It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Hemolysis is a common complication in critically ill patients with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or therapy with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Heme degradation product bilirubin might accumulate in conditions of significant hemolysis. In patients with ARDS and therapy with veno-venous ECMO (vvECMO), the prognostic potential of elevated initial total bilirubin (tBili) was investigated.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of patients with ARDS and vvECMO-therapy (n = 327) admitted to a tertiary ARDS center. A tBili cut-off value was determined by binary recursive partitioning. Baseline characteristics were compared and relevant variables were included in a multivariate logistic regression model with backward variable selection. Primary endpoint was survival within 28 days analyzed with Kaplan–Meier-curves and cox regression. Secondary endpoints included failure free composites for organ dysfunction, renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressor therapy and ECMO within 28 days and were compared using competing risk regression analysis.
Results
A cut-off value of 3.6mg/dl divided the cohort for ICU mortality (tBili ≤ 3.6mg/dl: 46% (n = 273) vs. tBili > 3.6mg/dl: 78% (n = 54), p < 0.001). The group with tBili > 3.6mg/dl showed a higher 28-day mortality (HR 3.03 [95%CI 2.07–4.43], p < 0.001) and significantly lower chances of successful recovery from organ dysfunction (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 0.29 [0.13–0.66], p < 0.001), RRT (SHR 0.34 [0.14–0.85], p = 0.02), and ECMO (SHR 0.46 [0.25–0.86], p = 0.015) compared to the group with tBili ≤ 3.6mg/dl. Recovery from vasopressor therapy did not differ between groups (SHR 0.63 [0.32–1.24], p = 0.18).
Conclusion
Patients with ARDS, vvECMO-therapy and tBili > 3.6mg/dl had a higher mortality and lower chances for recovery from organ dysfunction, RRT, and ECMO within 28 days. The tBili-cut-off value may be useful to identify patients at risk for unfavorable outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer