1. Introduction
Photovoltaics is one of the most highly regarded technologies for the future of the energy sector. Conventional photovoltaic systems based on semiconductors are limited in terms of efficiency and performance due to the bandgap of the materials [1]. Even though considerable progress is being made with halide-based materials some reliability challenges still need to be solved [2]. The need for innovative approaches is therefore repeatedly emphasised. In this context, photo-ferroelectric materials are gaining increasing attention due to their unique light-matter interactions, which can open up new possibilities for the next generation of photovoltaic technologies [3]. These materials can enhance the bulk photovoltaic effect (BPVE), in which the electric field from spontaneous polarization in ferroelectric materials separates electron-hole pairs without relying on a p-n junction [4]. This photo-response pathway means that the output photovoltage can no longer be limited by the material’s bandgap and can be increased by orders of magnitude [5,6,7,8]. Nonetheless, there is a development of a photovoltaic device based on ferroelectric materials, namely coordinating the generation of photocarriers and photocurrent for efficient charge collection at the electrodes [3]. The most important strategies include the design of heterostructures to exploit the BPVE [9,10], strain modification by epitaxial growth of ferroelectric films on different substrates [10,11] and bandgap engineering [12,13] to extend the absorption range into the visible region. Among these promising materials are the hexagonal manganite oxides, h-REMnO3 (RE = Lu or Y), which exhibit a remarkable combination of properties [14,15]. The phase is thermodynamically stable up to 1300 °C and can be easily prepared as bulk ceramics by conventional techniques such as solid-state, sol-gel or co-precipitation [16]. These compounds can also be prepared as thin films using different deposition techniques namely: Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) [17], Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) [10,18] or RF magnetron sputtering. The ferroelectric transition occurs at very high temperatures (TC > 750 K) and the non-centrosymmetric P63cm lattice structure exhibits asymmetric covalent bonding interactions between Lu and O along the c axis, which favours the off-centred electric dipoles responsible for ferroelectricity [15]. Last but not least, the bandgap (Eg) is between 1.1 and 1.5 eV and thus within the optimal values for the utilization of solar radiation [19]. Therefore, this compound is particularly interesting for potential photovoltaic applications due to the BPVE. Also convincing is the fact that the h-LuMnO3 is one of the least studied compounds of the manganite family, especially the thin film phase grown on different substrates, and the comparison with monocrystalline or polycrystalline bulk systems [20]. The most commonly used substrates for the experimental deposition of thin films are the standard Pt/TiO2/SiO2/Si (100) substrates, as the Pt buffer offers high electrical conductivity and adequate thermal stability even in O2 environments. However, some problems can occur when the temperatures required for the growth of ferroelectric oxides are above 750 °C [21,22]. These issues may include diffusion of Ti and recrystallization of SiO2 affecting Pt microstructure and adhesion, leading to dewetting and porosity, a process that has been clearly proven with live imaging by confocal laser microscopy [23,24,25], ultimately hindering electrical characterization [17]. Solving this challenge is also essential for reliable applications of thin film oxides. An alternative substrate with Pt buffer is hexagonal sapphire, which has the advantage of only 0.9% lattice mismatch between Pt (111) and Al2O3 (001) [26]. This stability is extended to the high temperatures required to synthesize the functional oxide materials by various physical deposition techniques [5,10,26,27,28]. In this study, the synthesis of single-phase h-LuMnO3 thin films, deposited by the RF-magnetron sputtering technique on various substrates, including SiO2 glass, SrRuO3, and Pt(111)/Al2O3(001) is explored. Then, characterization will evaluate the quality of the film phase, particularly using Raman spectroscopy, for which there are few reports. Further measurements of electrical and optical properties include the evaluation of the electroactive response under illumination.
2. Experimental Procedures
A high-quality stochiometric LuMnO3 target with a diameter of 5 cm was prepared using auto-combustion sol-gel synthesis (urea), details can be found in [Supplementary Material]. The h-LuMnO3 thin films were deposited using an RF-magnetron sputtering system with a Vac Techniche RFG300VT (Saint Leonards/UK) RF power supply at 13.56 MHz. The Al2O3(001) substrates (Kristallhandel Kelpin) (Leimen, Germany) were cleaved into 10 × 10 mm2 pieces. The wafers were placed on the top of the resistive heater with a fixed distance of 8 cm between the substrate and the target. The temperature of the heater was measured with a type K thermocouple placed directly behind the substrate using a Eurotherm 3216 (Worthing, UK). Before each deposition, the chamber was evacuated below 5 × 10−6 mbar using a turbomolecular pump. During deposition, the argon pressure was set to 3.2 × 10−2 mbar, and manually controlled via a precision leak valve and a gas flow meter (Omega FMA 1700A/1800A model FMA 1812A-ST-Ar) (Amstelveen, The Netherlands). The Pt buffer layer (bottom contact) was deposited from a Pt target (99.99%) at 25 W RF power under argon at 0.045 mbar, onto the Al2O3(001) substrates at 400 °C for 5 min (~30 nm) and 15 min (>90 nm thickness). Subsequently, the Al2O3/Pt films were annealed at 800 °C to ensure their stability under the conditions of growing h-LuMnO3. The h-LuMnO3 films were deposited for 60 min at 60 W RF power, resulting in a deposition rate of ~7.5 nm/min without heating, and then annealed for 12 h in a tubular furnace with 1 bar argon free flow.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired using a Panalytical X’Pert Pro MPD (Almelo, The Netherlands) equipped with an X’Celerator detector and a secondary monochromator, in Bragg-Brentano geometry, with λ(CuKα1,2) = 1.5418 Å, 2θ step size of 0.017° at 100 s/step. High Resolution (HRXRD) “Phi scans” measurements were performed using Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer, operating with λ(CuKα1/α2), or monochromatic λ(CuKα1) = 1.540598 Å radiation. The diffractograms were analyzed using X’Pert Epitaxy (Version 4.1) and OriginPro software (version 2018).
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS) were performed using an FEI Quanta 400 with W filament and an EDAX system respectively. The EDS acquisition spectra were performed at 15 kV to minimize the signal from the substrate and semi-quantification was performed standardless with ZAF correction factors without considering the elements from the substrates.
The unpolarized micro-Raman spectra were recorded in a backscattering geometry using the 633 nm He-Ne laser line for excitation and a 100× objective lens of a Leica microscope. The scattered light was analyzed with a Renishaw inVia Qontor spectrometer (Barcelona, Spain). Measurements were performed at room temperature and from 70 to 850 K with the THMS600 Linkam Stage. The laser power was adjusted to prevent sample heating. The spectra analysis of phonon modes was performed using a best-fit method of a sum of damped oscillators with the IgorPro software (version 6.0.0.0).
The diffuse reflectance measurements were carried out with Varian spectrophotometer CARY 50 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a range from 200 to 1000 nm, using the BaSO4 standard compound as a white background reference. The acquired spectrum was converted using the Kubelka-Munk function, where the magnitude F(R∞) is proportional to the absorption coefficient (α). The optical bandgap (Eg) is calculated according to the relationship introduced by Tauc and described by Davis & Mott: (α.E)1/n = (h.υ − Eg), where E = h.υ is the photon energy and Eg is the optical band gap. The power-law exponent, n, depends on the transition type: n = 1/2 for a direct Eg and n = 2 for an indirect Eg. The value of indirect or direct Eg is estimated by plotting (α.h.υ)1/2 or (α.h.υ)2, respectively, as a function of the photon energy and extrapolating it when α is zero [17,18,29].
Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) was performed in an Ar-filled glovebox to avoid the influence of the humidity and was done using a scanning probe microscope NT-MDT NTEGRA-Aura (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) equipped with an external lock-in amplifier Zurich instruments HF2LI); and custom-built signal pre-amplifier; commercial probes from Budget Sensors: ElectriMulti75-EG, with Pt coating tips of radius of 25 nm, resonance frequency ~75 kHz and spring constant k around 3–5 N/m. PFM scans and spectroscopy studies were done using dual AC tracking of the first contact resonance (DFRT) [30]. A 2 V AC voltage was applied to scanning probe microscopy for scanning. Switching spectroscopy PFM was measured through the electrode to attest ferroelectricity and avoid the effects of the charge injection. The images were edited with Gwydion software (Version 2.67). Electrical measurements under illumination were done at the scanning probe microscope NT-MDT NTEGRA-Aura using a built-in current preamplifier with logarithmic transfer function (Supplementary Material) and back-to-back diodes in parallel protecting the electrical scheme. The measurements were done in capacitor geometry by the application of the voltage pulses to the Pt electrodes deposited at the surface. Budget Sensors: ElectriMulti75-EG cantilever with Pt coating was used for the measurements. To achieve strong contact 1 μN force was applied to the probe. The measurements were performed in dark conditions with a switched-off AFM laser and feedback held by the capacitive sensor. A commercial US H-103D xenon lamp was used to illuminate the film surface with UV light. The measurements were pre-calibrated by performing I-V measurements at 1 nm lift-off from the surface to confirm no spurious contributions to the current.
Electrical measurements as a function of temperature from 273 to 620 K, were made in a 4-electrode linear configuration, using a Keithley 6487 Picoammeter/Voltage Source, and the temperature monitored with a K-type thermocouple connected to a TM920C temperature reader. Electrical resistivity was calculated from the I-V curves by multiplying the resistance by the cross-sectional area and dividing by the length between the electrodes.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structural Characterization
A series of Lu/Mn oxide films were deposited to determine the optimal conditions for the growth of the h-LuMnO3 phase. According to our previous work, h-LuMnO3 can only crystallize at temperatures around 800 °C [17]. Nevertheless, further experiments were carried out to investigate the influence of the substrate temperature during deposition on the development of the phase. Films were deposited for 60 min at 650 °C, 450 °C and at 40 °C, the inertial temperature of the plasma with the heater switched off. Then all were subjected to ex-situ annealing at 800 °C for 12 h in 1 bar Argon. Figure 1a–d shows the XRD patterns of the Lu:Mn:O films on different substrates. The diffractograms of samples deposited at 650 °C and 450 °C show mainly the presence of c-Lu2O3 (PDF#04-008-5231) [31] with clear reflection peaks at 2θ = 29.72° and 34.56 corresponding to planes (222)c and (400)c among other minor reflections from planes (211)c; (220)c; (111)c; (431)c confirming the formation of this phase. In addition, a mixture with an incipient phase of h-LuMnO3 can also be detected, with broad main reflections of the planes (002)h at 15.62° and (004)h near 31.45°. At such high deposition temperatures, the conditions for the formation of pure phase of h-LuMnO3 are not fulfilled. Consequently, it was found necessary to switch off the substrate heating and use only the inertial heating induced by the plasma (ambient conditions inside the chamber), which corresponds to stabilization at around 40 °C, monitored via a thermocouple probe in direct contact with the substrate. The film deposited on SrRuO3\Si (Figure 1a) still shows c-Lu2O3 as the dominant phase concomitant with the formation of polycrystalline h-LuMnO3. The film deposited on standard Pt\Si substrates (Figure 1b) appears more promising: It has no traces of c-Lu2O3 and a clear formation of the h-LuMnO3 phase with a preferential off-plane orientation along the ch-axis. However, the annealing treatment led to a slight segregation of the SiO2 from the substrate and a slight degradation of the quality of the Pt buffer, which affected the electrical characterization of the sample. A cross-sectional SEM image of this sample is shown in Figure 2a, from which the deposition rate of the film can be estimated. The film deposited on standard SiO2 glass substrates (Figure 1c) also appears to develop as the main phase of the h-LuMnO3 with a preferential off-plane orientation along the ch-axis. A small reflection peak at 2θ = 29.2° indicates traces of t-MnO2 from the (110)t planes [32]. Only the manganite film deposited on Pt(111)c\Al2O3(001)h (Figure 1d) shows no significant traces of spurious phases and therefore deserves special attention. It also shows a preferential orientation of the h-LuMnO3 P63cm phase along the ch-axis, and observes intense off-plane reflection peaks from the planes (002)h at 15.62° and from (004)h at 31,46°, with an estimated lattice parameter ch =11.343 ± 0.001 Å, corresponding to a strain of −0.16% of the ch bulk parameter. Relatively weak peaks can be observed at 2θ = 23.07°, 29.57°, 30.61°, 33.55°, 43.58°, which can be indexed to the planes (102)h; (110)h; (111)h; (112)h; (114)h respectively. This allows the calculation of ah = 6.056 ± 0.004 Å in the plane, which compensates for an expansion of almost +0.3% with respect to the bulk parameter ah. Therefore, the film cannot be considered fully relaxed, and the average cell volume (V = 360.274 Å3) is within +0.4% of the typical dimensions of the fully stoichiometric bulk structure [33]. The SEM image of the surface of this sample shows a very homogenous microstructure, as can be seen in Figure 2b.
As the previous series of h-LuMnO3 films were estimated to be about 450 nm thick, such broad films tend to relax the phase structure to approach the bulk form, masking possible strain effects resulting from the preferential crystalline orientation along the ch-axis on the Pt(111)c\Al2O3(001)h substrate. Further experimental depositions of thinner films were performed to determine whether the h-LuMnO3 phase can exhibit stronger more pronounced distortions due to epitaxial growth. Maintaining the previous deposition and annealing conditions, the new series of films was deposited for 10 min, corresponding to approximately 75 to 90 nm thin films, which are expected to be below or close to the structural relaxation threshold. XRD spectra shown in Figure 3a,b confirm a single-oriented growth of the film phase. For this thinner epitaxial film, the calculated lattice parameters ah = 6.090 ± 0.004 Å and ch = 11.384 ± 0.005 Å, which corresponds to a cell volume of 365.616 Å3, a relative increase of 1.92% compared to stoichiometric bulk structure [33]. The in-plane expansion of the cell parameters can be attributed to the epitaxial stress imposed by the sapphire substrate on the film, a similar effect that has been observed with other h-REMnO3 compounds [34,35].
Further structural characterization was performed by unpolarized Raman spectroscopy. The h-LuMnO3 profile is known to have 38 Raman modes (9 A1 + 14 E1 + 15 E2), which are predicted by group theory for the irreducible representation of the Γ-point zone centre according to the equation [36]: Γ = 10 A1 + 5 A2 + 10 B1 + 5 B2 + 15 E1 + 15 E2. The details of 38 Raman active modes and their position for the P63mc h-YMnO3 and h-LuMnO3 systems were studied by Iliev et al. [37]. Figure 4 a compares the spectra of the h-LuMnO3 film deposited in Pt\sapphire obtained in the range from 77 to 850 K with those of the bulk counterpart at ambient conditions [38]. Indeed, as detailed in Table 1, the film presents the expected coincident modes at 115, 461, 641 and 684 cm−1, while the main mode A1 mode at 684 cm−1 is slightly shifted to a lower value.
Figure 4b traces the most representative Raman modes and allows us to observe the evolution of the peak wavenumber and the bandwidths with temperature. The respective insets show the behaviour of these Raman modes between the temperatures of 90–100 K due to the antiferro- to para-magnetic phase transitions, and above 750 K starting the ferro-to para-electric phase transition. In particular, near 95 K, the 119, 466, 659 and 688 cm−1 modes exhibit a local maximum, indicative of the Neel temperature (TN), suggesting the presence of spin-phonon couplings in the AFM ordered phase. The anomalies of the E1 and A1 modes correlate with the displacements of Mn and O2 ions in the c-plane and Lu ions along the c-axis, in agreement with the literature [39]. As the temperature increases, there is a broadening of the Raman modes and some disappear, while others appear. Like the E2 mode near 135 cm−1, starting from 500 K, indicative of the involvement of added degree of motion of Lu(1) and Lu(2) atoms along the c-axis and the ab-plane respectively [37]. At temperatures above 755–760 K, significant changes are observed in the modes at 449, 634 and near 672 cm−1 going from A1 to A1g and from E1 to E1g. But usually, in this range of high temperatures, the phase transitions occur gradually and are not sharply defined, hence the anomalies should be interpreted as a lower limit of Curie temperature (TC).
3.2. Band Gap Meausurements
Figure 5a–c shows the transmittance and reflectance measurements with the respective optical band gaps calculated using the Tauc method. The h-LuMnO3 films on SiO2 glass and Pt\Al2O3 substrates confirm similar results. The respective values estimated for the indirect gap are 1.32 and 1.07 eV within an error of 0.2 eV which might be related to the form of substrate used and the measurement techniques. While the direct gap is 1.49 and 1.47 eV respectively within an error < 0.005 eV. These narrow Eg values are consistent with previous theoretical and experimental results [17,18,40,41,42]. The profiles of both curves’ show a strong absorption at low energies with a peak between 1.3 and 1.7 eV, followed by a slight decrease up to 2.3 eV, then a second strong absorption occurs. This behavior is a typical signature of h-LuMnO3 which is due to its electronic configuration and the resulting density of states (DOS) [17,18].
DFT calculations for h-LuMnO3 show that the valence band (VB) consists of the Lu 4f, Mn 3d and O 2p states, while the conduction band (CB) is formed of the Mn 3d, O 2p and Lu 5d states. Since the CB minimum and VB maximum are primarily dominated by the common Mn 3d and O 2p states [41,43], the inter-band optical transition from the occupied hybridized states of O 2p with orbitals dxy/dx2−y2 to the unoccupied Mn d3z2−r2 states, requires relatively low energies (from 1.3 to 1.7 eV) for electrons to be excited into these available states [18,40]. Therefore, the first sharp increase in absorption. The CB DOS between 1.7 and 2.3 eV offers no available states for electrons, which means that photons in this energy interval cannot promote transitions and thus bypass the material leading to a decrease in absorption. At higher energies (>2.3 eV) absorption resumes as more available states of the CB become accessible for electron excitation. These are also attributed to an inter-band optical transition from the occupied hybridized states of O 2p with orbitals dxy/dzx to the unoccupied Mn d3z2−r2 states [40]. These secondary absorption thresholds on SiO2 glass and Pt\Al2O3 substrates indicate additional indirect band gap values of 1.69 and 2.26 eV, respectively and other direct band gaps of 2.46 and 2.98 eV, respectively, within a <0.01 eV margin.
These results show that the obtained band gaps are within the optimal absorption range of sunlight (1.1 and 1.4 eV) for photovoltaic applications [3]. The direct Eg transition dominates photovoltaic response due to its stronger light absorption and efficient charge carrier generation. While the indirect Eg can contribute at longer wavelengths, its phonon-assisted nature makes it less effective for PV performance. The direct transition enables a higher absorption coefficient. Thus, direct bandgap is the primary driver of photovoltaic activity, making h-LuMnO3 a promising material for solar energy conversion.
3.3. Piezoresponse Force Microscopy
PFM characterization was employed to confirm the ferroelectric properties of the h-LuMnO3 films. The surface topography revealed an ensemble of crystallites with a size distribution between 30 and 100 nm as can be seen in Figure 6a. Both within and across each of the individual grains, the piezoresponse amplitude and phase scans, performed under 2 Vac, as depicted in Figure 6b,c, allow the observation of quasiperiodic patterns, that exclude substantial crosstalk effects to topography. The analysis of the PFM image histogram in Figure 6d, evidence that the phase difference between opposing oriented domains has around 120° phase shift, which can be influenced by the small size of the domains.
Switching spectroscopy experiments were performed through Pt layer electrodes deposited on top of the film surface, in order to rule out effects related to charge injection artifacts. These measurements clearly observe polarization hysteresis loops with amplitude signal outlining a “butterfly”-like shape and the phase signal plotting a saturated “parallelogram”-shape as illustrated in Figure 7a–c. From these curves are estimated an effective piezoelectric coefficient around ~7 pm/V, and a coercive field near ~11 kV/mm. Local scanning with the probe biased at ±10 Vdc revealed clear imprint and polarization reversal, as observed in Figure 7d–f.
3.4. Electrical Characterization
Since conventional measurements of the dielectric constant were inconclusive due to the high-loss behaviour of the samples, temperature dependence of the conductivity of the h-LuMnO3 film deposited on SiO2 glass can be observed in Figure 8a, indicating characteristics of a semiconductor-like behaviour, where the conductivity strongly depends on the availability of free charge carriers. In effect, the relatively low band gap < 1.5 eV means that at ambient temperature, a considerable number of electrons are thermally excited above the Fermi-level to reach the conduction band. The dependence of the conductivity (σ) on the temperature (T) follows the Arrhenius equation:
where, A is a constant, kB the Boltzmann’s constant and Ea the activation energy. This relationship can be seen in Figure 8b, where the plot of ln(σ) versus 1/T exhibits a clear linear trend, estimated from the slope, Ea to be approximately 0.49 eV. i. e the minimum energy barrier that charge carriers must overcome to contribute to electrical conduction. The close agreement between the experimental data and the linear fit supports the validity of the model and shows that the conduction process is determined by the thermal excitation of charge carriers. This value agrees well with the activation energy, which is for BiFeO3 [44], BiMnO3 [45] and YMnO3 in the temperature range from 330 to 500 K with a value of 0.36 eV [46]. The conduction mechanism in this case is attributed to the thermally activated hopping of small polarons between localized positions of Mn3+ and Mn4+ [46,47] following Arrhenius function. This result is confirmed by the linearity of the plot ln (σT) vs. 1/T (green dots), validating thermally activated polaron hopping as shown in Figure 8b. The statement is supported by the results of the other ReMnO3 compounds form [46].The photocurrent was measured both in the dark and under UV light at different applied voltages in capacitor geometry at the symmetric Pt/h-LMO/Pt dotted electrodes configuration. The graphs in Figure 9, show a residual current response ~0.02 µA/cm2, which is due to charge relaxation, when no voltage is applied between the electrodes. When a bias voltage of 3 VDC is then applied, the sample shows a clear and consistent response to light, which is observed when it is successively switched on and off. The photocurrent in the ON-state increases by almost 0.04 µA/cm2 compared to the initial value in the OFF-state, indicating a clear photoactive response of the system. A slight decrease in current during the ON phase is likely due to depolarization which reduces the efficiency of charge separation. The peak oscillations between the ON-OFF events are associated with the acoustic noise generated by the mechanical shutter of the lamp and detected by the sensitive microscope. To rule out possible expansion of the sample due to heating from light exposure, the system was scanned continuously during ON-OFF switching cycles as shown in the line scans of Figure S5c, which confirms the stability of the topography under external illumination, as no amplitude or directional drift is observed.
This result is in close agreement with the results of similar materials, which emphasize the role of electric fields in enhancing light-induced charge separation and carrier transport. For instance, research on Bi4Ti3O12/TiO2 bilayers, for example, has shown that they exhibit an improved photocurrent response compared to single-phase films. Time-dependent measurements under different applied bias voltages showed that this effect can be significantly modulated by adjusting the ferroelectric polarization and external fields, which enables the effective separation of photogenerated charge carriers [48]. In addition, studies on thin films of Methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) have shown transient photocurrent responses under bias voltage, which provide insights into the effective charge carrier dynamics [49]. In addition, studies on BiFeO3 films have shown that ferroelectric polarization and domain alignment under bias enhance the photocurrent response, highlighting the crucial role of ferroelectric properties in charge separation [50]. Thus, the h-LuMnO3 shows a similar behaviour, where the application of a bias voltage of 3 V probably aligns the ferroelectric domains, amplifying the intrinsic electric field and enabling efficient charge separation.
4. Conclusions
Single-phase photoactive h-LuMnO3 films were successfully deposited on platinized sapphire using RF magnetron sputtering, resulting in a high-quality homogeneous surface. XRD analysis confirmed the preferred h-LuMnO3(001) orientation for films below 90 nm thickness, while the structure gradually tends to other orientations for thicker films due to stress relaxation. The h-LuMnO3 phase films exhibited a narrow direct band gap below 1.5 eV, which is consistent with theoretically reported values [17,18,40,41,42]. Conferring a typical semiconductor behaviour with an activation energy of around 0.5 eV indicates that charge carriers are thermo-activated through the band gap and contribute to conductivity. Furthermore, PFM measurements also confirm the presence of a domain structure and ferroelectric hysteresis loops. Electrical measurements under illumination show consistent photoactive response, demonstrating the coupling of ferroelectric and potentially photovoltaic properties in a single material. The present results establish h-LuMnO3 as a promising candidate for advanced photovoltaic applications and pave the way for further research on its multifunctional properties and potential use in energy harvesting technologies.
Methodology, A.A.B., F.G.F. and P.B.T.; Software, J.R.F.; Validation, F.G.F.; Formal analysis, A.A.B., J.R.F., F.G.F. and P.B.T.; Investigation, A.A.B., J.R.F., F.G.F. and P.B.T.; Resources, J.R.F.; Data curation, A.A.B., L.F., D.O.A., M.S.M., B.P., R.V., J.R.F. and F.G.F.; Writing—original draft, A.A.B. and F.G.F.; Writing—review & editing, A.A.B., L.F., D.O.A., M.S.M., B.P., R.V., J.R.F., F.G.F. and P.B.T.; Supervision, J.R.F., F.G.F. and P.B.T.; Project administration, P.B.T.; Funding acquisition, P.B.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/
The authors acknowledge the Unidade de Microscopia Eletrónica (UME/UTAD) for the SEM and XRD measurements and Dra Maria do Céu Sousa Mendes and Paulo Coelho (Centro de Química-Vila Real, CQ-VR, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro) for helping in reflectance measurements.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. XRD patterns and indexations of LuMnO3 films deposited by RFS for 600 min at different temperatures followed by ex-situ annealing at 800 °C for 12 h in Ar. (a) on SrRuO3\Si (100)c; (b) on Pt(111)c\Si(100)c; (c) on SiO2 glass; (d) on Pt(111)c\Al2O3(001)h.
Figure 2. SEM images of the 450 nm thick h-LuMnO3 films deposited at 40 °C with ex-situ annealing at 800 °C for 12 h in Ar, (a) cross-section of film on Pt\Si substrate, and (b) surface of film on the Pt\Al2O3 substrate.
Figure 3. θ/2θ XRD scans of the h-LuMnO3 75 nm thick film deposited at 40 °C on Pt\Al2O3 substrate, with ex-situ annealing at 800 °C for 12 h in Ar, (a) normal Cu Kα1/α2 and mono-chromated Cu Kα1 and (b) grazing incidence at Phi = 275° revealing the reflection of the in-plane {110}h planes.
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of unpolarised Raman spectra of h-LuMnO3 bulk at room temperature [17,38] and of film with variation of temperature from 77 to 800K. (b) Respective evolution of reference Raman modes wavenumber with temperature. (Insets) Detail of the antiferro- to para-magnetic transition between 90–95 K and of the ferro- to para-electric transition between 755–765 K.
Figure 5. Measurements and calculation of direct and indirect optical Bandgap of the on SiO2 glass (a) by transmittance, and by diffuse reflectance on: (b) the ~450 nm h-LuMnO3 Pt\Al2O3; (c) The ~225 nm thick film on Pt\Al2O3.
Figure 6. PFM scans for the 450 nm h-LuMnO3 film measured through top Pt electrode layer. (a) local topography, (b) amplitude and (c) phase contrasting domains. (d) phase histogram.
Figure 7. PFM ± 20 Vdc bias spectroscopy hysteresis loops of the 450 nm h-LuMnO3 film through top Pt electrode layer: (a) piezoresponse, (b) amplitude and (c) phase signal. Local bi-polar imprint pattern from scanning with SPM probe at ±10Vdc bias: (d) topography, (e) amplitude and (f) phase images.
Figure 8. (a) Temperature dependence of the h-LuMnO3 thin film conductivity and respective (b) Arrhenius plot ln(σ) versus 1/T (Blue dots-left scale) and ln (σT) vs. 1/T (Green dots-right scale).
Figure 9. Photo-current measurements as a function of time through ON-OFF light states, with (a) no voltage and (b) 3 V bias applied to the system.
Comparison of the Raman spectra modes central wavenumber for h-LuMnO3 at different temperatures.
Temperature | A1 | A1 | E1 | A1 | Sample | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90 | 119 | 482 | -- | 690 | bulk | [ |
119 | 466 | 659 | 688 | thin film | This work | |
300 | 117 | 463 | 640 | 689 | bulk | [ |
121 | 472 | 642 | 689 | Single crystal | [ | |
118 | 469 | 648 | 688 | thin film | [ | |
115 | 461 | 641 | 684 | thin film | This work | |
750 | -- | -- | -- | 682 | Bulk | [ |
-- | 449 | 634 | 672 | thin film | This work |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Sze, S.M.; Ng, K.K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470068329]
2. Park, N.G.; Grätzel, M.; Miyasaka, T.; Zhu, K.; Emery, K. Towards stable and commercially available perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy; 2016; 1, 16152. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.152]
3. Bassou, A.A.; Figueiras, F.G.; Fernandes, J.R.; Tavares, P.B. Photo-ferroelectric oxides for photovoltaic applications: Insights, challenges and opportunities. Appl. Mater. Today; 2024; 41, 102465. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2024.102465]
4. Nechache, R.; Harnagea, C.; Li, S.; Cardenas, L.; Huang, W.; Chakrabartty, J.; Rosei, F. Bandgap tuning of multiferroic oxide solar cells. Nat. Photonics; 2014; 9, pp. 61-67. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.255]
5. Sheng, Y.; Tan, H.; Quintana, A.; Villa, M.; Gázquez, J.; Fina, I.; Fontcuberta, J. Untwining polar contributions from light-polarization dependent photovoltaic response of LuMnO3-based ferroelectric capacitors. Acta Mater.; 2023; 245, 118601. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118601]
6. Liu, F.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Yang, G. Ferroelectric-semiconductor photovoltaics: Non-PN junction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett.; 2014; 104, 103907. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4868304]
7. Tablero, C. An evaluation of BiFeO3 as a photovoltaic material. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells; 2017; 171, pp. 161-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.049]
8. Spanier, J.E.; Fridkin, V.M.; Rappe, A.M.; Akbashev, A.R.; Polemi, A.; Qi, Y.; Gu, Z.; Young, S.M.; Hawley, C.J.; Imbrenda, D. et al. Power conversion efficiency exceeding the Shockley-Queisser limit in a ferroelectric insulator. Nat. Photonics; 2016; 10, pp. 611-616. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.143]
9. Pan, D.-F.; Bi, G.-F.; Chen, G.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.-M.; Wang, G.-H.; Wan, J.-G. Polarization-dependent interfacial coupling modulation of ferroelectric photovoltaic effect in PZT-ZnO heterostructures. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 22948. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22948]
10. Han, H.; Kim, D.; Chu, K.; Park, J.; Nam, S.Y.; Heo, S.; Yang, C.H.; Jang, H.M. Enhanced Switchable Ferroelectric Photovoltaic Effects in Hexagonal Ferrite Thin Films via Strain Engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2018; 10, pp. 1846-1853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16700]
11. Bennett-Jackson, A.L.; Shafir, O.; Will-Cole, A.R.; Samanta, A.; Chen, D.; Podpirka, A.; Burger, A.; Wu, L.; Sosa, E.L.; Martin, L.W. et al. Strong Bulk Photovoltaic Effect in Planar Barium Titanate Thin Films. arXiv; 2022; Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06503 (accessed on 28 October 2024). arXiv: 2212.06503
12. Wang, J.; Peng, Z.; Wang, J.; Wu, D.; Yang, Z.; Chao, X. Band gap tunning to enhance photovoltaic response in NaNbO3-based bulk ferroelectrics. Scr. Mater.; 2022; 221, 114976. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114976]
13. Machado, P.; Scigaj, M.; Gazquez, J.; Rueda, E.; Sánchez-Díaz, A.; Fina, I.; Gibert-Roca, M.; Puig, T.; Obradors, X.; Campoy-Quiles, M. et al. Band Gap Tuning of Solution-Processed Ferroelectric Perovskite BiFe1−xCoxO3 Thin Films. Chem. Mater.; 2019; 31, pp. 947-954. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04380]
14. Barcelay, Y.R.; Moreira, J.A.; González-Aguilar, G.; Almeida, A.; Araujo, J.P.; De La Cruz, J.P. Synthesis of orthorhombic rare-earth manganite thin films by a novel chemical solution route. J. Electroceram.; 2011; 26, pp. 44-55. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10832-010-9626-3]
15. Suresh, P.; Laxmi, K.V.; Bera, A.K.; Yusuf, S.M.; Chittari, B.L.; Jung, J.; Kumar, P.S.A. Magnetic ground state of the multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO3. Phys. Rev. B; 2018; 97, 184419. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184419]
16. Figueiras, F.G.; Karpinsky, D.; Tavares, P.B.; Das, S.; Leitão, J.V.; Brück, E.H.; Moreira, J.A.; Amaral, V.S. Breaking the geometric magnetic frustration in controlled off stoichiometric LuMn1+ZO3+δ compounds. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.; 2016; 18, pp. 13519-13523. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6CP01562J]
17. Bassou, A.A.; Fernandes, L.; Fernandes, J.R.; Figueiras, F.G.; Tavares, P.B. Growth and Structural Characterization of h-LuMnO3 Thin Films Deposited by Direct MOCVD. Materials; 2023; 17, 211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17010211]
18. Han, H.; Song, S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, K.J.; Kim, G.W.; Park, T.; Jang, H.M. Switchable Photovoltaic Effects in Hexagonal Manganite Thin Films Having Narrow Band Gaps. Chem. Mater.; 2015; 27, pp. 7425-7432. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03408]
19. Brito, D.M.S.; Melo, A.T.; Lima, A.F.; Lalic, M.V. Origin of a large difference of power conversion efficiency between the hexagonal LuMnO3 and the hexagonal LuFeO3 ferroelectric photovoltaics. Mater. Chem. Phys.; 2021; 263, 124344. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124344]
20. Ghosh, A.; Sahu, J.R.; Bhat, S.V.; Rao, C.N.R. A Raman study of multiferroic LuMnO3. Solid State Sci.; 2009; 11, pp. 1639-1642. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.06.002]
21. Fox, G.R.; Trolier-McKinstry, S.; Krupanidhi, S.B.; Casas, L.M. Pt/Ti/SiO2/Si substrates. J. Mater. Res.; 1995; 10, pp. 1508-1515. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1995.1508]
22. Tiggelaar, R.M.; Sanders, R.G.P.; Groenland, A.W.; Gardeniers, J.G.E. Stability of thin platinum films implemented in high-temperature microdevices. Sens. Actuators A Phys.; 2009; 152, pp. 39-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.017]
23. Srolovitz, D.J.; Goldiner, M.G. The Thermodynamics and Kinetics of film agglomeration. JOM; 1995; 47, pp. 31-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03221433]
24. Hanief, N.; Topić, M.; Pineda-Vargas, C. Solid-state dewetting of continuous thin platinum coatings. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At.; 2015; 363, pp. 173-176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.06.030]
25. Jahangir, S.; Cheng, X.; Huang, H.H.; Ihlefeld, J.; Nagarajan, V. In-situ investigation of thermal instabilities and solid state dewetting in polycrystalline platinum thin films via confocal laser microscopy. J. Appl. Phys.; 2014; 116, 163511. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4898691]
26. Tanaka, H.; Taniguchi, M. Single crystalline epitaxial platinum film on Al2O3(0001) prepared by oxygen-doped sputtering deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.; 2017; 56, 058001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.56.058001]
27. Ramanathan, S.; Clemes, B.M.; McIntyre, P.C.; Dahmen, U. Microstructural study of epitaxial platinum and Permalloy/platinum films grown on (0001) sapphire. Philos. Mag. A Phys. Condens. Matter Struct. Defects Mech. Prop.; 2001; 81, pp. 2073-2094. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01418610108216653]
28. Pang, H.; Zhang, F.; Zeng, M.; Gao, X.; Qin, M.; Lu, X.; Gao, J.; Dai, J.; Li, Q. Preparation of epitaxial hexagonal YMnO3 thin films and observation of ferroelectric vortex domains. Npj Quantum Mater.; 2016; 1, pp. 1-6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjquantmats.2016.15]
29. Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How To Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV-Vis Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.; 2018; 9, pp. 6814-6817. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892]
30. Rodriguez, B.J.; Callahan, C.; Kalinin, S.V.; Proksch, R. Dual-frequency resonance-tracking atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology; 2007; 18, 475504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/47/475504]
31. Samoylenkov, S.V.; Gorbenko, O.Y.; Kaul, A.R.; Rebane, Y.A.; Svetchnikov, V.L.; Zandbergen, H.W. Metalorganic chemical vapour deposition of high quality LuBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films Peculiarities of growth and superconducting properties. J. Alloys Compd.; 1997; 251, pp. 342-346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(96)02696-5]
32. Palos, A.I.; Anne, M.; Strobel, P. Topotactic Reactions, Structural Studies, and Lithium Intercalation in Cation-Deficient Spinels with Formula Close to Li2Mn4O9. J. Solid State Chem.; 2001; 160, pp. 108-117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jssc.2001.9200]
33. Van Aken, B.B.; Meetsma, A.; Palstra, T.T.M. Hexagonal LuMnO3 revisited. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online; 2001; 57, pp. i101-i103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801015896]
34. Baghizadeh, A.; Vieira, J.M.; Amaral, J.S.; Graça, M.P.; Soares, M.R.; Mota, D.A.; Amaral, V.S. Crystal structure, magnetic and dielectric behavior of h-LuMnxO3±δ ceramics (0.95 ≤ x ≤ 1.04). J. Magn. Magn. Mater.; 2015; 395, pp. 303-311. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.082]
35. Gélard, I.; Jehanathan, N.; Roussel, H.; Gariglio, S.; Lebedev, O.I.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Dubourdieu, C. Off-stoichiometry effects on the crystalline and defect structure of hexagonal manganite REMnO3 films (RE = Y, Er, Dy). Chem. Mater.; 2011; 23, pp. 1232-1238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm1029358]
36. Vermette, J.; Jandl, S.; Mukhin, A.A.; Ivanov, V.Y.; Balbashov, A.; Gospodinov, M.M.; Pinsard-Gaudart, L. Raman study of the antiferromagnetic phase transitions in hexagonal YMnCO3 and LuMnO3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter; 2010; 22, 356002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/35/356002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21403302]
37. Iliev, M.; Lee, H.; Popov, V. Raman- and infrared-active phonons in hexagonal: Experiment and lattice-dynamical calculations. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.; 1997; 56, pp. 2488-2494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.2488]
38. Figueiras, F.G.; Karpinsky, D.; Tavares, P.B.; Gonçalves, J.N.; Yanez-Vilar, S.; Santos, A.F.M.D.; Franz, A.; Tovar, M.; Moreira, J.A.; Amaral, V.S. Novel multiferroic state and ME enhancement by breaking the AFM frustration in LuMn1−xO3. Phys. Chem.; 2017; 19, pp. 1335-1341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6CP07682C] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27973632]
39. Figueiras, F.G.N. Study of Multiferroic Materials. Ph.D. Thesis; Universidade de Aveiro: Aveiro, Portugal, 2011; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/4271 (accessed on 2 March 2022).
40. Choi, W.S.; Kim, D.G.; Seo, S.G.A.; Moon, S.J.; Lee, D.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.S.; Cho, D.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Murugavel, P. et al. Electronic structures of hexagonal RMnO3 (R=Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho) thin films: Optical spectroscopy and first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.; 2008; 77, 045137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.045137]
41. Brito, D.M.S.; Melo, A.T.; Lima, A.F.; Lalic, M.V. The structural, magnetic and electronic properties of the ground state of the hexagonal LuMnO3 multiferroic. Phys. Scr.; 2020; 95, 085801. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab9e95]
42. Brito, D.M.S.; Lima, A.F. Magnetic interaction induced splitting of bands in hexagonal RMnO3 (R = Lu, Y, and Sc) compounds. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.; 2024; 610, 172558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172558]
43. Sousa, A.M.; Coutinho, W.S.; Lima, A.F.; Lalic, M.V. Structural, bonding, and electronic properties of the hexagonal ferroelectric and paraelectric phases of LuMnO3 compound: A density functional theory study. J. Chem. Phys.; 2015; 142, 074703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4907787] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25702020]
44. Wu, J.; Wang, J. Ferroelectric and Impedance Behavior of La- and Ti-Codoped BiFeO3 Thin Films. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.; 2010; 93, pp. 2795-2803. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03816.x]
45. Dar, M.S.; Akram, K.B. Evidence of variable range hopping (VRH) and exchange interaction in Co-doped multiferroic BiMnO3 nanoparticles. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.; 2014; 27, pp. 613-623. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10948-013-2326-x]
46. Moure, C.; Villegas, M.; Fernandez, J.F.; Tartaj, J.; Duran, P. Phase transition and electrical conductivity in the system YMnO3-CaMnO3. J. Mater. Sci.; 1999; 34, pp. 2565-2568. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004692430582]
47. Wan, F.; Hua, X.; Guo, Q. Modulation of the Structural, Magnetic, and Dielectric Properties of YMnO3 by Cu Doping. Materials; 2024; 17, 2929. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17122929]
48. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, J.; He, Z.; He, H. Enhanced and adjustable photoresponse performance in Bi4Ti3O12/TiO2 bilayer films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.; 2020; 31, pp. 7060-7066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03273-2]
49. Basumatary, P.; Agarwal, P. Photocurrent transient measurements in MAPbI3 thin films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.; 2020; 31, pp. 10047-10054. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03549-7]
50. Choi, T.; Lee, S.; Choi, Y.J.; Kiryukhin, V.; Cheong, S.-W. Switchable Ferroelectric Diode and Photovoltaic Effect in BiFeO3. Science; 2009; 324, pp. 63-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1168636] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19228998]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
This work explores the deposition of hexagonal (h-) LuMnO3 thin films in the P63cm phase and investigates the conditions under which the synergy of ferroelectric and photoactive properties, can be achieved to confirm the potential of this material for applications in the development of next-generation photovoltaic devices. Single-phase h-LuMnO3 was successfully deposited on different substrates, and the thermal stability of the material was confirmed by Micro-Raman spectroscopy analysis from 77 to 850 K, revealing the suitable ferro- to para-electric transition near 760 K. Optical measurements confirm the relatively narrow band gap at 1.5 eV, which corresponds to the h-LuMnO3 system. The presence of domain structures and the signature of hysteresis loops consistent with ferroelectric behaviour were confirmed by piezoresponse force microscopy. In addition, light-dependent photocurrent measurements revealed the photoactive sensitivity of the material.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Centro de Química-Vila Real, CQ-VR, Physics Department, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal;
2 Centro de Química-Vila Real, CQ-VR, Unidade de Microscopia Eletrónica-Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento UME/CIDE, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal;
3 CICECO Aveiro Institute of Materials, Physics Department, Campus de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal;
4 Instituto de Física de Materiais Avançados, Nanotecnologia e Fotónica (IFIMUP), Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade Ciências da Universidade Porto, R. Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal;
5 Centro de Química-Vila Real, CQ-VR, Chemistry Department, Escola de Ciências da Vida e do Ambiente (ECVA), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal;