It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered via oronasal masks are associated with lower adherence, higher residual AHI and CPAP requirement in comparison to nasal masks. Mechanisms contributing to increased CPAP requirement are not well understood. This physiological study aimed to assess the effect of mask type on upper airway anatomy and collapsibility.
Methods
13 OSA patients, underwent a sleep study during which they wore both nasal and oronasal mask for half the night each (order randomized). CPAP was manually titrated to determine therapeutic pressure. Passive upper airway collapsibility was assessed using the Pcrit technique. Participants then underwent an MRI wearing both the nasal and oronasal mask. Cine MRI was used to dynamically assess cross-sectional area of the retroglossal airway across the respiratory cycle with each mask interface. Scans were repeated at 4cmH2O, as well as at the nasal and oronasal therapeutic pressures.
Results
The oronasal mask was associated with both higher therapeutic pressure requirements (∆M±SEM; +2.6±0.5, p<0.001) and higher Pcrit (+2.4±0.5cmH2O, p=0.001) compared to the nasal mask. The change in therapeutic pressure between masks was strongly correlated with the change in Pcrit (r2= 0.73, p=0.003). Preliminary MRI analyses indicate robust increases in cross-sectional area associated with increasing pressure. After controlling for pressure and breath-phase, the retroglossal area was larger when using a nasal compared to an oronasal mask (+12.42±5.87mm2, p=0.03).
Conclusions
These preliminary findings suggest that oronasal masks worsen the collapsibility of the airway which likely contributes to the need for an elevated therapeutic pressure relative to nasal masks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia
2 Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia; University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
3 Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia; Monash Health, Clayton, Australia