Abstract

Introduction

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered via oronasal masks are associated with lower adherence, higher residual AHI and CPAP requirement in comparison to nasal masks. Mechanisms contributing to increased CPAP requirement are not well understood. This physiological study aimed to assess the effect of mask type on upper airway anatomy and collapsibility.

Methods

13 OSA patients, underwent a sleep study during which they wore both nasal and oronasal mask for half the night each (order randomized). CPAP was manually titrated to determine therapeutic pressure. Passive upper airway collapsibility was assessed using the Pcrit technique. Participants then underwent an MRI wearing both the nasal and oronasal mask. Cine MRI was used to dynamically assess cross-sectional area of the retroglossal airway across the respiratory cycle with each mask interface. Scans were repeated at 4cmH2O, as well as at the nasal and oronasal therapeutic pressures.

Results

The oronasal mask was associated with both higher therapeutic pressure requirements (∆M±SEM; +2.6±0.5, p<0.001) and higher Pcrit (+2.4±0.5cmH2O, p=0.001) compared to the nasal mask. The change in therapeutic pressure between masks was strongly correlated with the change in Pcrit (r2= 0.73, p=0.003). Preliminary MRI analyses indicate robust increases in cross-sectional area associated with increasing pressure. After controlling for pressure and breath-phase, the retroglossal area was larger when using a nasal compared to an oronasal mask (+12.42±5.87mm2, p=0.03).

Conclusions

These preliminary findings suggest that oronasal masks worsen the collapsibility of the airway which likely contributes to the need for an elevated therapeutic pressure relative to nasal masks.

Details

Title
P070 Oronasal masks are associated with increased airway collapsibility and increased therapeutic CPAP requirements
Author
Landry, S 1 ; Mann, D 2 ; Beare, R 1 ; Joosten, S 3 ; Hamilton, G 3 ; Edwards, B 1 

 Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia 
 Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia; University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia 
 Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia; Monash Health, Clayton, Australia 
Pages
A43-A44
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Oct 2021
Publisher
Oxford University Press
e-ISSN
26325012
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3191369895
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.