It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the treatment results of folinic acid (FA) and folic acid (F) added to the chemotherapy protocol to reduce the toxicity due to methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients treated for low-risk GTN at two reference centers between January 2000 and March 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups, MTX/FA and MTX/F. Both groups received 50 mg/day MTX on days 1, 3, 5, 7 of treatment. On days 2, 4, 6, 8 of treatment 0.1 mg/kg folinic acid was administered to the MTX/FA group, and 20 mg/day folic acid was administered to the MTX/F group to reduce MTX toxicity. The groups were compared according to treatment success, resistance, and the development of toxicity.
RESULTS: Among 102 low-risk GTN patients included in the study, 64.7% (n = 66) were in the MTX/FA, while the remaining 35.3% (n = 36) were in the MTX/F group. There was no significant difference between MTX/FA and MTX/F groups regarding treatment success, resistance, and toxicity rates (84.8%, 13.6%, 1.6% vs 83.3%, 13.8%, 2.7%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of folinic acid with folic acid in low-risk GTN patients to reduce the toxicity that may develop associated with MTX treatment resulted in similar treatment success rates. Still, no significant change was observed regarding toxicity and resistance. There is a need for comprehensive prospective studies to further elucidate this relationship.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details












1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Private Can Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye. [email protected]
3 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Health Sciences University, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye
6 Department of Perinatology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bahçelievler Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
8 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye