will prepare choline-based ionic ILs and perform the extraction of curcuminoids and carvacrol using those ILs. The extraction will be compared to previously described extraction results. Cytotoxicity of ILs will first be determined. Biological effects of extracted curcuminoids will then be explored.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Chemicals Used
Choline (≥98%), levulinic acid (99%), lactic acid (85%), methanesulfonic acid (≥99%), octanoic acid (≥98%), dodecanoic acid (≥99%), sodium perchlorate (≥98%) and potassium lactate (60% in water) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Choline was dried at 60 °C for 1 h prior to use. Other compounds were used as received. All aqueous solutions were prepared with distilled water.
2.2. Physicochemical Characterization
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on an AC 500 Bruker for 1H and 13C spectra (500 MHz for 1H, 125 MHz for 13C, see Supplementary Materials). Chemical shifts (in ppm) for 1H and 13C NMR spectra were referenced to residual protic solvent peaks. IR spectra of liquid and solid compounds were recorded on a Bruker Alpha-T FTIR spectrometer at room temperature. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were carried out on a Perkin–Elmer 2400 C, H, N, S element analyzer.
The direct infusion MS analysis was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled with a Waters SYNAPT G2-Si High Resolution Mass Spectrometry equipped with electrospray ionization (ESI) source (Waters Corp., Manchester, UK). The mobile phase A consisted of water containing 0.1% formic acid, while the mobile phase B was acetonitrile. Mass detection was conducted in a negative ion mode, with the source temperature at 100 °C; capillary voltage and cone voltage were set at 2 KV (3 KV in positive mode) and 40 V. The desolvation gas was optimized to 650 L/h, the cone gas flow was 50 L/h and the scan range was from 50 to 1600 m/z. Mass was corrected during acquisition using external reference (Lock-Spray) consisting of a 1 ng/µL solution of leucine encephalin at a flow rate of 5 µL/min, in order to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility during the MS analysis. All data collected were acquired using MassLynx™ (V4.1) software in continuum mode.
Thermal decomposition of the studied ILs was conducted by heating samples of mass of several milligrams to 600 °C at a rate of 2 °C⋅min−1, using a NETZSCH TG 209 F1 Libra (Netzsch-Gerätebau GmbH Selb, Deutschland) recording microbalance in a stream of inert gas (Ar) at a flow rate of 50 mL·min−1. The sample was heated in an oven whose temperature was regulated by a programmable digital temperature controller. The carrier gas flow was controlled by electronic mass flowmeters. In addition to the TGA and DTG (first derivative of the TGA) curves, endothermic and exothermic effects were determined by means of the calculated DTA signal (c-DTA).
The viscosities measurements (in mPa·s) were performed using a Brookfield LV-DVII+ PRO viscometer with a CP51 cone spindle. The instrument was connected to a HUBER-ministat circulation-type thermo-regulated water bath, and measures between 298.15 and 353.15 K were realized. The repeatability of the viscometer was of 0.20% with an uncertainty in the viscosity measurements of 1.00% of the full-scale range, declared by the manufacturer.
To measure density at 298.15 K and constant atmospheric pressure, an Anton Paar oscillating tube densitometer DSA 5000 was used. The calibration of the instrument was performed using bi-distilled water and heptane. The standards and samples were degassed by sonication prior to measurements.
2.3. General Synthesis Process of Cholinium Ester-Based ILs Cho-C(8-12)-Lac and Cho-C(8-12)-Lev
The preparation of the choline based IL involved a three-step procedure (esterification followed by two anionic metathesis) with good yields (70–85%) according to procedures previously described [27,29] for compounds 4, 5, 7a,b and 8a,b.
The general procedure is outlined below [29]. The spectra of the compounds 4, 5, 7a,b and 8a,b are consistent with those described in the literature.
To obtain perchlorate intermediates Chol-Cn-ClO4, a suspension of dried choline (40 g, 286 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in methane sulfonic acid (1.5 equiv.) reacted with an excess of hexanoic or decanoic acid (3 equiv.) at 100 °C under reduced pressure (50–100 mbar) to remove the water during 6 h. After addition of water (100–200 mL), the crude material was first washed with diethyl ether (5 × 100 mL) and then with dichloromethane (5 × 100 mL) to remove excess fatty carboxylic acid. Then, to eliminate excess unreacted choline, an excess of sodium perchlorate (3 equiv.), previously dissolved in a minimum of water (10–20 mL), was added to a solution of crude material in water. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h and the Chol-Cn-ClO4 was extracted in dichloromethane; after washing with water (5 × 100 mL) to remove excess sodium perchlorate and the free choline sometimes still present, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the addition of diethyl ether precipitated the final compound. After filtration, the product was obtained as a white powder.
To obtain the lactate or the levulinate adduct, a slight excess of potassium lactate or levulinate (1.2 equiv.) in ethanol (20 mL) was added to a solution of Chol-Cn-ClO4 (1 equiv.) in ethanol (100 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After filtration of KClO4 and evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure, the resulting IL was washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum for 3 days.
For the compound 7a [29], the general procedure was used with 20 g of choline, 41.3 g of octanoic acid, 23.23 mL of methane sulfonic acid, 35.06 g of sodium perchlorate and 9.46 g of potassium lactate.
-
1H NMR δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 0.86 (3 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H11), 1.07 (3 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H1′), 1.25 (8 H, H7,8,9,10), 1.54 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H6), 2.34 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H5), 3.16 (9 H, s, H1), 3.47 (1 H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, H2′), 3.71 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H2), 4.45 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H3) ppm. 13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 14.1 (C11), 18.2 (C1′), 22.5, 24.5, 29.2, 29.3 (C 7,8,9,10), 31.6 (C6), 33.8 (C5), 53.2 (C1), 58.2 (C2), 64.1 (C3), 67.5 (C2′), 172.5 (C4), 177.8 (C3′) ppm. IR: ν (cm−1) 1116 (C-O-H Lactate), 1595 (C=OLactate), 1737 (C=Oester), 2912 (N-CH), 2815 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C16H33NO5: C 60.16; H 10.41; N 4.38%; found: C 59.64; H 9.98; N 4.32%.
For the compound 7b [29], the general procedure was used with 20 g of choline, 41.3 g of octanoic acid, 23.23 mL of methane sulfonic acid, 35.06 g of sodium perchlorate and 12.2 g of potassium levulinate.
-
1H NMR: δ ppm (500 MHz, DMSO d6): 0.85 (3 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H11), 1.24 (8 H, m, H7,8,9,10), 1.53 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H6), 2.06 (3 H, s, H1′), 2.21 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H3′), 2.33 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H3), 2.51 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H4′), 3.16 (9 H, s, H1), 3.72 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H2), 4.45 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H3). 13C NMR δ (62.5 MHz, DMSO d6): 14.2 (C11), 22.4 (C1′), 24.2, 28.7, 29.2, 29.3, 29.3 (C 7,8,9,10), 32.4 (C6), 40.2 (C3′, C4′)), 53.1 (C1), 58.4 (C2), 63.1 (C3), 172.7 (C4), 176.6 (C5′), 208.9 (C2′) IR: ν (cm−1) 1580 (COO−), 1715 (C=Oketone), 1746 (C=Oester), 2902 (N-CH), 2820 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C18H35NO5: C 62.58, H 10.21, N 4.05%; found: C 62.19, H 9.98, N 4. 32%.
For the compound 8a [29], the general procedure was used with 20 g of choline, 49.35 g of decanoic acid, 23.23 mL of methane sulfonic acid, 35.06 g of sodium perchlorate and 9.7 g of potassium lactate.
-
1HNMR: δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 0.84 (t, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz, H13), 1.08 (d, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz, H1′); 1.23 (s large, 12H, H 7,8,9,10,11,12); 1.51–1.53 (m, 2H, H6), 2.32 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, H5); 3.17 (s, 9H, H1), 3.52 (q, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz, H2′), 3.72–3.74 (m, 2H, H2); 3.87 (s, 1H, OH); 4.44 (s, 2H, H3). 13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 14.3 (C13), 22.0 (C1′), 22.6, 24.6, 29.3 (C7,8,9,10,11,12), 31.8 (C6), 33.9 (C5), 53.9 (C1), 58.2 (C2), 64.1 (C3), 67.5 (C2′), 172.8 (C4), 177.7 (C3′). IR: ν (cm−1) 1116 (C-O-H Lactate), 1595 (C=OLactate), 1737 (C=Oester), 2912 (N-CH), 2812 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C18H37NO5: C 62.22; H 10.73; N 4.03%; found: C 62.64; H 10.98; N 4. 41%.
For the compound 8b [29], the general procedure was used with 20 g of choline, 49.35 g of decanoic acid, 23.23 mL of methane sulfonic acid, 35.06 g of sodium perchlorate and 12.51 g of potassium levulinate.
-
1HNMR: δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz, H13), 1.22 (s large, 12H, H 7,8,9,10,11,12), 1.51–1.53 (m, 2H, H6), 2.05 (s, 3H, H1′), 2.24 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, H5), 2.37 (t, 2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H3′), 2.56 (t, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz, H4′), 3.27 (s, 9H, H1), 3.72–3.74 (m, 2H, H2), 3.87 (s, 1H, OH), 4.53 (s, 2H, H3).13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 14.2 (C13); 22.5 (C1′); 24.3, 28.5, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, (C 7,8,9,10,11,12), 31.78 (C6); 32.7 (C5), 40.3 (C3′, C4′), 53.2 (C1); 58.4 (C2), 63.3 (C3), 172.8 (C4), 176.3 (C5′), 208.1 (C2′). IR: ν (cm−1) 1590 (COO−), 1715 (C=Oketone), 1746 (C=Oester), 2910 (N-CH), 2815 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C20H39NO5: C 64.31; H 10.52; N 3.75%; found: C 64.19; H 10.08; N 3.32%.
For the compound 6, the general procedure was used with 20 g of choline, 57.37 g of dodecanoic acid, 23.23 mL of methane sulfonic acid and 35.06 g of sodium perchlorate. A white powder was obtained with a yield of 75%.
-
1HNMR: δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 0.86 (t, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz, H15), 1.22 (s large, 16H, H 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14), 1.53–1.56 (m, 2H, H6), 2.34 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, H5), 3.13 (s, 9H, H1), 3.64–3.67 (m, 2H, H2), 4.44 (s, 2H, H3). 13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 14.4 (C15), 24.7, 28.5, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, 29.5 (C 7,8,9,10,11,12, 13, 14), 31.9 (C6); 33.8 (C5), 53.4 (C1); 58.1 (C2), 64.3 (C3), 172.8 (C4). IR: ν (cm−1) 1062 and 616 (ClO4), 1733 (C=O), 2912 (N-CH), 2812 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C17H36ClNO6: C 52.91, H 9.40, N 3.63%; found: C 52.76, H 9.13, N 3.36%.
For the compound 9a, the general procedure was used with 20 g of compound 6, and 11.07 g of potassium lactate. The liquid obtained in quantitative yield was white and highly viscous, tending to solidify at room temperature.
-
1HNMR: δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz, H15), 1,05 (d, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz, H1′), 1.23 (large s, 16H, H 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14), 1.52–1.54 (m, 2H, H6), 2.33 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, H5), 3.14 (s, 9H, H1), 3.44 (q, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz, H2′), 3.63–3.66 (m, 2H, H2), 4.44 (s, 2H, H3). 13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 14.4 (C15), 22.1 (C1′), 22.6, 24.7, 24.6, 29.3 (C7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14), 31.8 (C6), 33.8 (C5), 53.3 (C1), 58.2 (C2), 64.2 (C3), 172.4 (C4), 177.1 (C3′). IR: ν (cm−1) 1118 (C-O-HLactate), 1595 (C=OLactate), 1737 (C=Oester), 2912 (N-CH), 2812 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C20H41NO5: C 63.96, H 11.00, N 3.73%; found: C 63.58, H 10.89, N 3.41%.
For the compound 9b, the general procedure was used with 10 g of compound 6, and 4 g of potassium levulinate. The liquid obtained in quantitative yield is white and highly viscous at room temperature.
-
1HNMR: δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 0.92 (t, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz, H15), 1.23 (large s, 16H, H 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14), 1.51–1.54 (m, 2H, H6), 2.05 (s, 3H, H1′), 2.14 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, H5), 2.33 (t, 2 H, t, J = 6.8 Hz, H3′), 2.47 (t, 2 H, J = 6.8 Hz, H4′), 3.18 (s, 9H, H1), 3.72–3.74 (m, 2H, H2), 4.44 (s, 2H, H3).13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 14.5 (C15); 22.4 (C1′), 24.5, 28.5, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, 29.5 (C 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15), 31.8 (C6), 34.0 (C5), 40.3 (C3′, C4′), 53.5 (C1), 58.2 (C2), 64.0 (C3), 172.7 (C4), 177.9 (C5′), 200.1 (C2′). IR: ν (cm−1) 1590 (COO−), 1715 (C=Oketone), 1746 (C=Oester), 2910 (N-CH), 2815 (CH3-N). Anal. calcd.: C22H43NO5: C 65.8, H 10.79, N 3.49%; found: C 65.59, H 10.38, N 3.22%.
2.4. Extraction of Curcuminoids
To extract the curcuminoids, 5 g of 7a was heated to 70 °C in 1.5 mL of absolute ethanol, 1 g of turmeric powder was added, and the resulting mixture was heated to 60 °C for 30 min. After cooling the medium, 80 mL of distilled water was added, and the undissolved turmeric powder residues were filtered. A liquid–liquid extraction of the filtrate was performed with ethyl acetate (100 mL) to recover the curcuminoids in the organic phase. After evaporating the ethyl acetate, 100 mL of diethyl ether was added to precipitate the residual IL. To recover the maximum amount of curcuminoids, the precipitate obtained after adding ether was solubilized again in water (100 mL) and re-extracted with ether (100 mL). The two ether fractions were then combined, the ether evaporated under reduced pressure, and the resulting powder dried under vacuum. The curcuminoids were analyzed by TLC and UV. The aqueous phases were collected, and after evaporation of the water, the structurally unmodified IL (checked by NMR) could be reused for further extraction.
2.5. Extraction of Carvacrol
Mashed oregano leaves (1 g) were extracted at 60 °C for 30 min with a solution containing 5 g 7a and 1.5 mL absolute ethanol, previously heated to 70 °C. Then was added water (80 mL) and, after filtration of the non-soluble residues as described above with curcuminoids, a liquid–liquid extraction of water–AcOEt (80/100) of the filtrate was carried out. After evaporation of the ethyl acetate, any IL still present was removed by washing with diethyl ether (4 × 100 mL). The ether phases were collected, dried, and evaporated under reduced pressure to furnish the carvacrol. As for the extraction of curcuminoids, the IL could be reused for other extractions batches (five cycles without loss of activity).
-
1HNMR: δ ppm (500 MHz; DMSO d6): 1.18 (d, 6H, J = 6.8 Hz, H4,H5), 2,13 (s, 3H, H1), 2.76–2.78 ppm (m, 1H, H3), 6.57 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, H11), 6.70 (s, 1H, H8), 6.95 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, H10), 9.04 (s, 1H, OH). 13C NMR: δ ppm (62.5 MHz; DMSO d6): 15.9 (C1), 24.7 (C4, C5), 33.6 (C3), 112.8 (C8), 117.1 (C10), 121.7 (C6), 131.0 (C11), 147.1 (C9), 155.7 (C7). IR: ν (cm−1) 3388 (Ar-O-H), 2957 (Csp3-H), 1584 (C=C Ar), 1249 (C-OH).
2.6. Cell Culture
MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). They were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 IU/mL penicillin/streptomycin.
2.7. Cytotoxicity Evaluation
Two different methods were used: (i) reduction of a tetrazolium salt (WST1) by mitochondrial oxido-reductases [54] and (ii) staining of cells with crystal violet, a triarylmethane dye that binds cell DNA and protein [55].
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (10,000 cells/well) in DMEM with 10% FBS and allowed to settle for 24 h. The medium was removed, and effectors were added to the cells at various concentrations in DMEM without FBS for 48 h.
WST1 assay: At the end of the incubation period, the medium was replaced by fresh medium containing 10% WST-1 reagent, and cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer (SPECTROstar® Nano, BMG Labtech, Champigny-sur-Marne, France).
Crystal violet staining: At the end of the incubation period, cells were washed with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), fixed with 1.1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in PBS for 20 min, and washed with PBS. They were then stained with 0.1% (m/v) crystal violet in HEPES (0.2 M, pH 6) for 20 min and washed with distilled water. Dye was eluted with 10% (v/v) acetic acid and absorbance was read at 560 nm.
2.8. Cell Growth Measurement
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (10,000 cells/well) in DMEM with 10% FBS and allowed to settle for 24 h. The medium was then removed, cells were washed twice with PBS, and effectors were added to the cells at various concentrations.
7a-extracted curcuminoid powder was dissolved in DMSO to get a 10 mg/mL stock solution and then diluted in a culture medium with 10% FBS to final concentrations ranging from 0 to 50 µg/mL (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 µg/mL). Commercial curcuminoid (Sigma–Aldrich, ref C1386; lot: MKCD2451) powder was dissolved in DMSO to get a 10 mg/mL stock solution and then diluted in a culture medium with 10% FBS to final concentrations ranging from 0 to 25 µg/mL (0, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25 µg/mL). The same amount of DMSO was added to the culture media for each condition, including control condition (medium without effectors referred as 0 µg/mL): 0.2% DMSO final concentration.
Cells were imaged every 4 h for 72 h using the phase contrast channel in an Incucyte® S3 (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). Four sets of phase contrast images from distinct regions within each well were taken at the intervals indicated in the figures using a 10× objective. Incucyte® S3 image analysis software v2024A was set to detect the edges of the cells and to determine their confluence in percentage. Graphs were generated with the Incucyte® image analysis software v2024A graph/export functions and Microsoft Excel software.
2.9. Scratch Assay
Cells were seeded in Incucyte® Imagelock 96-well microplate (40,000 cells/well) in DMEM with 10% FBS and allowed to settle for 24 h. Scratches were performed using the WoundMaker™ tool (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). The medium was then removed. Cells were washed twice with PBS and effectors were added to the cells at various concentrations in DMEM with 10% FBS.
The 7a-extracted curcuminoid powder was dissolved in DMSO to get a 10 mg/mL stock solution and then diluted in a culture medium with 10% FBS to 0, 20 and 30 µg/mL final concentrations. Commercial curcuminoid (Sigma–Aldrich, ref C1386; lot: MKCD2451) powder was dissolved in DMSO to get a 10 mg/mL stock solution and then diluted in a culture medium with 10% FBS to 0, 1.25, 2.5 µg/mL final concentrations. The same amount of DMSO was added to the culture media for each condition, including the control condition (medium without effectors, referred to as 0 µg/mL): 0.2% DMSO final concentration.
Wound closure followed using the Incucyte® S3 Live-Cell Analysis System according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Every 4 h for 96 h, pictures of each well were taken up. Cell migration rates are reported as the relative wound density calculated using an algorithm measuring cell density in the wound area relative to the cell density outside of the wound area. Graphs were generated with the Incucyte® image analysis software v2024A graph/export functions and Microsoft Excel software.
3. Results and Discussion
The preparation of the choline-based IL involved a three-step procedure (esterification followed by two anionic metathesis) with good yields (70–85%) according procedures previously described [15a,c] for compounds 4, 5, 7a, 7b, 8a and 8b (Scheme 1). Concerning compounds 6, 9a and 9b, the same methodology was employed, and compounds 9a and 9b were obtained with 75 and 80% yields, respectively (Table 1).
The first extraction tests were carried out with curcuma longa (1 g) and oregano (1 g). Three synthesized ILs 7a, 8a and 9a were used for the extraction of these two plants for comparison with the best classical extraction methods for these plants described in the literature [36,38,39], according to experimental procedure. Compound 9a was the IL that extracted the most active ingredients from both Curcuma longa L. and oregano (Table 2). This greater efficiency can be explained by the influence of the carbon chain length (12 carbon atoms) being the least polar. Unlike other anions, which can be neutral or hydrophobic, lactate provides the IL a hydrophilic property, with the possibility of establishing hydrogen- or ionic-type interactions that play an important role in biomolecule extraction. It should be noted that 9a presents an extracting efficiency for these two plants comparable to conventional methods, and that it can be reused at least four times without loss of extraction activity, which is not the case with conventional organic solvents.
Residual compound 9a is present in the extracts of curcuminoids, which was confirmed by gas chromatography (GC-MS) and NMR. As curcuminoids have a broad absorption spectrum, with a maximum around 425 nm, UV-Visible spectroscopy at 425 nm enabled us to estimate, according to the calibration below, a quantity of 0.21 g of curcuminoids per gram of turmeric powder; for 1 g of turmeric powder, the extraction yield was therefore 21%, or 95% of the total curcuminoids contained in curcuma longa. The extract was then purified with cold diethyl ether, as this solvent solubilizes curcuminoids well and precipitates residual IL.
The oregano extract obtained with 7a, 8a and 9a contained only carvacrol. This result was confirmed by TLC, 1H NMR and GC/MS. The best carvacrol extraction yields were obtained with 9a, which extracted 29% carvacrol with traces of IL. After optimization, we obtained 27% carvacrol by mass per gram of oregano leaves, i.e., 69% of the total carvacrol contained in oregano. This yield was determined using a calibration established at 275 nm (carvacrol’s absorption wavelength). Extraction of oregano with synthesized ILs is more selective than with conventional solvents because ethanol extracts contain not only carvacrol but also other compounds such as thymol, linalool and terpenes. This selectivity can be explained by the strong non-covalent interaction between the lactate anion of the IL and carvacrol.
After extraction, IL 9a was able to be recovered by evaporating the water, then reused for subsequent extraction. The recycling capacity of 9a was demonstrated in the same conditions of extraction as the curcuminoids (21, 20, 21 and 19%, respectively, for each run) and the carvacrol (27, 26, 27 and 24%, respectively, for each run).
3.1. Analysis of IL Cytotoxicity on MiaPaca-2 Cells
MiaPaca-2 cells were incubated for 48 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of each IL. Using the WST-1 assay (Figure 2), for the different concentrations tested, Chol-C8-lactate 7a did not appear to be toxic to cells, while Chol-C12-lactate 9a and Chol-C12-levulinate 9b showed similar toxicity from 20 µg/mL, with IC50 of 22.2 and 24.1 µg/mL, respectively. Very similar results were obtained with the crystal violet assay (Figure 3).
The ILs containing 12 carbon atoms 9 appear to be more cytotoxic than those containing eight carbon atoms 7. This observation is fully in accordance with the work of Arakelyan et al. [56], where it was previously reported that the length of the alkyl side chain in the cation ILs was a major attribute related to the toxicity. The nature of the anion is also important, and we observed that 9b is slightly lower than 9a. This difference between lactate and levulinate ILs has been also observed in previous works [14].
3.2. Effect of Curcuminoids on Cell Biological Activity
Solvent 7a was chosen to extract bioactive compounds, as it does not induce a cytotoxic effect on its own.
As a proof of concept, 7a-extracted curcuminoid biological activity was compared to commercially available curcuminoids (Sigma–Aldrich, ref C1386; lot: MKCD2451).
As shown in the WST-1 assay, MiaPaca-2 cell viability decreased dose-dependently following 48 h incubation with IL-extracted curcuminoids (IC50 = 50 µg/mL) (Figure 4a). The results were compared to those obtained with commercial curcuminoids. Toxic effects appeared at 2.5 µg/mL concentration and cell viability, then decreased dose-dependently (IC50 = 8.5 µg/mL) (Figure 4c). The results corroborate those obtained using crystal violet assay (Figure 4b,d).
MiaPaca-2 cell growth was assessed using the Incucyte® S3 imaging system after 48 h of incubation with increasing amounts of curcuminoids (Figure 5). Growth of cells incubated with 2.5 to 30 µg/mL of IL-extracted curcuminoids was quite similar to the control condition. It slowed down in the presence of 40 µg/mL of extract and was nullified in the presence of 50 µg/mL extract. After 48 h of incubation, an EC50 of 38.4 ± 0.6 µg/mL was calculated using the Incucyte® Software. By comparison, growth of cells cultured with 0.63 to 2.5 µg/mL of commercial curcuminoids was similar to the control condition. There was none for the above concentrations. A 3.6 ± 0.3 µg/mL EC50 was determined after a 48 h-incubation period with this compound.
The MiaPaca-2 cell migration was also studied using the Incucyte® Scratch Wound Analysis Software Module. No differences were observed in the curcuminoid extracts at the different concentrations tested (Figure 6).
Previous work from Bemonte et al. [57] reported a 10-fold increase in MiaPaca-2 cell apoptosis following 48 h incubation with 50 µM curcuminoids, corresponding to approximatively 20 µg/mL of curcuminoids. These results are in agreement with ours. Indeed, at the same concentration, we observed a large decrease in cell viability. An IC50 of 11.16 µM (4 µg/mL) was observed by Friedman et al. [58] in the cytotoxicity assay performed on MiaPaca-2 after 72 h of incubation with curcuminoids. After 24 h of incubation with 80 µM (30 µM) curcuminoids, Yang et al. [59] reported a 60% decrease in MiaPac-2 cell viability and 50% in Panc-1. In the same way, an IC50 of 25 µM (9.2 µM) was reported by Lev-Ari et al. [36] on pancreatic PANC-1 cell cytotoxicity. Liu et al. [46] previously reported IC50 of 9.87 and 13.49 µM, respectively, in cytotoxic assays on Panc-1 and MiaPaca-2 cells. All these results are consistent with ours, even though IC50 values may vary according to experimental conditions (incubation time, cytotoxicity test used, cell type). The results obtained in cell growth experiments confirm those obtained in the cytotoxic assay. At non-cytototoxic doses, we did not see any significant effect of curcuminoids on MiaPaca-2 cell migration. Liu et al. [60] performed migration assays in a scratch wound model and showed an inhibition of PANC-1 cell migration after a 24 h incubation period with 5 µM (1.8 µg/mL) curcuminoids. However, no results were presented for MiaPaca-2 cell migration, even though both cell types were studied for cytotoxic effects as reported above. In our study, at the 2.5 µg/mL concentration, we did not see any difference from the control condition regarding MiaPaca-2 cell migration.
Concerning the curcuminoids extracted with IL 7, we observed a six-fold less cytotoxic effect than the one observed with the commercial curcuminoids. This may be due either to a better solubility of curcuminoids in the ionic medium, implying an interaction between curcuminoids and the IL that slows down the curcuminoid–bioreceptor interaction [61], or to the composition of the extract in terms of curcumins I, II and III (Figure 1) in the ionic extract, which is not the same as that of commercial curcumins. HPLC and UV assay studies are scheduled in this field.
4. Conclusions
In the present work, six choline ester-based ILs were synthetized from saturated fatty acids (octanoic, decanoic and dodecanoic acids) and choline with conversions of 90, 75 and 80%, respectively. The ILs containing 12 carbon atoms have not been described in the literature and proved to be of interest for the extraction of curcuminoids or carvacrol from turmeric or oregano respectively, as the yields of extracted curcuminoids and carvacrol exceed the yields described in the literature for conventional organic solvents with or without activation methods. What is more, these solvents can be reused at least four times without loss of activity. The extraction of the carvacrol from oregano is also very selective. Furthermore, improvements in extracting yields through ultrasound activation are also in progress.
The cytotoxic activity of curcuminoids extracts containing traces of residual IL is six-fold weaker than that of commercial curcuminoids, requiring further work to be carried out in the near future to determine the ratios among the different curcumins. The cytotoxic activity of carvacrol or carvacrol extracts is also under investigation.
Conceptualization, S.B.-P. and S.B.; Methodology, J.-P.M., S.A., S.B.-P. and S.B.; Validation, J.-P.M., S.B.-P. and S.B.; Formal analysis, C.S., J.-P.M. and S.A.; Investigation, C.S., J.-P.M., S.A. and S.B.-P.; Writing—original draft, S.B.-P. and S.B.; Writing—review & editing, S.A., S.B.-P. and S.B.; Supervision, S.B.; Project administration, S.B.; Funding acquisition, S.B.-P. and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of 7a, 9a and 9b ILs on MiaPaca-2 cells evaluated using the WST-1 assay. Results are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical significance was studied using t-tests. NS: not significant; ***: p [less than] 0.001; ****: p [less than] 0.0001. n = 7.
Figure 3. Cytotoxicity of 7a, 9a and 9b ILs on MiaPaca-2 cells evaluated using crystal violet staining. Results are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical significance was studied using t-test. NS: not significant; ***: p [less than] 0.001; ****: p [less than] 0.0001. n = 7.
Figure 4. MiaPaca-2 cell toxicity of curcuminoid extract analyzed using WST-1 (a) and crystal violet (b) assay compared to commercial curcuminoid analyzed using WST-1 (c) and crystal violet (d), Results are expressed as means +/− SD. Statistical significance was studied using t-tests. NS: not significant; *: p [less than] 0.05; **: p [less than] 0.01; ***: p [less than] 0.001; ****: p [less than] 0.0001. n = 7; N = 2.
Figure 5. MiaPaca-2 cell growth analyzed using the Incucyte S3 v2024A software. (a) Liquid ionic extracted curcuminoids. (b) Commercial curcuminoids. Results are expressed as means ± SD. n = 3; N = 3.
Figure 6. MiaPaca-2 cell migration analyzed using Incucyte Scratch wound analysis software v2024A. (a) Liquid ionic extracted curcuminoids. (b) Commercial curcuminoids. Results are expressed as means ± SD. n = 6; N = 3.
Cholinium-based esters with lactate and levulinate as counter anion.
Ionic Liquids | Aspect | Degradation Temperature (°C) | Viscosity (cP) at 60 °C |
---|---|---|---|
Chol-C8-Lac 7a [14a] | Colorless oil | 218 | 49.3 |
Chol-C8-Lev 7b [14a] | Light beige wax | 229 | 67.8 |
Chol-C10-Lac 8a [14c] | Slightly yellow wax | 226 | nd |
Chol-C10-Lev 8b [14c] | Slightly yellow wax | 232 | nd |
Chol-C12-Lac 9a | White wax | 248 | nd |
Chol-C12-Lev 9b | White wax | 247 | nd |
Extractions of curcuma and oregano using 7a, 8a and 9a as extracting solvents.
Starting Material | Extracting Solvent | Conditions | Bioactive Compounds | Extraction Yields a |
---|---|---|---|---|
Curcuma (1 g) | 7a (6 g) | 2 h, 60 °C | Curcuminoids | 15 |
Curcuma (1 g) | 8a (6 g) | 2 h, 60 °C | Curcuminoids | 16 |
Curcuma (1 g) | 9a (5 g) | +EtOH (1.5 mL), 2 h, 60 °C | Curcuminoids | 21 |
Curcuma (0.6 g) | Acetone | Acetone (6 g), 2 h, 60 °C | Curcuminoids | 16 |
Oregano (1 g) | 7a | 2 h, 60 °C | Carvacrol | 12 |
Oregano (1 g) | 8a | 2 h, 60 °C | Carvacrol | 18 |
Oregano (1 g) | 9a (5 g) | +EtOH (1.5 mL), 2 h, 60 °C | Carvacrol | 27 |
Oregano (0.5 g) | Absolute EtOH | EtOH (50 mL), 6 h, 95 °C | Carvacrol | 18 |
a: gravimetry and UV determination.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Himani,; Pratap Singh Raman, A.; Babu Singh, M.; Jain, P.; Chaudhary, P.; Bahadur, I.; Lal, K.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P. An update on synthesis, properties, applications and toxicity of the ILs. J. Mol. Liq.; 2022; 364, 119989. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119989]
2. Shadpour, M.; Mohammad, D. Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents: Progress and Prospects. Green Solvents II; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 1, pp. 1-32.
3. Fabre, E.; Murshed, S.S. A review of the thermophysical properties and potential of ionic liquids for thermal applications. J. Mater. Chem. A; 2021; 9, pp. 15861-15884. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1TA03656D]
4. Domínguez de María, P.; Maugeri, Z. Ionic liquids in biotransformations: From proof-of-concept to emerging deep-eutectic-solvents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.; 2011; 15, pp. 220-225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.11.008]
5. Khoo, Y.S.; Chandra Tjong, T.; Wei Chew, J.; Hu, X. Techniques for recovery and recycling of ionic liquids: A review. Sci. Total Environ.; 2024; 992, 171238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171238]
6. Hajipour, A.R.; Rafiee, F. Recent Progress in Ionic Liquids and their Applications in Organic Synthesis. OPPI; 2015; 47, pp. 249-276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00304948.2015.1052317]
7. Johanna, C.; Sommer, O.; Udo, K. Ionic liquids in biotechnology and beyond. Solid State Ion.; 2018; 314, pp. 119-128.
8. Taylor, B.R.; Kumar, N.; Mishra, D.K.; Simmons, B.A.; Choudhary, H.; Sale, K.L. Computational Advances in Ionic Liquid Applications for Green Chemistry: A Critical Review of Lignin Processing and Machine Learning Approaches. Molecules; 2024; 29, 5073. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules29215073] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39519714]
9. Dobler, D.; Schmidts, T.; Zinecker, C.; Schlupp, P.; Schaefer, J.; Runkel, F. Hydrophilic Ionic Liquids as Ingredients of Gel-Based Dermal Formulations. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech.; 2016; 17, pp. 923-932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-015-0421-y]
10. Belovezhdova, I.; Todorov, B.; Bogdanov, M.G. Recovery of radionuclides with ionic liquids. I. Selective extraction of 241Am. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2021; 262, 118303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118303]
11. Tang, B.; Bi, W.; Tian, M.; Row, K.H. Application of ionic liquid for extraction and separation of bioactive compounds from plants. J. Chromatogr. B; 2012; 904, pp. 1-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.07.020]
12. Gadilohar, B.L.; Shankarling, G.S. Choline based ionic liquids and their applications in organic transformation. J. Mol. Liq.; 2017; 227, pp. 234-246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.136]
13. Klein, R.; Kellermeier, M.; Touraud, D.; Müller, E.; Kunz, W. Choline alkylsulfates—New promising green surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2013; 392, pp. 274-280. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.003]
14. Rogers, R.D.; Daly, D.T.; Gurau, G.; Macfarlane, D.; Turanjanin, J.; Dean, P.M.; Scott, J.L.; Bica, K.; Seddon, K.R. Dual Functioning Ionic Liquids and Salts Thereof. U.S. Patent; WO2010/78300, 8 July 2010.
15. De Santis, S.; Masci, G.; Casciotta, F.; Caminiti, R.; Scarpellini, E.; Campetella, M.; Gontrani, L. Cholinium-amino acid based ionic liquids: A new method of synthesis and physicochemical characterization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.; 2015; 17, pp. 20687-20698. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP01612F] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206450]
16. Liu, Q.P.; Hou, X.D.; Li, N.; Zong, M.H. Ionic liquids from renewable biomaterials: Synthesis, characterization and application in the pretreatment of biomass. Green Chem.; 2012; 14, pp. 304-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2GC16128A]
17. Fukaya, Y.; Iizuka, Y.; Sekikawa, K.; Ohno, H. Bio ionic liquids: Room temperature ionic liquids composed wholly of biomaterials. Green Chem.; 2007; 9, pp. 1155-1161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b706571j]
18. Peng, H.; Sun, S.; Hu, Y.; Xing, R.; Fang, D. Clean procedure for the synthesis of Aminophosphonates catalyzed by choline-based ionic liquid. Heteroat. Chem.; 2015; 26, pp. 215-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hc.21251]
19. Sanap, A.K.; Shankarling, G.S. Eco-friendly and recyclable media for rapid synthesis of tricyanovinylated aromatics using biocatalyst and deep eutectic solvent. Catal. Commun.; 2014; 49, pp. 58-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2014.01.031]
20. Phadtare, S.B.; Shankarling, G.S. Greener coumarin synthesis by Knoevenagel condensation using biodegradable choline chloride. Environ. Chem. Lett.; 2012; 10, pp. 363-368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10311-012-0360-8]
21. Zeisel, S.H.; Klatt, K.C.; Caudill, M.A. Choline. Adv. Nutr.; 2018; 9, pp. 58-60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmx004]
22. Elhi, F.; Gantman, M.; Nurk, G.; Schulz, P.S.; Wasserscheid, P.; Aabloo, A.; Põhako-Esko, K. Influence of Carboxylate Anions on Phase Behavior of Choline Ionic Liquid Mixtures. Molecules; 2020; 25, 1691. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071691] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32272688]
23. Ferlin, N.; Courty, M.; Gatard, S.; Spulak, M.; Quilty, B.; Beadham, I.; Ghavre, M.; Haiß, A.; Kümmerer, K.; Gathergood, N. et al. Biomass derived ionic liquids: Synthesis from natural organic acids, characterization, toxicity, biodegradation and use as solvents for catalytic hydrogenation processes. Tetrahedron; 2013; 69, pp. 6150-6161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2013.05.054]
24. Hayouni, S.; Robert, A.; Ferlin, N.; Amri, H.; Bouquillon, S. New biobased tetrabutylphosphonium ionic liquids: Synthesis, characterization and use as a solvent or co-solvent for mild and greener Pd-catalyzed hydrogenation processes. RSC Adv.; 2016; 6, pp. 113583-113592. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6RA23056C]
25. Ferlin, N.; Courty, M.; Nguyen Van Nhien, A.; Gatard, S.; Pour, M.; Quilty, B.; Ghavre, M.; Haiß, A.; Kümmerer, K.; Gathergood, N. et al. Tetrabutylammonium prolinate-based ionic liquids: A combined asymmetric catalysis, antimicrobial toxicity and biodegradation assessment. RSC Adv.; 2013; 3, pp. 26241-26251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ra43785j]
26. Mbakidi, J.P.; Barjhoux, I.; Aguibi, K.; Geffard, A.; Rioult, D.; Palos Ladeiro, M.; Bouquillon, S. Synthesis of New Betaine-Based Ionic Liquids by Using a “One-Pot” Amidation Process and Evaluation of Their Ecotoxicity through a New Method Involving a Hemocyte-Based Bioassay. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2021; 9, pp. 15427-15438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03982]
27. Fahri, F.; Bacha, K.; Chiki, F.F.; Mbakidi, J.P.; Panda, S.; Bouquillon, S.; Fourmentin, S. Air pollution: New bio-based ionic liquids absorb both hydrophobic and hydrophilic volatile organic compounds with high efficiency. Environ. Chem. Lett.; 2020; 18, pp. 1403-1409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01007-8]
28. Feuzing, F.; Mbakidi, J.P.; Lazar, F.; Marchal, L.; Leroy, E.; Bouquillon, S. Biobased ionic liquids as solvents of paramylon. J. Mol. Liq.; 2023; 370, 120983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120983]
29. Mbakidi, J.P.; Kerkache, A.; Lazar, F.; Bouquillon, S. Dissolution of Cellulose and Lignin with Biobased Ionic Liquids. J. Solut. Chem.; 2022; 51, pp. 345-356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10953-022-01148-0]
30. Chattopadhyay, I.; Biswas, K.; Bandyopadhyay, U.; Banerjee, R.K. Turmeric and curcumin: Biological actions and medicinal applications. Curr. Sci.; 2004; 87, pp. 44-53.
31. Prasad, S.; Smith, J.; Kumar, R. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects; 2nd ed. Benzie, I.F.F.; Wachtel-Galor, S. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; Chapter 13
32. Aggarwal, B.B.; Sundaram, C.; Malani, N.; Ichikawa, H. Curcumin: The Indian Solid Gold. The Molecular Targets and Therapeutic Uses of Curcumin in Health and Disease; Aggarwal, B.B.; Surh, Y.J.; Shishodia, S. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; Volume 595.
33. Gasbarri, C.; Angelini, G. Cyclocurcumin as Promising Bioactive Natural Compound: An Overview. Molecules; 2024; 29, 1451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071451]
34. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. The Golden Spice for Life: Turmeric with the Pharmacological Benefits of Curcuminoids Components, Including Curcumin, Bisdemethoxycurcumin, and Demethoxycurcumin. Curr. Org. Synth.; 2024; 21, pp. 665-678. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570179420666230607124949]
35. Zielińska, A.; Alves, H.; Marques, V.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Alves, T.F.; Morsink, M.; Willemen, N.; Eder, P.; Chaud, M.V. Properties, Extraction Methods, and Delivery Systems for Curcumin as a Natural Source of Beneficial Health Effects. Medicina; 2020; 56, 336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56070336] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635279]
36. Lev-Ari, S.; Starr, A.; Vexler, A.; Karaush, V.; Loew, V.; Greif, J.; Fenig, E.; Aderka, D.; Ben-Yosef, R. Inhibition of pancreatic and lung adenocarcinoma cell survival by curcumin is associated with increased apoptosis, down-regulation of COX-2 and EGFR and inhibition of Erk1/2 activity. Anticancer Res.; 2006; 26, pp. 4423-4430.
37. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. J. Clin.; 2021; 71, pp. 209-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660]
38. Islam, M.R.; Rauf, A.; Akash, S.; Trisha, S.I.; Nasim, A.H.; Akter, M.; Dhar, P.S.; Ogaly, H.A.; Hemeg, H.A.; Wilairatana, P. et al. Targeted therapies of curcumin focus on its therapeutic benefits in cancers and human health: Molecular signaling pathway-based approaches and future perspectives. Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2024; 170, 116034. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.116034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38141282]
39. Cheng, A.L.; Hsu, C.H.; Lin, J.K.; Hsu, M.M.; Ho, Y.F.; Shen, T.S.; Ko, J.Y.; Lin, J.T.; Lin, B.R.; Ming-Shiang, W. et al. Phase I clinical trial of curcumin, a chemopreventive agent, in patients with high-risk or pre-malignant lesions. Anticancer Res.; 2001; 21, pp. 2895-2900.
40. Dhillon, N.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Newman, R.A.; Wolff, R.A.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Ng, C.S.; Badmaev, V.; Kurzrock, R. Phase II trial of curcumin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res.; 2008; 14, pp. 4491-4499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0024]
41. Farghadani, R.; Naidu, R. Curcumin as an Enhancer of Therapeutic Efficiency of Chemotherapy Drugs in Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 2144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042144] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216255]
42. Shaikh, S.; Shaikh, J.; Naba, Y.S.; Doke, K.; Ahmed, K.; Yusufi, M. Curcumin: Reclaiming the lost ground against cancer resistance. Cancer Drug Resist.; 2021; 4, pp. 298-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.92]
43. Indira, P.K. The Chemistry of Curcumin: From Extraction to Therapeutic Agent. Molecules; 2014; 19, pp. 20091-20112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules191220091]
44. Sogi, D.S.; Sharma, S.; Oberoi, D.P.S. Effect of extraction parameters on curcumin yield from turmeric. J. Food Sci. Technol.; 2010; 47, pp. 300-304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0047-8]
45. Bajpai, S.K.; Chand, N.; Ahuja, S.; Roy, M.K. Curcumin/cellulose micro crystals/chitosan films: Water absorption behavior and in vitro cytotoxicity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.; 2015; 75, pp. 239-247. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.038] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25643996]
46. Pyo, D.; Kim, E. Rapid and Efficient Extraction of Curcumins from Curry Powder Using Supercritical CO2. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.; 2014; 35, pp. 3107-3111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.10.3107]
47. Patil, S.; Ranveer, R.C.; Debaje, P.P.; Kadam, J.H.; Sahoo, A.K. Ultrasound assisted extraction of curcumin. Asian J. Dairy & Food Res.; 2018; 37, pp. 250-254.
48. Shu, Y.; Gao, M.; Wang, X.; Song, R.; Lu, J.; Chen, X. Separation of curcuminoids using ionic liquid based aqueous two-phase system coupled with in situ dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Talanta; 2016; 149, pp. 6-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.11.009]
49. Teixeira, B.; Marques, S.; Ramos, C.; Serrano, C.; Matos, O.; Neng, N.R.; Nogueira, M.F.; Alexandre, J.; Maria, S.; Nunes, L. Chemical composition and bioactivity of different origano (Origanum vulgare) extractions and essential oil. Sci. Hortic.; 2013; 177, pp. 2707-2714.
50. Justė, B.; Valdas, J.; Liudas, I.; Dalia, M.K.; Gailutė, D.; Ruta, M.; Jurga, B. Optimization of carvacrol, rosmarinic, oleanolic and ursolic acid extraction from oregano herbs (O. onites L., O. vulgare spp. hirtum and O. vulgare L.). Nat. Prod. Rep.; 2016; 30, pp. 672-674.
51. Oliveira, R.D.; Leitao, G.G.; Bizzo, H.R.; Lopes, D.; Alviano, D.S.; Alviano, C.S.; Leitao, S.G. Chemical and antimicrobial analyses of essential oil of Lippia origanoides H.B.K. Food Chem.; 2007; 101, pp. 236-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.022]
52. Yin, Q.H.; Yan, F.X.; Zu, X.Y.; Wu, Y.H.; Wu, X.P.; Liao, M.C.; Deng, S.W.; Yi, L.L.; Zhuang, Y.Z. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effect of carvacrol on human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG-2. Cytotechnology; 2012; 64, pp. 43-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10616-011-9389-y]
53. Du, W.X.; Olsen, C.W.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Levin, C.E.; Friedman, M. Storage Stability and Antibacterial Activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7 of Carvacrol in Edible Apple Films Made by Two Different Casting Methods. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2008; 56, pp. 3080-3085. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf703629s]
54. Harkacz, O.M., Sr.; Carnes, D.L., Jr.; Walker, W.A., 3rd. Determination of periodontal ligament cell viability in the oral rehydration fluid Gatorade and milks of varying fat content. J. Endod.; 1997; 23, pp. 687-690. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80402-5]
55. Feoktistova, M.; Geserick, P.; Leverkus, M. Crystal Violet Assay for Determining Viability of Cultured Cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc.; 2016; 2016, pdb-prot087379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot087379] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037069]
56. Arakelyan, L.A.; Arkhipova, D.M.; Seitkalieva, M.M.; Vavina, A.V.; Sahharova, L.T.; Kurbanalieva, S.K.; Posvyatenko, A.V.; Egorova, K.S.; Ananikov, V.P. A comprehensive dataset on cytotoxicity of ionic liquids. Sci. Data; 2024; 11, 1379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04190-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39695170]
57. Bimonte, S.; Barbieri, A.; Palma, G.; Luciano, A.; Rea, D.; Arra, C. Curcuminoids inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in an orthotopic mouse model of human pancreatic cancer. Biomed. Res. Int.; 2013; 2013, 810423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/810423] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324975]
58. Friedman, L.; Lin, L.; Ball, S.; Bekaii-Saab, T.; Fuchs, J.; Li, P.K.; Li, C.; Lin, J. Curcuminoids analogues exhibit enhanced growth suppressive activity in human pancreatic cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs; 2009; 20, pp. 444-449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0b013e32832afc04]
59. Yang, H.; Fan, S.; An, Y.; Xin, W.; Pan, Y.; Xiaokaiti, Y.; Duan, J.; Li, X.; Tie, L.; Ye, M. et al. Bisdemethoxycurcuminoids exerts pro-apoptotic effects in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells through mitochondrial dysfunction and a GRP78-dependent pathway. Oncotarget; 2016; 7, pp. 83641-83656. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13272]
60. Liu, P.; Ying, Q.; Liu, H.; Yu, S.Q.; Bu, L.P.; Shao, L.; Li, X.Y. Curcuminoids enhances anti-cancer efficacy of either gemcitabine or docetaxel on pancreatic cancer cells. Oncol. Rep.; 2020; 44, pp. 1393-1402.
61. Lin, C.H.; Chou, C.C.; Lee, Y.H.; Hung, C.C. Curcuminoids Facilitates Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation to Ameliorate Inflammatory Astrogliosis. Molecules; 2022; 27, 2507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082507]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Six biobased ionic liquids were prepared from saturated fatty acids (octanoic, decanoic and dodecanoic acids) and choline with yields up to 90% following procedures respecting green chemistry principles. These ionic liquids were fully characterized (NMR, IR, elemental analysis, viscosimetry and TGA) and used as extraction solvents for bioactive compounds (curcuminoids and carvacrol) using classical conditions, and the ionic liquids were able to be recovered after five runs without loss of activity. The ionic liquid containing a C12 carbon chain was the best extracting solvent, extracting 95% of the total curcuminoids contained in turmeric and 69% of the total carvacrol contained in oregano, which are higher yields compared to the extraction procedures described in the literature. As C12 ionic liquids were more cytotoxic than C8 ones, the biological activity of the curcuminoids extracted with C8 ionic liquids was evaluated on a MIAPaCa-2, a pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line for which antitumor activity of curcuminoids had previously been reported. Compared to the cytotoxicity of the commercially available extract, the cytotoxic activity of the extracts was slightly weaker.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de Reims, UMR CNRS 7312, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Boîte n° 44, B.P. 1039, 51687 Reims, France;
2 URCATech, URCACyt, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51 Rue Cognacq Jay CS30018, 51095 Reims, France;
3 UMR CNRS/URCA 7369 (MEDyC), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51 Rue Cognacq Jay CS30018, 51095 Reims, France;