1 Introduction
Atmospheric aerosols influence the global climate system by scattering and absorbing incoming solar radiation and altering cloud microphysics, thereby impacting the atmospheric radiation budget and radiative forcing . Assessing climate change relies on the understanding of the processes controlling the burden and distribution of aerosols. This task is particularly challenging in the Southern Hemisphere due to the lower number of aerosol observations compared to the Northern Hemisphere, largely because of the greater ocean coverage relative to land. This is more crucial in the Southern Hemisphere, due to the low number of observations in comparison with the Northern Hemisphere. The Southern American and southern African regions are recognized to be significant primary sources of carbonaceous aerosols in the Southern Hemisphere through the biomass burning activity which occurs seasonally from June to November . This intense biomass burning activity has the potential to release a large number of pollutants, such as carbon monoxide and aerosols. These pollutants are harmful to both the environment and human health . Based on sun-photometer observations at the Réunion site, showed that the aerosol optical depth (AOD) variability is mainly modulated by the biomass burning activity over southern Africa and South America.
The low number of observations of aerosols and gas in southern Africa during the biomass burning season led to the achievement of several measurement campaigns in the 1990s, such as the Southern Tropical Atlantic Region Experiment in 1992 (STARE-92; ), combining two scientific experiments: the Transport and Atmospheric Chemistry near the Equator-Atlantic (TRACE-A; ) and the Southern Africa Fire Atmosphere Research Initiative (SAFARI-92; ). The TRACE-A experiment aimed to investigate the transport and chemistry of trace gases over southern Africa and the equatorial Atlantic Ocean. During the same period, SAFARI-92 was undertaken and focused on studying the impacts of savanna fires and biomass burning on the atmosphere, air quality, and climate. These experiments showed that biomass burning plumes are transported from both South America and southern Africa over the Atlantic Ocean. During the biomass burning season, a photochemical reaction occurs between the associated emissions and solar radiation, which increases the concentration of ozone and leads to its accumulation in the Southern Hemisphere, from eastern Brazil to Australia . SAFARI-2000 expanded upon the SAFARI-92 research, encompassing a broader range of topics, including aerosols, clouds, and land–atmosphere interactions in southern Africa . During SAFARI-2000, observed a thick and widespread layer of aerosols that covered southern Africa, forming a smoke plume that extended from southeastern southern Africa to the Indian Ocean. The SAFARI campaigns gave way to other campaigns in southern Africa, such as AErosol, Radia-tiOn and CLOuds in southern Africa (AEROCLO-sA; ), Namib Fog Life Cycle Analysis (NaFoLiCA; ), and Observations of Aerosols above Clouds and Their Interactions (ORACLES; ). These campaigns provided a large-scale picture of aerosols and their interactions with clouds and fog and specifically of biomass burning plumes at or near emissions (AEROCLO-sA and NaFoLiCA) and short- to mid-range transport (AEROCLO-sA and ORACLES). Recently, the data collected during AEROCLO-sA have made it possible to investigate the interaction between the tropical temperate troughs and cut-off lows that form over the west coast . These phenomena potentially contribute to the transport of biomass burning aerosols, also known as “rivers of smoke”, from fire-prone regions in the tropical band to temperate mid-latitudes. The occurrence of rivers of smoke is generally due to a direct eastward transport of biomass burning plume from the continent toward the southwestern Indian Ocean (SWIO) basin. This eastward transport is one of the five trajectories that govern the air flows over southern Africa . These trajectories lead to the transport of pollutants toward the SWIO basin and the southeast of Australia . Recently, performed a classification of the synoptic variability over 14 years (2003–2017) that controls the spatial distribution of biomass burning aerosols in southern Africa and the South Atlantic Ocean. They reported that the synoptic variability involves six weather regimes. Four of them correspond to disturbances traveling at mid-latitudes, and the two remaining ones account for pressure anomalies in the South Atlantic. These mid-latitude anomaly patterns may play a role in the formation of rivers of smoke and are consistent with .
An overview (2008–2021) of the spatiotemporal variability of aerosols in southern Africa and Réunion Island was recently investigated by , using a combination of sun-photometer and satellite observations. They highlighted that vertical profiles of elevated smoke reach 3–4 when biomass burning is at its maximum. Using the HYSPLIT back-trajectory model, they also demonstrated that intercontinental transport from South America and the Atlantic Ocean to southern Africa may rise during the biomass burning season. The quantification of the influence of biomass burning aerosols on the climate system using numerical models is highly dependent on how accurate the parameterization of aerosols is represented. However, for the tropical biomass burning regions, aerosol vertical distributions and their driving dynamical processes are poorly documented.
In the last 2 decades of the aforementioned field, campaigns have been conducted on the west coast . Given the lack of observations on aerosols along the east coast of southern Africa, efforts were made to perform regular aerosol and chemical measurements during the 2022 biomass burning season. The partners of the IRP ARSAIO (International Research Project – Atmospheric Research in Southern Africa and Indian Ocean) initiated the Biomass Burning Aerosol Campaign (BiBAC). BiBAC is a multi-instrumental campaign for quantifying optical properties of aerosols over southern Africa and the Indian Ocean, as well as the associated transport at a regional and large scale. BiBAC aims to determine the optical properties of biomass burning aerosols transported from southern Africa over the southwestern Indian Ocean basin. It also analyzes the chemical and optical properties of biomass burning emissions collected at Skukuza and at several sites in southern Africa (Fig. ), as well as the variability in chemical and optical properties based on the flaming and smoldering phases. The long-range transport of aerosol plumes off the east coast of southern Africa is identified using satellite observations. The vertical structure of the identified plumes is determined, and spatiotemporal variation is analyzed.
Figure 1
Geographical location of sites involved in BiBAC (a) and the sun-photometer site and the research camp of Skukuza (b). Each site is represented by a dot (BiBAC sites in purple, Réunion Island in orange, Skukuza in pink, and N'Rwaswitshaka Research Camp in cyan).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The intensive observation period (IOP) took place in Kruger National Park (KNP), at the Skukuza camp, from August to November 2022. Given KNP is highly exposed to the biomass burning plume, it is considered a core base site for investigating the characteristics and impacts of biomass burning emissions over southern Africa . Furthermore, this site has been hosting a Cimel sun photometer for several decades. During the IOP period, an instrument set including a mobile lidar, ground-based and in situ optical particle counters (including LOAC, the Light Optical Aerosol Counter), and a mobile monitoring station for measurement of surface aerosol and trace gas chemical properties and concentrations were deployed in the KNP.
This study reports on the analysis of the spatiotemporal and vertical evolution of aerosol optical properties during the BiBAC campaign. In addition, it aims to provide a general description of the dynamic context that has impacted the air mass distributions observed during the campaign. In this work, the temporal, horizontal, and vertical distributions of aerosols are determined from ground-based observations collected over southern Africa as part of the BiBAC campaign and combined with satellite observations and reanalysis data. The paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2 describes the observations used in this study. An overview of sun-photometer observations during the IOP, as well as the extraction of aerosol loading events, is presented in Sect. 3. The transport of and aerosol plumes from satellite observations is highlighted in Sect. 4, as well as their vertical distribution. This section presents the synoptic conditions that drive the transport of and aerosol plumes. The conclusions of the study are given in Sect. 5.
2 Site location, instrumentation, and methods2.1 Site location
The main study site of the BiBAC campaign is the N'Rwaswitshaka Research Camp, in Kruger National Park (24.98° S, 31.60° E), close to the main tourist rest camp, Skukuza. This site is located in the Mpumalanga province, in the eastern part of South Africa, and shares its borders with Mozambique and the provinces of Limpopo, Gauteng, and KwaZulu-Natal (see Fig. ). The sun photometer (pink dot, Fig. ) was located approximately 1.7 km from the N'Rwaswitshaka Research Camp, where ground-based instruments were installed (see cyan dot in Fig. b). Ground-based remote-sensing instruments were deployed from September to November 2022, collocated to the sun photometer.
2.2 Instrumentation and methods
2.2.1 Ground-based observations: AERONET sun photometer
The AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) sun photometer (model CE318) is a passive-remote-sensing instrument that measures the optical and microphysical properties of vertically integrated aerosols in the atmosphere by analyzing the attenuation of solar radiation. Measurements are taken under cloud-free and daytime conditions, at wavelengths of 340, 380, 440, 500, 670, 870, 940, and 1020 nm and at 15 min intervals. We used Level 2 data (Version 3) to analyze direct sun measurements of aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 440 and 500 nm and Ångström exponent (AE) between 440 and 870 nm. The single-scattering albedo (SSA at 440 ), extinction AE (EAE between 440 and 870 ), and fine-mode fraction (FMF at 550 ) were derived from the aerosol size distribution data obtained using the sun photometer. To prevent substantial inversion errors caused by the restricted aerosol information content, the SSA almucantar retrievals were only available when the AOD at 440 nm was greater than 0.4 . Under the cloud-free conditions, the uncertainty of AOD measurements is estimated to be 0.01 in the visible and near-IR, increasing to 0.02 in the ultraviolet (340 and 380 nm) . However, with the release of the AERONET Version 3 database, improvements in retrieval algorithms have further reduced uncertainties in aerosol properties . The uncertainty in SSA values was expected to be on the order of 0.03–0.05, depending on aerosol type and loading .
Several aerosol classification methods using sun-photometer measurements have been applied across different environments in the world , such as South Africa , India , Buenos Aires , and Australia . In our study, we classified aerosols using a combination of AOD, AE, EAE, SSA, and FMF, applying threshold values based on previously published studies (Fig. ). These thresholds are well established in the literature, to distinguish between different aerosol types, including biomass burning and urban industrial (BB/UR), clean marine (CM), desert dust (DD), and mixed aerosols (MX), as used in studies by , , and .
Figure 2
A flow chart illustrating the threshold values of aerosol optical parameters (AOD, AE, FMF, EAE, and SSA) used to classify aerosol types.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
For the AOD–AE classification method, threshold values were chosen based on their ability to distinguish aerosol types with high AOD values (typically indicative of biomass burning and urban industrial (BB/UR) aerosols) and lower values for clean marine (CM) and desert dust (DD) aerosols . This method has been widely applied in South Africa , with threshold values for AOD and AE set according to these previous studies. We also used the SSA–EAE method to distinguish between absorbing (SSA 0.95) and non-absorbing aerosols. SSA is sensitive to the aerosol absorption properties, and the use of SSA combined with EAE helps differentiate between dust (DD), biomass burning (BB), and urban/industrial (UI) aerosols, as shown by and . This method has been used and reported in numerous studies and in different environments and locations, like South Africa, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan (; ; ; ). In our study, we standardized the classification into BB/UR for consistency with previous works, such as . This method is a complement to the AOD–AE method in order to distinguish biomass burning and urban/industrial aerosol types.
The combination of SSA with FMF allows us to further classify aerosols by their size and absorption properties (absorbing and non-absorbing (NA) aerosol types). FMF helps in determining whether aerosols are predominantly fine-mode (from combustion processes) or coarse-mode (e.g., dust). We divided absorbing aerosols (AAs) into highly absorbing (HA), moderately absorbing (MA), and slightly absorbing (SA) based on SSA ranges, following , , and . This method was used in several studies by , , , , , and . Figure provides a visual representation of the aerosol classification framework used in this study. It shows how AOD, AE, SSA, EAE, and FMF are combined to classify aerosol types. To sum up, the commonly used method (AOD–AE) allows us to determine four main types: dust (DD), clean marine and biomass burning and urban industrial (BB/UR), and mixed (MX). The two other methods allow us to (1) distinguish biomass burning and urban industrial (BB/UR) and (2) capture the variation in absorption strength by distinguishing between non-absorbing aerosols (NA) and absorbing aerosols (AA). These classifications are complementary and useful for determining the observed aerosol types during the IOP, as well as for each event.
These classifications are both complementary and essential for identifying the types of aerosols observed during each event in the IOP. Additionally, calculating the frequencies of occurrence for each aerosol type over the campaign period (September to November) and across Events 1 and 2 provides further insight into their distribution over time. We calculated the aerosol frequencies based on Eq. (2) in . For a given aerosol type, the relative frequency of occurrence for each season, as a percentage, is defined by the following equation: 1 where (type) is the number of occurrences for a given aerosol type and period, and is the total number of occurrences for the given season (for all types). The calculation of occurrence frequencies is based on all-point data to have the largest amount of data. We selected the timestamps that were common to each pair of parameters with a 120 s interval.
Sun-photometer data for Skukuza range from 1998 to 2022, although the Skukuza sun photometer was out of operation from 2012 to March 2016 owing to calibration and maintenance issues . As a result, the data span the years 1998 to 2011 and 2016 to 2020. This represents 4605 d of AOD and AE measurements, out of which 246 were in 2022.
2.3 Satellite observations2.3.1 MODIS-Aqua aerosol observations
The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is carried on board NASA's Aqua (EOS PM-1) and Terra (EOS AM-1) satellites, which have heliosynchronous orbits and have been operational since 2002 and 2000, respectively. MODIS records data in 36 different spectral bands with wavelengths ranging from 0.4 to 14.4 and spatial resolutions ranging from 250 m to 1 , depending on the channel. MODIS products give several parameters derived from the radiance measurement. These quantities are the distribution of cloud cover, the amount of water vapor in an atmospheric column, the temperature distribution, and the characteristics of aerosols.
The study uses the Level 3 MODIS Atmosphere Daily Gridded Product carried on the Aqua satellite: “Combined Dark Target and Deep Blue AOD at 550 , for land and ocean” (MYD8_D3_v6.1), which is obtained from the NASA Giovanni platform (
Regarding fire data, the products “Thermal Anomalies/Fire locations 1 km FIRMS V0061 (MCD14ML)” from the Aqua and Terra platform were downloaded from the FIRMS platform (
2.3.2 CALIPSO aerosol profiles
The Cloud Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) was launched in April 2006, in a joint mission between NASA and the French Agency CNES, to investigate the effects of aerosols and clouds on the Earth’s radiation budget and climate. It is a polar-orbiting satellite of the A-Train Constellation, flying at a height of 705 with a 16 d cycle. The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) is one of the three instruments of CALIPSO and is an elastic backscatter lidar, which operates at two wavelengths: 532 and 1064 . It uses two 532 receiver channels and a channel measuring the total 1064 return signal . The dataset used in this study is the Level 2 Aerosol Profiles (V4-51), for a period covering the IOP and downloaded from the EarthData website (
2.3.3 MetOp-B IASI CO measurements
The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) on board the Meteorological Operational (MetOp) satellite uses a Fourier transform spectrometer to measure the infrared radiation at wavelengths ranging from 6.62 to 15.5 m during daytime and nighttime . It was designed for global observations of chemical species (such as ozone, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide) with a vertical range covering the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. In the present study we used the daily IASI/MetOp-B carbon monoxide (CO) dataset, which is processed using the Fast Optimal Retrievals on Layers for IASI (FORLI) software and downloaded from the AERIS platform (
2.4 CAMS global reanalysis (EAC4)
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) provides a global reanalysis (EAC4) dataset of atmospheric composition that covers 2003 to 2022 . This dataset was built on the knowledge gathered during the previous Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) reanalysis and the CAMS interim reanalysis. The CAMS reanalysis uses the ECMWF's Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) model to retrieve the total column of carbon monoxide (CO), tropospheric column of nitrogen dioxide (), aerosol optical depth (AOD), and total column and partial column and profiles of ozone () from satellites measurements (e.g. IASI, MOPITT, and TROPOMI for the and MODIS and VIIRS for the AOD). The reanalysis has a high horizontal resolution of 0.75° 0.75° and provides more chemical species at a high temporal resolution (3-hourly analysis fields) than the previous CAMS interim reanalysis.
This dataset has already been used by to describe the synoptic conditions over southern Africa in 2017. As reported by , the reanalysis data underestimate the AOD for some parts of southern Africa and Southern America. They showed that the modified normalized mean bias (MNMB) ranges from 0 % to 25 % in southern Africa. compared IASI and reanalysis data and showed a negative bias over biomass burning regions in South America and southern Africa up to 30 %. In the present study, we used CAMS reanalysis at 12:00 UTC to describe the synoptic condition that favored transport during the events. We used AOD at 550 ; the mixing ratio of (); and the wind speed at 850, 500, 400, and 300 . Additionally, to account for synoptic conditions during each event, geopotential height fields (meters) at 500 and mean sea level pressure were used. The geopotential height is obtained by dividing the geopotential by the Earth’s gravitational acceleration, 9.80665 , which is a fixed value in the IFS model. Reanalysis data were downloaded from the Atmospheric Data Store (ADS) website (
3 Evolution of aerosol properties during BiBAC
Figure a displays AOD at 500 nm (green line) and AE at 440–870 nm (purple line) recorded at Skukuza during the IOP. Daily average AOD and AE values in September and October 2022 are compared with a multiyear monthly average of the entire dataset (September and October 1998–2011 to 2016–2021). Monthly average values of AOD and AE lie in the 0.2–0.3 and 1.2–1.5 ranges, respectively, and reveal a decrease with time, suggesting a slowing down in biomass burning activity between early September and late October. These values are similar to those reported by during the austral spring (September to November). The daily AOD and AE values show the same trend as the multiyear monthly average values, except during the third week of September (from 18 to 23) and during the second week of October (from 9 to 17), where AOD and AE values increased and reached maximums of 0.7 and 1.9, respectively. Unfortunately, the photometers did not work on 20 and 21 September due to the rainy conditions.
Figure 3
Time series of AOD at 500 nm (green lines) and AE at 440–870 nm (purple line) over Skukuza (panels a and b, respectively). Colored lines represent daily 2022 observations, while lighter colored lines depict the multiyear monthly average values for the entire dataset. Shaded areas represent the standard deviation. Panel (b) shows the relative difference of AOD between the 2022 and multiyear monthly values (black solid line). The quartiles (Q1, Q2, and Q3) are represented, respectively, by the dashed blue line, the solid red line, and the solid blue line. The yellow and blue shaded regions highlight the two selected events (Event 1, 18 to 23 September, and Event 2, 9 to 17 October 2022).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
To characterize the anomalies in aerosol loading over the study site, the quartiles Q1, Q2, and Q3 of the relative difference of the AOD (AODRD) were computed and correspond to the following equation: 2 where AODmm represents the monthly multiyear average AOD values of the whole dataset (1998 to 2021) before 2022 (Fig. b). At least two values of AODRD exceeding the Q3 line within a given period are considered high aerosol load events at d. Two aerosol events were thus identified during the IOP: Event 1, from 18 to 23 September, and Event 2, from 9 to 17 October, highlighted with yellow and blue shaded areas, respectively, in Fig. b.
In the following part, the two events are characterized in terms of different aerosol classification types. Figure shows the aerosol type occurrence frequencies at Skukuza during the IOP (September and October) and during Events 1 and 2 and the austral spring 2022 period (called SON hereafter, for the September–October–November period). As mentioned above, the aerosol classification is carried out using three methods, on a bar plot between each parameter of AOD–AE (Fig. a), EAE–SSA (Fig. b), and FMF–SSA (Fig. c).
Figure 4
Aerosol classification from sun-photometer observations at Skukuza during austral spring 2022 period (SON 2022), the IOP (September and October) and Event 1 and 2. Relative occurrence frequencies of each aerosol type, in percentage, are based on AOD–AE (a), EAE–SSA (b) and FMF–SSA (c) methods. Each color is associated with an aerosol type. AOD–AE method: clean marine (CM, in blue), biomass burning and urban industrial (BB/UR, in purple), desert dust (DD, in orange), and mixed type (MX, in green). EAE–SSA method: biomass burning (BB, in light purple), urban industrial (UR, in beige), desert dust (DD, in orange), and uncertain (n/a, in white). FMF–SSA method: uncertain (n/a, in white), mixed type (MX, in green), non-absorbing (NA, in light blue), slightly absorbing (SA, in light gray), moderately absorbing (MA, in middle gray), highly absorbing (HA, in dark gray), and desert dust (DD, in orange).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Based on the AOD–AE method, Skukuza exhibits higher frequencies for the biomass burning and urban industrial (BB/UR) type (85 %) than for the mixed (MX) type (14 %) during SON (Fig. a). The other types are absent for both months. These values agree with those obtained by during austral spring. Complementing this first classification, the EAE–SSA method allows us to complete the distinction between biomass burning (BB) and urban/industrial (UR) aerosols. BB aerosols predominate against the UR type at Skukuza during the SON period (61 % against 30 %, Fig. b). An undetermined category (labeled n/a) corresponding to aerosol which does not fit in any category represents 8 %. The FMF–SSA method allows us to have more information on the absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols. The absorbing aerosols category, regrouping absorbing aerosols including slightly, moderately, and highly absorbing (SA, MA, and HA), prevails during the SON period, with frequencies of 98.3 % (Fig. c). In this category, aerosol is moderately and slightly absorbing, where MA and SA types account for 63.6 % and 33 %, respectively. The results found at Skukuza with this latter method are consistent with those reported by . The same maximum frequencies are observed in the September and October period. The BB/UR and MX types appear to be predominating, with values of up to 80 % and 2 %–12 %, respectively (Fig. a). BB types predominate at Skukuza in comparison with UR (58–60 against 30 %, Fig. b). The AA type represents the highest frequencies, with values of 98 %, where MA prevails with frequencies from 57 % to 63 % (Fig. c).
Looking at Events 1 and 2, BB/UR predominates at 100 % for both events (Fig. a). Based on the EAE–SSA method, the BB type prevails at Skukuza for both events with frequencies from 59 % to 85 % (Fig. b). With the FMF–SSA method, the AA type (MA and SA) is predominant for both events, with frequencies from 99.5 % to 100 % (Fig. c).
To summarize the aerosol classification over Skukuza with the three methods, the BB/UR aerosol type prevails over other types during the IOP and during the two events as well (see Table ). Using the SSA with other inversion parameters, we have determined that the BB aerosol type prevails, and aerosols are moderately absorbing.
Table 1Summary of relative occurrence frequencies of predominant aerosol type from sun-photometer observations at Skukuza during the IOP, during Event 1 and 2. Relative occurrence frequencies are in percentage and based on AOD–AE, EAE–SSA, and FMF–SSA methods.
Event 1 | Event 2 | |
---|---|---|
AOD–AE | ||
BB/UR | 100 | 100 |
EAE–SSA | ||
BB | 100 | 33 |
UR | 0 | 66 |
FMF–SSA | ||
NA | 0 | 0 |
AA | 100 | 100 |
SA | 0 | 33 |
MA | 100 | 66 |
HA | 0 | 0 |
With the sun photometer, we determined two anomalies of AOD with aerosol types that are mainly BB aerosols linked to biomass burning over southern Africa. In the following section, the transport and the vertical distribution of the biomass burning plume are investigated for both events.
4 Transport of CO and aerosol plumeTo characterize air mass transport, MODIS satellite observations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) over southern Africa were used. Additionally, measurements from IASI were employed to monitor biomass burning plumes. The is generated during the incomplete combustion of carbon compounds. It is one of the main pollutants emitted into the atmosphere by biomass burning activity. Given its lifetime (from weeks to months), it is often used as a tracer of biomass burning plume transport .
Figure 5
Average map of total column of (a, c) from IASI and AOD at 550 nm from MODIS-Aqua (b, d) over southern Africa and the eastern part of South America. Panels (a) and (b) correspond to an average over Event 1, while panels (c) and (d) correspond to that over Event 2. Note that the blank area in panels (b) and (d) could correspond to cloud contamination.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure displays averaged maps of the total column of and AOD at 550 nm during the two events (panels a and b for Event 1, panels c and d for Event 2), based on satellite observations from IASI and MODIS-Aqua. The maps show high values over southern Africa, mainly over the latitude band 5 to 25°, as well as the center of Brazil (Fig. a and c). The plume spreads across the southern Africa west coast, reaching the Atlantic Ocean and the eastern part of southern Africa. The center of Brazil also has a plume that extends to the Atlantic Ocean. From the maps, it is evident that the mixing of plumes from southern Africa and South America takes place in values over the Atlantic Ocean. The plume propagates thereafter towards the SWIO basin over the eastern part of southern Africa. AOD maps show similar structure between aerosol and plumes (Fig. b and d). The aerosol plumes spread over the Atlantic Ocean, over the SWIO basin, and from the center of Brazil to the Atlantic Ocean. The similarities between the structures of the and AOD plumes suggest that the AOD values are the result of biomass burning. Although the main structures are the same, there are differences between the areas of and AOD maxima. High concentrations are observed in the latitude band from 0 to 10° over the Atlantic, which is not the case for AOD. The maximum of AOD over the western coast of southern Africa seems to correspond to minima and/or missing data. The shape of the plume toward the SWIO basin differs noticeably between Event 1 and Event 2. During Event 1, the plume crossed Mozambique and reached the SWIO basin, while during Event 2, the plume crossed a larger portion of the eastern coast of southern Africa, spanning Mozambique and South Africa. The variation in and AOD values over the Western Cape province (South Africa) between the events is noteworthy. During Event 1, concentrations and AOD were found to be low, 0.5 to 1 and 0.2, respectively, reaching 2.5 and 0.4 to 0.5. More globally, during Event 2 these values were found to be higher. The shape of the and AOD plumes obtained during Event 1 looks similar to the so-called “river of smoke” phenomena reported in previous works during SAFARI-2000 on 2 September 2000 and the AEROCLO-sA campaign from 2 to 6 September 2017 .
In order to analyze the vertical distribution, Fig. shows the daytime and nighttime profiles of the elevated smoke aerosol extinction coefficient, measured by CALIOP over the Mozambique Channel (panel e), for each of the events. These profiles are compared to the multiyear average profile for September and October, calculated for the period 2006–2021, respectively. These average profiles are obtained using CALIOP Level 3 products. The September and October averages show a maximum of the extinction coefficient around 2.5 km. During Event 1, the profiles extend from the surface to 6–7 km. The nighttime profiles show a maximum of the extinction coefficient at between 3 and 4.5 in altitude, whereas for the daytime profiles, the maxima are between 2 and 3 km. For Event 2, aerosol nighttime profiles range from 1 to 10 km, with maxima between 4 and 6 km. The daytime profiles are within the standard deviation of the mean profile. The only notable exception is on 9 October (13:00 UTC), where a maximum is observed around 5 km. The same trend can be observed as for Event 1, where nighttime profiles show higher altitude maxima than daytime profiles. Thus, in general, the aerosol layers from biomass fires with CALIOP range from 1–6 during Event 1 and from 1–10 during Event 2.
Figure 6
Extinction coefficient profiles of elevated smoke aerosols measured by CALIOP during the IOP over the Mozambique Channel (e), for Event 1 (a, b) and Event 2 (c, d), respectively, during the day and night. The profiles (in color) are compared to the monthly profile averaged over the entire dataset (2006–2021, in black and in gray).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Both aerosol and peak events observed in the Mozambique Channel region during the IOP combine ingredients as locally produced aerosols, regional transport from the African continent, and intercontinental transport from South America, which will be described in the following sections.
4.1 Regional and intercontinental transport – Event 1: 18 to 23 September 2022Maps and profiles of aerosols during Event 1 (Figs. and ) suggest the occurrence of biomass burning activity from 18 to 20 September in the African and South American continents. Figure depicts the fire radiative power (FRP) values from MODIS-Aqua from 18 to 22 September. The Africa biomass burning activity was in the latitude band 10 to 25° (Angola, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique) and is associated with moderate values of FRP from 20 to 50 MW. Some locations show high FRP from 60 to 100 MW, such as the southeastern part of Angola or the central part of Mozambique on 20 September. The South America biomass burning activity is concentrated in two cells, one centered in the northeast region of Brazil and another that extends from the extreme west of Brazil, passing through Bolivia, Paraguay, and northern Argentina.
Figure 7
Fire radiative power (FRP in MW) over southern Africa and South America from 17 to 20 September.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The aerosol peak event is associated with short- and long-range transport over the north and center of Argentina and the southern part of the African continent. This transport is directly related to dynamic processes in the atmosphere that involve the propagation of baroclinic waves . Baroclinic waves may exhibit either cold or warm fronts, which form in regions of flow deformation between two areas of high pressure and two areas of low pressure, such as saddle points .
To analyze the synoptic conditions that favor the transport of aerosol and CO, Fig. overlays the total cloud cover together with mean sea level pressures (panels a–d) and AOD at 550 nm overlays winds at 850 (panels e–h) from the CAMS reanalysis during Event 1. Additionally, a 3-hourly animation of CAMS AOD is available as a video supplement (10.5446/67052, ). On 17 September (Fig. a), a broad saddle point (i.e., neutral point between two high-pressure and two low-pressure systems) is observed, extending from central Africa to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, where low-pressure supports a cold front over southern South Africa. Simultaneously, an extratropical cyclone is embedded in the western edge of the elongated South Atlantic Subtropical High , forming a broad cloud band associated with a frontal system. This system extends from southeastern Brazil (20° S, 40° W) in its cold branch to the southwest coast of South Africa in its warm branch, where it connects with the South African cold front. Wind fields at 850 highlight the transport of aerosols over southern Africa. This level was chosen based on the mean altitude of biomass burning aerosols from CALIOP observations (Fig. ). Figure b shows wind convergence at 850 toward two cyclonic circulation centers, where temperature, moisture, and the aerosol plume are transported via the low-level jet stream . This atmospheric dynamic favors the formation of the “river of smoke”, which passes over Zambia and northern Angola, carrying moderate (0.6–0.8) to high AOD values (0.8–1.2) to southern Namibia and South Africa and between southeastern Brazil and the adjacent Atlantic. Between 18 and 19 September, the Atlantic low-pressure system (in red) intensified southeastward and “broke” the high-pressure cell (Fig. b, c). By 19 September, the high-pressure system resumed a circular shape (Fig. c) and, between 19 and 20 September, elongated over the African continent, allowing the cold front to move toward the Mozambique Channel (Fig. d). The aerosol plume followed the low-pressure system toward the polar regions (Fig. f–g), moving between northeastern South Africa and central Mozambique, as indicated by wind speeds and AOD values (Fig. h). The strengthening prefrontal winds intensified aerosol concentrations as air masses passed through source regions. After the passage of the front precipitation “washed” the atmosphere, aerosol levels were reduced . Weather reports at Skukuza (not shown) confirmed rainfall on 20 and 21 September, with 6.6 and 8.61 , respectively, corresponding to reduced AOD values (Fig. ). However, the observed AOD peak cannot be solely attributed to regional transport from central Africa. The connection between the warm branch of the South American frontal system and the cold branch of the South African system on 17 September (Fig. a) suggests South American aerosol influence in the Mozambique Channel. Warm air advection over cooler air in a frontal system follows baroclinic wave propagation, transporting mass and energy through geopotential disturbances such as ridges and troughs .
Figure 8
Synoptic conditions from 17 to 20 September 2022. Black and white color shading represents the total cloud cover, and the grey–yellow–red color shading represents the AOD at 550 nm, from CAMS reanalysis. Blue and red isolines represent the mean sea level pressure above and below 1018 , respectively. Black arrows over AOD are wind speed (m s−1) at 850 .
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure 9
Daily maps of mixing ratio from CAMS reanalysis (color shading) and wind fields (arrows) for 500, 400, and 300 pressure levels and between 17 and 20 September.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Intercontinental transport is further analyzed through wind fields and mixing ratios at medium and high levels of the troposphere (500, 400, and 300 ) in Fig. . On 17 September, an upper-level cyclonic vortex extends vertically from the 500 to the 300 level (Fig. a–c), providing dynamic support to the frontal system observed near the South American coast (30° S, 35° W). The winds from this trough, surrounding the South American vortex, also interact with the trough supporting the South African frontal system (40° S, 15° E). This interaction facilitates the intercontinental transport of the South American plume towards the Atlantic coast of Africa. For southern Africa, a similar transport pattern is observed for the plumes, which move from Angola to Namibia and western South Africa. From 18 September onward, the cyclonic vortex intensifies, and the baroclinic wave transports it eastward, causing the South American plume to mix with the African plume at all three levels (Fig. b, f, j). A continuous flow of is observed over Angola, Botswana, and southern Africa. By 19 and 20 September, this plume gradually shifted toward eastern southern Africa and the Indian Ocean, coinciding with the “river of smoke” (Fig. c, g, and k and d, h, and l). The 500 level exhibits higher concentrations than the other levels, indicating that intercontinental transport occurs between the 300 and 500 levels, and it is most pronounced at 500 , following the baroclinic wave propagation .
Previous instances of the “river of smoke” were reported during the SAFARI-2000 field campaign and the AEROCLO-sA project in 2017 . In both cases, the synoptic conditions responsible for the formation of the smoke river involved the propagation of a westerly wave and the development of a cut-off low. In our study, however, only the westerly wave was present, without a cut-off low. A common factor among all three smoke river events is that they occurred during the negative phase of ENSO (El Niño–Southern Oscillation), specifically the La Niña phase. As noted by , ENSO phases do not directly influence biomass burning or emissions but impact the rainy season and agricultural practices. For example, the moderate La Niña phase that began in the austral summer of 1998 featured sea surface temperatures between 1 and 1.5 °C . Rainfall from Cyclone Eline contributed to vegetation growth, increasing the amount of fuel available for fires during the subsequent dry season . In contrast, the La Niña phases in 2017 and 2022 were weaker, with sea surface temperatures ranging from 0.5 to 1 °C (NOAA website) and no cyclone comparable to Eline occurring. Further analysis of precipitation patterns in the region will help determine whether similar meteorological conditions preceded the formation of these smoke rivers.
4.2 Regional and intercontinental transport – Event 2: 9 to 17 October 2022As observed during Event 1, the high AOD values recorded during Event 2 similarly indicate biomass burning activity across both Africa and South America from 7 to 10 October. Figure shows the FRP values for MODIS-Aqua for Event 2. As in Event 1, the biomass burning activity appears confined to the latitude band between 10 and 25°, with moderate to high FRP values. During Event 2, fires tend to extend eastward in southern Africa, impacting mainly Zambia and Mozambique. Over South America, the biomass burning activity is again concentrated in two areas (northeast region and west Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, and northern Argentina), highlighting the importance of locally produced aerosols, as well as regional transport from other African regions or intercontinental transport from South America during the Event 2.
Figure 10
Fire radiative power (FRP in MW) over southern Africa and South America from 7 to 10 October.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure 11
Same as Fig. but from 7 to 10 October 2022.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure 12
Same as Fig. but from 7 to 10 October 2022.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure 13
Meteorological features favoring the transport of aerosols and plume during Event 1 (top panels) and Event 2 (bottom panels). Frontal systems are shown as follows: cold front in blue, warm front in red, and occluded front in purple. Mean sea level pressure: low and high shown by red and blue lines, respectively. The geopotential at 500 is represented by black lines and the location of saddle points by cyan crosses.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure presents the total cloud cover and mean sea level pressure (panels a–d), alongside AOD at 550 nm and winds at 850 (panels e–h). A 3-hourly CAMS AOD animation is available as a video supplement and is accessible on 10.5446/67052 . Unlike Event 1, where the baroclinic disturbance exhibited a two-trough pattern supporting two frontal systems, Event 2 is characterized by a three-frontal-system pattern. From 7 October onwards, an increase in AOD values is observed, peaking on 16 October before decreasing (Fig. ). Vertical profiles indicate elevated smoke aerosols between 2–3 and predominantly between 4–8 km, indicating long-range transport. The synoptic conditions associated with Event 2 begin to form on 7 October (Fig. a, e), with the emergence of three saddle points and their corresponding low-pressure centers, which support the development of frontal systems. From the low-pressure center at 50° S and 55° E, a frontal system extends to the east of South Africa, driving low-level jet outflows at 850 that form an aerosol plume over the Mozambique Channel, moving towards the Indian Ocean. Simultaneously, a high-pressure cell elongates over the southern tip of Africa, transporting aerosol plumes from Angola towards the Atlantic Ocean. A second low-pressure center, located at 40° S and 10° W, generates a frontal system and associated cloud band over the central South Atlantic. At 850 , flow convergence contributes to transporting mixed aerosol plumes from South America and west Africa into the Atlantic. A large low-pressure system off the southern coast of Brazil supports another frontal system, which extends from central Brazil to the adjacent Atlantic, facilitating aerosol transport into the Atlantic Ocean. By 8 October (Fig. b, f), the frontal systems have shifted eastward. The frontal system over South Africa dissipates into the Indian Ocean, while the post-frontal high-pressure system causes aerosol plumes to recirculate over southern Africa. The frontal system in the central Atlantic advances towards South Africa, while the South American system extends further into the Atlantic, continuing to transport aerosol plumes. Near 40° S, 5° E, the warm branch of the South American system connects with the cold branch of the South African system. On 9 October (Fig. c, g), the baroclinic disturbance progresses eastward, extending the two connected frontal systems from southeast Brazil towards a low-pressure center in the Atlantic at 45° S, 15° W. This connection spans across southern Africa to a low-pressure center in the Indian Ocean at 50° S, 60° E, which drives an AOD plume over eastern South Africa and southern Mozambique. A new frontal system forms, extending from Paraguay and southern Brazil to a low-pressure center at 40° S, 45° W. By 10 October (Fig. d, h), the post-frontal high-pressure system advances eastward over South Africa, recirculating the aerosol plume over the region. Simultaneously, the two connected frontal systems continue advancing across the Atlantic, approaching the southwestern African coast. This sequence of frontal systems from South America to Africa sustains high AOD levels until 17 October (not shown).
The dynamics of the middle and upper troposphere are examined using wind fields and mixing ratios at the 500, 400, and 300 levels (Fig. ), in relation to the high aerosol extinction coefficients measured by CALIOP between 4 and 8 (Fig. ). On 7 October, the three frontal systems observed in Fig. are dynamically supported by three troughs at 500 , located at 40° S, 40° E; 40° S, 10° W; and 40° S, 50° W, respectively. These troughs facilitate the ejection of plumes to the east of each trough Fig. a. This pattern is replicated at both 400 (Fig. e) and 300 (Fig. i), with the 300 level showing higher concentrations than the other two levels. By 8 October, the westerly baroclinic wave at 500 Fig. b progresses eastward. The trough associated with the South African frontal system weakens as it moves into the Indian Ocean, while the trough over the central Atlantic shifts towards the east coast of Africa. Here, local plumes merge with filaments of the South American plume. This pattern remains consistent at 400 Fig. f and 300 Fig. j, where the trough near the South American coast exhibits a particularly intense plume, which even connects with the trough near Africa’s west coast. On 9 October, the westerly baroclinic wave continues to support the ejection of the South American plume, forming an extended transport channel that combines with the African plume. This combined plume is positioned over South Africa and the adjacent ocean. By 10 October, this long transport channel intensifies as the frontal systems over the South Atlantic merge, forming a continuous corridor of South American-origin smoke. In the middle and upper troposphere, this corridor connects with the African plume and is directed over the Mozambique Channel, causing the peak concentrations captured by ground and satellite instruments.
The persistence of high aerosol values observed until 17 October is attributed to the sustained activity of the westerly baroclinic wave, which continues to generate new troughs and associated frontal systems. These systems perpetuate the transport of the South American plume, facilitating its connection with the African plume and directing the combined plumes toward the Mozambique Channel.
5 Summary and conclusionThis study investigates the spatiotemporal evolution of aerosol optical properties during the BiBAC intensive observation period, focusing on two events: 18–23 September (Event 1) and 9–17 October (Event 2). These periods were statistically determined using sun-photometer data collected at the Skukuza site, by comparing daily measurements with the entire dataset. Aerosol classification based on sun-photometer observations aligns with the CALIOP algorithm, both indicating a predominance of biomass burning aerosols. The techniques described in our study show the dominance of moderately absorbing aerosols during both events. Satellite observations of and AOD revealed a southeastward transport across southern Africa, extending toward the SWIO basin. CALIOP vertical profiles indicated that aerosol layers, mainly composed of elevated smoke, typically span the surface to 6 km. However, part of Event 2 shows aerosol layers reaching up to 10 km. These altitude ranges and aerosol types are consistent with findings from , as well as earlier studies along the western coast of southern Africa, such as the 2017 case study reported by and .
In both events, the synoptic conditions played a crucial role in facilitating the transport of and aerosol plumes across the South Atlantic and towards southern Africa. Figure illustrates the synoptic conditions during both events. These include meteorological characteristics such as frontal systems, mean sea level pressure, the geopotential at 500 , and the location of saddle points. Event 1 was characterized by the presence of two troughs that supported the formation of two frontal systems (Fig. top). These systems worked in tandem, contributing to transport aerosols and plumes from South America towards southern Africa (Figs. and ), especially through the mid-tropospheric layers, where the transport was driven by a westerly baroclinic wave. Event 2, in contrast, involved a more complex synoptic setup with three frontal systems supported by three distinct troughs, with a post-frontal high-pressure system that allows the recirculation of plumes over southern Africa (Figs. and bottom). This dynamic system enhanced the transport of South American plumes, which merged with African-origin plumes over the Mozambique Channel (Fig. ). The sustained activity of the baroclinic wave generated new troughs, keeping the aerosol levels high for an extended period. In both events, the progression of baroclinic waves and the development of frontal systems were essential in driving the regional and intercontinental transport of aerosols and plumes. These synoptic features over several days led to the formation of the “river of smoke” during Event 1, influencing the atmospheric composition over the Mozambique Channel and the surrounding regions.
In our opinion, this study is the first to highlight two transport mechanisms of aerosol plumes and between source regions (South America and southern Africa) towards the SWIO basin. The maps (Figs. and ) reveal that, on an intercontinental scale, southern Africa is a major receptor region for aerosols from South American biomass fires. This underscores the importance of conducting transport studies that incorporate multiple aerosol sources. In further investigations, the FLEXPART model, coupled with emissions database, will be used to assess and quantify the contributions of African and South American sources to observed aerosol and concentrations. This analysis will provide deeper insights into regional and intercontinental transport in the Southern Hemisphere.
Data availability
Sun-photometer observations Version 3 Level 2 are available on
Video supplement
Animations 1 and 2 are available at 10.5446/67052 and at 10.5446/67051 , respectively.
Author contributions
Conceptualization and methodology, MR, NB, and HB; software, MR and NB; data curation, MR; writing (original draft preparation), MR; writing (review and editing), all co-authors; visualization, MR; funding acquisition, HB and NB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the paper.
Competing interests
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests
Disclaimer
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
Acknowledgements
We thank the PIs and their staff for establishing and maintaining the Skukuza site used in this investigation. We thank the PHOTONS National Observation Service of the ACTRIS-France infrastructure for the AERONET data and products. We also acknowledge the MODIS and CALIPSO missions scientists and associated NASA personnel for the production of the data used in this research effort. We acknowledge the use of MODIS data from NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) (
Financial support
This research was jointly funded by the Université de La Réunion (grant no. LACy/UMR 8105), the CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), and the NRF (National Research Foundation) in the framework of the IRP ARSAIO and by the South Africa–France PROTEA program (project no. 42470VA). This study is integrated and supported by (1) the LEFE BRAAI project (Biomass buRning Aerosols over south Africa and Indian ocean) and (2) the MOUSSACA project (Méthodes et Outils nUmériqueS appliquéS Aux Composés Atmosphériques) through the federation Observatoire des Milieux Naturels et des Changements Globaux (OMNCG) of the OSU-R (Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers – La Réunion) at the Université de la Réunion. Marion Ranaivombola received a doctoral scholarship from the Regional Council of Réunion (Conseil Général de La Réunion).
Review statement
This paper was edited by N'Datchoh Evelyne Touré and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Most major field campaigns, such as the Southern Africa Fire Atmosphere Research Initiative (SAFARI-92 and SAFARI-2000) and AErosol, RadiatiOn and CLOuds in southern Africa (AEROCLO-sA), have focused on the west coast of southern Africa, leaving the east coast underexplored. To address this, the Biomass Burning Aerosol Campaign (BiBAC) was initiated by the IRP ARSAIO (International Research Project – Atmospheric Research in Southern Africa and Indian Ocean) during the 2022 biomass burning season to study aerosol optical properties over southern Africa and the southwestern Indian Ocean (SWIO). This study analyzes aerosol properties during the intensive observation period (IOP) of BiBAC at Skukuza in Kruger National Park during two events: 18–23 September (Event 1) and 9–17 October (Event 2). Sun-photometer data, consistent with CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization), revealed a predominance of biomass burning aerosols. Transport analyses show southeastward movement of carbon monoxide (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Laboratoire de l’Atmosphère et des Cyclones, UMR 8105 CNRS, Université de la Réunion, Réunion Island, France
2 Institute of Engineering and Geosciences, Federal University of Western Para (UFOPA), Santarém 68040-255, Brazil
3 School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
4 School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa; National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa; now at: S.V.Raman Researcher’s Roadmap, Westville, Durban, South Africa
5 Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l’Environnement et de l’Espace (LPC2E), Université d’Orléans, CNRS UMR7328, CNES, Orléans, France
6 Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa