It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ecological restoration of watersheds in the Loess Plateau (LP) requires systematic planning due to the complex ecological problems. However, current restoration strategies remain predominantly limited to zoning modes of restoration, lacking a systematic integration of restoration priority assessments and configurations of technology at the watershed scale. To enhance the effectiveness of restoration in the LP, we propose a framework for selecting restoration modes by identifying watershed restoration priorities. Our methodology integrates three key components: (1) ecological network analysis to identify critical conservation areas, (2) a multi-criteria assessment to evaluate ecological importance, problem severity, and restoration potential for priority ranking, and (3) a watershed classification that synthesizes ecosystem status conditions and restoration priorities for selecting the corresponding restoration mode. The results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity in the status conditions and ecological problems of watershed ecosystems, with high-priority restoration watersheds concentrated in the western and central regions. In addition, the watershed ecosystems are categorized into eight classes, with corresponding combinations of technologies that match both the ecological problems and restoration priorities. This study selects restoration modes based on priority identification, offering methodological improvements for watershed restoration in ecologically fragile regions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 School of Land Science and Technology , China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China
2 School of Land Science and Technology , China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources , Beijing 100035, People’s Republic of China; Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration in Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources , Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China