Introduction
Many individuals are diagnosed with cancer during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. Worldwide, there were approximately 1 335 100 new cancer cases among adolescents and young adults in 20191; the incidence rate was 44.99 per 100 000 people.1 In 2020, the incidence rate for cancer among Hong Kong children and adolescents (aged 0-19 years) was 160 cases per 1 000 000 people.2 There were 177 newly diagnosed cancer cases in this age-group (92 in male patients and 85 in female patients).2 The survival rates for childhood and adolescent cancers are encouraging. In a retrospective cohort study from a research hospital in the United States,3 the 5-year overall survival rate exceeded 83%. Similarly, in Hong Kong, the 5-year survival rate among women diagnosed with breast cancer, the most common cancer in reproductive-age women, was 84% between 2010 and 2017.2
Chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy may affect fertility, either temporarily or permanently. Considering advances in cancer treatment and improved post-treatment survival rates, fertility should be discussed at the time of cancer diagnosis, especially for younger patients who have not yet completed their families. International guidelines regarding fertility preservation (FP) recommend that clinicians inform cancer patients about the potential effects of cancer and its treatment on reproductive function, as well as FP options.4 5In a semi-structured phone interview study of female cancer survivors who were diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer, breast cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma at age ≤40 years, participants were interviewed an average of 10 years after diagnosis.6 Those who had wanted children at the time of diagnosis but were unable to conceive subsequently reported distress related to their interrupted fertility.6 Additionally, patients who do not receive accurate and timely information regarding FP are at risk for psychological distress.7 In our recently published cross-sectional questionnaire study of reproductive-age women in Hong Kong who had been diagnosed with breast cancer,8 only 44% of those women were aware of FP; however, 46% of the women felt that fertility concerns affected their cancer treatment decisions.8
The most common FP options include sperm cryopreservation for men and embryo or oocyte cryopreservation for women. Other options for women include pharmacological ovarian protection using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition. In Hong Kong, FP was previously self-funded and only available through private services. Sperm cryopreservation costs approximately HK$4400 to HK$6600 for 2 years, whereas oocyte and embryo cryopreservation costs are approximately HK$15 000 to HK$20 000.9 Our centre launched the first public FP programme for cancer patients in Hong Kong, beginning in August 2020. Here, we review the two-and-a-half-year experience of providing public FP services to cancer patients in Hong Kong.
Methods
This retrospective study included men and women who attended the Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology at The University of Hong Kong—Queen Mary Hospital for FP services before cancer treatment, from the establishment of our public FP programme in August 2020 until the end of February 2023.
Criteria for public fertility preservation services
During the study period, we provided public FP for cancer patients [lesser than]35 years old, expressed a desire for future fertility, had a survival rate exceeding 50% after cancer treatment, had no living children, and had not undergone prior chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy. In women, an antral follicle count of [greater than]7 on pelvic ultrasound was required. These criteria were adapted from The Edinburgh Selection Criteria for ovarian tissue cryopreservation.10
There was no minimum age requirement for FP. Male adolescents could undergo sperm freezing if they were able to provide sperm samples for cryopreservation. For patients aged [lesser than]18 years, we included their parents in discussions prior to proceeding with FP treatment.
During the study period, the public FP programme offered up to 40 cycles of sperm freezing and 20 cycles of oocyte/embryo freezing per year.
1. You L, Lv Z, Li C, et al. Worldwide cancer statistics of adolescents and young adults in 2019: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. ESMO Open 2021;6:100255.
2. Hong Kong Cancer Registry, Hospital Authority. Overview of Hong Kong Cancer Statistics of 2020. Available from: https://www3.ha.org.hk/cancereg/pdf/overview/Overview%20of%20HK%20Cancer%20Stat%202020.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2023.
3. Bhakta N, Liu Q, Ness KK, et al. The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE). Lancet 2017;390:2569-82.
4. ESHRE Guideline Group on Female Fertility Preservation; Anderson RA, Amant F, et al. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Open 2020;2020:hoaa052.
5. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2019;112:1022-33.
6. Canada AL, Schover LR. The psychosocial impact of interrupted childbearing in long-term female cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2012;21:134-43.
7. Rosen A, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Rosenzweig L. Psychosocial distress in young cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs 2009;25:268-77.
8. Ko JK, Cheung CS, Cheng HH, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and intention on fertility preservation among breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 2023;13:9645.
9. Yeung SY, Ng EY, Lao TT, Li TC, Chung JP. Fertility preservation in Hong Kong Chinese society: awareness, knowledge and acceptance. BMC Womens Health 2020;20:86.
10. Wallace WH, Smith AG, Kelsey TW, Edgar AE, Anderson RA. Fertility preservation for girls and young women with cancer: population-based validation of criteria for ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1129-36.
11. Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, The University of Hong Kong–Queen Mary Hospital. How to make an appointment. Available from: https://hkuivf.hku.hk/en/services/fertility-preservation/how-to-make-an-appointment/. Accessed 27 Nov 2024.
12. Ko JK, Lam KK, Cheng HH, et al. Fertility preservation programme in a tertiary-assisted reproduction unit in Hong Kong. Fertil Reprod 2021;3:94-100.
13. Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, The University of Hong Kong–Queen Mary Hospital. Fertility preservation. Available from: https://hkuivf.hku.hk/en/services/fertility-preservation/. Accessed 27 Nov 2024.
14. Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, The University of Hong Kong–Queen Mary Hospital. YouTube Channel. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/@HKUIVF. Accessed 27 Nov 2024.
15. Hong Kong e-Legislation, Hong Kong SAR Government. Cap 561 Human Reproductive Technology Ordinance. Available from: https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap561!en-zh-Hant-HK. Accessed 27 Nov 2024.
16. Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, et al. Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer 2012;118:1710-7.
17. Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:1994-2001.
18. Blumenfeld Z. Fertility preservation using GnRH agonists: rationale, possible mechanisms, and explanation of controversy. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health 2019;13:1179558119870163.
19. Zong X, Yu Y, Yang H, et al. Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs on ovarian function against chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxic effects in premenopausal women with breast cancer in China: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2022;8:252-8.
20. Chen H, Xiao L, Li J, Cui L, Huang W. Adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure in premenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:CD008018.
21. Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Poggio F, et al. Ovarian suppression using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility of breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Ann Oncol 2015;26:2408-19.
22. Demeestere I, Brice P, Peccatori FA, et al. No evidence for the benefit of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in preserving ovarian function and fertility in lymphoma survivors treated with chemotherapy: final long-term report of a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2568-74.
23. Moravek MB, Confino R, Lawson AK, et al. Predictors and outcomes in breast cancer patients who did or did not pursue fertility preservation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021;186:429-37.
24. Arecco L, Blondeaux E, Bruzzone M, et al. Safety of fertility preservation techniques before and after anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2022;37:954-68.
25. Takae S, Lee JR, Mahajan N, et al. Fertility preservation for child and adolescent cancer patients in Asian countries. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;10:655.
26. Chung JP, Chan DY, Song Y, et al. Implementation of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2023;29:121-31.
Dorothy TY Chan; Jennifer KY Ko; Kevin KW Lam; YW Tong; Evelyn Wong; Heidi HY Cheng; Sofie SF Yung; Raymond HW Li; Ernest HY Ng
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Introduction: Fertility preservation (FP) offers cancer patients the opportunity to have biological children after completing treatment. This study was performed to review the experience and changes in service demand since the implementation of a public FP programme for cancer patients in Hong Kong.
Methods: This retrospective study included men and women who attended an assisted reproduction unit for public FP services before cancer treatment from August 2020 to February 2023. Their medical records were reviewed and the results were compared with findings from our previous study to evaluate trends in service demand.
Results: During the study period, there were 48 consultations for female FP, compared with 72 women who presented for FP from 2010 to 2020 prior to establishment of the public FP programme. The median time from referral to consultation was 3 days (interquartile range [IQR]=2-5). Eighteen women (37.5%) underwent 19 cycles of ovarian stimulation for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. Thirty women (62.5%) received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during cancer treatment. There were 58 consultations for male FP during the study period, compared with 265 men who presented for sperm cryopreservation from 2005 to 2020. The median time from referral to consultation was 4 days (IQR=2-7). Fifty-five men (94.8%) attempted sperm cryopreservation, and 49 (84.5%) successfully preserved sperm.
Conclusion: Since the establishment of a public FP programme for cancer patients, there has been an increase in the demand for FP services at our centre. Regular review of FP services is warranted to assess changes in demand and identify areas for improvement.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer